sounds simple ... but how does the 'earnings' get redistributed? ...
unless of course it goes straight to the owners wallet of course ...
#crysx
It does. |
|
|
|
hi all .. just posting a message i left on spreadcointalk to see what ideas ( if any ) could be thrown about - thats all ... post below ... focusing on the farm now guys - not even mining spr as of this minute - but will get back into it soon ... im wondering who would be interested in joining me in a group focused on spr and mn's when they hit mainnet ... i read up somewhere in another thread that there are those that have concerns with the way mn's were setup between home and datacenter / business ... home users are more likely to be dropped if any internet link is dropped or a wallet locks up on their systems or other such issues - whereas most people who set all these things up inside a datacenter or business based system and NOT drop and de-elected ... its just an idea that is bubbling in my mind as to the stability of the systems and farm that we have here as opposed to those with home systems ... im not offering anything - yet - but it may be something to look at that may help the 'smaller' systems stay online by having their wallets and mn's on a more ( albeit not entirely concrete ) reliable place to call home ... we have unlimited internet - unlimited storage ( yes - in excess of 24TB currently ) and the technical network expertise to get some thing sorted for the 'underdogs' here ... the only thing missing here is simply - there are no developers that we have in the 'team' as yet ... and of course - we are STILL growing the farm and increasing the ability to mine these little fellas - whether spr or not ... but obviously im aiming this comment directly between the eyes of spr not drk ...  its only an idea at the moment - thats all ... ( posting this also on bct to see what responses are given ) ... #crysx All you need to host a Masternode for someone on your server is for them to run 'mnsecret <output>' (they get the <output> from their QT wallet under the Masternodes tab where their collateral amount is listed) and send the result to you. Put a 'mnstart=<result>' line in your spreadcoin.conf and restart the daemon on the server. It's perfectly trustless, they retain full control of the collateral and their earnings. Charge people whatever upfront monthly and off you go. I was going to offer such a service myself.  |
|
|
|
Agreed. There is a psychological barrier associated with the term 'Dark' anything.
Speak for yourself mate. You wouldn't believe how much dark chocolate I eat. Some of us aim to misbehave.  |
|
|
|
Economy: Not sure what you mean by this, but Spread Masternodes are several time more profitable to run and far easier to set up than Darkcoin Masternodes.
Doesn't "more profitable to run" mean "less profitable to mine"? Doesn't that undermine "security"? No, because Spread is also a shitload more profitable to mine (or less unprofitable, depending on your costs) than just about anything else. Although I'm not sure how that affects blockchain security - more total hash is always better of course, as long as it remains distributed. I did a very rough calc here: http://spreadcointalk.org/index.php?topic=101.0 - bear in mind though that the paramaters currently in use on testnet may change before it hits mainnet. |
|
|
|
I think there are one or two other fairly simple ways to create public pools too but at the end of the day none of this matters. The important thing is what Spreadcoin offers over Darkcoin in terms of privacy, security, transaction speed and economy.
Devil's Advocate here. What does Spreadcoin offer over Darkcoin in terms of privacy, security, transaction speed and economy? Privacy: Nothing. Spread doesn't currently have Darksend, or any other privacy/anon tech. Security: Spread's mining is far more decentralised. 90% of the Darkcoin hashrate is controlled by 3 people running 3 pools on 3 servers. Transaction speed: No difference when Spread brings its implementation of InstantX to mainnet. Economy: Not sure what you mean by this, but Spread Masternodes are several time more profitable to run and far easier to set up than Darkcoin Masternodes. Darkcoin is more mature, has a bigger dev team and community, Darksend, and a correspondingly much higher price. But I think Spread can grow to offer some worthwhile competition and continued innovation of its own. The Masternode architecture allows for all manner of great things to be built in the future, it will be interesting to see how each currency employs them. Assuming Mr Spread shows up again. Hopefully he hasn't been hit by any US funded 'lethal aid.' |
|
|
|
