You're doing it wrong. There was no MACD crossover yet, as far as we know it can end in a formation looking like the one on 10th Feb on your chart - close, but no intersection. You need today's and probably tomorrow's candle closed to confirm the crossover.
But its only fun if afterwords I can quote myself saying it before it happened. Besides, Im expecting a nice 18k BTC buy to "come out of nowhere" anytime now... Wtf, how did you know that? He IS the Manipulator! Except...he helped... Achievement unlocked: Get accused of being the manipulator. This right here is why I post the chart early. This is just a smokescreen, guys! He IS the manipulator!
|
|
|
Thanks WA +1
|
|
|
You're doing it wrong. There was no MACD crossover yet, as far as we know it can end in a formation looking like the one on 10th Feb on your chart - close, but no intersection. You need today's and probably tomorrow's candle closed to confirm the crossover.
But its only fun if afterwords I can quote myself saying it before it happened. Besides, Im expecting a nice 18k BTC buy to "come out of nowhere" anytime now... Wtf, how did you know that?
|
|
|
Yeah, but those graphs are noisy like hell. They don't say much IMO. Much better to look at the longer timescales, so the indicators are much smoother.
|
|
|
Just found out what you're using in the original topic, impressive stuff! I see you modded those HAF 932 cases so they could house 3 cards with enough spacing between them for fresh air. Clever! Wouldn't a Haf X case be easier/better since they would work exactly the same unmodded? Ah, well, I digress. Could you still please tell me whether you ran those cases open or closed? And what kind of temperatures you were getting in what kind of ambient temps? Thanks again !
|
|
|
Out of curiosity, what cases are those on that picture? Are those Haf X cases? Were you running them with the cases closed? And what kind of temperatures were you getting on the 6990s with what kind of ambient temperature? And one last question: What PSU are you using? Thank you very much in advance
|
|
|
One possible cause could be, text to float conversion + rounding made price to appear higher than it was.
Rule number 1: Never use floats for financial data Rule number 2: Never forget rule number 1
|
|
|
alright
that was a rally
We're just warming up
|
|
|
Yeah, following. This sounds like a major flaw in the trading algorithm...
|
|
|
Hey Slush,
Thanks for creating this! I've using this a lot. I have ran into a few problems with it, though. If I see a big move on Mtgoxlive I usually open sierra chart to provide me accurate realtime data by using this wonderful tool. The problem is that when I open it after a big move, it downloads the historical data, but that data is always lagging behind, so the big move isn't downloaded. Then it opens the streaming socket and receives data from after the big move, which leaves strange gaps between different bars in sierra chart. The same behavior can be observed if my laptop happens to go to sleep while your application is open and then wakes up. There's a lot of missing data. I know your program is open source, but I have zero experience with python, so I'm not sure if I could program it myself, although it should be quite simple. I also don't have any experience with compiling python applications.
Anyway, here's some pseudo code that wouldn't prevent the "bugs" from happening, but it would fix it upon opening the application again at a later time.
If (mtgoxUSD.scid.bak exists){ copy mtgoxUSD.scid.bak to mtgoxUSD.scid; } else{ create mtgoxUSD.scid; } downloadhistoricaldata(); copy mtgoxUSD.scid to mtgoxUSD.scid.bak; openstreamingsocket();
So basically, it downloads the historical data, backups the file and starts writing whatever that's added by the streamingsocket to the original file. Once you use the program again, it copies the backup over the original, effectively discarding any data that has come through the streamingsocket, and downloads the historical data again until it's up to date. So any data that's missed because the computer/laptop went to sleep while the application was open, or whatever data that's missed due to the historical data lagging will be added upon running the application again. This would prevent a messed up mtgoxUSD.scid which requires a download from the start. Let me know what you think! If you have any pointers on how to get started with Python, I could probably implement this myself.
Thanks for reading, and thank you very much again for this wonderful application of yours!
Mushoz
|
|
|
the indicators indicate that soon something will happen. If by tomorrow it doens't go down, then rally.
Scenario I) price goes down. Scenario II) price goes up. Forecast fully on track. More like: Scenario 1) If prices go up past X, the target will be Y. Scenario 2) If prices go back down below A, the target will be B. If that's not useful for you in your trading decisions, then I don't know what is.
|
|
|
By the way, I love the charts are numbered like that! Makes it possible to discuss it here, without giving away your analysis. Good job
|
|
|
Is everyone making lots of money here If not, then subscribe already For those thinking about subscribing, I charge a mere 2.5bitcoins/month which provides you with daily (sometimes more) charting updates. Plus, I'm a great source for all you beginners out there who want to learn how to trade based on charting. If you find yourself interested just private message me with your email Daily updates? I'm getting spammed with updates Which is a good thing! Great updates, made me a lot of money Thanks again, keep up the good work!
|
|
|
Volume is rising, mostly upticks. Lookin' good!
|
|
|
"For amusement purposes only, not to be used for real trading" Ahw, did I burst your bubble? Would be epic if the graph's semi-correct ^^
|
|
|
What happened?
1) Sell off first, and then the ask walls got removed (Which implies a sell from someone else). 2) Ask walls got removed, and then a sell off (Which implies the walls were sold into the bids).
Thanks!
Does anyone happen to have the answer to this question?
|
|
|
What happened?
1) Sell off first, and then the ask walls got removed (Which implies a sell from someone else). 2) Ask walls got removed, and then a sell off (Which implies the walls were sold into the bids).
Thanks!
|
|
|
Guys, please check if you happen to have $63k laying under your pillow. Would be epic if you bought into those walls, and profit from at least a 50 cent rise per BTC through a rally.
|
|
|
He just let the price go up to rebuild bid depth, so he can sell more at better prices. There are already few k drops here and there, and a bigger one (from the owner of 10-20k ask walls) probably will follow. Fasten your seatbelts! Then why would he drop down the walls slowly but surely by 1 cent steps each time, while he could just keep the wall a bit higher to let Bids replenish again? Doesn't make sense if he really wants to sell. He's just putting on downward pressure, without actually selling much if anything at all.
|
|
|
|