He is not posting anything except asking loan, which refers to something wrong too. His recent days passing only by asking loan. No legit user take loan such a way where the first small amount then increases the amount. If you can find out 100 people like this then you may find out at least 95% loan default.

I am not calling scammer, but I am telling e may scam base on my above points. Not for this single point. Please read all point. and also this point indicates scamming which happen at least 80% time for point number seven.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5118210

The lender should not give this loan, there is 99% chance to be scammed.

I think marcotheminer is/will be a scammer. Need opinion from experts. The reason for thinking it:
1. He came back on bitcointalk after a long gap.
2. He was a lender and now he is a borrower.
3. He is trying to only take loan after came back. He is not contributing anything on this forum.
4. He was active lending service as well as borrowing (we told several times then he locked his lending service).
5. The first time he trying to take about 0.04/0.05BTC loan when failed tried to take small loan once repaid the small loan to bill gator received positive trust then again took a loan from Pamoldar, o.o4BTC and then again took loan 0.033BTC
6. Now he has two active loans and trying to take another loan 0.33BTC loan. Where all loans are non-collateral.
7. When a borrower took multiple loans without collateral are usually scammer.
8. According to Timelord2067: and 9. He asked loan from another person on the 6th march on PM archive.


Why I am  Posting:
1. As marcotheminer has positive feedback few people who do not know research may allow the loan which happened for the second loan. The previous lender did not give a 2nd loan because he knows the risk but new lender gave. Also the 2nd lender didn't give any neutral trust.
2. Trust can be changed for a different amount. For example, I may not scam for 0.05BTC but I may scam for.2BTC
3. I know "prevention is better than cure", so want to keep him away from taking the loan as want to stay him away from scams.
4. I have posted here as scam still not proved but I highly believe that it will be scammed.

Let me know if I am wrong.

Done, sorry I forgot to remove. Thanks for reminding me. You are always welcome, don't hesitate to let me know if you need any more help, thanks.

Loan request accepted, BTC sent.
TRX: https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/6f9a5c4993eb21588710166cd2fbe84ce48b390ad148b60163ac67d2f5c1aaa5
Repayment address: 3JaFkXxj5g3MJRTDRH48mMUaKymvvLyMsk

You are always welcome.
Repayment confirmed in full with interest earlier than repayment date. Thanks for the fast repayment.

Thanks for understanding the issue, I hopefully think you will not mind for being failure of accepting your loan request due to unaccptable collateral to me.

XLMX listed on those exchange which I am not familiar and its price as well as volume is too low, so I am not interested to fund against it.

Rejected.
You are right.
It is not a fact how long before you created an account here.
Exactly.
Please don't edit the post. Please create a new post. as I am replying multiple posts now.

0-shasan

There is a lot of impersonator of reputed members. No one should make any deal without becoming confirmed on bitcointalk. I am a new member but I have already faced several impersonators. Also impersonator of Minerjones too. Minerjones then gave negative trust to the impersonator.

I saw several projects where it's happened. Higher ranked people accepted instead of the exact rank though there is a lower rank person available with good posts as well as meet all requirement. If any lower rank can't be accepted when upper rank applied. Then why not opening post only for legendary as there is a lot of legendary ranked people? I think accepting higher ranked people instead of exact rank is nothing but only the exploitation of lower ranked people.

It is self-contradictory as the slot opened for another rank.

As there is no rule for that by the forum then campaign manager can take any decision on his/her own way. But is it not self-contradictory as s/he will mention one type of rank and then will take from another rank?

I think the campaign manager will take from any other rank. But what will s/he will do if legendary rank is blank? Will s/he take from lower rank? If s/he will not take from lower rank, then s/he will take from an upper rank of a lower rank slot?

I saw many signature campaigns where bounty manager declared specific rank, for example, Jr. member rank. And on that post, many high ranked member eg: hero/legendary member apply on that post. How legit it is? What can happen to it?
My personal opinion, it is not legit. Because:
1. When a Hero/Legendary member applies for a jr member and got accepted then the jr. member ranked person will lose their chance of acceptance.
2. When Hero/legendary member got jr. member rank and if ranked up then that positions people will lose their chance to be accepted. For example, if Sr. member ranked opened then previous accepted hero/legendary will get that position. In this case, sr. member is a loser for that hero/legendary member.
3. As payment of Jr. member is low so, when there is another project hero/legendary member will take that position. In that case, the position will open again and now bounty manager has to find out another person so many people will apply again.
So, I all-time there should have an issue if one position filled up by another positions people. Please don't take it personally. Just give your valuable opinion. If another thread already exists then let me know sothat I can lock it.

Note: If this post does not deserve this board then please suggest the correct board.

Loan request accepted. ETH sent.
TRX: https://etherscan.io/tx/0x497d9d072079ef3755c5259e362fc7fdfb9c316c540a360fb03da77971797a5e
Repayment address: 0x032e9A4385e850C7cC912Ff59B1f47B71B9C75BE

Response is same as earlier.
Partial repayment confirmed. I think last repayment date was 13th march if you want to pay on 14th march then no problem, take your time. Thanks.

I can give 31.5$ skrill if it is okay, then let me know. If the rate is not okay then you can skip this post, and if already sold then please lock the thread.

SO it is one type of collateral where borrower gave the permission to take part on a bounty. In the meantime, the lender could make other scams which have not made, though the lender shows his scam behavior that's why arpind has to recover his account.

If Ajrah was sold then it was his/her alt account and now that is being operated by another person. But according to the blockchain transaction the account is/was must alt account.