The government can still reclaim your land even if you have all the legal documents, if they really want to reclaim the land for their own purposes, you won't be able to do anything to them. But that happens very rarely and those are just rare cases. In general, any investment will have risks, including real estate or gold, and bitcoin is no exception. Maybe our bitcoins won't be unjustly robbed or confiscated by the government but we also face many different dangers. Bitcoin is also not completely safer than real estate or gold.

Among the good-old coins listed on the market today, which one do you prefer the most? Litecoin or Dogecoin? The former is often used for serious cross-border payments at a fraction of the cost, while the latter is used more for micropayments/tipping. Despite these differences, it's no secret that DOGE is faster and cheaper to use than LTC itself (Dogecoin's block time is lower than Litecoin's, while market prices are cheaper). I'd choose both as they're tried-and-tested blockchain networks with decentralization and security/reliability in mind.

What would be your pick? And why did you choose that coin in the first place?

I've never seen an England team fall like they did today. The England team could not withstand the bowling pressure of South Africa. Because England is another strong team in the cricket world which always performs very well. But England team has performed so badly today that it is only 84 runs for 7 wickets which is definitely surprising. Because a very strong batting line would lose like this to the bowling of South Africa I never imagined. So thousands of gamblers like me have faced losses in betting today. But the batting klaasen of the South African team has performed very well in the batting line, that's why the South African team has scored more runs.

I'm usually not lucky in winning in gambling and that's why I have limited my engagement on gambling to the barest minimum. I know some group of people who are always making cool money from gambling but after making several attempts to win my gambles, I always find out that I'm not as lucky as others so I decided not to get involved in gambling again like others. But that doesn't mean that I've totally stopped gambling as I can only gamble on sports betting whenever I can do it without my basic income.

I wouldn't be surprised if some groups ramps up the call for better crypto regulation and that would encompass these fake news disguised as errors. There are no real negative repercussions for releasing false and misleading articles at the moment so the likes of Bitpay can do it and still get away.

**Performance in 31 Days:** Forward test
I've completed twelve trades,. Over these 31 days, I've achieved a return of 1.91%, which translates to a daily return of 0.06%. Projected over a year, that would be 22.52%, but this can vary based on market behavior. It's important to note that this is in the spot market. Can it be done in futures? Yes, and with leverage (2x or 3x), you can easily reach 60% to 70% returns due to compound interest. However, I prefer the spot market as I see it more as a long-term investment.

Here's the link to the spreadsheet https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1nfNuJB5ZkewvZ8A9ACPJik0p3Vq1g-TO/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=105063930982027234018&rtpof=true&sd=true where you can see all the trades I've made, a screenshot of how the strategy operates on TradingView, and a sheet of risk. I'll provide another update at 60 days and continue until I reach 180 days, which will conclude my testing, and then I'll consider adding more capital. Feel free to ask anything...

However, I am here to say these are the reasons why it is not always good to gamble in a betting agent's shop, because if the manager of the shop does not run with the money a gambler wins, then one of the workers in the betting shop might run away with the money someone wins,

so I do conclude that an online gambling site with good reputation is the best for gambler, so what do you guys have to say about this?.

It depends on the person you are marrying to. I worked in a place before where there was a couple and they got married there, they benefited from all the things that they could, and then they got pregnant as well, and she worked until 7th month or so if I am not wrong, and had 6 months break, 2 months of pregnancy and 5 months while taking care of the baby and recovering.

I think that was a good deal, she didn't even come to work and still got paid, and then she quit, which made her get severance package that was a good amount and find a job somewhere else right away. Sure they had a babysitter that took care of the baby, or a nurse, I do not know what they are called when you take  care of a baby, but they had one like that, but they still had two incomes and a great package for leaving the work while not even working for the last 6 months. I would say that if you could end up with a marriage like that, the income situation should not be all that bad and could be helpful.

Centralization:

Pros: Potential for faster transaction throughput, a focal point of control and regulation, easier to implement changes and updates.
Cons: Risk of a single point of failure, susceptibility to censorship, a tendency towards monopolization.

Decentralization:

Pros: Censorship resistance, enhanced security through distribution, inheriting the initial spirit of Bitcoin and the idea of autonomy.
Cons: Potentially reduced scalability, decision-making difficulties, possibility of fragmentation and disparities.
It's clear both come with their merits and demerits. But, do we need to acknowledge that both can coexist? Are there situations where centralization could be beneficial? Can there be a balance?

