This is very great. I also wanted to live in Philipines for some time and still do. I think it must be a great experience after all. But honestly, I didn't know that it was so dangerous there. I guess it's relatively safe anyway, compared to most of the part of South America or Africa. So yeah, you just need to be a bit cautious, and nothing bad will happen
Yes, you pretty much summed it up. Just don't be an ass, which includes being a dick or getting too drunk in public, and also be mindful of your surroundings, and you'll be fine. I highly recommend trying it out. I also recommend everybody get out of their comfort zone from time to time and travel somewhere completely foreign to them as its an eye opening experience and gives you a newfound perspective on things. People who sit around the house all day, all year, year after year, just telling themselves that they know things, don't actually know much of jack. Or as Henry Rollins once said, "Knowledge without miles equals bullshit." |
|
|
|
So he deleted all his comments here (or had them deleted for him) and is now attempting to tag team Bitcointalk with game-protect in Scam Accusations: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5179453It's a match made in heaven. Or hell. You know, one or the other... |
|
|
|
None of those documents written by UN, it is written by me and these are the only linguistically valid translations in the entire world. Dude, you've already exposed yourself as being completely nuts, but you keep getting nuttier. This text is the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, written by the U.N. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) is a milestone document in the history of human rights. Drafted by representatives with different legal and cultural backgrounds from all regions of the world, the Declaration was proclaimed by the United Nations General Assembly in Paris on 10 December 1948 (General Assembly resolution 217 A) as a common standard of achievements for all peoples and all nations. It sets out, for the first time, fundamental human rights to be universally protected and it has been translated into over 500 languages. https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/It most certainly is NOT written by you. You must realize by this point everyone here thinks you're a lunatic. Do you not understand this?
IT IS WRITTEN BY ME! HOW MANY TIMES I NEED TO TELL YOU YOU RETARD?
So you were not only alive in 1948 but of an age where you could pen something so profound and transformative? You must be at least 100 years old.  |
|
|
|
I see you weren't very cautious when reading, so I will put it for you again: And again, shouldn’t that include the BTC, BCH, and BSV and every other fork of Bitcoin? All of those had to replicate the original blockchain starting from zero.
According to the judge it’s only from before Dave died, so only BTC. Sorry BTC.
It would appear this assertion is incorrect:  https://edoc.pub/kleiman-lawsuit-amended-complaint-pdf-free.html |
|
|
|
They've been accepting bitcoin donations since 2013, a year before you started your copycat venture.
LIE! The Bitcoin address they listing on the derivative work which is a copyright infringement because entirely based on my work, received the first transaction in March 2019 when they published the infringing material solely to scam people to believe they donating to us! March 2019 was the date when they published the page you mentioning, see https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://hrf.org/donate-bitcoinThere is zero evidence of this on their archived website. There are zero similarities between their bitcoin donation page and yours. Dude. They've been around since 2005. You've been around since 2014. You clearly took the same of an organization that had already been in existence for 9 years! Its your fault if you get shitty web ranking results and have a hard time with SEO -- you are using the name of a well-known organization. For several years they used the URLs humanrightsfoundation.com, humanrightsfoundation.org and thehrf.org. Whenever they moved to the "hrf.org" domain is irrelevant. Regardless, you've apparently accomplished absolutely nothing in 5 years. There is no sane reason why anyone would donate money to you. |
|
|
|
So do you think CB is also Gmax, or is your insights only limited to me?  Of course not. CB is British whereas Gmax is American. Adding your sunglasses emoji to the end of your comment reminds me of this post you once wrote in the Bcash thread: 1. I like women. 2. I kick your ass for that comment in the real world. FYI2:
For Centuries Speculation was the earth was the center of the universe,
Factually it was the Sun, but people believe what they want.
Factually there is no center of the universe. FYI3: Since you're talking with me, I wonder if CB thinks you're "astro-turfing" . @nutildah, let's really waste your time, go thru and catalog the posting time of me and zang zin,& everyone else you suspect me of being, and then compare the posting times to see if we are on the same schedule. Surely the same person would be posting at the exact same times, due to work schedules and such, no matter their alias. I almost can't wait to find out how many people I actually am. No need for all that as I'm 99% certain you are the same people. - invade same subject threads with same trolling tactics - same writing style - same usage of emojis - both way into extremely obscure shitcoin Frankly you're too boring to care any more about. |
|
|
|
No, we don't publish human rights violations until we don't receive any. So in over 5 years and with over 5 BTC in donations, you've not received a single communication, nor have you published a single "report, article or media", nor have you "provided secure tools and communication channels", nor have you "educated the public". You haven't "promoted, protected, or upheld" human rights, because you haven't actually done anything. How are potential whistle-blowers going to feel comfortable trusting reporting human rights abuses to you and trusting you with information and correspondence which may very well put their lives at risk, when you can't even be trusted to openly and honestly answer basic questions about your "organization"? I think you got your answer They probably keep getting bypassed by complainants in favor of the real Human Rights Foundation. Probably should have come up with a more original name. Kind of reminds me of this: 
(talking about anything other than what they have actually accomplished as far as "human rights" are concerned.)
