Every merit I have was given to me because they thought I deserved it.
So who did you snitch on to get them? It's funny that you don't have the balls to go after the legendaries who told you the exact same thing I did, that you're a merit beggar yourself. Oh please, I think you're just making a big deal out of this because you haven't earned any Merit at all. If you have any proof of snitching on someone, feel free to place your accusation on the table. I'll be waiting Actually, it's about how the statement was delivered. You don't know how I confront people here regardless of their Rank or their position in this forum. Man, just lock the thread. If you consider you have your answer already, why to continue with this nonsense?? Lock it. Problem solved.
|
|
|
As they told you, this topic has been already discussed: - Merits to become JR: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4654923.0Next time, when you read the meta board after a while off, be sure you get beyond the first page or use the "search" button.
|
|
|
I highly doubt it. They may have had a temporary ban for something other offence. Considering you said this is the highest ranked account among you and your colleagues I can guarantee they did not have plagiarism permabans overturned.
I can't just understand how people can be so stupid. I mean: if you have many accounts, all of them spamming the forum and one of them is banned, how are you so idiot to come to meta and try to recover one of your multiple-spamming accounts? We are going to see your activities, tag you and have information about your others accounts... Seriously, I just can't understand how people cheat the system and, yet, they have the face to come to here (while still cheating) and ask for forgiveness.... ( I am starting to develop a convulsing facepalm disorder)
|
|
|
what do you mean " it would make your account more susceptible to ban" if i join more than one social media bounty campaigns? ban by who? bitcointalk or the social media?
Because to have alts accounts to spam the forum, to milk the system and just to earn some cents by writing stuff like "Good Project, sir", is considered SPAMMING and leads towards a permaban. The permaban included all your accounts, meaning, your person. You can be banned for: - Spamming all over the forum (with such one-lined phrases like "Good Project", etc. - Copy/pasting other's work or by plagiarism - off-topic or non-sense quotes (take a look at your own activity) - etc. If your only goal in here is to earn some cents by joining as many bounties as you can instead of making useful contributions and being a part of the forum, probably you will end banned. To the OP, no. You are just thinking about ranking-up as a way of milking, even more, the cow. This is far from being a good attitude towards the forum.
|
|
|
After taking a look at the services offered on several internet websites, I do agree with the merit requirement for juniors will be a great step ahead against the spamming problem. Take a look at this one, for example: This guy is offering "bumping" services on your ann thread. In fact, it seems to be profitable for him, for he has managed to get some clients. If you pay attention to the description, the guy claims to have more than 200 JR Member accounts. Now, if all those juniors accounts had needed 5 merits (or at least one) to become junior, then he will manage 200 Newbies accounts and be able to do the same. So, maybe implementing a merit to become Newbie and 5 Merits to become Jr is the solution. In addition, if newbies and Juniors CAN'T bump a thread, this guy "enterprise" will be pointless. I don't think that guys like this one are rare. In fact, one of the most troubling information is how he manages to have 200 accounts<? The link to his "services" (he has many different offers): - ICO marketing for $100: https://www.seoclerk.com/content-writing/602427/Cryptocurrency-ICO-marketing-on-Bitcointalk-and-other-crypto-forums- Bump your thread for $100: https://www.seoclerk.com/Traffic/611685/Bump-Up-Your-Bitcointalk-ThreadSo, do you think that by asking for merits to this kind of accounts will be a good solution? To me, it is. It will be difficult for this guys to sell the services, I hope.
|
|
|
I installed the ILIAS academy software on HeadBoy.com for evaluation as part of the proposed Bitcoin Talk tutorials project, but there didn't seem to be any interest in it. I'm so impressed with the software that I'm cosidering keeping it, and using it for a Jet Cash academy. If I do this, then I'll include the posting stuff as a course. I started it on fit to Talk, but it is only half completed.
Seems pretty awesome. Can you provide me the link? I haven't heard of it...
|
|
|
I agree with that. In fact the idea was to fly it in Meta, and get a feel for community opinion. If it generated some positive comments, then I planned to move it to beginners. I think it could still be beneficial to move it onto the beginners' board.