Well, sadness and regret is a human emotion and people handle situations differently. We should not judge people for showing their emotions, because we are all human.

It does not matter if she knew that she would lose her money or not.... she did and she decided to show her emotions. A lot of people are so desensitized to people around them and immediately perceive actions like this in a negative way.

Let's give people the opportunity to learn valuable lessons in life and allow them to cry if they learnt those lessons. 

I can’t really predict the future but all I can say is that if I still have passion for my favorite games when I get old and I still can access my internet to make my betting online without any issue or if I can work down the betting shop without feeling any pains due to stress or bond weaken base old age, then I think I can still place a bet.

The only thing is that I will have to change my pattern of betting, that’s if bet regularly before now that I’m old I will have to make few selections and not all games that I will have to gamble on, I can even change from the regular gambling to pool betting which is what most advance men in my local do now are days.

Digital assets are an amazing investment as long as you can get in on the family/early round and manage to sell as soon as public sale opens, ideally BEFORE the sale opens. For a medium or long term hold there is almost 0 value.
The only way you might play this out successfully is mayb buying at the lows of bear market and then the market explodes but thats nearly impossible.

You are lucky that you can still remember your weaknesses in the past so that you can stop gambling and take a break. Yes, that is the best thing you can do to stop a study that is not giving you good results. And I agree that if we have been gambling for a while, we must immediately stop gambling so we don't think about trying to win. When you play for too long, you might think about recovering previous losses and still want to win even though you already had a previous win, even though it wasn't much.

By resting, you can calm yourself from gambling which might occupy your attention. And it is true that when playing gambling, we don't need to force ourselves to keep playing, especially if we feel bored or fed up. It can trigger us to place bigger bets than before. And by resting, you can do other things that might be useful for you.

Naturally people who place such big bets on their personal accounts never put such bets out for the world to see, but with Drake it's different and being the brand ambassador  this puts stake name on the gambling map and also shows the world they are able to handle big bets without a problem which is also  Drake doing his job as a marketing and sales personnel !

My first preference will be doge coin. Having a great utility is one of the most important thing of any coin or project. Even though litecoin is more aggressive in that part from doge coin, later one is having huge community and kind a backed up by Elon Musk along with nonpayment utility. It also offers less gas fee for its transactions which is also one of the important factor.
From investment perspective, doge coin is way better than litecoin if we look at the growth patterns.

     Other gambling gamblers have no other source of income, but somehow they win. And if there is no win, there is no profit. The only problem is that even though we know that the number of losers is greater, we still continue to gamble. Why is it?

    Because there are still gamblers who hope that one day they will get lucky and get the jackpot. But there are still only a few who win, because there are still other gamblers who have a tendency to stop playing or betting when they win.

Exactly, there's nothing to resolve if you are still attached and even you are recognizing the problem but if you are not submitting yourself and you are not listening and doing what is needed to fix it, then the aid is useless, you need to work with your own self-will admitting is a good beginning but trying to fix it with willingness to submit even how difficult things are, there's always a potential solution if you are open-minded and you are willing to take the hard route just to make sure that you will succeed from your intention to solve the issue that you currently trying to resolve.

Many of the VIP gambling channels are no better than the gambler who's hanging his hope on them for a greater chance of getting winnings games through them. These channels are just doing packaging business and not that they're sure of the predictions they offer, it's still same analysis a gambler could spend his own time critically analyzing about a particular sport he wishes to bet on, that's the same analysis these VIP channels undertake too to arrive in their predictions they sell out. Just that it's as if a few piles of gamblers have turned lazy in doing this paperwork themselves and have decided to push it to these channels in exchange for payment of service.

That project may be his own if you check well. There are those who pretend alot in the name of asking for advice but do not need it. He sent links to the project instead of telling us the name and allow us do the research by ourselves. Am advising that those who want to invest should carry out research on it but if Op is truthfully seeking advice and he is not a team member of that project I will suggest he does research also.

The fact that gambling is involved, I don’t think he can be trusted when it comes to money matters. Although it’s okay if he will really use the money for good purposes, but when it comes to gambling using borrowed money, then never expect that he will still be able to repay you or even pay a portion of it.

However, I have never experienced financing a gambler ever since. And if it’s going to happen in the future, for sure I will never ride with it. I am a regular gambler so I know eventually the winning rate vs the losing rate. And most of the time, gamblers often lose so while the house is always the winner.