Bitcoin Forum
June 22, 2024, 07:40:58 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 [330] 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 ... 408 »
6581  Economy / Services / Re: 🔥▄▀ ⚡️ BITCOIN TRANSACTION ACCELERATOR for Unconfirmed TX⚡️ ▄▀🔥 on: April 05, 2019, 03:29:11 AM
4a4194c145ef1e35ce146d1c8af9dbc7c5995ce6f1fac0f188bbba5c0749955a

 Roll Eyes
6582  Other / Meta / Re: DefaultTrust changes on: April 05, 2019, 01:17:42 AM
A member can easily just tag a lot of scammy accounts and work their way up to DT in order to pull off a really big scam.

well but that's the case with everyone else, some people trade with DT members just to get positive feedback "trust farming" and you can see many examples of feedback from DT members even for small deals.

escrow agents may also plan a large exist "scam" , people with higher ranks can also use their rank to scam , The risk is there in every corner of the internet.

besides, you do not need to trust a member to trust their feedback, when you buy something of amazon or ebay and you check the feedback, you don't need to trust the reviewers, I trust many people's feedback but probably only 1 or 2 of them with money, and i am sure that's the case with everyone else. so trust and feedback should really be treated separately IMO.

so if a newbie or member rank gets into DT and spend time and effort tagging scammers,and proves himself to be a good DT member, it does not mean one should trust him with money, that's a whole different subject.

6583  Other / Meta / Re: DefaultTrust changes on: April 05, 2019, 12:38:12 AM

I don't get your point here..

you talked about freedom, and i explained that every member on the forum has the same level of freedom regardless of their position and score in the trust system.


Quote
The consensus of the DT1 members opinions decide who is on DT2, who is on DT1, what behavior is acceptable, and what behavior is not acceptable..
We need DT1 members that we can trust to make good laws, or come to a good consensus of what is right and wrong for the community.. Not just hand out tags..


The laws that are followed now came from old DT members , the majority of new DT1 and DT2 members are elected by old members, so if you trust their judgment then there is no reason to nag about new members.


Quote
Satoshi should most definitely be DT1.. Are you kidding?

Nop , i am not ! it's good to see you practice what you preach, just checked Satoshi's trust page and you have him in your trust list despite the fact that he has 0  feedback sent ,and most likely will never send any, you seem to be confusing trust list and DT to feedback and trustworthiness. having Satoshi in your trust list does nothing besides adding a new row into the forum's database.

but hey that's just my opinion,  if you still insist that only old members should be on DT , you may very well sort all users by user's ID and include the first 100/1000/5000 members in your list.

I have received the 99th most merit out of every forum member

and i received the 44th most merited in just a few months, not a big deal.

  
Quote
Perhaps you should review my posts, or ask my opinion instead of blindly assuming my stance on issues.

Sorry if i was too harsh ,its not me who accused you for anything, it's the "older members" whom you think should control DT list , why bother explain yourself to a new comer like me ? i am just a random person who "trigger happy when it comes to tagging users"  known by nobody, you should spend the time sorting things out with those that you think matter most.

Quote
Your statement is a prime example why you are unqualified to play any role in forum politics....

You are probably right, except that, i have 0 interest in forum politics, and i give no fuck who likes/dislikes whom, check my trust list and you will understand, my main motive is to expose and tag scammers and that's it.
6584  Other / Meta / Re: DefaultTrust changes on: April 04, 2019, 11:32:27 PM

you are mixing things up here, a trustworthy user does not necessary mean a good reviewer, the initial purpose of the trust system was intended for that ONLY  > https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=211858.msg2221664#msg2221664

it was even named "Marketplace trust" when it was first implemented, just because some people use it for other purposes , it does not mean that it's good for anything else aside from mainly tagging scammers.

not being on DT does not reduce your right of free speech, not even having negative feed back does, in fact a few people with negative feedback post more than 100 other users combined on Meta alone, your theory would have been valid if the trust system limits you from posting or something like that.

aside from that a good DT member is one who spots scammers and abusers, if satoshi himself was to come back and not be active in terms of tagging scammers then he does not deserve to be a DT member, he would probably be the most trusted member but that's a whole different story.

so unless the community members are going to benefit from your position in terms of trading, then there is no reason why one should be on DT list just for their own self satisfaction.

