Bitcoin Forum
June 25, 2024, 08:19:57 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 [322] 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 »
6421  Economy / Services / Re: Beijing on Bitcoin (a new holiday experience) on: May 03, 2012, 12:44:22 PM
I wouldn't mind travelling to Asia, my biggest problem is my food allergies/picky-ness..
I am allergic to ALL types of nuts, and all sea-food.. and I refuse to eat pork and beef haha....

Well if you can handle lamb a very popular snack/meal here is called "yang rou chaunr" (羊肉串 http://www.echinacities.com/expat-corner/guide-to-street-food.html) - it's BBQ lamb on sticks (can buy in the streets and in restaurants and usually only 2 RMB per stick).

As it is warming right up now (around 30 C during the day) it's perfect to mix some BBQ with cucumbers, cherry tomatoes and beer!

Smiley
6422  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Help! Can I change the account for a specific tx? on: May 02, 2012, 07:29:58 AM
To import them fast I did the following :
...

Thanks for the tips!

I was hoping there would be an easier way but guess I'll at least by skipping the rescans for each address it shouldn't take me too long to sort it out.
6423  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Help! Can I change the account for a specific tx? on: May 02, 2012, 01:10:03 AM
So is there anyway to change the account for a specific tx?

Am guessing by the lack of response there is no direct way. Sad

So is the only option to export every receive address, create a new wallet and import them back in (something that will take a long time as I understand it will do a rescan on each key import) Huh
6424  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Help! Can I change the account for a specific tx? on: April 30, 2012, 05:17:55 AM
I used the "sendfrom" expecting it (incorrectly now I know) to use the BTC from the receive address I had previously issued a "setaccount" for (instead it picked some other address not visible in the GUI).

What I am now wanting to do is to stop "listtransactions" from showing that particular "send" as belonging to that account (well more basically what I am wanting is for "getbalance" to match the balance that I see in blockchain.info/blockexplorer.com for the address I did the "setaccount" on in the first place).

So is there anyway to change the account for a specific tx?
6425  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Addition to coderrr's Coin Control features branch on: April 26, 2012, 06:30:17 AM
It isn't part of the core code because it doesn't play nicely with other features (accounts and listtransactions, for example). See https://github.com/gavinandresen/bitcoin-git/tree/noprivacy

I took a good look at the diff (https://github.com/gavinandresen/bitcoin-git/compare/master...noprivacy#diff-0) but (due to my lack of understanding) can't see how this causes problems with accounts and listtransactions - if it's not too much trouble could you give me an example of the kind of problem it introduces (so perhaps I can try and consider coming up with something similar that won't have the same problem)?
6426  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Addition to coderrr's Coin Control features branch on: April 26, 2012, 12:47:48 AM
Thanks Gavin - I will take a look at that patch (although I really hope something that accomplishes this can get into the core code).
6427  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Addition to coderrr's Coin Control features branch on: April 25, 2012, 05:25:27 AM
Let me try to further explain why I want this feature (and I really don't care exactly what form or exactly which RPC command is modified to support it) - I am wanting to use the blockchain as a "true" ledger for a specific address (i.e. that can be publicly audited without having to try and chase up "change" addresses and without using inputs from any other address).

I am so far surprised that no-one seems to be interested in this (for things such as Bitcoin100) and (if the feature actually does get added) will be creating a "project management" package for the CIYAM software platform that will integrate with bitcoind to work with such "non-anonymous" addresses.
6428  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: The decentralised social network freegala on: April 24, 2012, 01:04:44 AM
The code for Diaspora is OpenSource (and written in Ruby, which means comparatively easy to read), so the chance of someone slipping a backdoor in there is slim.

True - although the initial release (perhaps a little rushed) apparently had huge security holes (hopefully most of those have now been addressed).
6429  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Addition to coderr's Coin Control features branch on: April 24, 2012, 01:00:55 AM
I think a better solution would be to have the send from address option added to sendmany, its basically what I do in the GUI when I want to control the change, just add yourself as a second recipient and calculate the exact change.

Haven't really looked into sendmany yet but if it will do the job then that would be fine also (am only wanting the functionality), however, calculating the change manually (and the fee?) is not really what I'd want to be doing (in my case I actually just want the sendfrom and changeto to be the same address).
6430  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Addition to coderr's Coin Control features branch on: April 24, 2012, 12:59:32 AM
it's 3 "r"s man, come on!

