If you notice I didn't tag the account @Marcogwapo because I can't proof you guys are connected i only stated the obvious as for the negative comments on my trust page, a quick review of them you'll notice they're all false and just emotional retaliative feedbacks just like yours which i don't care about.

I don't also leave retaliative feedbacks if not I would had done so to all the accounts on my page including @Marcogwapo The feedback stays until you have proven ownership of the account with a valid proof like sign message from either your staked bitcoin address or previously used bitcoin address before the password and email were changed.

Although I might consider removing my feedback if you can prove ownerships of account others might not since you tried sales of account (which is frowd at by many including myself) and also tried what i just mentioned in OP.

This user ramsdaj28 posted on the auction board few hours ago advertising to sell his Snr member account. Looking through the account, the password has already been changed twice (source: BPIP) and email was recently changed too [source: Trust page]

Aftering leaving a negative feedback on the account the user tried to act smart by moving the topic to Bitcoin discussion board (source: account's post history) so the evidence of attempt to sell account can be removed since the auction board doesn't offer such privileges. Unfortunately for the user, I have already achieved the thread before he could do that.  Archive link: http://archive.is/oSp1V

I presume the account to be a hacked account until proven otherwise and request for visible negative feedback from DT members should be given to the account.

From his PM there are possible reasons for me to assume this user Marcogwapo is connected to the account somehow since he promised to retaliate and that account has already left a false tag on my account but since I can't prove the accounts to be connected to each other except the fact that, the account has received Smerit from the accused on a deleted post, that'll be a story for another day .

Seen and just opposed the false flag. Those supporters are just alts, hope you don't mind bringing up another accusation against the account for abusing the flag & trust system by registering alts just to support a false flag against you. Seems the account need more negative feedbacks.

To the accused (@SpectreSecurity), if you feel you have be wrongly accused (which i doubt it's the case) you appeal by bringing out valid evidence to support your claims and not being an asshole by abusing the flag & trust system.

When I did my very first and only infographic on the forum; [Infographic]: Guide on possible reasons to leave a -ve/+ve trust feedbacks. Forget about my simple template, just needed to pass an information. I did used Canva: Graphic Design & Logo, Flyer, Poster maker. Note: the link leads directly to Google playstore. I downloaded the app with my mobile phone, after creating the infographic downloaded it to my phone then uploaded on imgur before uploading on forum. I didn't have any knowledge about creating infographic so that was the easiest way I could used.

Although you have to upgrade your account to have privileges to more features, their free account has hundreds of different template and designs you can choose from and the App is quite easy to navigate. Haven't used the App since then to inform you about any possible chances to expect but you can try it out might just give you what you want.

bros, welcome oh sorry say the thread no dey active like dat but feel free to ask any questions wey you get and I go answer or direct u go right source. True say if you use ur head wella you fit make small cash legitimately 4rm the forum but no too carry am for mind so you no go turn spammer wey just dey post because dem dey pay am. Welcome again, enjoy yourself wella and try obey all rules so u no go regret am.

If you ask me, i would say the first match was staged report also confirmed Anthony Joshua made alot of money from that match and who knows he might have placed a big money bet against himself through someone.  Joshua is far better than Andy Ruiz both physically and in their fighting skills so if this match don't get staged like the previous I don't think Andy Euiz can have a chance against our Joshua. He's a Nigerian, he's my pick any day any time. He has proven himself to be one of the best in the business so I foresee him winning.

Reading you comment just made me laugh. The two best teams in Europe currently and best teams in english playing their very first match of the season then you predict a draw against a lesser, wicker and one of them were just promoted to the Premier league. Sound funny to me, Man City haven't lost their last 15 premier league matches and you expect them to loss to West Ham lol. Thanks you just made me laugh.

Congrats he did but I suppose Everton goalless draw just ruined your chance of winning the jackpot prize for matchday 1. I must say, I didn't see this coming, Tottenham scoring 3goals, Harry kane scoring twice in the timeframe of 4 minutes was another surprise. Thought the highest Tottenham could get was a draw after the game was still 1-0 in favor of Aston Villa at the 70th minute mark. Well congrats to Tottenham fans here game ended 3-1 in favor of you guys.

The user is just looking for a way to get back at @tvplus006 for exposing their projects shady behavior, plagiarized work of others via their whitepaper. The user has already left retaliation feedbacks for all those who tagged his account for plagiarism (including myself) but I guess that wasn't enough. That's why the user is now coming up with a made-up story.

The project is a joke so don't take any misleading information he writes here seriously. Next time you will always give reference to those that deserve it instead of copy pasting others work or maybe come up with write ups that are yours.

A simple guess is, the user is just trying to get into a paid bitcoin signature campaign anything soon as most campaigns now requires at least 5+ earned merit to be eligible or altcoin signature campaigns that require earned merits to be accepted (seen few lately with that requirement). The possibilities of both account been operated by the small individuals is there but since there isn't any evidence we just have to assume they're different individuals.

OP since you're kinda interested in the accounts involve you can keep an eye on what the reciever does next like if account trys to join a campaign that requires earned merit. Then the whole merit transaction becomes suspicious for now it's just one of those emotional meriting cases.

Quick question @FJ how do I locate my matchday 1 predictions? When I login it only shows me matchday 2 games to predict.