If I had any sMerit left, I would give this post merit.

for obvious reasons you don't.

you are probably lean towards "older members prioritizing theory"  because you have been a member since 2014 and due to your untrustworthy actions you are way too far form being neither trusted nor on DT while some people have proven themselves both wise in terms of giving feedback and trading in under a year, you and many other members are  perfect examples of why older does not always mean better.
6585  Other / Meta / Re: DefaultTrust changes on: April 04, 2019, 10:40:45 PM

same here, also here > https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;dt  he still (1) despite the negative count in the Hierarchical view.

I think it takes time for these things to show up.

edit: it's showing 41: -0 / +5 now
6586  Other / Meta / Re: DefaultTrust changes on: April 04, 2019, 10:22:43 PM
This is exactly why older more established members should be in charge of the trust system.

I have no comments about what's going on between you and others, as a matter of fact I do trust you a lot, and i do trust some people whom you don't trust and some people that don't trust you and i guess that's normal despite how messed up it looks.

but the quoted statement above is wrong at it's best.

here is a list of 78 confirmed scammers > https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3486346.msg36123932#msg36123932

more than 90% of them were never tagged by the "older more established members " but rather by the "new comers" despite the fact that many of them have been scamming the forum long before the new system was implemented.

not saying this because I am a "new comer" DT member but i do not seem to understand why does older has to mean better judgment.

yes i have no clue about the past of this forum, don't know what did TMAN do to who and why does Lauda  not trust you and all that drama, and i honestly don't care , and I don't need to know all that shit to tag scammers.

let alone the simple fact that a few DT members alone can never handle a couple of hundreds if not thousands scammers coming in every week.


 
His trust score went up from 4: -1 / +5 to 707: -0 / +74, which means he's added almost all users who left him positive trust to his trust list.
I'd say this is not how DT1 should be used. Before jumping to conclusions and excluding him, I'm posting it here Smiley

nothing out of the ordinary , just a quick hack  " how to change untrusted feedback to trusted feedback". he forgot to add 4 members who gave him positive feedback tho, maybe because the risked BTC amount was not high enough.

his sent feedback is even worse.

this guy with no doubt does not deserve to be a DT member.

6587  Economy / Reputation / Re: Is it okay for a top 10 most trusted account too... on: April 04, 2019, 09:44:01 PM
I am asking if I blow this person up or not

depending on how bad the stuff he/she did were, if it's just a minor shity move that did not result in people losing money of any scam related, and that member has changed since then and became somehow a good member for the community, i think you should just let it pass.

looking at your feedback you seem to have changed from an "account seller" and an "extremely annoying" person to a good trusted member, so again , just use your best judgment.
6588  Economy / Speculation / Re: BTC might do something nice soon. TA only ( No crystal Ball/s) on: April 04, 2019, 02:54:59 AM
This is probably it for the week, we should now have low volume,not much movement to either side , we will probably go down a hundred or two every day from now till next week, just to draw a sort of bull flag, then break it towards 5600$-5700$ , then we will probably enter a bear market again for about 6-8 weeks till 3400$-3600$ (200sma on the weekly) and if that 200sma holds "again", we will probably enter the new bull market that will go on for years till 80-100k.

let's see if we do hit 5600$ the a few coming days  and bounce back, then 2014-2015 charts will have more weight than ever.
6589  Other / Meta / Re: Suggestion for the Admin (Admin please read) on: April 04, 2019, 02:12:39 AM
My suggestion is to have some system which "DISABLE" Signature on important sections like "META", "SCAM ACCUSATION" and some others anyone got in mind.

but sir! how are you going to promote  plagiarized "Maya shitcoin " then ?
6590  Other / Meta / Re: Smerit on: April 04, 2019, 02:00:34 AM
when you join the "merit cycling club"  Roll Eyes , kidding .

you get merit for posing high quality content, usually by providing answers and solution for questions and problems raised by other members , but that's not all , in general any informative , well structured post has a potential of receiving merit.

