Thanks I'll vote for XC, I see the other coins that are "accepted" have yet to be implemented including Litecoin... anyone know if this site will actually add XC as an option if we get the most votes? At 60 cents/vote its all good either way but I would love to XC added. there is no reason to waste time on http://cryptomart.co, the site look and sound stupid. no one going to use it anyway. dot com probably going to cost a few btc but seem this person can't afford it. You are dumb as a brick here is another annoying crap. go creating your own site suckmydickmart.co I can't believe how retarded you are... here is one quick business 101 for you, get a dot com domain if you want your business to look real, even if it's sound stupid and fake. SEO bitch...SEO...but you're too stupid and ignorant to understand things...and look into the future on branding possibilities related to crypto currency/crypro coins/.co domains There is absolutely no difference between .com and .co, well, except for ignorants like you, who always think .com is the only serious domain even if they have no fucking idea what they are talking about. At least read a bit about what you're stating... Cheers |
|
|
|
Thanks I'll vote for XC, I see the other coins that are "accepted" have yet to be implemented including Litecoin... anyone know if this site will actually add XC as an option if we get the most votes? At 60 cents/vote its all good either way but I would love to XC added. All accepted coins are implemented now |
|
|
|
Thanks I'll vote for XC, I see the other coins that are "accepted" have yet to be implemented including Litecoin... anyone know if this site will actually add XC as an option if we get the most votes? At 60 cents/vote its all good either way but I would love to XC added. there is no reason to waste time on http://cryptomart.co, the site look and sound stupid. no one going to use it anyway. dot com probably going to cost a few btc but seem this person can't afford it. You are dumb as a brick here is another annoying crap. go creating your own site suckmydickmart.co I can't believe how retarded you are... |
|
|
|
Thanks I'll vote for XC, I see the other coins that are "accepted" have yet to be implemented including Litecoin... anyone know if this site will actually add XC as an option if we get the most votes? At 60 cents/vote its all good either way but I would love to XC added. there is no reason to waste time on http://cryptomart.co, the site look and sound stupid. no one going to use it anyway. dot com probably going to cost a few btc but seem this person can't afford it. You are dumb as a brick |
|
|
|
so everyone was asking for the last 2 days where is the dev, what happend at conference, and when he finnaly apears he just says us something poor about some usb stick that using TOR wich nobody knows when it gonna be released, how we buy it and etc and everyone cheers him how cool is all this ( im using VPN since 2010 paid with btc , anonymouse hosted in a country wich by law, hosting company doesnt need to keep any logs and all users share same IP adress ( www.mullvad.net ) this Tor feature means nothing for me to be honest, whatever ) im not trying to spread FUD, i bought 6k XC at 310k , i bought 6k more this morning between 110 and 150k and i am very annoyed about all this situation, nothing clear, nothing specific, only preanoucement of anoucement, we dont even have a REV 2 release date but we talkin about this beta testing of the usb os? why we not talkin about REV beta testing or other important things ? look in my post history, im a heavy XC ( and vrc ) supporter, never spread fud but this is getting worse and worse +1 I agree and im def concerned as well. Im already chalking my invested btc as a loss with no real chance of even making an even return. Have you least twitted one thing about this coin until now? I bet no... Lots of angry leeches, who panic so fast cause they can't make some quick buck without doing anything... |
|
|
|
|
Shake some weak hands, and back on up-trend...
|
|
|
|
Every PoS wallet I've used requires you to unlock it for staking. What makes you believe otherwise?
Don't mix my words. Yes it needs to be unlocked, but if it wasn't locked to start with your point? Re: Me a fudder, you are a tool! My posts on Veri go back 4 weeks ya diphead. You need a towel for your tears? BadAss, I think you're just an ignorant twat. Answering like that to anybody who raise a concern its just stupid...so you're plain stupid and ignorant |
|
|
|
I don't see how VeriBit is useful at all to drive that much fee in the dev's pocket... I mean... 1%... for real now I believe it is 0.1% not 1% No, its 1%, read again  |
|
|
|
Paying directly from the exchange is already 100% anonymous since nobody can link that payment to any of my personal information, so this gets out of question from the start.