Everton just cost us a chance to win lol if only Richalison could finish that through pass from the corner kick in the first half . The game ended goalless. He was also my pick to win.


Their announcement stated, predict 7 goalscorers so it should be goalscorers of the matches irrespective of their teams and not who scores first.

Who were the dreamers thinking Manchester city won't respond to Liverpool's victory last night lol. Perfect respond from City, 5 goals advantage and a clean sheet. Sterling was awesome earning himself the first hat trick of the season and man of the match award. 1 down, 6 more to go via the FJ prediction contest.

@Pamoldar, what makes you think H. Kane would deliver? history doesn't favor him, remember it's not September yet lol my pick and yours have two similarities lets watch out for the outcome.

Doubt this even happen on the forum although there are other lending platforms you can take advantage of, for that long but still you can experience short period luck on the forum just like the one you mentioned. Taking a weekly loan when bitcoin was $13,000 +/- and repaying when it dropped to $9200 +/- but you have to convert to USD to profit.

This isn't always the case though, my last loan months back, was an Ethereum non-collateral loan used for trading. Did make profit via USD value but due to the spike in ETH value my profit was reduced by almost 80% when I tried buying back the ETH to replay loan.

I also disagree with your statement, in my opinion the major difference has to do with their money mindset. What they consider to be assets and liabilities. While an investor is all about making the profit, a common man or non investor (to be precise) is just about surviving. He doesn't care about investing his money for profits, all he's concerned about is how to put food on his table, survive the next day and life continues.

Using method of talking a loan to differentiate between them isn't that appropriate as they both can take loan for self satisfaction although the investors will only apply for that loan because he needs it while the common man will do the same but because he wants it.

If i knew it all I won't have asked this question and you don't have to be a Nigerian to contribute to the discussion. Economy has the same meaning anypart of the world you come from. Don't think any nation have accepted bitcoin legally as you suggest if it's accepted in my country. The question has to do with the benefits, what are the benefits other countries are recieving that we can tap into. So far only few user have given me something to think about other are just posting generic spam say bitcoin will benefit the country if we accept it bla bla bla. Conclusion bitcoin is just like every other currencies accepting it doesn't automatically mean your economy will improve. So I guess what we should be promoting is the blockchain technology and not bitcoin.

Well this wasn't your average bounty campaign, it was a paid bitcoin campaign. The manager to my understanding have been employed as a part of the team. It started as a BM job but from his comments he's now a part of the team. The project is originated from Korea and they have physical casinos so were just trying to get online audience for their online casino. Understandable the BM is now in charge of all english activities and further campaigns are to be launch soon which he'll also be in charge of. Therefore to my understanding he's now like an english representative of the project.

Since I have gotten enough support, topic will be locked now. If you have any other information that say otherwise feel free to PM and I'll unlock the topic for more debate.

The thing is neither the project or BM are concerned about the tagged. They have indicated that numerous times and have taken their final decision. It make no sense we debating about an issue when the affected parties aren't showing any concern.

@mikeywith, As the image shows the user CHUDI did point out to the BM that when he comes out openly to support the decision of the team not to pay the participants when he did approved the removal of signature that does send a wrong signal to the community. And before that user must have suggested that to the BM, it means the BM must had showed support for the team's decision. Like I say some message have already been deleted so I can't get the whole message. Due to insults and messages they consider to be fud starting popping up in the group the BM did delete some messages so I hope you don't mind joining the group to ask questions and possibly get answers you need to convince you. Here's the group link: https://t.me/AnyoneLTD

There are thousands of messages and I can't scroll through all to give you want you want, you can verify all the information you want from the group (it's somehow active so won't take you time to get answers and leave the group)

Currently watching the match, just pause to drop this comment here. My prediction is going quite well, Mo salah has his goal, Liverpool are 4 goals up. Just knew they'll score more than 3 goals but never thought all will be in the first half. With this form liverpool can easily score 6 goals but still stand on the 5 goals mark.

Thanks for the competition and I'm glad it's free, did registered few minutes after you made the post and have already predicted my 7 goalscorers although I'm not happy i didn't get a chance to predict on the Liverpool match. With my pick on Salah would had been 1 down 6 more to go

Understandable one of the users affected (in the person of @tvplus006, have indicated interest not to flag the manager therefore there isn't much we can do as we weren't affected directly. So unless another user comes in to give a different point of view then we can engage on the debate of whether to support, ignore or oppose the flag.

For now I suggest, just the projects accounts on forum should be tagged (given negative feedback) as they're the ones refusing to pay the bounty participants.

You know though, this medicine after death practice the forum is using (tag after scam has already been committed) isn't actually solving the problem, as most time the hunters don't still get paid. We need new effective solutions.

@mikeywith, just did a quick search via the "boss words" on the telegram group since that word was used in the group mostly when the final decision came in. I left the groupchat same day this thread was created as I saw no benefits of staying in the group as they have decided not pay as indicated above. I notice some earlier comments have been deleted but this image below will give you an idea of what happened that resulted to my tag on his account.


If you have been following the scam accusation you would notice at first, I opposed the suggestion of a tag on his account but after observing the follow up comments from the BM the whole issue just looked staged to me.

Neither the team or BM are concerned about the tag on their account (they have indicated that numerous times on the groupchat) that's also why, they haven't made any statement to defend themselves on any of the accusation thread although they're all aware of the scam accusation against them.