|
Going to throw about 870 KH/s at kittehcoin for a while. Lets see what happens. Anyone who cares to join in can do so at the link below.
|
|
|
|
yeah, kinda sucks. Didn't think it would be this hard to get a piece of kitteh...  ya maybe the devs will hard fork it earlier since it could be a month or longer to reach the 131XXX target. No, catcoin made that mistake after they were warned by several community members. The best course of action is to promote the coin, not apply an "instant gratification" fix. Anyone that wants to contribute hash can do so to my public mining pool http://kittehcoin.securepayment.cc. Block finders (who use their kittehcoin address) will get half the block reward. |
|
|
|
Hashrate has dropped significantly: Network Difficulty: 49.1683 - Network Hash Rate: 790 MH/s Might be possible to mine this again for a while. |
|
|
|
Stop fixating on price and focus on how we can spread KittehCoin adoption and make it easier for merchants to accept MEOW. If you build it they will come. If you sit there whining about how you haven't become rich of KittehCoin then you're not really in this for the community and you're probably better crypto-hopping. For those complaining about price- what have you done to help KittehCoin? Aside from buy some hoping to get rich? If your answer is nothing then maybe you should think about what you CAN do to help.
Team is looking for a solid Marketing/PR person, if this is you or you know someone who would be interested please contact me via PM. We have awesome new stuff coming and want to make sure its announced properly and in a global way.
Sorry I was a bit MIA yesterday (I will be today as well, damn meetings all day) but we are already running 0.8.6.2 KittehCoin on test networks with Kimoto Gravity Well difficulty algo to address drive-by-miners and hashrate fluctutations. This is what we do instead of wringing our hands about price, you should try doing something constructive for KittehCoin too, like zachamo is doing.
Is Kittehcoin 0.8.6.2 based on the newer Bitcoin code? |
|
|
|
|
Everyone wants the price to go up so they can sell their multi-million kittehcoin stash for Bitcoin, convert to fiat currency, and then retire on a tropical island somewhere.
This is exactly the reason why the price won't go up that high.
|
|
|
|
next doge?
Bigger than doge. |
|
|
|
Well, I'm no whale, I'm just a small goldfish. I'm a miner. I mined a bit when this kitty first came out after the doggy. I choose this kitty over that other kitty (CAT), I'm retiring for the night, and putting my coins back to fiat. I believe those walls are traps, Sum of bid volume is too low to keep this price. I have no confidence in any coins for the next three days. So GL.
That other kitty had a lot of potential but the developer was talked into forking (for the wrong reasons). I was able to solo mine one block before the fork. I switched over to Kitteh afterwards. |
|
|
|
|
MEOW/DOGE hasn't seen the same major drop as MEOW/BTC
|
|
|
|
What are you using as the trade engine?
umm, we're using the trade engine? I'm just wondering since the Github page say "trade engine is closed source and not included" |
|
|
|
|
What are you using as the trade engine?
|
|
|
|
By comparison with the recent code from github I am only getting 190kh/s when I use autotune. Crashes otherwise.
somehow running two or more GPUs in one cudaminer instance is no longer working. workaround: run two cudaminers, one with -d 0, the other with -d 1 getting less kHash/s with the github version? consider using the Y kernel instead. Christian Better with Y kernel: [2014-01-28 16:17:18] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 660 Ti, 286.84 khash/s
[2014-01-28 16:17:28] Stratum detected new block
[2014-01-28 16:17:28] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 660 Ti, 286.53 khash/s
[2014-01-28 16:17:39] Stratum detected new block
[2014-01-28 16:17:39] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 660 Ti, 282.79 khash/s
[2014-01-28 16:17:46] Stratum detected new block
[2014-01-28 16:17:46] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 660 Ti, 280.32 khash/s
[2014-01-28 16:18:01] Stratum detected new block
[2014-01-28 16:18:01] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 660 Ti, 284.01 khash/s
[2014-01-28 16:18:04] Stratum detected new block
[2014-01-28 16:18:04] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 660 Ti, 280.76 khash/s
[2014-01-28 16:18:13] Stratum detected new block
[2014-01-28 16:18:13] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 660 Ti, 283.66 khash/s
[2014-01-28 16:18:15] Stratum detected new block
[2014-01-28 16:18:15] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 660 Ti, 279.79 khash/s 32-bit build with github code -H 1 -d 1 -i 0 -l Y7x32 |
|
|
|
Getting some weirdness with my EVGA 660 GTX Ti's :  64-bit 12/18/2013 build -a scrypt -H 1,1 -d 0,1 -i 0,0 -l K7x32,K7x32 EVGA Model: 02G-P4-4069-KB It seems to accept the shares and it doesn't crash. But why? By comparison with the recent code from github I am only getting 190kh/s when I use autotune. Crashes otherwise. |
|
|
|
dead?
It's Alive. Giving the original developer a month to appear before we clone the repository and re-launch. |
|
|
|
|
Does anyone know if these optimization were ever backported into pooler's CPU miner?
I have a few G5's sitting around doing nothing.
|
|
|
|
Definitely a lot more nodes coming online recently: [connections] => 100
[difficulty] => 7.83777079
Went from just 20 yesterday to 100 right now. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
