|
Hi Mark,
I confirm receipt of my exchange TagCash = 3768.82 (I had to get near some proper WiFi before the wallet would connect). I'm just sorry I was unaware of such places as miningrigrentals.com until Tag was past the early days of mining.
Kudos and Thanks again.
|
|
|
|
Thanks everyone for posting overnight, I'll add them to the Google Spread Sheet later this afternoon. @ ibminer: If you'd like to give a couple of lines explanation I'd be happy to add this link to the Resources section on the OP. @ ahmedjamal1998: Have activated your Level of awesomeness entry... |
|
|
|
The user has alot of negative feedback (without any real positive feedback), so i guess that they are not really that trustworthy at all.
However i think that, that 120 BTC feedback might be very fake as well, because i don't see a way that a Sr. Member wouldn't run with that amount, because that's alot of money
Since theymos removed part of the Trust Wall feature which showed the level of trust of the one posting it's becoming a little grey as to the validity of posts on the trust wall. |
|
|
|
faucet dies?
are developers active ?
SXC Devs are very active - Don't forget Faucets are a free gift - as such there is no obligation to top up the Faucet at a set time (unless of course the faucet maintainer has a contract with a third part to do so). I for one hope you enjoy your free gift and hope that you will stay a while and maybe even join us in this thread. |
|
|
|
|
SXC is the symbol for SexCoin while CanaryInTheMine (who recently recovered their account after it was hacked) is a supporter in the wider SexCoin community.
There's some mining rigs being set up to ensure stability in the SXC network, perhaps that relates to the purchase of those rigs?
I'll flag this in the SXC forum and see if anyone recognises the UID SXC.
One of the original Dev's of SexCoin was LittleDigger (who's account I suspect has been hacked as it came back to life a few weeks ago after a two plus year absence) perhaps the third UID you mention bitdigger2013 is an earlier incarnation of LittleDigger?
|
|
|
|
I would also like to say that I would be strongly suspicious of any campaign ever managed by Lauda, although a few accounts that I suspect to be his sockpuppets generally do not participate in his campaigns. Hey quickseller -501: -9 / +11 !!! You're welcome to come join our merry band over at the [User Generated Mk III] - Known alts of anyone Mk III https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.0 thread. We take all posts seriously (or in your case we'll keep a straight face until you've finished speaking)... We even have pretty graphics: ^^
-<(@)>-
||_||
||+||
||=||
//||_||\\
We're watching you... Would you like a cookie? |
|
|
|
Who do I contact about trying to remove a false rating put on me by a scammer/sockpuppet?
I was rated as a PIVx scammer in real life (I have never met anyone from here) and after trying to contact the user, he has ignored me.
I rated him back but since it was a sockpuppet account they could care less.
and yet you waited five and a half months to Red Paint TM the other person? Sounds like there's more to this story than you're letting on... |
|
|
|
Both bhoybitcoin and bhobafett are on activity 140 while cannycassiopeia 's 82/82 can be interpreted as a rotation of postings (and all three were created roughly a month apart). (and the last active being identical for the first two is a dead giveaway) Name: bhoybitcoin u=1075196
Posts: 207
Activity: 140
Date Registered: 21 July 2017, 11:41:46
Last Active: Today at 04:54:28
Name: bhobafett u=1109313
Posts: 157
Activity: 140
Date Registered: 16 August 2017, 01:50:21
Last Active: Today at 04:54:44
Name: cannycassiopeia u=1160610
Posts: 82
Activity: 82
Date Registered: 19 September 2017, 23:41:39
Last Active: Today at 05:47:53 yields ten pages of UID's so it's a little inconclusive that there's a direct connection there given how random the names are. |
|
|
|
All of these accounts are spamming for the Jetwin campaign and connected to this wallet: [08b5cea580](snip) At least one of the ten accounts Razick has crossed my desk in the past. Nice catch TwitchySeal. I have updated the Google Spread Sheet and am just about to level you up in the Level of awesomeness listing. |
|
|
|
I think you copied from an old table. Tavos hasn't been my alt account for at least a year, probably over a year and a half now. Sheet 2015/16 Mk I is lifted directly off of the OP for the Mk I page here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1206112.0 while Sheets 2016 Mk II and 2017 Mk II are lifted directly off of the Mk II OP here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1702409.0 I have split the Mk II listings into two - the Mk I stops 03 December 2016, 05:10:49 and the Mk II takes over straight away with only a handful of postings before the end of the year. I was thinking of shifting those handful to the 2017 sheet, but then figured there'd be someone out there who would go through both sheets with a fine tooth comb to find any differences. I have amended the 2015/16 Mk I page (line 101) accordingly with a link to this post. (If I remove it entirely, someone at some point in The Future will ask about it)In the Mk II OP the entry was amended to show the DarkStar_alt so I haven't touched that entry. There are 38 UID's with the phrase as part of the name, but it's highly doubtful all are Alts of eachother. Ref links:Post One and Post Two DarkStar_ self admits ownership of Tavos ( Archive Post One Archive Post Two ) and as advised in the quoted post above he has on sold at some point in the past which is cross verified through the OP of the Mk II. DarkStar_ 's assertion is verified. |
