I'm back, and disappointed but unsurprised to find that OP hasn't made any kind of sensible response to my posts. Reading mad's posts makes me think he's a conspiracy theorist.
The word "sheeple" in someone's vocabulary is pretty much unique in this respect. Using it three times in a short succession is quite conclusive: 12:41:40 (755992) <raylene> keep on being sheeple and learn critical thinking or else I've got a bridge to sell you 12:48:40 (755992) <raylene> you could call me an altruist I guess, I help you sheeple fight darwinism by protecting you from scams 12:57:19 (755992) <raylene> because sheeple that's why
Dooglus appears to be as transparent as possible without risking the safety of his investors/players.
You could say the same about the owners of Gox before it all went down, I just want to encourage critical thinking and make people question their blind decisions. You couldn't say anything like the same about MtGox. They never published a list of user balances, and only once (to my knowledge) did any kind of proof of holding coins with the 424242 BTC transaction or whatever it was. What you could say about MtGox would be: "MtGox held large amounts of customer funds but never proved they were solvent. It was therefore not particularly surprising when they declared bankruptcy. Just-Dice on the other hand proves their solvency every week, and has been doing so since shortly after launch, well before MtGox shut down, so there's really no similarity". That would be more truthful but wouldn't help your case. I wonder what your real motivation is behind this witch hunt. Is it something to do with your own failed casino site I wonder? Weren't you the guy who tried to copy JD's investment model on a crappy video-based roulette site and ended up "losing" customer funds somehow? so... guys casinobit.net is apparently a very nice casino, owned by yours truly... as an alt account of course.
"Yours truly" means "me", not "him". Doesn't it? Oh, by the way I managed to find the post where I was previously called a scammer for not publishing transaction IDs. It's from "tmbp" who I've long believed to be the guy who ran casinobit (into the ground), and I'm not the only one: It's funny because this thread is garbage and every poster here has a Trust rating of -10 or less.
It is, because most of them are either the scammers that I have reported or their shills, they also get pissed off and neg rep me too. Where is the list of all the bets together with txids that are on the blockchain on Just-dice.com?
Just-Dice doesn't fill the blockchain with bets. If you had done any research at all you would know that. Dooglus, stop trying to twist your way out of this, where is the list of the txids of the desposits of all the accounts on your website?
|
|
|
My point was that if someone leaves out this huge potential flaw in the logic of their website in exchange for little to no (supposed) gain then it is incredibly suspicious.
But this isn't a flaw in logic at all. It's a decision not to release personal information about JD customers to the public. If I theoretically decided to run an online casino but not integrate any provable fairness at all and assure players that I will choose a random number from 0 to 10 on every bet in an honest manner, am I then a scammer despite the players having no concrete evidence showing that I am favoring one of them?
I don't see the relevance. JD is provably fair. Whether or not there are "fake" bets on the site is unrelated to whether the site plays fair with the "real" bets. But to answer your question, "no". You're not a scammer if you make a non-provably fair game. Almost no fiat gambling site in the world is provably fair. What makes you a scammer is if you are scamming people, not the absence of proof of the absence of scam. My opinion is that dooglus is a scammer until proven otherwise, the fact is that there is a huge flaw which could potentially be exploited.
Opinions are like assholes; everybody has one. You can think what you want. Others might be tempted to share your opinion if you could present it in a way that makes sense to them. If there's a flaw, please describe it and how it could be exploited? What's the worse that could happen if I was some evil MySQL/PHP-fueled genius with a fake bet machine? What's the doomsday scenario here? You seem to be comparing JD to MtGox, but JD is provably solvent, and whether or not Gox had "fake trades" on their site wasn't related to their eventual demise. So what gives?
|
|
|
Please post the logs, one second you disappear because "someone is hacking the cold wallet" another second one of your other moderators supposedly bans me accidentally. Just that fact alone should make players cautious.
The bit about the cold wallet was meant as a joke. Someone said: 12:43:58 (759608) <kelvinnia> hell he has access to all the invested btc , if he was looking to scam 12:44:10 (759608) <kelvinnia> he might as well do it like how inputs.io did
to which I replied: 12:44:23 (1) <@dooglus> oops. I think I see a hacker in the cold wallet! 12:44:24 (1) <@dooglus> brb 12:44:26 (1) <@dooglus> etc
Sorry if you didn't get that. You see, hackers can't get into the cold wallet. Because it's cold (ie. offline). Funny, right? Sigh. Anyway, here's the full unedited log: 12:33:51 (755992) <raylene> Dooglus 12:33:56 *** vinton (757025) [#1194409853] bet 1.57 BTC at 49.5% and won 1.57 BTC *** 12:33:59 (755992) <raylene> if your website is indeed not a scam 12:34:07 (755992) <raylene> why not add the deposit txid to every bet? 12:34:17 (755992) <raylene> this would prove that the user has actually made a deposit and is real 12:34:31 (755992) <raylene> not some bot running queries on your mysql database 12:34:44 (1) <@dooglus> biggest 4 weeks: Oct 14 2013 7.09% | Jul 29 2013 7.56% | Oct 7 2013 7.69% | Jan 13 2014 7.82% 12:35:00 (739766) <Homer> wow 12:35:05 *** vinton (757025) [#1194411350] bet 0.15 BTC at 49.5% and lost *** 12:35:07 *** vinton (757025) [#1194411374] bet 0.15 BTC at 49.5% and won 0.15 BTC *** 12:35:07 *** vinton (757025) [#1194411385] bet 0.15 BTC at 49.5% and won 0.15 BTC *** 12:35:07 *** vinton (757025) [#1194411404] bet 0.15 BTC at 49.5% and won 0.15 BTC *** 12:35:08 (1) <@dooglus> raylene: what are you asking? 12:35:19 (756608) <sammie jo> raylene I thought about that 12:35:20 (650660) <Theo> what txid? 12:35:23 (1) <@dooglus> I expect most of the bets are made by bots, but don't think that's a problem 12:35:31 (755992) <raylene> When a person has made a bet 12:35:41 (756608) <sammie jo> he means your system creating fake bets I think 12:35:45 (755992) <raylene> why not display the transaction id that he used to deposit to his account 12:35:50 (650660) <Theo> many people run bots on their accounts 12:35:56 *** vinton (757025) [#1194412413] bet 0.7 BTC at 49.5% and lost *** 12:35:58 (755992) <raylene> not those kind of bots 12:36:00 *** vinton (757025) [#1194412473] bet 0.7 BTC at 49.5% and lost *** 12:36:07 (755992) <raylene> those would be appropriate 12:36:11 (1) <@dooglus> raylene: if you deposit 1 BTC ten times, so your balance is 10 BTC, which txid should I put next to all your bets? 12:36:15 (650660) <Theo> I know what youe mean 12:36:18 (755992) <raylene> the kind of bots dooglus runs on his myself database without real accounts 12:36:28 (755992) <raylene> it's just a php script inserting queries into a myself database 12:36:29 (737389) <cthulhu> she means where's the proof that nakowa actually deposited and wasn't just a figment of your imagination 12:36:40 *** vinton (757025) [#1194413226] bet 1.07 BTC at 49.5% and lost *** 12:36:40 (755992) <raylene> to create the apprearance of a busy casino 12:36:40 *** vinton (757025) [#1194413261] bet 1.07 BTC at 49.5% and won 1.07 BTC *** 12:36:41 *** vinton (757025) [#1194413280] bet 1.07 BTC at 49.5% and won 1.07 BTC *** 12:36:47 (1) <@dooglus> you're suggesting I use PHP? that's offensive 12:36:58 (755992) <raylene> no 12:37:03 (650660) <Theo> I see