the way I see it, small cloud outfits are the future and most beneficial to the miner - spreading the hashrate between many is far better than the building the likes of 3 datorhalls and mining for yourself. I'm happy to invest in this because it's not centralising anything, it's spreading the wealth. If you don't get that fact, you remain; a clueless troll.  some people will never change. Investing in PMBs is investing in centralized mining--small mining companies, if successful, grow to become large mining companies. If you are against centralized mining, don't invest in aspiring mining concerns--buy a miner and mine. Or, at least, troll elsewhere. you clearly have no idea where bitcoin mining is going. are you going to run a 100TH/s rig in your spare room by the time difficulty gets to 100billion? reality check. I do have an idea where bitcoin mining is going, and perhaps it has already arrived. It is highly centralized, and becoming more so. Thanks for making this possible by funding ASIC manufacturers and investing in centralized mines. Of course, history has shown that you'll lose money in the process of doing both, but to me that's a small solace |
|
|
|
|
^Not sure what you mean by "real IPO," but the appeal of an unlicenced Panamanian exchange is precisely the lack of such intrusive due diligence.
|
|
|
|
the way I see it, small cloud outfits are the future and most beneficial to the miner - spreading the hashrate between many is far better than the building the likes of 3 datorhalls and mining for yourself. I'm happy to invest in this because it's not centralising anything, it's spreading the wealth. If you don't get that fact, you remain; a clueless troll. some people will never change. Investing in PMBs is investing in centralized mining--small mining companies, if successful, grow to become large mining companies. If you are against centralized mining, don't invest in aspiring mining concerns--buy a miner and mine. Or, at least, troll elsewhere. |
|
|
|
Up for me. 26 shares already sold  |
|
|
|
...
i gave no opinion, simply subscribing to the thread with my intent. go away, arsewipe.
ADD: I note by your signature that you are a gambling addict - each to their own.
I note by your signature you pimp Spondoolies  |
|
|
|
|
There's also all the grossly devalued assets (HIF being one of them) and delisted offerings that must be replaced (NEOBEE[Q] and COG come to mind).
|
|
|
|
How is havelock operating at a loss? Don't get generate 1BTC from each issued share per month + any initial entrance fees + trading fee's? They must be pulling in $5-6,000 a month, I don't understand how thats not an operatable budget at this point :O
Err... Perhaps you should ask Havelock? https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BxnW49twNMNbX0tic1N6VVpaV28/edit |
|
|
|
I think Havelock is a trustable exchange...
According to Havelock's latest "financial statement," it is operating at a loss. IPOs are a great way to increase trading volume, hence the latest series of IPOs. ~Happy investing |
|
|
|
...All is Kosher.
... Oy vey... |
|
|
|
...
We've due diligence all the parties involved, and I'm 100% confident.
Moreover, hefty collateral has been taken.
... My understanding is Havelock sends you the take from this IPO, so your risks are negligible to nonexistent. Why the "hefty collateral"? |
|
|
|
...
But, unfortunately, in our corporate rules it is prohibited to discuss such questions on puplic.
...  |
|
|
|
@Havelock; provasic; cbcm.co: I warned you to hunt responsibly, now it's too late. The noble Bitcoin Investor has been hunted into extinction  The American Passenger Pigeon, once a staple food of American Indians, is now extinct. Consider the chilling parallels between this noble bird's tragic tale and the plight of the Bitcoin Investor. "At a nesting site in Petoskey, Michigan in 1878, 50,000 birds Bitcoin investors were killed each day for nearly five months. The surviving adults attempted a second nesting at new sites, but were killed by professional hunters before they had a chance to raise any young."[1]
...
"Still another way [of hunting Bitcoin investors] was to simply set a nesting tree on fire, cooking the doves investors or collecting them as they tried to escape."[1]
...
"Two farmers from the vicinity of Russelsville, distant more than a hundred miles, had driven upwards of three hundred hogs to be fattened on the pigeons Bitcoin investors which were to be slaughtered. Here and there, the people employed in plucking and salting what had already been procured, were seen sitting in the midst of large piles of these birds amateur financiers. The dung lay several inches deep, covering the whole extent of the roosting-place."[1]1. Passenger Pigeon, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passenger_Pigeon#Hunting |
|
|
|
...
In law there is a difference between doing something intentionally (like "I am going to kill xyz") and doing something while incapable of reasoning or similar (like being wasted and hitting someone so that he unintentionally falls on the road)... In finance,  |
|
|
|
... BG wants to ensure Ken fails and thats why he's on here campaigning.
... Why, after pimping this thing and [allegedly] investing his own money? I'm afraid I must agree with Bargraphics regarding your poor mental hygiene. |
|
|
|
|
Have no preferences re. how you lose money. Just wanna keep up with the doings of major international financiers such as yourself.
|
|
|
|
...we have a couple of 'larger' investors speaking with us so that may end up not being the case.
Naturally. Met them while discussing your five-dollar ponzi investment, did you? |
|
|
|
|
Bargraphics, in a stroke of comedic genius, introduces a "virtual identity totally owned by the Active Mining Corporation (Belize) that represents both itself and its profits" (AKA Ken) to a "stealth ASIC company" (AKA People's ASIC).
As the newly-forged conglomerate [oddly] fails to prosper, the hijinks intensify as Bargraphics places a call to the MSD.
|
|
|
|
...
Also that 150,000 shares was worth about $90,000 at the time, so the IP couldn't have been really worth that much right?
Worth ~$500 nao |
|
|
|
@Bargraphics: Stop being such a huge faggot petulant child. How hard is it to post a Bizpedia link? And what does the link tell me about Ken's involvement with People's Asic? @kleeck: How's that quality information you traded on panning out? Make you rich yet?  |
|
|
|
... Does anyone know who they are/if they exist/they dealt with Ken (never heard of People's Asic), or is Bargraphic's word cannon?
You love to do research yet you can't even look back when this deal was announced and people posted links to People's ASIC and confirmed they existed? Even if they did "come on here" you would simply say that it was an alt account of someone. What exactly would you be comfortable with that could be used as "proof"? I have no problem asking People's ASIC to make a post on here but I highly doubt they even want to get involved. PS: People's ASIC as far as I know were never Employees of Ken. Simply contractors that guided Ken on how to proceed with making the chips and sourcing parts for the HashFast board. Their shares were not tradable just like the rest of us and I do not believe they ported them to CT. Instead of snarky comebacks, could you simply answer my question? Who/what is People's Asic (company details/registration), and names of the parties involved. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
