Hal Finney, RIP. Maybe you were Satoshi, thanks for everything.  Has it been a year already since he died and became frozen in literal time and space. My respects to Hal and he is surely missed thank you for PGP and for being a key part of the first experiment in cryptocurrency. |
|
|
|
do i need to keep wallet opened for earning clam ?
also how can i do that through wallet ? its odd
Gives it another shot since I think I get what your asking this time, Clams are a proof of stake system in order to receive and earn clams you can store them in a Clam Wallet and participate as a Node (when transactions are received you receive a staked portion of clams for contributing to the network if your node is chosen) or you can participate as an investor in a service such as Just-Dice where you receive rewards from just-dice staking blocks on the clam network in addition to a proportional percentage of gambling profits from users on the site as an investor. In terms of small balances it makes sense to join as an investor in a site such as Just-Dice as the chance of staking a block is directly proportional to the amount of coins you have staked. For additional information on how proof of stake works check https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Proof_of_Stake |
|
|
|
do i need to keep wallet opened for earning clam ?
edit:it says "user not found"
If your running it from your Clam wallet, the faucet is likely is looking for a Just-Dice user account to send the Clams to. In that case sign into just-dice.com look in your account settings and type in the user ID so it knows where to direct the balance. Your user ID is ______. Your username is _______ Then specify your wallets clam address as the emergency withdrawal. |
|
|
|
Winners have been chosen!
Great job all, thanks for participating. If you have any unique ideas on giveaways we should do similar to this, email edward(@)Primedice.com
All accounts that won will be credited within 24 hours
Congrats to all the winners some fun ones were in there Great Job. |
|
|
|
thank you ! im trying to earn some clams but im stuck at this site http://clamcoin.science this site is giving some clam to just-dice.com users(a dice site) but site says "user not found" what should i do ? Looked at the site for you it seems to be a connection problem for one reason or other, doog did change the deposit addresses the other day so maybe it sending to an old one. There is a connection problem between bot and Just-Dice. You may not get paid if the balance isn't enough. |
|
|
|
CLAMS dropped by a lot today. It even dropped lower than 0.004 when it was more than 0.01 a week ago.
Someone dug up lots of CLAM to dump today.
The wall was just tested again on polo it held up but it pushed down to 0.0041 for a bit Looks like the dump is still ongoing. That said well at least Bitcoins not broken just a digging machine cough I wonder if at this point I should just call them a prospector or a miner digging up all those blocks. |
|
|
|
Wow ! that's pretty good news. Yep made me notice it through the trading volume there Congrats on the listing. |
|
|
|
|
Noticed this coin through the trading volume on Poloniex
Made me a bit curious on the idea will keep watching.
|
|
|
|
|
This is a strange challenge
But I feel a strong connection to November 17th
So for fun I'm going to choose that one.
|
|
|
|
Is scrypt.cc included in this thread ,it is the biggest ponzi as far as i know and its cold wallet has an average amount of 1500 + coins and its still running and increasing the coins daily with the help of FANBOYS.
Ponzi scams by their nature tend not to be included as they are considered voluntary Their are exceptions such as Pirateat40 with his Bitcoin Savings and Investment Trust but generally until the coins are stolen it's not counted. |
|
|
|
Seems like upwards correction did indeed happen. Wonder if it's going to stay that way, I see a lot of people being worried about China's economy slowing down and how that's going to effect the rest of the world on the mid to long term.
It's interesting because China changed its Yuan rate Now they just announced an interest rate cut so its difficult to predict how much more the market will decline for now. And oil at 38 bucks damn feels like a good time to buy it up. http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/canadian-oil-stocks-hit-hard-on-markets-1.3201890 |
|
|
|
Big companies wanting a scaling bitcoin implementation so they can scale their operations. Who would have thought?!
They want blacklisting and deanonymization added in XT. It's the only way to get their business extended 100-fold (by cooperating with authorities). Seemed like a miswording since a Blacklist implies bitcoins fungibility there are only 21 million Bitcoins so affecting supply would be a no go, deanonymization part is fine. Edit in: Prioritizing would have been better but yah people needed context on that one have it now. |
|
|
|
|
I like these proposals as they factor in growth alongside transaction fees
Setting a dynamically adjusted max cap is the true solution to blocksize problems as it allows for a right size fits all in all cases puts the issue to rest
and is the best middle ground in my opinion it will have a lot less polarization as it makes sense to me and likely others that blocksize growth should match demand with a dynamic margin that grows or shrinks alongside usage in the future.