what yoe mean 12:37:03 (755992) <raylene> I'm suggesting that you're a scammer 12:37:05 (737389) <cthulhu> hey php isnt that bad if you use Symfony 12:37:19 (755992) <raylene> you could link us to a page with all the 10 txids 12:37:27 (755992) <raylene> the question is how bad do you want it 12:37:27 (1) <@dooglus> if I wanted to make fake bets, having to make fake deposit transactions to back them up wouldn't be a problem at all 12:37:34 (1) <@dooglus> each deposit could make a million bets... 12:37:35 (755992) <raylene> the answer is not at all 12:37:46 (755992) <raylene> Yes 12:37:54 (755992) <raylene> but in this case you create volume as well 12:38:00 (755992) <raylene> you could make a fake 250BTC bet 12:38:03 (756608) <sammie jo> raylene.. most of the big betters.. talk in the chat /end 12:38:03 (755992) <raylene> for publicity 12:38:08 (650660) <Theo> so how should someone proof that this is not a scam? 12:38:15 (755992) <raylene> when in fact you're a homeless person without a dime on your ass 12:38:33 (755992) <raylene> I already answered that question 12:38:39 (755992) <raylene> say I deposit 10BTC to this account 12:38:39 (1) <@dooglus> raylene: there was a big bet (something like 200 BTC) recently. a couple of them I think. did you see me posting *anywhere* about it? 12:38:42 (755992) <raylene> I then make a bet 12:38:55 (737389) <cthulhu> wish i knew some homeless node.js developers, I'd take them in 12:38:57 (1) <@dooglus> if it was a fake bet for publicity, would I - uh - publicise it? 12:39:02 (755992) <raylene> it would link you to a page next to my bet where there are all the transaction ids that I deposited to my account with 12:39:19 (584175) <BouvieR> doog loves to give free btc to investors, confirmed =) 12:39:19 (755992) <raylene> doesn't matter 12:39:31 (759608) <kelvinnia> basically you just want the address of high rollers ? 12:39:33 (755992) <raylene> just the fact that you're displaying information which isn't true is bad enough 12:39:35 (1) <@dooglus> a txid doesn't prove anything other than that coins moved from one address to another. I can make txids if I want to fake stuff 12:39:39 (650660) <Theo> I think he suggests, that you scam a 200 btc WIN, so we loose our investment 12:39:50 (755992) <raylene> doog loves running ponzis, confirmed 12:39:56 (1) <@dooglus> raylene: I don't mind discussing this with you, but let's stick to the facts shall we? there's no need for you to make stuff up 12:40:00 (759608) <kelvinnia> raylene you really dumb bro 12:40:09 (743316) <flux-capacitor> raylene, maybe u will have better luck at the slots ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) 12:40:12 (1) <@dooglus> I never ran any kind of bot here, not to play, and not to make fake bets 12:40:15 (743316) <flux-capacitor> get on a plane to vegas 12:40:46 (650660) <Theo> I understood raylene that he is asking about it. So for me these where just hypthetical thoughts 12:40:46 (755992) <raylene> you could make txids up but eventually you'd get caught when someone posts the private key for an address which you claimed belongs to your website 12:41:06 (650660) <Theo> no, raylene 12:41:16 (1) <@dooglus> you make no sense. if I claim an address belongs to me, it would. they're free to create. how would someone else get the key? 12:41:22 (759608) <kelvinnia> raylene how stupid are you ? 12:41:24 (650660) <Theo> he just needs to shift money from his accounts to other accounts 12:41:39 (372683) <aurelian> lol, raylene thinks doog would create a collision 12:41:40 (755992) <raylene> keep on being sheeple and learn critical thinking or else I've got a bridge to sell you 12:41:57 (650660) <Theo> two things: 12:42:06 (755992) <raylene> Look doog 12:42:12 (1) <@dooglus> raylene: if you can make a coherent argument, please do so. name calling isn't helping you here 12:42:21 (650660) <Theo> 1. @doog: he means, you take big transaction and claim it went here 12:42:29 (759608) <kelvinnia> honestly first you try to get your facts straight , understand the concept behind bitcoins and this site properly and then present your lame ass theory 12:42:32 (756608) <sammie jo> raylene is making a pretty valid point doog 12:42:39 (759608) <kelvinnia> you are just making yourself look stupid 12:42:42 (372683) <aurelian> raylene, one thing to point out a potential problem, another to accuse doog 12:42:47 (1) <@dooglus> maybe she has a point, but it's muddled 12:42:49 (755992) <raylene> you claim that you could potentially make up txids which aren't really deposits in this site is this correct? 12:43:11 (650660) <Theo> 2. @raylene: you may ask critical question. What is not ok, is to say that doog is a scammer, just because you think he might be 12:43:12 (1) <@dooglus> raylene: I claim that anyone can create bitcoin transactions. that's not controversial 12:43:13 (759608) <kelvinnia> he can send bitcoins from his personal address to this site 12:43:27 (743316) <flux-capacitor> raylene, its a free market 12:43:35 (759608) <kelvinnia> he has access to the seeds 12:43:41 (743316) <flux-capacitor> u can play at any site u want 12:43:43 (759608) <kelvinnia> he can make 200 btc 12:43:44 *** vinton (757025) [#1194421667] bet 0.32 BTC at 49.5% and lost *** 12:43:47 *** vinton (757025) [#1194421693] bet 0.32 BTC at 49.5% and lost *** 12:43:48 *** vinton (757025) [#1194421740] bet 0.32 BTC at 49.5% and won 0.32 BTC *** 12:43:58 (759608) <kelvinnia> hell he has access to all the invested btc , if he was looking to scam 12:44:05 (1470) <KLYE> Doog could infact win the entire bankroll for himself.. But he isn't karp[ 12:44:06 (650660) <Theo> I understand how you think doog could scam here. But saying he does is like calling everyone with a knife a morder 12:44:10 (759608) <kelvinnia> he might as well do it like how inputs.io did 12:44:08 (1470) <KLYE> karpeles 12:44:16 *** vinton (757025) [#1194422268] bet 0.15 BTC at 49.5% and won 0.15 BTC *** 12:44:20 (1470) <KLYE> Bahahah 12:44:20 (756608) <sammie jo> He has a valid point and it could be indeed true but my opinion is that it's not. 12:44:22 *** vinton (757025) [#1194422379] bet 0.15 BTC at 49.5% and won 0.15 BTC *** 12:44:23 (1) <@dooglus> oops. I think I see a hacker in the cold wallet! 12:44:24 (1) <@dooglus> brb 12:44:22 (1470) <KLYE> Poor TF 12:44:25 *** vinton (757025) [#1194422449] bet 0.15 BTC at 49.5% and won 0.15 BTC *** 12:44:26 (1) <@dooglus> etc 12:44:38 (1470) <KLYE> I don't think TF scammed to be honest.. I talked to him in here and he was trying to sell his JD UID 12:44:45 (743316) <flux-capacitor> raylene, just put all ur money at mtgox , 12:44:46 (759608) <kelvinnia> TF did fucking scam 12:44:51 (755992) <raylene> If you published the txids for all the deposits for each account it would add many additional requirements for you to make fake bets, one among them is to actually have access to large amounts of untainted BTC or else we'd be onto you 12:44:58 (1470) <KLYE> You got proof? No? Shut your talking cock hole 12:45:01 (605159) <GamblingBad> dooglus when u will make a poker site? 12:45:09 (755992) <raylene> hacker right 12:45:16 *** vinton (757025) [#1194423397] bet 0.15 BTC at 49.5% and lost *** 12:45:18 *** vinton (757025) [#1194423439] bet 0.15 BTC at 49.5% and won 0.15 BTC *** 12:45:19 *** vinton (757025) [#1194423450] bet 0.15 BTC at 49.5% and won 0.15 BTC *** 12:45:19 *** vinton (757025) [#1194423468] bet 0.15 BTC at 49.5% and lost *** 12:45:21 (759608) <kelvinnia> raylene doog has over 5k bitcoins to his name 12:45:22 (1) <@dooglus> raylene: these fake accounts are presumably going to win a little for me, right? 12:45:24 *** vinton (757025) [#1194423551] bet 0.15 BTC at 49.5% and won 0.15 BTC *** 12:45:28 (136) <@sqwerty> just-poker would be amazing 12:45:30 (1470) <KLYE> A man who would have stolen 4000 or whattever coins would not be in here firesaling his UID 12:45:33 (1) <@dooglus> so I could withdraw from one, and deposit into another? 