Oops - fixed the topic.  Embarrassed
6431  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: The decentralised social network freegala on: April 23, 2012, 04:13:32 AM
A very good idea - I have also started creating a similar sort of application with the CIYAM platform (one thing that really worried me about Diaspora from its start was reading that Mark Zuckerberg was by far the biggest donator to the project).

The approach I am taking is to actually send all content AJAX style encrypted over a plain HTTP connection (as HTTPS is blocked in some places as can the use of specific ports but rather tricky to block HTTP). Am yet to work out how to handle files/movies but images are fairly simply handled as raw data.
6432  Economy / Services / Re: Beijing on Bitcoin (a new holiday experience) on: April 22, 2012, 11:29:13 PM
I'm not a meat eater anymore, but I think I'll have to open an exception while in China!

Am I going to find trouble with this food restriction issue?

It can be a little tricky to avoid meat here, however, we do know of a few quality vegetarian restaurants that are around the Lama Temple area.

Smiley
6433  Local / 中文 (Chinese) / Re: [off-topic] Visiting and staying in China on: April 22, 2012, 02:19:05 PM
Welcome - and just in case you hadn't noticed it before: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=64495.0

Smiley
6434  Local / 中文 (Chinese) / Re: [off-topic] Visiting and staying in China on: April 22, 2012, 12:56:21 PM
Short term rent is certainly possible - if you are going to be staying in Beijing then the easiest way to find short-term rental (and maybe even a bicycle for sale) is to check out http://www.thebeijinger.com/ (for other cities there are other such expat websites).

Understand that legally you cannot work in China whilst on a tourist (or even a business) visa.

Be aware that getting a deposit back for the accommodation can be a problem (maybe worth offering a bit extra to not pay a deposit at all).


Cheers,

Ian.
6435  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Addition to coderrr's Coin Control features branch on: April 22, 2012, 07:25:31 AM
I understand that coderrr's branch provides control over the addresses chosen to "send from" when performing a "sendtoaddress" and changes the RPC for "sendtoaddress" to the following:

sendtoaddress <bitcoinaddress>[:<sendfromaddress1>[,<sendfromaddress2>[,...]]]

From the perspective of being able to control the addresses I think it should also be possible (at least through RPC) to optionally specify the address to send change to. Syntax of the RPC command could be as follows:

sendtoaddress <bitcoinaddress>[:<sendfromaddress1>[,<sendfromaddress2>[,...]][;<changeaddress>]]

Also - any ideas when/whether the coderrr branch will be merged into the main trunk?
6436  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Troubles understanding sendfrom (bitcoind) on: April 19, 2012, 09:40:00 AM
No - the patch is really meant for people who want to control which addresses are associated for anonymity reasons.  It still sends change to new addresses.

oic - a pity no option for that as that would have made things extremely simple.

You can either sweep the change back to your named addresses, or you might want to look at Electrum.

yup - will have to mull over this - thanks again for the helpful info!
6437  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Troubles understanding sendfrom (bitcoind) on: April 19, 2012, 09:09:46 AM

Thanks (should have kept reading a bit more  Embarrassed ).

I guess the only other thing (which I'll just assume has probably also been covered by this fork) would be to make sure that the change goes back to (one of the) address(es) that were sent from also.

I hope this will get merged soon as I think it will be very useful for being able to create more public ledgers (only as an option of course).
6438  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Troubles understanding sendfrom (bitcoind) on: April 19, 2012, 08:19:00 AM
Yes, the coderr fork (the one I linked) does it.  The patch will probably eventually get merged into the standard client.  Electrum can also do it.

Didn't read the entire thread but from what I gather it is a GUI only change (right?) - any proposal to do this with bitcoind (I would want to have this automated to fit into a project management application I am envisaging) Huh
6439  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Troubles understanding sendfrom (bitcoind) on: April 19, 2012, 07:38:13 AM

Yes I had read that - but it provides no details about what a sendfrom actually does (about the same as using "bitcoind help sendfrom").
6440  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Troubles understanding sendfrom (bitcoind) on: April 19, 2012, 07:29:39 AM
sendfrom sends from an account, not an address.  Accounts are just internal ledgers in your wallet.  They do not map to addresses.

Thanks - yes thought it was something basic - I got confused by those accounts again (I'll get it right eventually). Smiley

The standard Satoshi client cannot send from a specific address.  You need this:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=24784

Has anything further been considered in regards to this or is there an alternative client that already does this?

(the thinking is to have a publicly verifiable ledger via the blockchain that will show all "donations" and "payments" for an open source project)
Pages: « 1 ... 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 [322] 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!