According to the provided prof Rothschild99 is a scammer. And according to the this Archive, Soha 1 is also a scammer as the person selling other person material without permission who is the altar of Soha which has already been tagged as a hacked account. Which might be hacked or sold.

Quote for reference. How you configure the person of sythe and the mentioned person of bitcointalk are the same person?
Your reference link should be: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5098397.msg49403318#msg49403318 for the mentioned person.

It is because the price is comparatively low that's why people leaving this campaign and as a result, need to re-assign others to fill the blank slots.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=615953.msg49431615#msg49431615 is the latest update.

As you are not the owner of the discord then why you have posted the lending service here. Here only those people create topics who need a loan or provide a loan. As you are posting here if there is anything wrong then you will be responsible for that. Though there is no reason to believe you. You have just created an account only to promote other lending services. If they want to make the service then they will post it here.

I have just received this item:

Partial Repayment Confirmed. Now due: 0.45 ETH and 1% per day interest will be calculated. If more than one-week extension require and the borrower can repay interest weekly then interest will be 5% per week.

Archive to shorten the post., staked addres
BTC sent.
Trx: https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/70f4472dfd761f81c329899c8ee082a880b1fc1f69f5acd6d7931e436b0b2e42
Repayment address: 3JaFkXxj5g3MJRTDRH48mMUaKymvvLyMsk

Loan request accepted. You have to verify few things before I sent you the Bitcoin.
Please give stake address of your bitcoin address. And also provide sign message.
And also confirm me that you will not take any loan until you repay mine as well as you will not sell anything before the repayment which can be reversed.

2-shasan

Usually, it engaged with merit trading and/or sending merit to his/her own account. But sometime it may happen sothat we can concentrate on the merited person so that hacker can stay away. But as merited accounts are not high ranked that possibility is too low. There might have 5-10% chance to be random. If they trade those merit then it will be difficult to catch though we imagine they are engaged merit trading but if those are altered then we could tell 100% confidently. I will try to visit those profiles and try to get if there is any matching info.
Edit:
All merit has been sent within 6 minutes so there is more chance to alter account of the hacker.
All accounts received merit only from the hacked account.
They have not used any smerit. So, if they bought they could sell too. It is more chance to be altered of the hacker account.
Your mentioned 3 positive feedback was long ago in the meantime anyone's mind can be changed.

The hacker can sell those merits (or took merit to his accounts) or hacker can send merit randomly. If these accounts are connected then we would be able to tell undoubtedly that those are engaged with hacking or merit abusing.

You have written a long story which I do not want to make any more argument.
I have an offer and that is trying to take part in a good signature campaign and work hard. And then you would be able to earn the profit. In the meantime make your profile more reputed and stake your bitcoin wallet. If you really in need loan then people may consider your case. Base on your profile condition I do not think anyone will give you any loan without collateral.

I agree with it only about 25% rest 75% they are alter. Experienced merit abuser detector will be able to judge properly what that actually should be.

As account trading is not trustworthy taking account as collateral means 0 collateral and if default then from there lender can get 0 satoshi. But by taking account as collateral may decrease more scam activity as Borrower will not have any access of the account. But if the lender is the same of borrower I mean if lender trades the account then his personal account as well as selling account should be tagged negatively. As happened for grtthegreat

Reserve

Archive to shorten the post.
Partial Repayment, Combine all into one, new loan amount and repayment date are confirmed.

Why only account buyer will be tagged? If tag requires then it should be both for seller and buyer. Isn't it?

You have received the highest number of valid collateral according to your lending time. It is because you are a DT as well as a high ranked person, no negative trust etc.
On the other hand Crypto Capital is a member and also no positive trust, no DT power as a result though s/he has escrowed fund yet almost no loan with valid collateral.

For zazarb who is a reputed member as well as high ranked got a good number of valid collateral but not better than yours comparing time.

Probably you have not read my lending rules and edited time of those rules. That incident happened before my new rules. And edited rules marked as red. Also after editing archived that. See post number 2.