if you still having issues after a full resync specifically add the following dnsseed values in the aerome.conf to see if It will force to connect. -dnsseed Find peers using DNS lookup (default: 1) dnsseed=aerome.publicvm.com
dnsseed=aerome2.publicvm.com That bit did the trick, thanks. |
|
|
|
Thx for all your help Wolf0 but no luck, even with your modifications  , still can't get pass 65 khs. I tried rebuilding my QT with -03 and -march=native and my i5 went from 50kh/s to 35kh/s... I think Wolf is toying with us.  Weirdly I get 25kh/s with one core, maybe I can get 100kh/s by running 4 separate wallets @ 1 core each. |
|
|
|
Damn!! The guy's a f*ckin' robot I tell you!  What's this going to do Will break inputs for DS tx's across multiple masternode so no single masternode knows all the inputs per round as it currently stands. Makes the probabilities of blockchain analysis per round exponentially harder because the masternodes are now blind to what other inputs are part of the mix. You're effectively taking Darksend as it currently stands and pumping it full of steroids. And consequently greatly speeds the Darksend process as the same obfuscation can be achieved with far fewer rounds of mixing. |
|
|
|
Evan on the other hand even if he maybe wouldn't be considered "cool" from a marketing point (although I do find him cool ) is very very interesting to watch and to listen to. His expertise and calm way of talking is great and he reminds me of John CarmackI've had this thought many times.  |
|
|
|
Thanks Majika. I still can't sync though, stuck on 1352 of 81380 and counting. debug.log has a lot of 'ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK, prev=083ac96d7b715085122b' type stuff in it. edit: my connections keep dropping to zero too. eg. 'connection from 68.96.191.5:51420 dropped (banned)' Obviously I'm doing something wrong. |
|
|
|
Thanks, building leveldb and generating libmemenv.a allowed me to build the daemon, after which the QT compiled too. Would be nice if the instructions mentioned this though, stuff like this is irritating. Wallet sync seems stuck at block 1352 of an estimated 80000+ with 8 connections. |
|
|
|
I'd release the working bins for probably around 2 BTC - which is about what I'd make off it in the next 31 days.
2 BTC ~ 6666 SPR 6666 SPR / 31 ~ 215 SPR/day Daily minted SPR ~ 9000 Net hash ~ 4000 MH/s (215/9000) * 4000 ~ 95 MH/s. How many 290's are you running? |
|
|
|
Doesn't build on Xubuntu 14.04 or 14.10. QT fails with missing libqrencode header file and daemon fails with missing libmemenv header file. Same result with a clean Ubuntu 14.10 image in a VM. Source downloaded from https://github.com/aeromasterdev/am-aerome as per link in OP. Please fix or update build instructions. |
|
|
|
i asked this question, because when 1st started MN 15 days ago...from local wallet... i typed masternode start "pass" it returns: MASTERNODE STARTED SUCCESSFULLY, now when i did the same start from local it said: Masternode started remotely... maybe this was update between wallets?
'masternode started remotely' means your MN has recognised itself as a MN and started itself, as it does with updates that don't include a protocol bump and therefore a remote start. |
|
|
|
I don't think that'll even affect the price when the reference nodes are removed.
People simply don't care about that.
Most people don't care about 90% of the network hash residing in the hands of 3 leeches. But ask yourself, if you had $millions, would you trust it to a currency who's 'security' is arguably far more centralised than traditional financial institutions? I run a few MNs but I wouldn't trust Darkcoin with serious money and neither is anyone else going to who does have serious money. |
|
|
|
Dear Morons,
Don't leave money on exchanges. Use InstantX instead.
Sincerely,
tlc.
Its not that simple really. Traders don't have time to send their coins from wallet to exchanges over and over again :/ Ah yes, the hectic lifestyle of the cryptognat daytrader, all that commuting between screen, fridge and crapper! |
|
|
|
|
Dear Morons,
Don't leave money on exchanges. Use InstantX instead.
Sincerely,
tlc.
|
|
|
|
Once exchanges/merchants get their heads around using IX properly, there will be a steady flow of new adopters and then news, and then price rises.
Hopefully just in time for users and exchanges to also appreciate Spread IX. |
|
|
|
Has anyone else noticed the huge drop in the price of DRK? Its lost 50% of its value in less than a week. Anyone know why?
You're cherry picking your numbers somewhat eh? DRK spiked to 0.016 for about five minutes, now it's back at 0.011 while BTC is on the up. DRK's US$ value has only dropped about 18% though from that spike top. And whatever way you look at it the price is much higher now than the 0.006 / sub $2 it was at for months. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