I think it can be useful to create a new thread on the Beginners board explaining what kind of thread "style" are not really being supported, how to avoid to be disrespectful or whatever. Anyway, taking a recent look to this board, I've come to realize that it has become an altcoin board extension since most of the threads opened are related to bounties/airdrops. Anyway, it is never pointless to speak about your own statements, one of two concerned newbies probably will appreciate this.
|
|
|
Merit talking seems to have become the new racism. If you dare to mention the "M" word, then you run the risk of being accused of being a merit beggar. As far as I can see, the biggest advantage in being a Legendary, is that you don't get accused of begging for merits, it takes the "me" out of "merit" I'm curious about what do you think of that: This is the OP profile information. I have some mixed feelings about the matter: on one hand, the OP is asking if another user's behavior is ok when he's doing quite the same. On the other hand, when this "merit" persecution is going to come to an end? Since when Torquemada has come back to life?
|
|
|
I thought someone will use my own words against me. That personal message is not begging for Merit. I can justify that by quoting threads that states "Donations are appreciated" with BTC/ETH address included. If my personal message is considered begging then people with "Donations bla bla bla" are also begging.
Quite the same, from my perspective, and since your asking for personal opinion, to me there is an unnecessary statement, a lack of elegance. For instance, I will not merit you if I read that in your profile, as I wouldn't merit the other guy, for I truly dislike this kind of behaviour (again, my personal opinion). I don't think this kind of message is necessary as you don't need to "allow" anyone to merit you. If you deserve merit, people will merit you.
It's not begging but I really dislike this kind of behavior.
Totally, I just can't see the point. I don't know, every time I see this kind of messages into a profile information I use to think "This guy is just seeking for merits in every thread he creates", so no merit from me. It is against the merit spirit, from my perspective.
|
|
|
Not against the rules, but a DT member will probably neg trust him because of this.
Well, this is just pathetic. By this, probably the user will end in the ignored list of many so he will not receive a single merit This is not the first case of this stupid behavior I've seen, it is, actually, kind of common. EDIT: eeeehmmm... man, you are doing quite the same:
|
|
|
To be honest, I don't think it can works. Probably it will become a spam-fest-crying for merits-board.
If you read most of the topics giving-away merits, mostly all the participants don't even bother in reading the thread rules; also, I've seen how many even copy-paste whatever they consider hoping to get some merits in return.
It is not bad for these threads to be difficult to find. Maybe the effort they have to make to find them is, in fact, good.
|
|
|
If you have long been looking for where to improve your knowledge and find new friends, to which you can apply for advice - then this is for you information. What unites the great French revolution and blockchain? To celebrate the Bastille day, we offer a 40% discount on participation in Blockchain & Bitcoin Conference France (July 18). Hurry up, the groundbreaking discount is valid for four days only! The Parisian popular revolt of the late 18th century marked the beginning of a new life for the country. The development of blockchain technologies in France also resembles a revolution. And the motto ‘Liberty, equality and fraternity’ perfectly describes their nature: transparency of transactions, guarantee of fair transactions, freedom of monetary assets management. Let’s speed up the revolution and celebrate both events! To celebrate the National Holiday of France, get tickets to Blockchain & Bitcoin Conference France, a revolutionary blockchain event, with a 40% discount! The special offer is valid from 10 to 15 of July inclusive. Blockchain & Bitcoin Conference France is fully dedicated to decentralized technologies, cryptocurrencies and ICO. By visiting the event, you will get: More knowledge on blockchain and ICO. A possibility to establish business ties, communicate with well-known crypto experts. A chance to make a name for your company. Leading blockchain enthusiasts, financiers and crypto investors will gather within the event to contribute to the global development and popularization of the blockchain technologies. Expedite the blockchain revolution >>> https://goo.gl/1TKksSThis is not to "help beginners", it is a sale, and it doesn't belong to this board.
|
|
|
Where should these advice threads be posted? I believe that there is a need for them if Bitcoin Talk is to regain credibility in the crypto world.
In my humble opinion, the thread belonged to the Beginners & help board, since it is about your personal experience and oppinion. I think it should be far more useful in there than in reputation (I can't understand why the mods moved the thread to reputation since it is not related to any kind of accusation, it is just a statement about your own perception). Meta also seems ok, I don't get why they moved it to reputation... I get a bit concerned that I'm trying to push Bitcoin Talk in a direction that mods and admin don't think is correct. I'm hoping that Bitcoin Talk wiil be the place to discuss the new Government cryptos when they arrive. Because of the strong membership base here, especially in the populations of the emerging countries, I think it will be a great place to gauge popular opinion. If we are to do this, then we need to present a more professional image, and allow the extremely good technical and economic posts and posters to become more obvious.
