My problem with it is that humans need to trust other humans in a manual manner (If I understood correctly).
That's just not as elegant as other consensus mechanisms where the protocoll does that for you.
Same problem with DPOS where people have to vote for delegates.

If you want fast adoption then everything needs to be as easy as possible. You can't bother avg people with voting or "trusting". They wanna use the system and that's it. The security should "just happen".

Bith IP and browser-fingerprint where used to group people. Noone got put on the sock puppet list for not being active. This has been stated dozens of times.
Activity was only used to CLEAR people. I.e. if you were very active or at least logged in recently (and very is really relative here, i think it was like 50 posts or so - not that active) you were cleared.

That's very cool !
When will you add XEM ?

It's also much easier for other people with the same problem to find the solution there. Burried in this thread that's almost impossible.

Plz msg both of us (makoto1337 and patmast3r)

you can use delegated harvesting on your local NIS as well.

You can harvest from an empty account. So basically you delegate your importance to the remote account (which every account has).
That way you can also harvest on a remote location without having to put your private-key there (you use the private key of the remote account which has no funds).

Show me a single project that did not have a lower value than at launch 3 weeks after launch.
And factor in that a lot more people have been given coins initially so initial dumping will take longer as many don't check btt regularly.

Are you also on Win 8.1 Fatih ?

that's because btt is a toxic dump and everone is using other channels. Most really active people are on telegram.

I think the client is great.
I think harvesting is a much more satisfiying experience than forging in other coins because even people with lower importance do forge.
I don't know what you mean about the tx spead. Blocktimes are way more consistent than other crytos.

Overall though launch was just the first milestone. It was clear at least to me that at launch NEM would not be much better than other platforms. That takes time.


Agreed. There is good reason for this though. If any platform is to be reliable it needs to be developed carefully and well tested. That takes time but it's time well spent.
However even the most basic feature i.e. payment hasn't been adopted by a significant amount of people yet so that's where I'd focus on.
Everyone is eager to see new features but that's worthless if noone is using them.

You're trying to jump from a test version to a live version. That's not going to work. You need to create a new wallet.

I wasn't offended and I told him this via pm. I simply don't like to read posts that take up 2 entire pages because someone feels the need to post his entire inbox.

That post earns you a special spot on my ignorelist.

Sounds like a bug in the gui. Delegated harvesting is most likely still active and if the NIS your harvesting on is running you'll harvest blocks.

I don't think NEM was developed test-driven. The devs wrote a fuckload of unit-tests but not before the implementation of the functionality.
Could be wrong.

Crypti released DPOS. Maybe you can be "helpfull" there ?

Thanks for posting it !

I think the times where positive news had a great impact on value are over. Only demand can increase the price significantly especially long-term.
Maybe we can get some demand via coingateway

From what I can gather the installer works well too. It's just MAC users that seem to have problems. That's what happens when none of the devs have a MAC

For me the the experience with installer vs Webstart was like day and night. The only downside is that there is no auto-update right now (Webstart did that for you).