Since you dont have the seed you will need the password, do you remember anything about it?

btw, dont create two threads for one problem. It will only result in questions asked twice and one thread getting removed for spam.

After some back and forth, Im out.

I dont know what the deal is here, they do not seem to add me on steam. We agreed on a loan; we agreed on a sale, or at least that was my impression. From the sale thread it looks like the game isnt even tradable. I only do a few trades here and I dont have time for this. Do not contact me via PM or steam.

picture -> https://i.imgur.com/EC5JtS5.jpg
as posted here -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1055771.0

I agree and reported accordingly.

Its certainly helping the network more if the node runs 24/7.


I run mine off a VPS with 2 GB ram and a single core. It handles 50 connetions fine. The only "propblem" will be the disk space soon. I might be able to switch from SSD to HDD though as I dont need the extra speed anway.

Running it 5 minutes a day and only allowing outbound connections its still called a full node, as long as it can sync in that time. A full node is any network node that is capable of enforcing all the network rules.

Yes, there are other full node implementations though. Like btcd.

Just post the proof you have if you want anyone to care. All I see are your claims. I dont know you, thus I dont care much about your claim unless you can back them with something.

I wouldnt buy the game in case of a default no. I currently do not have the machine to play it properly. Im still considering whether to accept it as collateral alone or not. My understanding is also that its not a steam account (which would comes with additional risks), but a steam gift. Its an item that can be traded via steam and activated or traded further. Steams policy is to not reverse these transactions.

@Riley Nico: Im a bit busy right now, I will write you tonight (~2100 CEST) unless someone else already filled the loan. 12 hours should be enough pondering

The game would cover the loan amount (~106%), but not the interest. Is there anything else you could offer as collateral? Preferable on steam as well to keep it in one place.

I think its good to see posts like these from time to time. It shows that the community is fighting with the staff against spam. They are not that frequent either.

Yes, the bigger TX inputs had been confirmed for ages. This one was probably the one that was swept from the paper wallet.

Anyway...

No. SPV clients that allow you control over your private keys (like Multibit or Electrum) are for all general purposes as safe as a full node.

Its probably best to ask your personal friend for a loan in that case. According to the rating - thats missing a ref link - the loaned you way over 2 BTC in the past. So a loan as small as 0.2 should be no problem, no?

Edit: Please update the TX hash, you broke it somehow. Its probably easiest if you just provide a link instead of a two line hash with whitespaces.

updated, thanks.

links:
https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/tx/89803954bffa8589bc22e3824b60c36e319b640c950a68f2028701c2db551f79
https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/tx/44748803b88deb5d06f62a4b5fd563016ee18d43bdc2136c2550448ce32d9200

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rWBntJAvTmY

A right you are unable to act out is no right.


Yes, to decrease spam. Its probably mostly effective against the automated kind though. The limitations have been worse in the past. A discussion in meta with your newbie account would have been signigicantly more difficult while we still had the newbie jail.


Things change over time. Sometimes the change is positive, sometimes not. Your opinion that the development is bad is just that, an opinion. It is not the fact you try to make out of it. Whatever Satoshi would or would not think about the discussion at hand is irrelevant. They decided to fade into the shadows and let others handle things.


Really? You are the one thats hijacking thread after thread with this topic. You drag it back into the light whenever you can. Your points are always the same. Even this little back and forth is already spinning in circles.


So your only solution is an outright ban that might be a solution? Cant you see why this is not acceptable to others? You have nothing to offer but the hope for maybe a little bit, while at the same time creating a very difficult situation for the staff. Your suggestion is as efficient as the prohibition of drugs is helping addicts. Besides that you apparently want to keep the possibility or right to have alt accounts. Thus the only thing your solution would lead to is to drive the sales elsewhere. You would not keep a single scam from happening you would only affect those that trade in accounts for other reasons that are not related to scams.
Spam is a problem, but I currently see a very healthy development in that regard. BadBear has cleaned house enough to reach the elborated spammers, signature campaign managers actually care about the quality of their participants and act against spammers. There also have been several lengthy discussions about the topic and my personal impression is that the community in general is keeping an eye open in that regard.

Yes, you can selecte a little icon when you create a thread. Posts also have one if you want.

Your reason to have an alt is different from the reaons of others. Reasons that are not necessarily malicious. E.g. earning money from ones posts. IIRC Salty even gave a good explanations why signature campaigns in a sense make scams with "trusted" accounts (as in higher rank as well as in trading feedback received) more difficult and expensive.


With alt accounts essentially comes the trade with accounts. IMHO you cant have one without the other. If I am allowed to have a second account why should I not be allowed to use the 17th account of someone else. An account they no longer need or want. Since building an account takes time its only natural that I pay a certain amount for the time someone else invested in the account.

The reason might be as simple as Im spoiled and I dont want to be hindered by the limitations of a new account.

Yes, bought accounts might get used to scam someone, but thats true regardless if there is a rule against it or not. "Self-made" alt accounts can be used for scams as well. You either limit every person to a single account or they will get traded.

How do you suggest to solve this problem in a way that is decreasing the chance of successful scams? By an admin saying in some thread that its bad?

"Gay originally used to refer to feelings of being "carefree", "happy", or "bright and showy"[...]"

Its not as serious. Trust sold by OP would most likely be gay, because its mainly carefree as nothing was actually risked. I doubt it would be marketed as such to avoid confusion with lesbian trust, which can only be given by accounts under control by the people of Lesbos. As such lesbian trust is rare and highly valued.

As someone on DefaultTrust you should know.

I know for a fact the rank went down. I am however not certain how long it took. I know it was increasingly harder to delete or report posts as the activity went down and thus increased the time I have to wait to perform certain actions.

Its strange though isnt it. It seems its the same person behind all these accounts complaining, sounding like a broken record. The fact that you seek protection by the rule you deem bad has been pointed out several times. Still new accounts keep poping up, none providing any new arguments, just the same old "QS so bad". The only fruitful discussion with Salty is probably long forgotten and instead of staying on the level that might actually convince someone, more trolling.