So what have you actually accomplished in your 5 years thus far? Your website has nothing except for a picture of your founder and then of course your section on how to donate. You list no plan of action, no ideas of how you plan to improve human rights, nothing tangible that would suggest you are going to improve anybody's lives anywhere. I gotta tell you, even if you were trying to do this via charity ICO, you would be ridiculed into the ground. Perhaps its best if you seek donations elsewhere. This is only a step up from when those Criptonians accounts kept begging for 50 BTC to magically boost bitcoin's acceptance and price. (all their accounts were banned and all their messages deleted)
Your HRF.org is not even existed when I did registered the domain name!
It was registered in 2001. The actual Human Rights Foundation has been in existence since 2005. They've been accepting bitcoin donations since 2013, a year before you started your copycat venture. SO WHO IS THE SCAMMER? WE OR THESE FASCISTS IN THE EMPIRE STATE BUILDING?
All signs point to you. You can't even provide evidence of a single solitary thing that you've accomplished. |
|
|
|
Actually , Zang Zin very Last post was on Feb 2th, so that blows your theory.
Might want to read the post history a little better next time.
Perhaps, but I don't that's necessary here. Your first post was 32 minutes after his self-declared "last post." Then he took a break until Feb 2nd, during which time you wrote 42 posts. Then you started posting again as Khaos77 on Feb 3rd. Some of your other similarities (outside of subject matter) include: -excessive use of emojis, especially when finishing a post -you both structure your paragraphs in an odd format that doesn't utilize the full width of the text field -both consistently have improper use of punctuation marks, or lack of punctuation where appropriate -English is a second (or third) language The final kicker is you are both fanatics of a virtually unknown microcap coin called ZEIT. Since i can't get my wallet synced even after downloading the bootstrap, seeing the low difficulty and that all new blocks are created by only 4 addresses i would say Zeit has forked.
ZEIT has not forked, there are some asshats intentionally causing congestion that is blocking many from syncing. Block explorer is synced and correct. All Exchanges are matching the block explorer. There has been an exodus of stakers, Kiklo has even put a call out for more people to stake, but it has gone unanswered. The community is faltering and failing zeitcoin. ZEIT is currently ranked #1415 on CMC. What are the odds that you're not the same person? I'd say extremely slim. @nutildah (or anyone else)
were there ever any instances of Aliashraf defending/tag-teaming with other suspected Anonymint alts (i.e. dinofelis/TPTB_need_war/trainscarwreck etc)
I'll give it a look over. |
|
|
|
The website saying that "Publishing and distributing uncensorable reports, articles and media about human rights violations" because that is exactly what we intend to do! Again we don't have millions of dollars every year because as is noted previously we do not publish U.S. propaganda.
You want to see human right violations? Support us by donating Bitcoin and if you wish you can also write article or report and we happy to publish it if its contains evidence about those human rights abuses.
I read through your website and I'm wondering, what have you accomplished in 5 years of operation? I would have asked this question in your own thread but you seem to have locked it. |
|
|
|
You refuse but still make a point regarding inheritance of BCH and BSV by Ira Kleiman, implying that this will crush the market even worse. A wrong point, in contradiction with the US Federal Judge of Florida.
We still don't know if the trust ever existed to begin with, so likely Wright won't be giving Kleiman any bitcoins. What Wright will have to fork over is the expenses of Kleiman's legal fees, which could very well come from the selling of his BSV holdings. I just noticed in a trust feedback you left for gmaxwell today you stated the following: So now, for the first time in history we have confirmation by a US Federal Court of the fact that CSW is at least 50% of Satoshi Nakamoto. This is wholly untrue. The judge refused to rule on whether or not Wright was Nakamoto -- 10%, 50% or 100%. The only people in the court room who said Wright was Satoshi were the attorneys. |
|
|
|
What a coincidence: your first post was on the day of his last. Perhaps you wanted to start over with a fresh reputation; now that this one is starting to sink, you should probably consider starting over again. |
|
|
|
I'm curious about your thought that aliashraf is Anonymint, though. I didn't get that impression, although I can see some similarities. - similarities in style/tone/presentation
- similraties in the areas of knowledge used
- appeared very shortly after Anonymint was perma-banned
not definitive, but for all intents and purposes, Aliashraf plays the role of Anonymint's reincarnation whether it really is him evading his ban or not. He also came to anonymint's defense on the regular: Although @anunymint is somewhat harsh and used a bitter language, I've to acknowledge his contribution as being helpful.