that's Merit, but the tittle states Smerit, which = merit received / 2.  so for every 2 merit you receive you get 1 Smerit which you can cycle  send to another member whom will receive 0.5 Smerit for it.
6591  Economy / Reputation / Re: Another 5 merit pools for who can link the rest of those 7-10 accounts on: April 04, 2019, 01:41:50 AM
A little reward in Merit for a good and time-consuming research is encouraging more people to make reports in my opinion. But the research has to be good of course to prevent bad (or faked) reports to gain a quick Merit. I think compared to the time for doing such reports the rewarded Merits for them are often still very low at a Merit / hour ratio. And the value of detailed and accurate reports to improve the forum is also an important factor to send a few Merits.

These guys deserve more than just merit, no debate is required  for that matter.

but i do not think merit should be put as a reward for doing something specific like that, there are many scam and spam busters who just tag users instead of posting, how are you going to reward those members ?
6592  Other / Meta / Re: Does anyone here make a living off the forums? on: April 04, 2019, 01:29:03 AM
Most people have this sort of dream where they can actually live off the internet in general, it all goes well until it does not, the forum and crypto in general are still sort of amateur, just like anything else in life, you may get lucky here and there , but as things develop only those who are actually experienced at something will end up making the majority of the money, so if you are just an average Joe, chances are you going to stick to your everyday's job till you retire.

I personally make more money mining and trading bitcoin than i make from my average IT related job, in fact if i quit my job today and invest all my time and effort in crypto, i could make 2-3 times more income, but then i'd be stupid, if crypto goes south i would be broke and will have to start all over after having lost all my clients and skills, things will be worse than ever.

TL;DR : unless you have a good amount of reserves, then living off the forum and crypto in general is too risky, there is nothing wrong with some extra income from signature campaign or trading goods and services, but don't go balls deep, just in case!
6593  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: Antminer S9 Firmware ASICBOOST original hacked , no dev fee hidden on: April 03, 2019, 10:15:07 PM
I am willing to take a vouch copy , I do not have a particular use for any custom firmware, don't really care about power consumption since my power is free, but i am willing to make a review on your "modified" firmware. pm me if you are interested.
6594  Economy / Reputation / Re: Another 5 merit pools for who can link the rest of those 7-10 accounts on: April 03, 2019, 12:11:30 AM
but if you will find more you will be rewarded with my personal merits (I've tried to apply to be a merit source if I ever will be one of them I will do more of this things)

not sure if this is a proper way to reward alt busters, i also think spending merit this way could very likely reduce your chances of becoming a merit source.

don't get me wrong tho, the work you do is highly appreciated,

6595  Local / العربية (Arabic) / تجنب الشراء من الراوبط الاتوماتكية والمو on: April 02, 2019, 01:25:16 PM
الموضوع الاساسي هنا https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3035620.0   > "EcuaMobi"
ساقوم بتلخيصه واضافة بعض الاشياء الاساسية المفقودة .

اولا يجب ان تعرف انه يوجد 3 انواع من المواضيع

1- موضوع عادي

2-موضوع مغلق locked



لا حظ وجود علامة القفل , يعني لا يمكن لاحد التعليق في الموضوع
يستعمل المتحالين هدا النوع من المواضيع لكي يمنعو الناس من تنبيه بعضهم البعض بخصوص عمليات نصب


3-موضوع يتحكم فه صاحبه كليا self-moderated



لاحظ وجود النص بالخلفية البيضاء عند دخولك للموضوع

Quote
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.

هدا يعني ان المحتال يمكن ان يمسح اي تعليق يريده..يفتحو اكتر من حساب ويقومون بنشر تعليقات مثل
 
شكرا استلمت البضاعة ,بائع موثوق , سعر ممتاز , معاملة ممتازة ,,الخ ..

واي شخص يحدر من نصبهم يقومو بمسح تعليقه فورا حيث لا يمكن ان يراه احد.


___________________________________________________

كيف نتعامل بحدر ؟

1-اولا تنجب التعامل مع الاشخاص الدي تظهر عندهم علامة
"Warning: Trade with extreme caution! "

انظر الى الصورة الموجودة فوق لتفهم .