12:45:36 (650660) <Theo> @raylene: just if he does not have much money. Since this website runs for a while he has enough btc, whether it is a scam or not 12:45:56 (605159) <GamblingBad> dooglus u will make just-poker.com? 12:45:57 (755992) <raylene> No, they would be here to create action, make the site seem busy so people invest 12:45:57 (372683) <aurelian> just-draw, a simple 5 card draw gambling site 12:46:03 (584175) <BouvieR> just-21 12:46:09 *** vinton (757025) [#1194424359] bet 0.97 BTC at 49.5% and lost *** 12:46:09 (372683) <aurelian> just-* 12:46:11 *** daphne (44070) [#1194424398] bet 0.117128 BTC at 90% and won 0.0117128 BTC *** 12:46:11 (650660) <Theo> @doog as fas as I understand raylene, she thinks you might not have enough money for the self-transaction scam 12:46:15 *** vinton (757025) [#1194424461] bet 0.97 BTC at 49.5% and lost *** 12:46:15 *** vinton (757025) [#1194424477] bet 0.97 BTC at 49.5% and lost *** 12:46:18 (1) <@dooglus> raylene: also I have no incentive to make the site look busier than it is. I don't care if people play here or not to be honest 12:46:27 (755992) <raylene> Yes 12:46:31 (755992) <raylene> but this is your claim 12:46:33 (755992) <raylene> not a fact 12:46:41 (650660) <Theo> yes 12:46:42 (750722) <may> well you got financial incentives commission etc. 12:46:37 (755992) <raylene> I am discussing facts here 12:46:45 (1) <@dooglus> it's both 12:46:45 (755992) <raylene> what you could potentially do to steal from your players 12:46:49 *** vinton (757025) [#1194425068] bet 0.97 BTC at 49.5% and won 0.97 BTC *** 12:46:48 (91380) <Seuntjie> i think doog would be very happy if people stopped playing and he could close the sites 12:46:57 (759608) <kelvinnia> raylene you think doog cant make a deposit from one of the JD to address to his new deposit address 12:46:58 (1) <@dooglus> I'd quite like to close the sites, yes 12:47:14 (755992) <raylene> kelvinnia we would then detect the taint 12:47:14 (759608) <kelvinnia> why doog ? 12:47:15 (1) <@dooglus> they take up too much of my time, are too stressful, and I already have plenty of BTC 12:47:17 (739766) <Homer> seuntije 12:47:17 (152565) <SeuntjieBot> λ WARNING! 739766:Homer seems to be impersonating 757646:Homer λ 12:47:19 (372683) <aurelian> I would rather not have my deposit address publicized everytime I make a bet ok 12:47:20 (650660) <Theo> @raylene: no, you were not discussing. You could ask about it. Why we got a bit angry is, because you SAID the IS a scammer 12:47:27 (737389) <cthulhu> if you gambled and won you could have so much more 12:47:35 (755992) <raylene> you already have too much btc from running this scam 12:47:37 (755992) <raylene> or so you claim 12:47:45 (739766) <Homer> 757646 is djarno, he is the 1 impostering "homer" can you change it @ seuntije 12:47:51 (755992) <raylene> you are losing your credibility by the second 12:47:52 (759608) <kelvinnia> raylene you have issue no one is asking you to stick along 12:48:01 (1) <@dooglus> could you help me out and tell me what you think I've done that's scammy? it is just making the site look busier than it is? or something else? 12:48:03 (743316) <flux-capacitor> doog, i understand the busy part, but what is the stressful part? 12:48:03 (326399) <x> raylene, you are the only one losing here. 12:48:04 (91380) <Seuntjie> no i don't manage the list 12:48:07 (739766) <Homer> who does? 12:48:13 (759608) <kelvinnia> not like you existence matters to anyone in here 12:48:14 (91380) <Seuntjie> !s notice 12:48:14 (152565) <SeuntjieBot> λ Please contact Wilco, Warren or Arrogant with your new JD deposit address. All JD addies have been removed from the list at 7:30 PM UCT, on 04/23/2014 λ 12:48:17 (91380) <Seuntjie> they do 12:48:20 (743316) <flux-capacitor> BANHAMMER time for raylene ! 12:48:20 (136) <@sqwerty> doog let me know if you ever want to make a poker site. i could/would be interested in helping 12:48:21 (650660) <Theo> raylene, please for the peace, can you say "you could" instead of "you are" 12:48:22 (739766) <Homer> ok thanks 12:48:40 (755992) <raylene> you could call me an altruist I guess, I help you sheeple fight darwinism by protecting you from scams 12:48:41 (650660) <Theo> it is the difference between proofless accusations and discussions 12:48:49 (1) <@dooglus> raylene: please? 12:48:52 (759608) <kelvinnia> theo dont you get it already he is just a dumb troll 12:48:58 (743316) <flux-capacitor> sqwerty, just ban this troll already 12:49:19 (755992) <raylene> look doog 12:49:21 *** vinton (757025) [#1194427719] bet 2.07 BTC at 49.5% and lost *** 12:49:26 (755992) <raylene> say if I have a website 12:49:32 (755992) <raylene> no provable fairness what-so-ever 12:49:37 (755992) <raylene> I just ask people to trust me 12:49:38 (750722) <may> talking about safety is totally legit though, always gotta be careful in the bitcoin world see gox etc. 12:49:40 (755992) <raylene> PLEASE TRUST ME 12:49:43 (91380) <Seuntjie> raylene i've had coins invested in this site for months i've withdrawn multiple times and has always received all of my coins. Nothing about this page points to a scam 12:49:47 (755992) <raylene> I won't steal your BTC, promise 12:49:48 (650660) <Theo> ok, let me ask you directly: do you have any reasons beside the possibility, that this is a scam? 12:49:52 (91380) <Seuntjie> so please stop accusing the site without proff 12:49:55 (91380) <Seuntjie> proof* 12:50:04 (759608) <kelvinnia> raylene you dont trust doog then leave man , Stop pissing off everyone in here 12:50:09 (755992) <raylene> but you don't have any proof of me actually scamming but you have this huge gaping hole in my casino 12:50:15 (755992) <raylene> am I then not a scammer? 12:50:20 (650660) <Theo> in my eyes, it is valid to ask 12:50:25 (91380) <Seuntjie> where is the whole? 12:50:25 (756608) <sammie jo> I don't agree with nobody here.. all I know is that betting here if fair if you are a casual gambler not investor 12:50:32 (1) <@dooglus> what hole? 12:50:33 (756608) <sammie jo> so I can win or lose just my luck 12:50:33 (136) <@sqwerty> just use /mute userid if you dont want to listen 12:50:51 (4764) <@G.Wilco> doog will mute when he gets bored 12:50:54 (605159) <GamblingBad> is a big hole in just dice 12:50:56 (136) <@sqwerty> sorry... /ignore userID 12:51:09 (755992) <raylene> the whole concept is flawed because you don't add all the deposits for all the accounts next to each bet 12:51:14 (136) <@sqwerty> then later you can /unignore all to clear the list 12:51:12 (755992) <raylene> and you never will 12:51:15 (756608) <sammie jo> jk 12:51:16 (1) <@dooglus> lol 12:51:21 (755992) <raylene> because it would then make it impossible for you to fake bets 12:51:22 (650660) <Theo> @raylene: 12:51:26 *** vinton (757025) [#1194429989] bet 0.15 BTC at 49.5% and won 0.15 BTC *** 12:51:30 (91380) <Seuntjie> that makes fuckoll sense.... 12:51:31 (755992) <raylene> you don't have access to those kind of amounts of untainted BTC 12:51:36 (755992) <raylene> you never will 12:51:40 (650660) <Theo> I don't want the people see how much money is going through my account 12:51:43 (650660) <Theo> or from where 12:51:46 (755992) <raylene> Seuntjie what doesn't make sense? 12:51:49 (1) <@dooglus> even if i was faking bets, how does that let me scam anyone? 12:51:57 (755992) <raylene> your account is psuedoanonymous though 12:52:03 (755992) <raylene> you could even be behind Tor 12:52:03 (91380) <Seuntjie> your whole argument.... 