Thanks for your Valiant work, what's the news URL?  I can't find it on their website.   

Not sure I should keep handing SXC out if they just evaporate because Cryptopia decide to close the SXC market.  I also can't withdraw them, so they're stuck there which is a pity given yobit also didn't seem to head the advice to upgrade their wallet.

Enlighten me.

You mean like how servants in India carry a book around from one employer to the next which has written in it all the good and not so good work that they have done over the years?


He did: http://archive.is/B5Ghj#selection-8243.0-8228.3 (This is why I archive things...)

And again apologies for my ignorance about Indian culture, what is


Is that 30,000 rupees?

30,000,000 rupees?

30,000,000,000 rupees?

Under what UID name does this charlie Shrem use here on BCT?

I ask because Escrow.ms hasn't red flagged any UID with the name "charlie" or "Shrem":  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=76380 so I'm wondering why Escrow.ms would be bellyaching ^TM about Red Paint ^TM splashed about (or not as the case may be) for another UID.

Good news indeed.

I just checked my wallet and saw all bar one are User Agent SexCoin0.10.4 while the sole exception is SexCoinCore.  Is that some ones own branch?

A couple of days ago the ratio of 0.10.4.0 to 6.4.6 was about sixty / forty in favor of the new wallet with a sharp spike in numbers of both.  I'd say people were in the process of upgrading, or, shifting onto newer wallets.

Definitely time to celebrate.         

One of the many problems with keeping a list is the occasional cut and paste going into the wrong section.     Have moved the blockdozer entry to the BCC/BCH section.   

Am just looking through the last part of your post to ensure I get the posting of that information in the correct section and transcribed correctly.   

Am pretty sure I've caught up on all the links, if anyone has been left out, drop me a note.

Something about being involved in Ponzi's wasn't it?

I'll keep an eye out for any such beasties...  
Given that BitCoin XT is a direct clone of the Core wallet you can push a transaction yourself.  (See my first post)

OTOH, BitCoinCash is a scale-able block concept, I'm guessing most punters will dial their "Pay only the minimum transaction fee" down to the bare minimum of 0.00001000 BCC/BCH per Kbyte as that BitCoin clone will probably sweep up all transactions and just grow the block size, so there won't be any real need to pay a little bit extra to get into the next block as the block will just keep growing to accommodate all transactions...  QED.

Unless I'm mistaken?

I unlocked the thread to update the information on the title page to include information about the Version 0.10.4.0 update on the first post and made a new last post with the corresponding information pointing to this thread.

I then re-locked the thread.  The other stuff about why it was originally locked is history.

As you can see we've already had a respectable 52 pages of discussion here about every-one's favourite Alt coin specifically targeted to the adult industry.

Come and join us on the sexcoinforum and the slack chat channel.

    maryve20 u=886011    and  nasashi u=382175 are the two most likely to be active at the moment

while myjulie92 u=885992     mehika_7 u=886000     alonaseeks u=884309 and     lineofdeath u=885997

are the most recently inactive - probably in reserve and to watch closely.

Four of your list

19 June 2017, 13:49:50 Last Active:    cage_one
19 June 2017, 13:46:49 Last Active:    jennifersong64
21 June 2017, 07:07:38 Last Active:     luis_carlos42

08 July 2017, 09:45:01 Last Active:     hannahmontana

ties in with

25 June 2017, 01:49:36 Last Active:       ser1ck u=524606 http://archive.is/1H3aQ
25 June 2017, 02:03:10 Last Active:       polloptc u=553006 http://archive.is/dTuLI

27 June 2017, 14:21:51 Last Active:       ExchangerPeru u=739810 http://archive.is/6qCp8
27 June 2017, 14:47:17 Last Active:       rechargeppwithbtc u=887324 http://archive.is/ExIIF

05 July 2017, 00:07:44 Last Active:       Humbertin19_ u=726260 http://archive.is/ekHDH
06 July 2017, 19:21:25 Last Active:       Champion Of PvP Humb u=798472 http://archive.is/32zko
06 July 2017, 22:00:46 Last Active:       HumberDice u=951868 http://archive.is/qhiEg
06 July 2017, 22:00:09 Date Registered:    HumberRoll u=1056284 http://archive.is/vuBHJ

---

while

24 July 2017, 02:20:14 Last Active:     gormett
26 July 2017, 09:55:02 Last Active:    danny_love
26 July 2017, 09:55:29 Last Active:    houvan92
27 July 2017, 10:41:13 Last Active:     renatash
27 July 2017, 12:56:02 Last Active:    eckynucky
31 July 2017, 12:38:20 Last Active:    napoetr15

fit in with

22 July 2017, 02:42:25 Last Active:       DavidThomas u=954849 http://archive.is/v2bmo

29 July 2017, 22:03:38 Last Active:       DavidXXXX u=875854 http://archive.is/4tMcn

30 July 2017, 13:55:40 Last Active:       HumberRoll u=1056284 http://archive.is/vuBHJ
30 July 2017, 19:52:35 Last Active:       cryptonauten u=978923 http://archive.is/kHn2o

as possible / probable connections.

Am starting to get into the rarefied atmosphere, have just ticked over 1,204 activity...

I have Bitcoin Core version v0.14.0 (64-bit) (running from about 36 hours prior to 1^st Aug) - it's now showing two "banned peers" since after the 1^st August GMT (never had any prior to then in previous runnings of program) - is this related to the above?  Is there somewhere you can point me to read up on this please?

You should tag them yourself first...

In any event,

all except were created in a narrow band between the 3rd and 6th of August 2016. and just two more the 11th and 13th of July 2016

Other activities around this time include:

06 July 2016, 04:02:54 Last Active:       Humberton19 u=842007 http://archive.is/QVa3m
07 July 2016, 00:59:11 Date Registered:    DavidXXXX u=875854 http://archive.is/4tMcn

29 July 2016, 10:10:47 Last Active:       TheRealCryptonaut u=559382 http://archive.is/txpV7

10 August 2016, 09:47:52 Date Registered:    rechargeppwithbtc u=887324 http://archive.is/ExIIF

while

20 August 2014, 02:18:15 Date Registered:    cryptonaut420 u=368452 http://archive.is/N9r1P

28 September 2014, 18:56:08 Date Registered:    nasashi u=382175 http://archive.is/o0H3y

could be close enough to be connected ??  In any event, nasashi is the first UID of that particular cluster.

and

03 August 2016, 23:55:09 Date Registered:        rekcahxfb u=884467 http://archive.is/T9MJR
06 August 2016, 00:32:10 Last Active:     rekcahxfb   u=884467 http://archive.is/T9MJR

could show which UID Alt Farmer ^TM created those accounts.

rechargeppwithbtc (owned by Humbertin / DavidXXXX etc) could also have been bought in the same UID Alt Farmer ^TM sale.

I can't see where you are quoting from...


New reports should be formatted thus:


Archiving posts that you are relying on also helps: http://archive.is/

The "Level of awesomeness" is subjective due to Lauda being selective in acknowledging which posts contain proof.   

How do we get a permanent node set up?

We seem to be on our own, besides, if it can't mine past 48070, why not? How can you mine two more after rolling back one block?