2- تجنب الشراء من روابط تاخدك خارج المنتدى

3- استعمل مايعرف بالوسيط "escrow" وهم موجودين هنا , ناس موثوقة وقامو بالبواسطة لمئات الصفقات

4- تجنب شراء القفت كارد بانواعه لانه حتى باستعمال وسيط يمكن للشخص ان يسحب القفت كارد منك بعد استلامه

5- تجنب التعامل ب paypal مع الاشخاص الغير موثوق فيهم

6- استعمل حدسك, اي شي رخيص جدا ع الاغلب نصب

7- انا وعضو اخر  قمنا بعمل قائمة للنصابين في المنتدى , نحاول دائما تحديثها, خزنها عندك وحاول زيارتها قبل اي التعامل للتاكد من عدم وجود الشخص بها

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3486346.0

6596  Economy / Digital goods / Re: WTS a list of known scammers - Must buy guide before buying from forum "Vouched" on: April 02, 2019, 01:23:48 PM
Don't you think it's time to update your list?

list is up to date, we have now added more than 50 scammers to the list, we sort them from most recent to less recent, we made a few additions in the list, as well as a huge discount.

this is the best time to buy the list now, buyers will receive updates.
6597  Local / العربية (Arabic) / Re: من الانڨليزية الى العربية. on: April 02, 2019, 01:03:03 PM
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3035620.0

سوف اقوم بترجمة واعادة صياغة هد الموضوع
6598  Other / Meta / Re: KFC instead of KYC? on: April 02, 2019, 12:57:50 PM
these KYC topics occupying most of Meta now, it's getting really boring,and April is almost over anyway ( only 28 days to go )
  i miss DT and Merit drama already Roll Eyes
6599  Economy / Speculation / Re: BTC might do something nice soon. TA only ( No crystal Ball/s) on: April 02, 2019, 12:30:00 PM
ok let's make an update.

the coming chart as well as the above are all from Bitfinex, so they might look a lil different from yours.

as you may know, i got screwed with my last short position  Grin lost 4% ,i entered a long position @4160$ ( after the weekly close above 20sma) and i had to sell at flat 5000$ despite the fact the we still have a room to go up, i couldn't resist 20% profit especially after having a terrible loss on my last short.

now let's get a bit realistic with what to expect ?

i did mention that

Quote
This means , if we don't drop below 3850$ before Sunday (weekly candle close)we could very likely enter a mini-rally and see sub 5000$-5600$ in a few weeks.

we went to as high as 5108$ , do we still have more room to the upside ?  yes ! , should i wait for exactly 5600$ before taking profit ? NO.





above is a daily chart, let's dig.

what do we have to worry about

1- 1 year old trend line from Feb 2018 ( very very powerful)
2- 200sma on the daily  ( very powerful)


the bigger picture on the weekly suggest that we would still move higher, but the daily suggest other wise, for this rally to keep up and actually does touch 5.4k/5.5k/5.6k we need to see a daily candle close above both points mentioned above.


I don't how to explain this to you, but these are meant for day traders, if you are buying for long term investment, then you should not bother about all my TAs, but if you are a day trader then you should take the above 2 points very seriously.

as long as we are trading below those points, we are likely going to have a correction to the downside, the moment we break them we should see another huge candle.

if you entered at the weekly close then you are now at decent profit, move your SL to break even, and start taking profits slowly.

we can very likely test 5600$ but i would exist all long positions and probably enter short positions at 5450$.

will try to keep this thread updated.
6600  Other / Meta / Re: The KYC process is not finished on: April 01, 2019, 10:32:49 PM
For you this is a joke, but for some people it's not, this is serious,
Try to imagine that on your credit card you have a value of $ 20. 000, after that is lost in drain, what you imagine, cry, scream or run around the world, money.

@theymos, give us one assurance that credit cards are safe forever.

I hate to say this, but if some one is so stupid to send their credit card details for a KYC application then maybe that money is something they don't deserve in the first place  Grin


edit, there is an insert-function that he probably disabled , so i am very certain that non of the details entered through that form were stored anywhere.
Pages: « 1 ... 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 [330] 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 ... 408 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!