Me too. I suppose, when the time comes to discuss such matters (well, it is already in here), we will still have the Serious Discussion, if it is able to survive to the new whale of stupid threads. On the "legal" childboard we have had some good discussions already regarding the poloniex issue, the new regulations, etc. The problem is that this is a Bitcoin Discussion's childboard, and maybe you have it ignored ('??). Anyway, the good topics are always getting lost in between al the crappy ones in the child too.
|
|
|
Good catch. It will be useful to try to buy his services and discover what accounts he's actually using. I was truly surprised. Are they hacked accounts? Or maybe old ones in disuse? Perhaps bought ones? I'm aware of the multiple uses of the forum to SEO services, but this is going too far. Maybe the solution is to buy one of the services and get all those accounts banned.
|
|
|
Why " restricting things" and " banning stuff" are the only solutions everyone thinks is perfect? Theymos should start a sub-forum under the domain www.elite.bitcointalk.com where there would be no signatures,no bounties,no marketplaces , just elite posters discussing stuff. Also the sign-up process would be invite basis only. Jajaja, you are absolutely right. Maybe it just desperation, but you know, this is terrible to spend some time in here and to find more and more difficult to engage in a real discussion due to the state of the forum. The merit system is working, from my point of view, for it absolutely encourages some good members to rank-up and do their best. But, also, there is the well-known spam problem having place, each day worse than the previous one. We have an average of 500 new users per day. Probably the 90% of them are only seeking to earn some (some others just bots), not to learn or discuss the forum or the crypto world. I agree with some kind of "effort" is necessary for them to can earn something, for actually, the system is out of control, and mostly all the new users are just trying to post whatever, even if they are unable to speak the language. Now, I don't like "social classes", I don't believe that a new one is strictly worst than and senior member: they are some good new users. But maybe it is time to be realistic. We can try to encourage others to become a good "citizen" in here, to contribute to the forum, and we are doing it by meriting those who try their best. But there is a reality in here: they are few. The ones willing to give a shit are few in comparison with the ones with no interest in the forum but in their "earnings". As a product, we are all seeing how the boards are getting lost in between bumping-nonsense quotes, and to enroll a good debate is impossible by now in some of them. So, if by encouraging and meriting the people we have achieved nothing, what can we do? I would like to see a good forum with clean boards with a nice debate, discussion, information, et all in there. But it is not happening (maybe utopic, but why it should be utopic?) So, what to do, then? I don't like prohibitions too, truly, I don't. But what can be done? To leave the forum to die in between all the crap we have to read every single day?
|
|
|
This thread is on the wrong board. Please move it to the altcoin announcements one, the button "move" is on the lower-left of the thread
|
|
|
<...>
Yep, I've already proposed to need 5 merits to become Jr Member, for it will ease the number of shitposter or bots joining bounties and spamming all over the forum. I don't think a single merit requirement is of any significance, it's too easy to feed into an alt and bot network. I've mad a number of suggestions in the past, and some of them are. - Newby thread starting restricted to an intro and an account recovery board. Newbies and juniors restricted to beginners and associated boards. - Merits associated with posts deleted by a mod, or by the poster should be removed. - No merits for trading, bounty, ICO or similar posts. I think there were a load more, but that will do for the moment. Yeh, we talked about something similar weeks ago, in my case the proposal was about a newbie jail in where they need some number of merits to become junior and leave the jail. Since Theymos doesn't seem to like the idea (probably because the last time it was a total failure), maybe the jail is not necessary. Even if the jail is too much, by asking for some merits to become junior probably it will be easy to get rid of many shitposters, at least on the bounties. The issue also is that many bounties are accepting newbies, even brand new users, in their campaigns. So, in addition to the merit implementation for newbies to become junior, I would suggest that the bounties maybe should stop accepting brand new and newbies. 5 merits is a bit of effort, and if you are a "normal" user (considering normal as someone interested in grow-up in here, or at least, interest on the crypto world), you should be able to have them in less than a month. Of course, newbies in a need of merits will create a whole new specimen., the "forever newbie", in substitution of the actuals "forever juniors". So, as far as newbies can join airdrops and bounties, it doesn't have any sense, it is only going to change the name of the specimens.
|
|
|
|