|
|
|
This thread does not make sense like OP  . Hard to hear but the fact, No'oe better than Lauda here I'm sorry to hear that you won't be joining the party; even Lauda is encouraging people to post here: Archive: http://archive.is/snA00#selection-1673.0-1677.2Feel free to join us whenever you feel like it.    |
|
|
|
Let me kickstart the process of neg tagging by starting out with yet another alt account of our old friend AngelFalls and his legion of alt accounts. First three are already negged though. (snip)Miscellaneous: DT members tag this new scumbag to his family of scumbags ASAP *TheUltraElite awaits for retaliatory negative feedback on his account from the scumbags * Hey thanks for these finds, I was able to use them to kick-start the Google Spread Sheet - I've also started the Level of awesomeness I personally prefer UID's identified to be listed across the page eg: (but that's just me) Just one quick question, what's the connection to AngelFalls? Your first link http://archive.is/71FX1 (although correctly linking to the other three) is for an Alt called ZeusIsBack who you don't mention in your post. |
|
|
|
Actually you don't share a pw to give others access to edit the sheet. You have to enter a persons email address and send them access. If you planned on giving others access to a sheet, just choose 2 ppl you trust not to allow others access
My first foray into the world of on-line Google Spread Sheets... https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Lv2aTSJ0mCTA8OKPS9x_Lswa4QUnxF8UYe1QRXJejzo/edit?usp=sharingIf I've set it up correctly anyone can view but do not need to login. At this point, I've set up separate sheets 2015, 2016 Mk I, 2016 Mk II, 2017 Mk II, 2017/18 Mk III and 2019. I don't beleive it is necessary to have a "date added" and if I post a Quarterly summary here people should be able to narrow down when UID/Alts were found. I may be able to copy all entries across - am just trying a test version else where, but that link is good to go. Hopefully I'll have it sorted by this time tomorrow at the latest. *edit* Have also added link into the Jump To: bar and the Resources Section of the OP |
|
|
|
I have to admit I don't use Google Spread sheets, although I'm guessing Google has made it simple enough even I could use it... The two previous threads relied on the OP to maintain "the list" so I had that in the back of my mind that I would be needing to allocate regular time to do that task. If three or four people have access to editing "the list" (echo echo) and one sends the password to their friend who wants to do some third party editing - then the password gets spread around... Sooner or later, you either have no list or "Screw Flanders" five hundred times... I also feel that some of the flack recently being generated was aimed at Lauda who didn't do himself any favours by playing into their Belly Aching TM instead of just letting the exposed UID/Alts huff and puff and blowing out to sea. At the top of the first post I can add links to the "Jump To:" section eg: "The list" echo echo doesn't really need to be on the first page as long as there is a clear path to its location and back to the OP, besides anyone worth their weight in paper wallets can use the search function at the top right of the all pages of this (and every thread) to search "the list" echo echo skies darken... OTOH ... I *could* start a separate thread for *just* "the list" echo echo ground shakes, trees sway which I could lock and post a summary of the previous Quarter's findings. That way the list follows on from one quarter to the next. Investigations, Red Paint TM and Belly Aching TM here; summary list in a locked thread used for reference only over there. No? |
|
|
|
~~
Which looks better? Is it clear that each line is a separate set of connections?
Well, if you are keen on choosing 1 of the 2, I'd have to say that the first looks cleaner and a bit more 'well presented'. But hey, thats just me.  I'm open to suggestions or other ideas for dot points... (not sure I can do roman numerals, but pretty sure I can do the letters of the alphabet here). |
|
|
|
One of the inherant problems with listing the sheer volume of Alts found is the tables become very bloated, so, to that end I would like to try a different approach. 2018 Q1Which looks better? Is it clear that each line is a separate set of connections? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