12:52:07 (650660) <Theo> it makes sense WHAT you say, but not HOW you do it 12:52:10 (758624) <whelk> freeroll 12:52:29 (756608) <sammie jo> <@dooglus> even if i was faking bets, how does that let me scam anyone? well thats that 12:52:43 (1) <@dooglus> step 1 should be to describe the scam 12:52:48 (750722) <may> i think raylene has a good point BUT thats the same in the whole bitcoinworld. you earn trust over time. no regulation by gov also means no safety sometimes 12:52:48 (755992) <raylene> Because A) you can run a ponzi on investors by issuing more "on-site" BTC than actual BTC in your system 12:52:51 (650660) <Theo> I got it 12:53:07 (750722) <may> gox was behaving weird so people asked questions 12:53:11 (1) <@dooglus> check the faq for 'ponzi' 12:53:12 (605159) <GamblingBad> bitcon and just dice are 2 ponzi schemes 12:53:13 (750722) <may> imo JD never behaved weird in any way 12:53:34 (755992) <raylene> B) you can create "fake bets" to lie to investors about the worth of your business and the traffic it gets 12:53:35 (756608) <sammie jo> raylene I heard theres a paranoid convention down the road.. go take a look 12:53:55 (743316) <flux-capacitor> doog, whats the most stressful part of jd, besides trolls like raylene? 12:53:58 (1) <@dooglus> investors see their returns 12:54:00 (755992) <raylene> you also make your site look more credible to potential bettors because they wouldn't bet here otherwise get free publicity etc 12:54:06 (650660) <Theo> @raylene, thanks for using "can" not "are" 12:54:11 (755992) <raylene> Not all of them at once 12:54:12 (650660) <Theo> don't stop with this, here 12:54:22 (755992) <raylene> you could still pay them their returns at the expense of others 12:54:23 (1) <@dooglus> flux: im not a big fan of the responsibility 12:54:51 (756608) <sammie jo> ever think about dropping that responsibility? 12:54:53 (759635) <brandyne> doog why do you wanna close the site ? 12:54:53 (750722) <may> raylene: thats the same with almost anything up to a certain point. see cyprus. government fucked them. you just have to go the place that you trust the most 12:54:56 (605159) <GamblingBad> doog when u finnish answer raylene and can answer my question? 12:55:02 (1) <@dooglus> raylene: check the proof of solvency stuff 12:55:12 (650660) <Theo> but txids would not change it 12:55:14 (755992) <raylene> Theo doog is a scammer unless proven otherwise, 12:55:18 (650660) <Theo> not any more 12:55:27 (650660) <Theo> that is something for a new website 12:55:32 (759635) <brandyne> or maybe doog is not a scammer unless proven otherwise 12:55:32 (1) <@dooglus> i prove solvency every sunday 12:55:47 (1) <@dooglus> ie. non-ponzi-ness 12:55:55 (650660) <Theo> no 12:55:56 (755992) <raylene> the whole point of crypto is that you don't need to trust people based on their word 12:56:03 (650660) <Theo> you can say, he might be a scammer 12:56:05 (759635) <brandyne> all you have pointed out is just "maybe" 12:56:06 (372683) <aurelian> but you can if you choose to 12:56:14 (650660) <Theo> it is not a scam not to proof everything 12:56:18 (759635) <brandyne> you have no proof of any sorts that he is actually doing it 12:56:18 (750722) <may> raylene: if JD was a scam or behaved weird in any way the majority would have stopped playing in a post-gox world 12:56:32 (755992) <raylene> if he wasn't a scammer he wouldn't leave such a gaping flaw in his concepts to exploit freely, that is my conclusion 12:56:39 (605159) <GamblingBad> raylene if u dont trust dooglus dont invest or gamble here, 12:56:45 (750722) <may> you DO need trust in the cryptoworld. a lot actually 12:56:48 (755992) <raylene> I don't need to catch one of the board members balls deep in kids assholes to know that he is a pedo 12:56:57 (372683) <aurelian> wtf? 12:57:01 (750722) <may> even if you only use full blockchain wallets 12:57:04 (4764) <@G.Wilco> if dooglus is losing credibility by the second then why does invested amount keep growing? 12:57:11 (755992) <raylene> same thing with scammers like dooglus 12:57:14 (650660) <Theo> raylene: why not just ask here. we would happily discuss everything. Why directly claim that he is a scammer? 12:57:14 (1) <@dooglus> i was looking for something i had lost 12:57:19 (755992) <raylene> because sheeple that's why 12:57:26 (755992) <raylene> or he keeps creating fake investments as well 12:57:29 (134004) <@SJ> lol 12:57:35 (134004) <@SJ> time for your medication raylene 12:57:45 (759635) <brandyne> lol raylene did you lose your btc in here ? 12:57:51 (755992) <raylene> never 12:57:52 (750722) <may> dooglus: cant you just show him the wallet addresses 12:57:53 *** vinton (757025) [#1194437183] bet 0.15 BTC at 49.5% and won 0.15 BTC *** 12:57:53 (4764) <@G.Wilco> you can check hot wallet/cold storage if you want 12:57:56 (134004) <@SJ> he probably lost 0.000001 btc 12:57:56 (759635) <brandyne> i think you are just another sore loser 12:57:57 (755992) <raylene> I don't gamble like a degenerate 12:57:57 (733758) <cyndi-beth> fake investments? you can see balances in wallets, wtf? 12:57:59 (1470) <KLYE> Raylene. Kill yourself 12:58:04 (650660) <Theo> no, I want my privacy 12:58:04 (755992) <raylene> not even "invest" in shit like this 12:58:10 (134004) <@SJ> fuck off then 12:58:17 (1470) <KLYE> To spare the world having to hear your delusional bullshit 12:58:23 (750722) <may> why do you spend your time here then 12:58:24 (755992) <raylene> most people on here aren't nearly intelligent enough to comprehend the matters at hand 12:58:26 (650660) <Theo> nobody forces you to do so 12:58:30 (755992) <raylene> except Theo apparently 12:58:31 (1) <@dooglus> may: i pointed him at the faq twice where it is all linked. he 'knows' the truth already, and cant think further 12:58:46 (372683) <aurelian> not really "investing" but "bankrolling" 12:58:51 (605159) <GamblingBad> dooglus when u will answer me 12:58:55 (1470) <KLYE> Most people aren't paranoid schizophrenics like you either raylene.. It's not an advantage you have.. It's a sickness 12:58:56 (650660) <Theo> maybe, but nobody wants to listen to you, because you are just impolite 12:59:04 (372683) <aurelian> raylene just a troll 12:59:05 *** vinton (757025) [#1194438666] bet 0.15 BTC at 49.5% and won 0.15 BTC *** 12:59:11 (372683) <aurelian> ban already 12:59:11 (134004) <@SJ> mega troll 12:59:13 (372683) <aurelian> ban hammer 12:59:21 (755992) <raylene> because I am an altruist that is concerned about your BTC don't bitch and moan on bitcointalk when this shit hits the gox fan again 12:59:23 (1470) <KLYE> *gives doog the nod* 12:59:27 (1470) <KLYE> altruist? 12:59:28 (1) <@dooglus> raylene: the mods are squabbling over who gets to mute you ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) 12:59:36 (1470) <KLYE> Isn't that the cult from GTA5? 12:59:41 (750722) <may> thinking about how dooglus could be scamming is valid and good and just critical thinking. but dont just claim stuff you cant prove 12:59:50 (1470) <KLYE> Doog isn't a scammer. 12:59:54 (650660) <Theo> raylene, it would be okay to point out where you see the possibility for a scam 12:59:54 (743316) <flux-capacitor> klye , good call. 13:00:09 *** vinton (757025) [#1194439828] bet 0.15 BTC at 49.5% and won 0.15 BTC *** 13:00:03 (759481) <wynter> raylene has ass burgers 13:00:03 (152565) <SeuntjieBot> λ WARNING! 759481:wynter seems to be impersonating 421101:wynter λ 13:00:05 (1) <@dooglus> like i say im willing to discuss all this stuff 13:00:05 (1) <@dooglus> but raylene doesn't seem to be 13:00:05 (755992) <raylene> may look 13:00:08 (1470) <KLYE> And the 20 Million isn't enough for him to run with yet. ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) 13:00:13 (1) <@dooglus> she makes little sense, and won't listen to reason 13:00:17 (650660) <Theo> but claiming this without evidence...I'm sorry to say so, that is trolling 13:00:20 (759635) <brandyne> raylene if you consider yourself this smart . tell us this why would someone spend so much of time and effort to make their investments seem higher to scam when doog can just take the btc and run 13:00:24 (737389) <cthulhu> maybe somebody's attempting to hack the servers tonight and sent a troll into the chatroom to distract you 13:00:24 (743316) <flux-capacitor> doog, u are expecting fact and reason 13:00:24 (1470) <KLYE> You can't reason with retards. 