Okay, I told as the person already got 5 negative trusts. We can't recover anything by creating scam accusation. And the negative trust stands for not to trade with the person whom profile we see "trade with extreme caution". But Op has traded with that person. Scammer always scammer but a legit person might be a scammer. I thought 5 negative trust where there is no positive trust might be the same for 10/12 negative trust.

Anyway, it is right that creating more accusation if they really scammed then we will be able to know that the person still scamming. Where there is required to check too much thing before making a deal who has no feedback or has positive feedback as they might be a scammer. But op traded with the person who already marked as a scammer.

I just cut the line to encourage to create more scam accusation against scammer if they have been scammed by a proven scammer.

Do you support merit abusing (merit buying), and multi accounts which have been used as merit abusing. As far as I know, merit trading is not allowed, so how merit buying can be trusted. They may not be engaged with account hacked but according to their words which you told they are merit abuser (merit trader) in this case, they can't be trusted. In this situation, I could not understand the reason to change your mind from negative to neutral.

They have not kept their words but you have kept. Though there is still a chance they may create post on here.
You see the right thing which you wrote. I do not think merit buyer will tell publicly, As it will happen same for merit buying.

It cant be good collateral. Because it might be recovered by a social team. and also the price of the domain might be not accurate it can be manipulated.

I have seen your post but didn't reply as it is a too low amount. Anyway, I can try if you can pay 1.5$ extra from the PayPal charge. You will pay only if I can pay successfully.

Check it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5104729.msg49525034#msg49525034
Check it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5104729.msg49524958#msg49524958

All slots filled, so do not need to apply more and also there already 2 persons have duplicate entries.

I told it as you have offered something which is not valid and your rank is not enough for a loan without collateral. You are here for a long time though low activity but got negative trust as you could not fill the collateral requirement.

You can lock this thread or move to archival.

Transaction confirmed, thanks.

Payment confirmed. Thanks for fast communication, fast transaction, and friendly behavior. Don't hesitate to let me know if you need any more help.

Paypal fund sent. All confirmed on PM. Once you BTC send please post the transaction ID on: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5102555
As deal complete, you may lock the thread. Thanks.

Send me your PayPal email so that I can send PayPal to you. If you believe to take PayPal from me. Thanks. Waiting for your kind response.

You are a self-contradictory person. You have advised not to post on lending section but on your 19 posts 6 posts on the lending section where you are a newbie too.

You just got negative on your old profile though it is a newbie. If you contribute to this forum regularly by posting a helpful post then you could be a hero member and if so you could easily get this amount without getting a negative tag. The non-collateral loan is only for the good contributors to the forum. Your profile of the mentioned forum is useless as it might be recovered from the support team or social engineers.

You are too busy to make a post as you have to do a lot like this that's why you have mentioned one amount on the title and another amount on the body? Every lender can understand the intention of you so no one will give you loan about only a single satoshi.

It might be the more chances. If not, that's ok. Giving loan either taking this as collateral and non collateral almost the same for a lender.

It is because almost all lender thinks before listing on a good exchange token has no value as there is a chance not to be listed and if listed they don't know how much that would be and also when that would be.
If you read [EDU] The Rule of "No Collateral, No Loan" -----Updated Jan 26 2018----- then you would be able to know that the mentioned token cant be valid collateral.

Yes, I am interested. If you still need it please contact with me to make a successful trade. Waiting for your contact. Thanks in advance.

I got my repayment and again asked me another loan but I refused as asked more after paying first one. Though I got my repayment and now proved as a scammer, I have just withdrawn my feedback.
Edit: As account was on collateral the current owner of the account is blackrabbit1 who is already marked as a scammer. So, giving negative.

TMAN already told to provide four quality posts but OP failed to do so. Actually, OP is not trying to make quality post hence s/he is trying to buy a reputed account.

On real-life police work to stop the offense and on this forum DT try to stop the scam.

On Amazon that is for trading only and there, payment can be checked. There are a lot of worker works to stop scammer. And for trade, you have to pay the fee (I am not sure if I am wrong then correct me.) But bitcointalk is a discussion platform where trading is only a sub-board. I want to say sub sub board. And on here there is no fee deduct by the site. So you can't compare these two.

They have made a transaction or not so what? Let me give you an example: Police may catch a criminal but do you think every criminal make offense to the police? If not, then why they will catch?

As police catch criminal, to keep the forum scam free or make less scam DT will give feedback. You can exclude anyone if you do not trust that person so that person trust will show on your untrusted list.

To see the feedback you have to read comments and reference link sothat you would be able to know the actual reason, reason of that feedback.

Thanks a lot for reminding me. I have added Lauda on the list. Also Updated your recognition rank as well as recognition rank of all the listed users on this topic. Thanks again.