Why being in this topic after all? Is this how you treat new ppl who have some concerns? You just ask them "wtf are you here anyway if you don't like something?"... Very mature... |
|
|
|
Paying directly from the exchange is already 100% anonymous Except for all the information that links you to your exchange account. Even if it's just an email account, that account links on to somewhere else where it has been used to register an account for you on another unrelated service and so on, whereby, over time you gave your name or a delivery address for some goods to a supplier and, bingo, that Exchange address now clearly belongs to you and any payments sent from it are, indeed, linked to you. Yes, yes, you might have used TOR and a disposable Email address when you registered for your exchange account and all the other guff that nobody with nothing worth hiding bothers with. If so, then why bother complaining that this service does nothing for you when it clearly does a ton for everybody else. All I'm saying is that I don't see how VeriBit is useful at all to drive that much fee in the dev's pocket... I mean... 1%... for real now If you want to pay for something that accepts BTC, just exchange some VRC for BTC and pay with BTC...is that simple... Its not about anonymity here, I was just answering to somebody's else point of view... |
|
|
|
What is Veribit? VeriBit is a feature that allows people to use/spend VeriCoins anywhere that Bitcoins are accepted. Here is a desktop video of me using the current implementation to buy a Papa Johns Pizza gift certificate: http://youtu.be/PLuBgdQJ6NQI don't see how is that special at all... I can always exchange VeriCoin on a legit exchange and pay with BTC from there...and do it faster... Do you gain interest on said btc? How about fees? Speed of transaction for delivery to other exchanges? Did you account for all that? Lol, we are talking about <0,1% fees. I'm all good with that fees for 100% price transparency. Thanks You have another layer of verisend, so veribit with verisend means: buying everywhere with VRC where BTC is accepted directly, using anonymous transaction. Paying directly from the exchange is already 100% anonymous since nobody can link that payment to any of my personal information, so this gets out of question from the start. |
|
|
|
As for VeriBit, there is a large buffer of BTC we have donated by a large investor (not in Black Hand) to block any market disrupting uses of it. For now we will limit maximum sends of 1 BTC until we can ensure we will not manipulate the price greatly. We are leveraging the optimal buying algorithm to recover the BTC after a VeriBit transaction and it's been seamless so far. There are no "fees" per se, but the conversion rate is constructed using price levels and often leaves us with ~1% extra BTC after. That BTC goes to boost the buffer to reduce potential damage from sends in the future. Nobody is getting rich of VeriBit. It's designed to help the community, not make much profit.
That's useful, and very pertinent information that needs to be layed out clearly for people, so that they can decide whether they are happy to pay the ~1% premium. It's an interesting development, I look forward to seeing how it's received. It's not a 1% premium when the market goes down. The system just calculates the lowest price required to ensure it can buy back the BTC. We trained it so it will be minimal. Really, it's just a price. The % depends on how much BTC you want. The more BTC, the higher the rate-- it's just how the market works. If you're often left with ~1% extra BTC, then that's a premium on top of what I would have paid to go through an exchange. I don't have a problem with that if the info is laid out for people. Many users will be happy to pay something for the convenience. But that's a side issue. I don't understand the '% depends on how much BTC you want' part. Why is this ? When trading on an exchange, I am not presented with a different rate according to the value I am trading. Am I missing something ? Exactly what I was trying to say... Useless service. I'm better with exchanging vericoin in a legit exchange with 100% price transparency. I don't see this service useful at all, as long as the service is doing nothing special, except for the fact that the VRC are exchanged on an exchange by a script |
|
|
|
What is Veribit? VeriBit is a feature that allows people to use/spend VeriCoins anywhere that Bitcoins are accepted. Here is a desktop video of me using the current implementation to buy a Papa Johns Pizza gift certificate: http://youtu.be/PLuBgdQJ6NQI don't see how is that special at all... I can always exchange VeriCoin on a legit exchange and pay with BTC from there...and do it faster... Do you gain interest on said btc? How about fees? Speed of transaction for delivery to other exchanges? Did you account for all that? Lol, we are talking about <0,1% fees. I'm all good with that fees for 100% price transparency. Thanks |
|
|
|
What is Veribit? VeriBit is a feature that allows people to use/spend VeriCoins anywhere that Bitcoins are accepted. Here is a desktop video of me using the current implementation to buy a Papa Johns Pizza gift certificate: http://youtu.be/PLuBgdQJ6NQI don't see how is that special at all... I can always exchange VeriCoin on a legit exchange and pay with BTC from there...and do it faster... |
|
|
|
Exacltly there have been some horror shows recently.... WHere the BTC just gets poured in...
Crypt, Cloak, probably RZR next although that looks flat to me.. I do find it surprising that a coin like XC has not already felt "some love"
We do seem to be getting buying tonight though , hopefully it is the start of a good week....
The bigger the accumulation period, the bigger the pump will be... Just watch the market carefully You'll receive all your answers I expect at least 0.01 price when the show starts... |
|
|
|
So we're merging with CACHE now? And before anyone says otherwise, it is a merger if they have to share the same codebase to implement PoBc, presumably they will share the same anonymity technology as well? Exactly how much of this tech will be given away as part of the deal? The mixer? Or the whole multipath paradigm working on TOR? What if PoBc can't be implemented? Will CACHE still get the anonymous tech? Taken from the CACHE thread. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=400389.msg7442411#msg7442411And before anyone says it's none of my business, I remember mining this coin when it was getting battered by a massive private hashrate. It was a community decision to end PoW early, with the dev asking for the community's input. Where would we be now if we had let that hashpower get the majority of the coins? Higher price? Lower price? The only certainty is that we'd all have a much lower percentage of the total number. Well, what will happen if we give away the secret sauce? We all saw that the dev was promising some next level shit where anonymity was concerned. No-one claimed that bounty did they? Did anyone even get close? In business, you don't give away the one thing that makes your product better than the rest. We are NOT merging with Cache, please stop spreading rumours, in the end it only hurts the coin. There is no proof from dev or PR about any such merger. Nobody said any merging from the start...but what can you expect from such ignorant bunch... |
|
|
|
If XC shares its features with another coin (so that we have 2 coins with the same features), I'm dumping. No questions asked.
You are an idiot, and you're the dev of a coin too...lol The tech will be open source anyway at some point... |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