13:00:25 (755992) <raylene> I have already made this point twice 13:00:34 (743316) <flux-capacitor> that is too much for raylene 13:00:35 (1470) <KLYE> What point? That you don't trust doog? 13:00:36 (605159) <GamblingBad> no one can prove is scamme or not, so no point to disqus it. either u trust doog or u dont. 13:00:37 (755992) <raylene> what if I made a casino without any provable fariness 13:00:45 <system> (4764) <@G.Wilco> muted (755992) <raylene> for 3600 seconds 13:00:46 (91380) <Seuntjie> +1 <KLYE> You can't reason with retards. 13:00:47 (1) <@dooglus> there is provable fairness 13:00:48 (1470) <KLYE> You can't. and you won't 13:00:51 (759635) <brandyne> then assholes like you shud be kicked out 13:00:52 (733758) <cyndi-beth> klye, past performance does not guarantee future success. and we don't know dooglus in person, he exists only online. We take his word, and that's it. Still very risky. but he site has been here for years now, and if he wanted to make away, right now he 13:00:53 (134004) <@SJ> then youd make sometihng nothing like this site 13:00:54 (1470) <KLYE> and if you did.. you could call it dragons tale 13:01:01 (134004) <@SJ> lol 13:01:07 (733758) <cyndi-beth> could do so to the tune of $16.5M just from this site 13:01:11 (733758) <cyndi-beth> yet he doesnt 13:01:14 (733758) <cyndi-beth> that means something too 13:01:35 (759635) <brandyne> okay for all those who dont get it yet 13:01:38 (1470) <KLYE> As I said before. Doog isn't a scammer.. He needs to wait till invested is 100K before he pulls a karpeles. ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) 13:01:40 (1) <@dooglus> cyndi: not quite 1 year yet - but the bankroll has been over 60k at times and I let people withdraw it down to 30k... 13:01:57 (1470) <KLYE> *jokes* 13:01:59 (750722) <may> its also easier for him. constant commission etc is a nice income. for for all his life if bitcoin doesnt crash. 13:02:01 (759635) <brandyne> what raylene is suggesting that doog doesnt posses any btc and his investment maybe virtual 13:02:07 (1470) <KLYE> LOL 13:02:07 (134004) <@SJ> the 2 biggest ever investors both withdrew no problem 13:02:13 (650660) <Theo> as fars is I got your point, ray, you are afraid of a pyramid scheme, right? 13:02:19 (1470) <KLYE> Doog has 4000+ BTC of his own 13:02:23 (733758) <cyndi-beth> you guys gotta look from his perspective too: we want to be able to meet him and know who he is, but if he started letting people do that, he would put all the BTC at risk too 13:02:26 (759635) <brandyne> hence profiting from JDS profits without having any btc 13:02:28 (1) <@dooglus> brandyne: I possess 39.5k BTC [19Zmw5kM] 13:02:46 (759635) <brandyne> doog i know 13:02:56 (750722) <may> proving that its not a ponzi has been done already 13:03:05 (1) <@dooglus> and each week I publish a list of investor balances, which add up to the same amount 13:03:08 (759635) <brandyne> but that dumbass raylene cant understand 13:03:09 (605159) <GamblingBad> mhmh wish i had that wallet=) 13:03:12 (759514) <shaneyney> doog what happens when you die? everyone lose their coins? 13:03:19 (650660) <Theo> hey 13:03:20 (1) <@dooglus> if I made up false investments, the total would be more than I own 13:03:23 (1470) <KLYE> No. Failsafe kicks in place 13:03:24 (759655) <jozelle> doog muted me 13:03:24 (1) <@dooglus> people would notice 13:03:29 (759655) <jozelle> hey Theo 13:03:36 (759655) <jozelle> doog why did you mute me 13:03:38 (1470) <KLYE> Doog has a dead mans switch 13:03:39 (605159) <GamblingBad> when dooglus dies i take over the site 13:03:45 (1) <@dooglus> jozelle: I didn't, but one of the mods finally got sick of you I guess 13:03:48 (650660) <Theo> this is an argument, doog did not bring before 13:03:49 (1470) <KLYE> False. i take the site over 13:03:54 (1) <@dooglus> GB: what's up? 13:03:56 (759655) <jozelle> right right 13:03:58 (650660) <Theo> so maybe this is enough for you, ray? 13:04:04 (605159) <GamblingBad> u will make poker site? 13:04:05 (759655) <jozelle> making too much sense perhaps? 13:04:06 (1470) <KLYE> I am the #1 JD champion. 13:04:12 <system> (134004) <@SJ> muted (759655) <jozelle> for 3600 seconds 13:04:13 (605159) <GamblingBad> just-poker.com 13:04:16 (759514) <shaneyney> doog does anyone else have access to those or when you die will you take all the coins with you? 13:04:18 (1) <@dooglus> Theo: I pointed him at the "ponzi" section of the FAQ, which explains all this in detail 13:04:21 <system> (4764) <@G.Wilco> muted all new users for 360 seconds 13:04:22 (750722) <may> it would be enough if dooglus caught a trojan and his wallet.dat got stolen. you CANT control all of that. but he claims to have offline storage so it SHOULD be safe. just like your bank safe is PROBABLY safe. but it COUULD be robbed. 13:04:22 (759635) <brandyne> fuck someone punch this guy in the throat and shut him up 13:04:28 (650660) <Theo> ok 13:04:42 (1470) <KLYE> Jozelle. you are obviosuly to retarded for logic. Please kill yourself and any children you have to prevent your stupidity from further polluting the gene pool of humanity.. thanks 13:04:50 (678506) <ricky> LOL 13:04:55 (678506) <ricky> what is going on 13:04:58 (733758) <cyndi-beth> may, your bank stored money is insured by the FDIC to a certain amount 13:04:59 (1) <@dooglus> may: the 39.5k is on a laptop that never goes online 13:05:01 (134004) <@SJ> kyle always says it with a style i could never manage 13:05:03 (743316) <flux-capacitor> klye is direct 13:05:01 (733758) <cyndi-beth> this isnt 13:05:06 (759514) <shaneyney> doog does anyone else have access to those or when you die will you take all the coins with you? 13:05:27 (1470) <KLYE> I am a man of well thought out words.\ 13:05:33 (1) <@dooglus> shaneyney: nobody else has access so long as I keep pressing the button 13:05:41 (750722) <may> dooglus: i believe since everybody sane would do the same. arguing is pointless here anyway 13:05:58 (759635) <brandyne> no wonder he is so good at begging 13:06:05 (733758) <cyndi-beth> dooglus, how many backups of the wallet.dat do you have, and are they all on magnetic mediums such as hdd's? 13:06:07 (759514) <shaneyney> you have a backup plan if you die? 13:06:08 (650660) <Theo> @doog, her points were valid, but she did not just ask about them 13:06:13 (757463) <Abundance> when u have35k btc death could not take u 13:06:35 (757463) <Abundance> doog atm is immortal that's why he doesn't use them 13:06:35 (678506) <ricky> dooglus if you ever need some landscaping work done just say you buried the wallet.dat in the plot you need dug 13:06:37 (739766) <Homer> @doog : out of curiosity, what would happen if something did happen to you? what would happen to the coins 13:06:37 (152565) <SeuntjieBot> λ WARNING! 739766:Homer seems to be impersonating 757646:Homer λ 13:06:51 (650660) <Theo> deb would pay us? 13:06:53 (1470) <KLYE> Go fuck the wall raylene/jozelle. It might might be pointless as this fight but atleast you'll feel better afterwords.. of course we will still think you are retarded but it will prevent you from further fagging this chat up. -_- 13:07:02 (4764) <@G.Wilco> homer pm me your address and i'll add you to the list to stop that message 13:07:08 (739766) <Homer> ty 13:07:14 (750722) <may> cyndi-beth: just pointing to cyprus. if the govmt wants to fuck you up they just do. stealing from the cypriots was commissioned by the EU. dont you think the US could do the same? you cant really have absolute security 13:07:37 (733758) <cyndi-beth> may, agreed. but it's another layer of protection 13:07:41 *** leelasha (757172) [#1194449929] bet 0.1 BTC at 55% and lost *** 13:07:39 (678506) <ricky> point to ireland. the EU is forcing citizens to pay bank debt 13:07:41 *** leelasha (757172) [#1194449959] bet 0.1 BTC at 55% and won 0.08 BTC *** 13:07:41 *** leelasha (757172) [#1194449995] bet 0.1 BTC at 55% and won 0.08 BTC *** 13:07:43 *** leelasha (757172) [#1194450026] bet 0.1 BTC at 55% and won 0.08 BTC *** 13:07:44 *** leelasha (757172) [#1194450094] bet 0.1 BTC at 55% and lost *** 13:07:47 *** leelasha (757172) [#1194450129] bet 0.1 BTC at 55% and won 0.08 BTC *** 13:07:47 *** leelasha (757172) [#1194450159] bet 0.1 BTC at 55% and lost *** 13:07:47 (1) <@dooglus> cyndi: I have plenty of backups, and some are on solid state 13:07:49 *** leelasha (757172) [#1194450191] bet 0.1 BTC at 55% and won 0.08 BTC *** 13:07:50 *** leelasha (757172) [#1194450213] bet 0.1 BTC at 55% and won 0.08 BTC *** 13:07:49 (678506) <ricky> how does that even make sense or how is it allowed? 