That said a setting in addition to a dynamic max cap would be a recommended minimum for client installations as it would address concerns about nodes not having the needed resources, adding into that a warning if a node approaches a limit where it would not be able to optimally function in the future.
|
|
|
|
Roger Ver: Bigger Blocks Mean More Decentralization for Bitcoin https://www.bitcoin.com/news/bigger-blocks-means-decentralization-bitcoin/*Currently a very modest internet connection, available in most of the world, can easily support blocks more than one hundred times what is in use today.
*A $100 USD hard drive would take the better part of a century worth of full blocks to fill up at the current block size limit.
I think he did not calculate that one accurately We are not just concerned about the size but the speed of the internet connection and geographical regions we may see larger adoption but in areas where the requirements for a speedy connection are met. On the other hand incentivization to run Bitcoin nodes is non-existent per se besides feeling more secure from online exchange risk and nodes do not it face the issues of miner centralization near cheap electricity so I guess there may be a point for an increased userbase resulting in more nodes but in a capacity that can't really be measured till we start pushing that limit. (mumble did a speed test on wifi down = 16mbp up = 4.87 mbps) Plan offers 20-50mbp down 10 up ISP's over advertise compared to actual for local bandwidth purposes but sizing aside not the main issue. A voice of reason in the storm sides with Meni on this. |
|
|
|
It is nice to see that some real philosophers have joined the discussion, I am a philosopher as well. I have constructed a simple argument of my own, you are welcome to try and rebuttal. There has been a lack of rational responses to my arguments so far, and far to much ad hominem and hyperbole. I believe that good philosophy should be simple.
To put it simply, if we do not increase the block size it will be more expensive and less people will be able to use it, that is to transact on the main chain directly, and instead we will be "forced" to us 3rd party payment processors.
However if we increase the block size then it will be less expensive and more people will be able to use it. Even if full nodes will only be able to be hosted on powerful computers, since miners do not run full nodes, the pools do.
Considering that these would be the most likely outcomes with increased adoption, to me it seems clear that increasing the block size would lead to more decentralization as a whole compared to keeping the restriction in place.
I can go into much more detail of course but I would like to keep it simple in the interest of constructive argument.
Throws in a wrench fork if mining is equal to transaction fees after revenues perpetual increases in block size results in lower rewards, lower rewards = less incentive to mine after halving = Centralization under XT. A limited supply leads to higher transaction volume above dust = More value per transaction + Miner incentive after halving = Long term growth and development Spin it how you want it still ='s from both viewpoints. - Solution A - Size Increases Solution B - Side-chains True Solution - Will be determined as we approach the true date of settlement in 2016. |
|
|
|
Not theymos is not really unknown. His real name had been mentioned here several times.Also on reddit as far as I know.
So only Satoshi is still not known who he/she/they is/are.
Easy enough to find Dox on him m lawrence etc but it usually comes with a ban or warning if used inappropriately However the forum is not for sale. |
|
|
|
Well purchasing power aside I guess the other view is that people are also hoarding a heck of a lot of food to feed the black-market or I guess to starve the community stores. Instead of waiting in the line to get cheap food. http://lainfo.es/en/2015/08/16/venezuela-found-tons-of-food-hidden-underground/http://axisoflogic.com/artman/publish/Article_71293.shtmlThe Bolivarian National Guard (GNB) seized 50 tons of food in the San Juan west of Maracaibo (Zulia state), called bachaqueros buried dozens of sacks of sugar in the courtyard of a house in the sector. In other homes, sacks of rice, coffee, pasta, beer, soda, detergent, toothpaste, and chlorine were seized, among others.  ...
coinableS
One modern response to hyperinflation has been to go out and buy cars, as they hold their value better than the currency.
If their government will print larger denominations, then the bulk of cash needed is reduced. The last hyperinflation I saw in Peru had a bank note of 5,000,000 intis worth some $3.00 at that time (late 1980s IIRC). As hyperinflation continued, they went back to the sol ("New Sol"), their currency has been stable since.
Ahh okay thanks. So like the Trillion dollar bill in Zimbabwe, Venezuela has larger denomination bills? I guess by the photo provided I thought they didn't have larger bills available. No, they have only small bills. Na those are small bills they go up to 100 according to wiki the image uses 2 Bolivar Banknotes although they were valued higher historically with the Pre-1998 stuff. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venezuelan_bol%C3%ADvar2008 Series Banknotes are in denominations of 2, 5, 10, 20, 50 and 100 bolívares. |
|
|
|
Dislike is good too, it prevents people from going out of line because flaming will be disliked immediately.
If it was integrated with a tip-jar then a Like button it could be fun to see how people react send a change-tip to users for constructive posts and have a dislike button that demands money for reading their awful ones  (That or dislike turns posts to hidden after the threshold is reached) |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
