Damn! I wonder how many tries it took for him to get that jackpot.
|
|
|
Newbies made several days ago promoting and providing txids? Great!
|
|
|
I do not know this image Could be a Cow. Next time do this, download the image and if you can't download directly, just go to page info and there you'll find all the images in Media tab and then upload the same to google image search and it will show you similar images which might give you an idea what the image is of. You can do all that for 0.000025, can you not? Ow by the time you do that the captcha might get expired and you might have to start again but it's all worth the effort. You should just be able to drag the image through to Google, and it'll automatically search for similar images.
|
|
|
Multipliers: (center to extreme) --------------------------------------------------- 0.5 0.73 1 1.5 2 3 5 8 20 --------------------------------------------------- Max amount playable: 5 --
Odds: 98.257% Max win: 100.00 BTC Name: Beat The House Bitcoin Address: 1Lwc4Hq28nnT6w31nj6QCPNwUxdPM7QTYS
|
|
|
Gambling can never fix your life, Someday you might win big but in the long run, you will end up broke and lose all your money.
The house always wins in the end. Can't beat probability without exceptional luck.
|
|
|
Is this site still paying? I see only payment proofs from the admin and not from the users... Basically not even a site, just a wallet. The website is just some trash HTML page whipped up in like 5 minutes. Don't bother.
|
|
|
Payment received Newbie with negative trust, promoting another ponzi. Wow. It doesn't get any more obvious than this.
|
|
|
64Block_3nq7Vdz7iJZWNPGyhIuvxp
Thanks.
|
|
|
Yes. I have already sent a pm to him. But looks like he is offline from many days or may be get banned. And it doesn't matter who funded the loan, the main thing is whether the loan is repaid on time or not.
I'm willing to do this. Please sign an old address for me. This one. 1BPFKnxAENaxp26g8QbWKUWMuedRo5ZjDY
|
|
|
How are you affording all the base jackpots? If players don't lose, i.e. spam the jackpots, then you'll just have a net loss.
|
|
|
My guess for this week is
$245.17
|
|
|
While I can kind of see where you're coming from, you're looking at it the wrong way. Take, for example:
Max win 10 BTC. 1 player is betting 1 BTC at 10x for max win 1 player is betting 0.01 BTC at 10x (1/100 max win)
Both are essentially going for the same thing, at the same risk to investors (person 1 can lose once, person 2 can lose 3x) but both are, relatively, an equivalent bet.
Hmm, I don't understand your example? The risk to the investors on the first one is 100x as much. For instance, imagine you had a 1% house edge, and a 100 BTC bankroll. Taking the first bet would be absolutely insane (hugely negative expected bankroll growth), while the second bet is a great deal! Or put another way, if you had a 100 BTC bankroll you'd probably want a 10% house edge to even consider the first bet. But you'd happily take the second bet even if it had a 0.1% house edge. This is exactly how MoneyPot works, investors are rewarded proportional to their risk in such a way that ensures every bet they accept is "kelly compliant" Consider this my "was up all night" math, lol. I was looking at it like: 100 bets at 0.01 BTC/10x is 1.0 BTC at 10x, when it's not. Not sure why that's how it clicked, though, as it's an obvious error. Did you perhaps try to mean something like: Betting 0.1x on 1BTC and 10x on 0.01 BTC or something like that?
|
|
|
I'm in!
Username: actmyname Bitcoin Address: 1Lwc4Hq28nnT6w31nj6QCPNwUxdPM7QTYS
|
|
|
Username: actmyname
Good luck to everyone!
|
|
|
Stats Bitcoins mined: 740.78M Bitcoins click-mined: 195.62M Bitcoins sold: 761.98M Bitcoins click-sold: 21.5M Total upgrades purchased: 43 Total USD earned: $32.96B Total USD spent: $35.93B Seconds spent playing: 467,392 Bitcoins mined per click: 1,757 Bitcoins exchanged per click: 1,107
It's hard to get the money for the expensive miners/exchanges.
I increased the prices since people were saying it was too easier...are they too high? I believe that it is a little bit... hard to get the better upgrades. It takes a lot of time, to get from several large points in the game. Especially with the exchange feature.
|
|
|
I will go for d3 as well. Nc3 seems to restrict the movement of the Queen. So I am against it. If d3 isn't that popular, I would look at d4.
Since Nc3 seems unpopular, I'll go for d3. Now we have two votes for d4, two for d3, and one for Qb3. Actmyname, are you willing to break the tie by changing your vote to one of d4 or d3? I'm still recommending Qb3. The reasoning behind this, if you can see, is that d4 and d3 give him an advantage because he can insert the move b5, attacking the queen, kicking it away, and then playing Bb2. He doesn't need to take the d4 pawn if d4 is played, because he can develop his bishop if we take on c, and d3 is very passive. However, with Qb3, if he plays b5, we get to play whichever move matters more to the situation, getting more flexibility.
|
|
|
There's just one problem I have with this: there's no incentive to be the first bidder, because you won't gain anything except for your own money.
That is not correct. If you check the game site, there are 4 blocks and each of them shows jackpot amount at the top. So that means that just by one bid even if you are the only one, you can win the jackpot. For example first block has the jackpot of 2 cents and bid costs 1 cent. So if you bid and even if you are the only one and the timer drops to 0, that means that you win the whole amount. Each block has different jackpots and different bid costs. So if you are the only bidder then thats even better for you, because you double your coins without a fight and win twice the amount of your bet Best of luck and best regards, BidyBit | Support Center I see. Thanks for informing me.
|
|
|
There's just one problem I have with this: there's no incentive to be the first bidder, because you won't gain anything except for your own money.
|
|
|
Well, I guess this is just going to be a case of, "the rich get richer".
Good luck to all those players!
|
|
|
This is so ridiculous that anybody could see that this is an obvious scam. 1500%? Haha, what a joke.
|
|
|
|