Also for people that doubt it:
I just put in 0.2BTC, within 10 minutes rose to 0.2135 BTC and clicked checkout.
My transaction had 0 confirmations so nothing happened.
Then my transaction got 1 confirmation and within 10 seconds I got 0.21345 BTC deposited back.
So yes, they pay out, and fast.
|
|
|
Mirror image
Yeah, but worse than that, you should never be able to see the 3 and the 4 at the same time on dice. 3 and 4 are on opposite sides. All opposite sides of a dice always add up to 7 That's what he meant: the dice on the picture as 3 and 4 next to each other.
|
|
|
For the first time ever I sent someone some BTC. Now, 1.5 hours later my client (bitcoin-qt) says the transaction has 10 confirmations, but the receiver and blockchain.info still claim it's unconfirmed. Also blockchain.info says this: "Estimated Confirmation Time Very Soon"
I sent 0.1BTC and included a fee of 0.0005 BTC (bitcoin-qt suggested this).
Is this normal or did I do something wrong?
|
|
|
Good job bro with that attitude. Losing your free btc and complaining without providing any possible ways for Stunna to fix it aint helping.
I too faced the same problem and at least tried to find out whats wrong, double posting doesnt help. "Period"
you are double posting "Period". I don't think you know what double-posting means. And I also don't think you can read and comprehend what you just read. In this thread and the other thread people have explained to you why this happened and why nobody stole your money (since it didn't happen).
|
|
|
Nodes kun je makkelijk vertalen naar knooppunten (in een computernetwerk). Het woord nonce wordt op Nederlandse wikipediapaginas over crypto-technische onderwerpen ook veelvuldig gebruikt dus dat zit wel prima. (voorbeeld: http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Onweerlegbaarheid )
|
|
|
For people that asked about bots: Yesterday I used a bot for several hours using a variant of the martingale system (bet on >66.67 with payout 2.97 to prevent betting much on long losing streaks) and I went up from my free 0.0001 to around 0.0012. The site owner didn't tell me to stop so I guess it's not forbidden.
|
|
|
Beware, the Java applet on that site wishes to run in unrestricted access. With unrestricted access, you allow Java to install ANY other software on your PC. Access ANY file (including your wallet).
It's basically a confirmation to allow virusses to be installed on your PC.
|
|
|
With this idea you would gain a hype for a short time (as so many things did with BTC) and then the average person forgets about it.
What BTC needs is an easy way to securely store your money. Of course there are online sites offering this, which puts back the centralized bank into the network, which is something I would not see as desirable. This leaves the option to speed up synchronizing local clients with the network (which takes quite some time nowadays). Because right now I won't be able to convince my mom that BTC is good when she first has to download a program and let it run 3-4 hours until it is usable.
|
|
|
Thanks for the links.
EDIT: Well, people laughed at me when I bought a 6950 2 years ago. It was dirt cheap and it gives me 330MH/s, unlike Nvidia cards friends of mine have that cost way more.
|
|
|
Because the GPUs' archictectures are different. ATI/AMD GPUs have a lot more tiny, stupid cores, while Nvidia GPUs have fewer cores but they are more powerful. Hashing is fast and stupid, so AMD and its stupid cores do better here.
Thansk, but if NVidia utilizes powerful cores wouldn't those be able to calculate more hashes simultaneously per chip than the "stupid AMD cores"? (well, we know the rate is much lower so it apparently isn't but where is mistake in this logic?)
|
|
|
Congrats
|
|
|
Thanks
1QtHuSHkeMyZnKFHhf7UeEs4NusVnrVQq
|
|
|
Hello, I am a student from the Netherlands who had a few dozen BTC's from back in 2010 but I lost my wallet and lost interest. After looking for some old research I found my old wallet as well (wasn't even looking for them) and I thought: "Why not get back into this" so I registered here and you might read more often from me in the future
|
|
|
|