Banning users is cruelty but removing their posts? It is slutter.
@anunymint, Shelby is a polemic, a warrior. He goes beyond polemics by too much exaggerations and insistings on lost fronts but it is not his fault, it is ours and our prominent figures in bitcoin who have betrayed the cause, the resistance axiom, who have compromised bitcoin.
A warrior is out of options in this situation, he has to over magnify the truth, to make it distinguished from the lies and to bring it out from the shades and shadows.
God forgive me, but this Greg dude is really a troll. I mean it. He seriously trolls in this forum and everywhere else. Any chance to have him beheaded instead of Shelby?  |
|
|
|
BTW I still don't consider them a "scam exchange," but at this point I would say they do have questionable ethics.
Even after their Monero scam? Perhaps poor judgment on behalf of Livecoin to not attempt to better reimburse their affected customers, but not a scam. This issue has been rehashed several times already, I'm not going through it again. |
|
|
|
Can't sell something if you'll never get it.  Next up, Craig will say: "Whoops, can't access the trust no matter what." Everybody (sans BSV muppets): "Why not, because it never existed?" Craig: "No, because Dave implemented Shamir's Secret Sharing System improperly and the coins are lost for good." Judge: "Tough noogies. You're still on the hook for $5 billion. And you're still not Satoshi." |
|
|
|
I guess the main takeaway is that Craigy is now a rubber stamped and fully endorsed liar.
Oh the BSV fanbois will be spinning this into a win by the simple fact that they'll claim it shows that CSW must be Satoshi if he has been told to give half of the Satoshi stash to the Kleimans. Although, as per the latest Coindesk article on this outcome: According to the source, while the judge did not find Wright to be credible, he did not make a finding on whether or not Wright was Satoshi Nakamoto, bitcoin’s creator.
This is certainly what I would describe as a one-two punch to the nuts. Craig's not Satoshi, but he still has to pay $5 billion. Peter Todd summarized the outcome best in a tweet: The interesting part isn't the judge ruling against Craig Wright.
The interesting part will be when Craig fails to pay up because he never had any of those BTC. |
|
|
|
this is really a rhetorical point I'm making, but maybe it will spark a discussion but certain users should be singled out for this behaviour, notably: @WindFURY@DooMADI'm actually a fan of these users. I think WindFURY honestly enjoys provoking anti-Core people, and I enjoy watching him. Let's face it: I have to pick the word "Core" there because that's the part about bitcoin that infuriates their adversaries, like franky1 and khaos77, the most. DooMAD seems honest to me about his intentions and beliefs. I don't think they are part of some plot to keep the debate alive, they just enjoy the sparring. This guy more comes across as an average user who channels his liferage through the forum. I think he's harmless. |
|
|
|
blah blah blah blah
Wow, what an entitled lunatic. I remember this guy too. He never changed his signature. It sounded like he was the one being raped before, and it sounds like that now as well. What a meaningless way to go through life, trashing a bitcoin dice site that you think owes you a living. |
|
|
|
NFL Season 100 I know the NFL isn't extraordinarily popular on the forum so I thought I'd try to make a thread to kind of collect the thoughts of the few fans that are here, in my attempt to create Wall Order-esque environment. Which means anything goes but the primary focus is of course on things pertaining to the American National Football League. Last season I ran a Super Bowl Poll in which I correctly picked all 7 playoffs games, including the Super Bowl. I'm going to be picking one game a week and will run a poll for that particular game as well, but I have to add the caveat that I'm better at picking winners much later in the season. Early on, anything could happen, and its hard to gauge the strength of teams at the beginning of the season. The season opener, set for Sept. 5th, 8:20 EST, and will feature the league's oldest rivalry, the Green Bay Packers and the Chicago Bears. Sportsbet.io currently has the line at -3.5 Bears, with the payout slightly in their favor (1.98x for Bears vs. 1.81 for Packers). I suspect more money has been going to the Packers because they have a slight advantage traditionally in the matchup between the 2, but the Bears had a pretty stellar record last year (12-4) compared to the Packers (6-9-1). Several sportsbook have the line at exactly -3 Bears, which also explains the payout differential on Sportsbet. For this game, its a tough call, but I'm going to with the Bears at -3. Its a home game for them, first game of the year, big rivalry, the crowd will be pissed if they lose. Rogers is one of the best QBs in the league but I think this will be the year that Trubisky really comes into his own -- he's only been around for 2 seasons. I wouldn't be surprised at all if the game outcome falls exactly on the line, with the Bears winning by 3, so taking that extra half point is kind of ballsy move. Also, just for fun, here's Sportsbet's current Super Bowl winner odds, so we can reference how they shift over the course of the season.  I never bet on Super Bowl odds this early in the season, but I will personally be rooting for the Rams, just as a public disclosure of interests... |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
