fuck it .. here's the code:
****-****-****-**
Scanning reciept now. Will send to you in a few.
Dont scam me pls.
OP sent me a bogus code. I'm done with this foolery. The one he sent me for $200, I redeemed. I'm not sure what method you used to check it, but on moneypak.com it always asks me for the ZIP code it was purchased in. If you were not provided that, or the receipt (as I was), you would not have been able to redeem it, I believe. |
|
|
|
|
FirstAscent still using the Newspeak dictionary, I see (in quotes).
|
|
|
|
|
Aw, bit.me is already taken, would have let freewil get it.
bitcoin.me redirects to bitly.com, weird.
|
|
|
|
|
Ain't closed until the OP locks his/her own topic.
|
|
|
|
|
The way I read it, the self in self-defense refers to any innocent human being, not just 'yourself', as much as the auto in autopsy doesn't refer to a medical examiner performing his/her own post-mortem examination after becoming a zombie or posessing someone else's body to figure out their own cause(s) of death. The 'auto' refers to examination of a human being, and a necropsy is of animals.
|
|
|
|
Let me rephrase: do I have the right to endanger your life? Is it only morally wrong if you actually get hurt? Can the proposed ethical rule, "No one may endanger the life of another person," be applied universally to all people without creating any logical contradictions? No moral is absolute. But if the only problems we have in the world are gray areas like, "is it OK to lie about your wife's whereabouts if someone wants to kill her?" then we shall hardly need philosophers at all. If someone wants to kill your wife, it's imperative that you lie about her whereabouts to anyone who asks, as that lie is an act of self*-defense. Unless your wife is in a bunker and ready to shoot anyone who tries to storm it to kill her, then I'd follow her directive and not lie about where she is. *Meaning any innocent human being, not just 'yourself'. |
|
|
|
$40 at GoxLast:  |
|
|
|
I see myrkul is against speeding tickets. Because, if nobody gets hurt, no harm done, right? I should have the right to go as fast as I want, so long as nobody gets hurt, right?
Do I have the right to load a single bullet into a revolver, spin the chamber, aim at your head, and pull the trigger?
If the gun doesn't go off, no harm done. But if it does, then it's too late. Punishing me now won't bring you back to life. Therefore, there should be some deterrent against performing the aforementioned Russian Roulette scenario. Perhaps it's even morally wrong to endanger someone's life?
There is a deterrent, however infringed into oblivion it might be: the right to self defense. All assembled guns are to be treated as always loaded, and if you point a gun at me, you have only the right to be shot, or if at point blank range (impractical to draw), be disarmed with a knife through your wrist or a broken wrist, and have your gun figuratively shoved up your attempted homicidal ass. |
|
|
|
I'll take a MP but I only have  to sell. |
|
|
|
|
Sending as a gift doesn't make a bloody difference! 180 days later, PayPal will chargeback 'gifts'!
|
|
|
|
sent you a pm
Already taken care of, feel free to close this mods.
|
|
|
|
If you've received more than 1 BTC completely randomly, out of the blue, and 100% unexplained in the past few days, post your public key below (and please sign with it if you feel comfortable doing so, otherwise it's the honor system as far as us believing it's really your key). My unsure if related topic.To my knowledge and according to a few others, this is the first Christmas since the invention of Bitcoin that anyone has received random BTC "gifts". 2012 is also the year of the Bitcoinica and Bitfloor hacks (any others I'm missing)? |
|
|
|
BTW: When people say chances of collision is low they don't mean 'low' as people use the word in normal everyday life. In reality the chances are infinitely small. The chance of Sol going supernova in the next microsecond is considerably larger then the chance of a collision ever occurring. For a properly generated address, right. But this one came from a closed source vanity address generator of dubious design. The generator I used: http://nyhm.net/bitcoin/vanity/The topic about the generator: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=76038.0Note my post above and at the vanity generator topic. One thing I want to make sure I understand: BTC are being sent to your public vanity address, not taken from it, yes? This is, of course, very important. It's a wild leap to go from receiving BTC at an address to considering the possibility of a collision. If BTC is ever taken from the address without your direct intervention, then that's another thing. (Even in that case, it's much more likely your private key was compromised in some way, rather than a collision.) So, I'm keen to follow this very interesting situation, and will assist in any way possible. Here's what folks can do (as will I): Run the vanity generator with the same first bits in question (or the whole thing for that matter). If anyone hits upon the target address, let us know (and prove it). In fact, if you can ever produce any duplicate address, it would be remarkable, and the research would certainly be valuable for the Bitcoin/bitcoinj community (the generator uses the bitcoinj library to produce addresses). (PS I actually have some updates in the works for this utility, but I'll keep the v0.4 version up there for now. Note the clear warnings on the page.) EDIT: There's an (undocumented) command-line switch for non-gui searching. Try this: java -jar VanityAddress-v0.4.jar TBZ --case-sensitiveYep, thanks. 519.704 total was sent to it, and nothing was taken. Since receiving that amount (and 0.1337 BTC inbetween that I won in a "first person to post your address gets free BTC" contest), I split off the 519.704 (minus 1 satoshi) amount to another key, and my own BTC to another key. This way, 1) If someone does have the same private key for 1TBZjmXho6mdGhoESaMV2svtqJXYtWfEp, they can't spend my BTC 2) If they are paying attention to their balances, it will appear their BTC has been stolen, so hopefully they will find this topic 3) Hopefully this will prevent confusion in other ways. |
|
|
|
BTW: When people say chances of collision is low they don't mean 'low' as people use the word in normal everyday life. In reality the chances are infinitely small. The chance of Sol going supernova in the next microsecond is considerably larger then the chance of a collision ever occurring. For a properly generated address, right. But this one came from a closed source vanity address generator of dubious design. The generator I used: http://nyhm.net/bitcoin/vanity/The topic about the generator: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=76038.0 |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
