Yup, they even rent real executive offices too! It's a great location. (Esp. only being about 5min from the house.)
Free power included with the monthly.

WeExchange offers a btc exchange. It follows AML and KYC requirements. Being a business owner I am sure you can understand a need for this?
I mean, a business that's primary focus is to handle money really SHOULD know something about their customers and try to follow legal procedures.

While I cannot give you any advise on what to do about those fields. I can and will be helpful enough to tell you that currently, there is no verification needed if you are only depositing or withdrawing BTC. It is primarily for the fiats.

You seem kind of annoyed at having to deal with my sites in general? I am a little confused at this since you have had a BF account for some time now.
If you have 'competitor syndrome' or something like that I guess it is understandable why you cannot keep your personal issues to private conversation.

You know, I think I have mentioned several times that I have had accounts, not only on btct, but litecoinglobal as well, and even own shares of ltc-global.
Even if something on the site has annoyed me, or whatever, I still complied with and did what needed to be done to use the service without going into your thread/s and blasting you over my personal opinion, esp. when it is completely biased and irrelevant to anyone else.

I am glad to see that you were easily able to find readily available contact info for the site, and probably saw the ticket support system in BitFunder as well. I think any reputable site owes it to their users to offer some direct means of contact!

WeExchange is an exchange site that Graet and myself operate.

I hope you would consider giving it a try as many others have and see the benefits for yourself.

Thanks!

BitFunder is currently performing maintenance tonight.

Happy new years.

First of two maintenance windows are complete.

The last one will start about 9pm CST and last 2~4 hours.

As soon as you are around we can get things setup for you to upload the claims.

Ah, that was probably WeExchange, it has a known bug for that actually.

Ian,

Was it the signup verification email, or lost password verification email?
Usagi seems to have a problem with the lost password one.

-Ukyo

Lets move this to the BF thread.

And if you do not have an MPEX account, you could also buy some s.dice shares via DeadTerra's pass-through on BitFunder.

Strange problems you are having there. Why would the verification code not work? It works when I test it. Have you tried to copy and paste?
What errors are you having with WeExchange specifically? PM me and I will be more than happy to help you out.

Cancel on the asset page now leaves you on the asset page.

Yes, that would be no problem on BitFunder.

1. Check it now, see how that looks.

2. Yeah, I am adding some js by this weekend to be able to update the pre-rendered page data.

3.  a. Yes, the missing shares are unclaimed glbse shares.
b. I am aware of the blanking, and honestly have not had the time to fully consider the ramifications of allowing users to blank it out. I was debating allowing it, and posting a message that if they did it, then it would be a huge risk on their side if something should happen to BitFunder. For the same reasons, I am still debating forcing it. The signup requires an address.

How about some community input on this? That's the whole point.

Hi kneim, and to everyone else concerned,

As you can see from my prior offering/deal with Oliver(Usagi), I wanted to be able to help out all of the shareholders have a way to collect
rather than having the community suffer because he does not want to do it himself by hand.


I had an email from btct.co saying that he had listed his asset there. When I looked, it was a filled out asset that was launching.
With no further contact from Oliver, and the fact that there was no description updates, no claims uploaded, nothing was there, I marked the asset as disabled.
Nothing that could not be undone in a moments notice and put exactly to how it was. He has made is very clear in at least one post, he wanted to be on
an exchange because of all the trouble to pay people by hand. Wanting the extra trouble to list on multiple exchanges without any sort of claiming plan seemed very far fetched based on this.


Obviously, this would have been a "bad thing" regardless.

A. The asset could only be seen by Oliver, which I made him aware of that.
B. There were no claims in the system for anyone to claim. (They would not have been able to anyways since the asset was still private, as I told Oliver.)
C. There were no plans made or mentioned, for cross-site claiming.

If he did in-fact send out any such emails, then it would have left a lot of people highly confused and/or mad.
Sending out such emails after publicly listing on another exchange could cause further problems.
If he did not, then it is just extra drama that is not needed.

While I was willing to easily say 'Oh, alright' and go along with whatever plans, and re-enabled the asset if there was some misunderstanding then I would have.
Before there was even a chance to talk about it, he begun kicking up drama.

I did not have the immediately available time to spend on drama. Many people here can vouch that I take care of things that need taking care of when they need taking care of, and generally do it in a very quick and orderly fashion. From my point of view, after having the asset ready for use for two days, and not using it at all, he had decided to launch on BTCT, set everything up, and launched. I simply disabled the asset to keep it from being abused / double listed and avoid any potential accidents from it. Instead of messaging me saying 'hey, X disappeared from my screen.' he went out of his way to create public drama over it.
Before there was even a chance for me to respond to him saying he wanted to dual-list on exchanges, he started making it sound as if he had done everything
with the BitFunder asset, and had already launched, and told users where to claim their stuff, and made it sound as if I was some big bad guy who came along
and pulled the rug out from underneath him. Esp. being xmas and short on time, I will not stand for people who insist on involving me with their drama. He had
pressed the wrong buttons at the wrong time, and could take his drama elsewhere. He did not have a live asset, he did not even really have an asset on BitFunder
at all except for a tag that was privately listed on a page only he could see, and he had already announced he was launching on BTCT. So I decided to let things be at that.

Thank you Burnside, I have been spending the day with my Family today.

I am sorry to say that the decision has been made to not be involved with your assets, regardless of recent events.
I wish you the best of luck elsewhere.

err, the asset was never even enabled, had any claims uploaded to it, or even had a description or any detailed written on it.
You had posted that you were listing on btct.

Hi Oliver,

I see you have chosen to move forward with btct.
I wish you the best of luck.

-Ukyo

Hi Oliver,

I will be quite honest, the intentions of the offer are geared towards assets that plan to keep trading.
An asset that will just liquidate would just be taking advantage of the offer. I do see a problem with you knowing what the shareholders want to do though.

Let me propose this.. If you re-list, and the shareholders agree to continue trading then the asset will receive a bonus dividend from BF.
This will be an extra, and special slot for this case.

How does that sound?

No problemo, that is what I a here for.

If anything else comes up, lemme know.

Hey there,

I just asked a couple others on irc to test theirs and they seem fine. Mine does as well.
I do see where you did a password recovery and are set to 2-Factor.

The problem would actually be password matching. If you gave a bad 2-Factor code you would have seen 'Google 2-Factor incorrect or not provided.'.

I have PM'd you and we will get the issue resolved.

Thanks!