13:07:51 *** leelasha (757172) [#1194450272] bet 0.1 BTC at 55% and won 0.08 BTC *** 13:07:57 (733758) <cyndi-beth> and under normal circumstances you can use it if shit hits the fan, ie. a bank goes belly up 13:08:05 (650660) <Theo> ok, guys, I was happy to talk to you 13:08:11 (650660) <Theo> but work is calling 13:08:24 (1) <@dooglus> Theo: I'm not sure that she really had any valid points. I think you may be reading more into what she said than she meant 13:08:32 *** leelasha (757172) [#1194451435] bet 0.1 BTC at 55% and won 0.08 BTC *** 13:08:35 (733758) <cyndi-beth> thanks dooglus, I figured this much, but a lot of people rely only on magnetic backups 13:08:40 *** leelasha (757172) [#1194451685] bet 0.1 BTC at 55% and won 0.08 BTC *** 13:08:40 (1) <@dooglus> Theo: but please, if you can find any germ of reason in there that I didn't already counter... 13:09:10 (1) <@dooglus> oh, ok 13:09:16 (650660) <Theo> @doog: for someone who was uninformed it was valid. In I think the chat is there for answering it 13:09:32 (733758) <cyndi-beth> the approach was bad 13:09:35 (739766) <Homer> . 13:09:50 *** leelasha (757172) [#1194453715] bet 0.1 BTC at 55% and won 0.08 BTC *** 13:09:52 *** leelasha (757172) [#1194453775] bet 0.1 BTC at 55% and won 0.08 BTC *** 13:09:53 (1) <@dooglus> Theo: yes, I don't mind answering such questions. she didn't do very well though - it was quite a mish-mash of fuzzy accusations 13:09:55 (750722) <may> the only safe thing is probably gold stored under your house protected by a private army plus owning stock in all of the big companies. 13:10:01 (136) <@sqwerty> 17200 holding strong we're going up! 13:10:08 (759514) <shaneyney> Im going to drive thru all of canada with a magnet in a moving truck breaking bad style and see if you can protect agains that 13:10:13 (134004) <@SJ> doog needs to hit the doom switch 13:10:14 (650660) <Theo> her assumptions were: 1. you do not own many btc 13:10:14 (750722) <may> LOL 13:10:29 (650660) <Theo> 2. not many people use this site 13:10:40 *** leelasha (757172) [#1194455099] bet 0.1 BTC at 55% and won 0.08 BTC *** 13:10:44 (1) <@dooglus> her main point seemed to be "there's no way you've really had 1.2 billion bets, so you must be faking it" 13:10:51 *** leelasha (757172) [#1194455495] bet 0.1 BTC at 55% and won 0.08 BTC *** 13:10:52 (678506) <ricky> lol 13:10:54 (750722) <may> Theo: theres even guides and clones on the web that explain how to create scams like the one suggested. 13:11:04 (650660) <Theo> yes 13:11:04 (1) <@dooglus> I expect that comes from "I have a dice site and nobody uses it. Waaaah" 13:11:08 (750722) <may> and everyday people get scammed. you just gotta earn reputation 13:11:13 (134004) <@SJ> probably someone who owns a pathetic failing scam dice site crying that they cant bring in revenue 13:11:18 (650660) <Theo> no, doog 13:11:25 (650660) <Theo> it came from her arguments 13:12:01 (1) <@dooglus> wasn't the arguement "you fake bets to make it look busier, to attract investors, and players"? 13:12:13 (4764) <@G.Wilco> !s user 739766 13:12:13 (152565) <SeuntjieBot> λ User not found λ 13:12:16 (1) <@dooglus> that's the motive, and I clearly have the opportunity - so I'm guilty? 13:12:22 (730457) <dragon> hello 13:12:23 *** leelasha (757172) [#1194458173] bet 0.1 BTC at 55% and won 0.08 BTC *** 13:12:25 (650660) <Theo> she wanted to see txids ... because if you do not have much money, you can hardly face bets with showing txids 13:12:27 (678506) <ricky> you said yourself you don't even necessarily want more investors so 13:12:33 <system> (4764) <@G.Wilco> muted all new users for 0 seconds 13:12:48 (678506) <ricky> they're just stupid 13:12:56 (650660) <Theo> @doog, I tried to tell her: not because you could, this means that you do 13:13:08 (1) <@dooglus> I just don't think showing txids helps at all, while affecting everyone's privacy 13:13:20 (650660) <Theo> that was also my point 13:13:33 (1) <@dooglus> also, if you want to see someone's deposit transactions, you can look up their deposit address on the bot and go from there? 13:13:35 (733758) <cyndi-beth> frankly, I see no motive to do anything that would jeopardize this business 13:13:37 (650660) <Theo> I said, I understood her arguments. I did not say that I agree with them 13:13:54 (584175) <BouvieR> "her" 13:13:55 (1) <@dooglus> right. her conclusions didn't follow from her premises 13:13:56 (584175) <BouvieR> "she" 13:14:04 (1) <@dooglus> clearly a girl on the internets ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) 13:14:09 (678506) <ricky> lol 13:14:14 (650660) <Theo> and is definitely the very wrong way to call you a scammer to start the discussion 13:14:59 (733758) <cyndi-beth> does this conversation transpire every time dooglus comes in here? 13:15:03 (1) <@dooglus> also, most of the bets here are tiny 13:15:05 (733758) <cyndi-beth> with accusations and stuff? 13:15:15 (1) <@dooglus> it wouldn't take much BTC to fake enough deposits to support the level of betting we see 13:15:37 (650660) <Theo> but doog, that was her point 13:15:51 (650660) <Theo> she said: show us the transactions, you can not fake that 13:16:12 (650660) <Theo> she saw only the numbers here on the site 13:16:46 (730457) <dragon> good leelasha 13:16:54 (723513) <Djarno> doogles, can you add an option for custom max bets ? 13:16:56 (650660) <Theo> it doesn't take long to set up a system that just looks like many bets are made, if nobody sees the wallets behind it 13:17:10 (723513) <Djarno> you know sometimes you dont realize howmuch u bet 13:17:13 (584175) <BouvieR> Djarno Unchained ! 13:17:20 (650660) <Theo> at least that's how I understood her
|
|
|
I have never played nor ever will play at just-dice, I won't invest either. We have free speech here and I feel as if the community needs people like me more than ever to shed some light on scams before shit hits the fan and everyone is bitching and moaning on the forums like post-Gox again.
Your insults are pointless, discredit my claims don't insult the messenger, plus thanks for re-wording exactly what I've told you and sending it back, I appreciate despite the fact that the way I've said it was more classy.
Me quoting your insults are meant to shed some light on the kind of degeneracy that looms those chats, not as a compliment, but take it however you will.
We have free speech, and I wouldn't try to stop you exercising it. Just-Dice isn't a scam, and from what I see you don't even have a slightly convincing argument that it is. I don't like Klye's argument style much either. It's not helpful to shout "retard" and "mongoloid" at people. But I think you started it, calling everyone "sheeple" and such like. Your whole style in the chat was aggressive and abusive, so it's not entirely surprising you were met with the same in exchange. Moving on, can we have a discussion now?
|
|
|
It is irrelevant, dooglas has proved to be untrustworthy by his sketchy behavior. It would cost little to nothing to have what I'm suggesting implemented and rule out this possibility yet he never will.
I'm not going to publish player deposit addresses. If they want to, they can. There's a bot for that. This isn't "sketchy" in the slightest, and proves nothing about my trustworthiness. I'm going out for a bit now, but I look forward to reading your reply when I return. Please take your time and make your best effort at laying out a logical argument. It's worth the effort.
|
|
|
I raised the issue of just-dice being a potential scam with Dooglus himself but was called a retard that should commit suicide to prevent my genetics from ruining the gene pool by one of the players and banned shortly after.
Not by me you weren't. I was incredibly patient with you even though you failed to present any kind of reasonable point. Eventually one of the chat moderators with less patience than myself put an end to your pointless trolling. I can post a log of the chat if you like so others can decide whether: I was provocative to the minimum
or whether you were just trolling. The point that I have raised with Dooglus is that his provably fair concept isn't secure from all vectors, in fact it has a rather large flaw that could potentially (and very likely IS) be exploited by himself. The flaw is he could potentially be running a bot that runs Mysql queries and inserts "fake" bets. This would allow to make the website seem more secure than it really is as well as giving the impression that it is significantly more busy, worth significantly more and encourage players to make bets that they otherwise wouldn't on a website with less credibility, not to mention the investments.
This is the kind of nonsense you were spouting in the chat too. I'll try to address it. * I don't add any fake bets to the site. The server often struggles to keep up with the volume of real bets we get. I don't need to add any more volume. I add artificial delays to low-stake bets precisely to reduce the number of bets going through the server. This is documented in the FAQ tab. * Even if I did add fake bets, this wouldn't have anything to do with whether the site is provably fair or not. The fake bets wouldn't affect your chance of winning or losing. You can verify that all your rolls were made fairly. * Why would the presence of fake bets make the site look more secure than it is? It wouldn't. * Why would I care about making the site look like it's worth more than it is? It's not for sale. I've turned down several huge buy-out offers. * Players bet on Just-Dice because it's provably fair, and because it has a long (in Bitcoin years) history of reliably paying out winners. * I don't need to attract investors. I have too many already. They're diluting my share of the profits. I don't need to make the site look more attractive to investors. Did I miss anything? Oh, you think I use MySQL and PHP? I don't. The solution would be to add a link next to every bet, once a user clicks the link he would be redirected to a page showing all the txids of the deposits of the user making the bet. Since Dooglus couldn't possibly have access to those amounts of untainted BTC (he couldn't keep reusing the same BTC or else we'd notice) this would disprove my claim for all the future bets on this website with little to no cost to Dooglus.
Someone asked me to provide complete blockchain transaction histories for all players once before, too. Was that you? I could quite easily provide a bunch of fake deposit transactions to go along with any fake bets. You're probably not realising that most of the bets are really tiny dust bets, worth fractions of a cent. It would be trivial to find enough untainted coins to produce txids for deposits to these 'fake' accounts. So I'd be publishing personal information of every player for no gain at all, other than kind of convincing you that I'm not adding fake bets to the site that make no sense for me to add anyway. No thanks. Since every account on just-dice is psuedoanonymous in nature the same way as Bitcoin addresses privacy isn't a huge concern.
As it currently stands, there's a third-party bot in the chat that you can register your deposit address with, for the purposes of collecting 'rain'. Many players chose to disclose their deposit address, and along with it their deposit history. I don't want to force that disclosure on everyone. Given the nature of Dooglus and his unwillingness to meet in person due to the supposed risks on his side I am calling this out as the next Mt Gox.
Please stay safe and have a nice day!
I don't know if you're familiar with how Just-Dice proves its solvency on a weekly basis, but we've been doing it since before MtGox closed. Search the FAQ tab for "Is this site a scam or Ponzi scheme? Is it insolvent?" for full details, but basically we: 1) publish a weekly list of investor balances 2) keep the majority of invested coins in a well-known address Each investor can then check that the coins they invested are still held by us. This is something that MtGox wouldn't have been able to do since they apparently were insolvent, and something that has become quite fashionable since the MtGox collapse. If you have any remaining concerns, please feel free to bring them up and I'll do my best to address them.
|
|
|
site is down, any update? Noticed hotwallet and cold wallet were empty, rebuilding?
The wallets are empty and the site is down. Hmmmm.... The hot wallet contains everyone's deposit address, so it's hard to see the whole balance. The cold wallet address changed about a week ago. I updated the FAQ with the new address and a new signature. Was the site really down for a while? I wasn't offline for long so I guess I missed it. Or maybe it was a localised cloudflare outage.
|
|
|
I've read this before, but I missed something, dooglus, you made the exchange?
I took the existing open source intersango exchange software that britcoin (which later was rebranded as 'Intersango') was running on, changed the colours, made a bunch of other changes, and installed it on Andre's web server. So depending on your definition of "made" I guess that's either a 'yes' or a 'no'...
|
|
|
Just-Dice game What is the longest series martingale ??
I'm not sure, but at least 27: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fs29.postimg.org%2Fwtlf7t8ef%2FCapture.png&t=665&c=wdv168BLutSrhA) Note that with over a billion bets so far we would expect the longest losing streak to be about 30 bets long. 2^30 ~= 1 billion.
|
|
|
Just invested 40K dogecoins in this site. I love that they made a JustDice variant for Doge. Amazed that so much is invested in the site, I only have 0.001530% of the sites bankroll.
Over 2.6 billion DOGE invested last I checked. Most of it is here in an offline cold storage wallet: http://dogechain.info/address/DT4ZXv7ByoGbrkE6umxLpVesy5BUWmRqxw
|
|
|
On suitable volume, it should be possible to offer a 0.1% edge and be profitable (over the long term - as variance can cause even a site with a 10% edge to lose money in the short term).
My impression is that the gambling websites with a 1% edge are making large profits.
Just-Dice.com has a 1% house edge, but after more than 1.1 billion bets has only kept 0.32% of the amount wagered. The reason not many sites offer much less than 1% edge games is that the smaller the house edge, the greater the effect of variance, and the more likely the site is to go bust. In other words, the smaller the edge, the bigger the bankroll the house requires to be safe from going bust. Sites which offer player-vs-player games can obviously afford to take a much smaller cut, since they are guaranteed to win a little from every bet.
|
|
|
Huh? Did I miss something? The max profit is 176.82 BTC, so you should be able to bet nearly 90 BTC on 50% chance.
You should be able to bet about 176 BTC at 50% if the max profit is 176 BTC, since at 50% your profit is about the same as your stake. SatoshiDice doesn't have the same max profit across all of its bets though for some reason, and never has done. I don't know what the reasoning is. Maybe they're willing to risk more than they can really afford (from a risk-of-ruin point of view) on the low-chance high-payout bets because you're unlikely to win many of them?
|
|
|
I like the feature that allows me to enter 99 dice rolls to generate a truly random address, but it is lacking the ability to encrypt the keys with BIP38 and so leaves the paper wallet vulnerable to physical theft. How hard would it be to allow BIP38 encryption on the 'details' tab? It seems I currently have to choose between allowing bitaddress to generate the randomness or having my paper wallets unencrypted. Please let me use true randomness and encryption at the same time. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
I think I did the literal worst on the 1B promotion. Grats to everyone else.
You're right. Here are all the bets of 0.1 BTC or more within 10k bets either side of the 1B bet. Note there was only one such bet with a chance to win less than 97%, and that was your bet. Note also that every one of the 181 such bets won except yours: +------------+-----------+--------+------------+ | betid | bet | chance | profit | +------------+-----------+--------+------------+ | 999990310 | 0.1015421 | 98.99 | 0.00001025 | | 999990340 | 0.1015421 | 98.99 | 0.00001025 | | 999990354 | 0.1015421 | 98.99 | 0.00001025 | | 999990411 | 0.1015421 | 98.99 | 0.00001025 | | 999990433 | 0.1015421 | 98.99 | 0.00001025 | | 999994121 | 3.1 | 98.9 | 0.00313447 | | 999994214 | 3.1 | 98.9 | 0.00313447 | | 999997254 | 0.1 | 98.5 | 0.00050761 | | 999997351 | 0.3 | 98.6 | 0.00121704 | | 999997378 | 0.1 | 98.5 | 0.00050761 | | 999997395 | 0.3 | 98.6 | 0.00121704 | | 999997660 | 0.3 | 98.6 | 0.00121704 | | 999997906 | 0.3 | 98.6 | 0.00121704 | | 999998102 | 3.1 | 98.9 | 0.00313447 | | 999998202 | 3.1 | 98.9 | 0.00313447 | | 999998464 | 0.3 | 98.6 | 0.00121704 | | 999998768 | 0.3 | 98.6 | 0.00121704 | | 999998967 | 0.3 | 98.6 | 0.00121704 | | 999999135 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999160 | 0.3 | 98.6 | 0.00121704 | | 999999199 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999213 | 3 | 98.98 | 0.00060618 | | 999999230 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999234 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999238 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999252 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999264 | 3.1 | 98.9 | 0.00313447 | | 999999275 | 3 | 98.98 | 0.00060618 | | 999999277 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999296 | 0.1015421 | 98.99 | 0.00001025 | | 999999304 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999314 | 0.1015421 | 98.99 | 0.00001025 | | 999999319 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999330 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999345 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999357 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999364 | 0.1015421 | 98.99 | 0.00001025 | | 999999365 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999371 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999382 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999394 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999401 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999408 | 0.3 | 98.6 | 0.00121704 | | 999999409 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999419 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999428 | 0.1015421 | 98.99 | 0.00001025 | | 999999434 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999450 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999455 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999464 | 0.1015421 | 98.99 | 0.00001025 | | 999999465 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999469 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999475 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999512 | 0.1015421 | 98.99 | 0.00001025 | | 999999513 | 3.1 | 98.9 | 0.00313447 | | 999999514 | 3 | 98.98 | 0.00060618 | | 999999515 | 0.3 | 98.6 | 0.00121704 | | 999999516 | 0.1 | 98.5 | 0.00050761 | | 999999518 | 0.1 | 98 | 0.0010204 | | 999999522 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999581 | 0.1015421 | 98.99 | 0.00001025 | | 999999601 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999602 | 0.3 | 98.6 | 0.00121704 | | 999999609 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999611 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999613 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999623 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999642 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999646 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999650 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999658 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999666 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999671 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999677 | 0.1 | 98 | 0.0010204 | | 999999686 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999689 | 0.1 | 98.5 | 0.00050761 | | 999999696 | 0.3 | 98.6 | 0.00121704 | | 999999697 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999699 | 3 | 98.98 | 0.00060618 | | 999999705 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999712 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999721 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999731 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999734 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999736 | 3 | 98.98 | 0.00060618 | | 999999737 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999747 | 0.1 | 98.5 | 0.00050761 | | 999999749 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999755 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999761 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999770 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999776 | 3 | 98.98 | 0.00060618 | | 999999781 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999786 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999793 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999795 | 0.3 | 98.6 | 0.00121704 | | 999999796 | 0.1 | 98 | 0.0010204 | | 999999797 | 0.1015421 | 98.99 | 0.00001025 | | 999999799 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999805 | 0.1 | 98.5 | 0.00050761 | | 999999806 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999811 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999819 | 0.1015421 | 98.99 | 0.00001025 | | 999999820 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999821 | 3 | 98.98 | 0.00060618 | | 999999827 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999838 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999846 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999851 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999854 | 3 | 98.98 | 0.00060618 | | 999999855 | 0.3 | 98.6 | 0.00121704 | | 999999857 | 0.1 | 98.5 | 0.00050761 | | 999999859 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999865 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999867 | 0.1 | 98.5 | 0.00050761 | | 999999872 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999880 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999886 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999890 | 3 | 98.98 | 0.00060618 | | 999999892 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999897 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999899 | 0.1 | 98 | 0.0010204 | | 999999900 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999909 | 0.1015421 | 98.99 | 0.00001025 | | 999999910 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999911 | 3 | 98.98 | 0.00060618 | | 999999916 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999920 | 0.1 | 98.5 | 0.00050761 | | 999999924 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999929 | 0.3 | 98.6 | 0.00121704 | | 999999931 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999936 | 0.1015421 | 98.99 | 0.00001025 | | 999999937 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999941 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999942 | 0.1 | 98.5 | 0.00050761 | | 999999947 | 3 | 98.98 | 0.00060618 | | 999999948 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999949 | 0.1015421 | 98.99 | 0.00001025 | | 999999952 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999957 | 0.1 | 98.5 | 0.00050761 | | 999999960 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999961 | 3 | 98.98 | 0.00060618 | | 999999962 | 0.1015421 | 98.99 | 0.00001025 | | 999999964 | 0.3 | 98.6 | 0.00121704 | | 999999966 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999972 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999976 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999980 | 3 | 98.98 | 0.00060618 | | 999999981 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999991 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 999999993 | 0.1015421 | 98.99 | 0.00001025 | | 999999994 | 0.1 | 98.5 | 0.00050761 | | 999999999 | 0.1 | 98 | 0.0010204 | | 1000000000 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 1000000006 | 3 | 98.98 | 0.00060618 | | 1000000011 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 1000000013 | 0.3 | 98.6 | 0.00121704 | | 1000000014 | 0.1 | 98.99 | 0.0000101 | | 1000000017 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 1000000019 | 3.1 | 98.9 | 0.00313447 | | 1000000021 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 1000000024 | 3 | 98.98 | 0.00060618 | | 1000000026 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 1000000032 | 0.1 | 98.5 | 0.00050761 | | 1000000033 | 0.1015421 | 98.99 | 0.00001025 | | 1000000034 | 1 | 98.99 | 0.00010102 | | 1000000037 | 0.3 | 98.6 | 0.00121704 | | 1000000041 | 3.1 | 98.9 | 0.00313447 | | 1000000042 | 0.1 | 98.5 | 0.00050761 | | 1000000050 | 0.1015421 | 98.99 | 0.00001025 | | 1000000069 | 0.1015421 | 98.99 | 0.00001025 | | 1000000084 | 0.1015421 | 98.99 | 0.00001025 | | 1000000090 | 0.1 | 98 | 0.0010204 | | 1000000091 | 0.1015421 | 98.99 | 0.00001025 | | 1000000161 | 0.1 | 98 | 0.0010204 | | 1000000253 | 3 | 49.5 | -3 | | 1000002813 | 3.01 | 97 | 0.06206186 | | 1000002859 | 3.01 | 97 | 0.06206186 | | 1000002930 | 3.01 | 97 | 0.06206186 | | 1000002958 | 3.01 | 97 | 0.06206186 | | 1000003010 | 3.01 | 97 | 0.06206186 | +------------+-----------+--------+------------+
|
|
|
Anyways, to prove my legitimacy, here is some info that only Doog would be privy to:
-------------------------------- --- 390060 ------- -------------------------------- bets: 13,593 wins: 6,915 losses: 6,678 luck: 100.81% wagered: 2,622.21936140 (profit): 279.64896255
-------------------------------- --- 443793 ------- -------------------------------- bets: 2,755 wins: 1,380 losses: 1,375 luck: 100.22% wagered: 1,408.70396357 (profit): 132.72196976
-------------------------------- --- 444612 ------- -------------------------------- bets: 4,006 wins: 1,986 losses: 2,020 luck: 99.28% wagered: 1,584.80297668 (profit): 50.38480271
That's close enough. It looks like the 390060 account has played a little more since you posted that, but the other two are spot on. Anyhow, I came here to say, for anyone thinking of trying this, it's not only just a matter of pure Martingale. There's a little pattern that I took a while to feel out. Most sessions, the pattern seems to work and every once in a while, when it just doesn't "feel right", I log off, randomize seed and come back later.
I noticed your pattern. It seems to be pretty simple: switch hi/lo on every loss, leave it the same on a win. But sometimes you stop alternating on a loss, and I couldn't work out why or when. Is that just gut feel? I have seen in the chat rooms that people are selling their accounts. Doog, is there any worth in an account with a win ration like the 3 I have been playing with? I think I remember reading somewhere that it affects one's payout ratio when they invest.
I don't think so. Every time you hit 'randomize' you get a new random seed, which isn't based on the history of your account at all. The accounts which change hands for lots of coins are the ones with a large loss from investing. Investors on pay commission on new profits, not on profits made after a big loss. So while you're recovering investment losses, all profits are commission free. Such accounts are worth up to however much they will save their new owner in commission. On another note, if there is someone out there that can ELI5 how to verify how my rolls were provably fair, I would be forever in their debt. I know JD is on the level, but I have never even *came close* to losing 11 bets in a row before that unlucky streak.
I would just like to learn more about the math of the whole thing.
Not sure why you struck that out, but I'd be happy to walk you through the verification process. The first place I'd refer you to however is the 'Fair?' tab on the site, and the verifier linked at the end of that tab.
|
|
|
Well at least as an investor martingalers are great as although they may take money in the short term you can guarantee that one day you'll get their whole stack.
It's looking like that 64 BTC loss was this player's last bet. They've already withdrawn hundreds of BTC of profit over the last few weeks. Maybe they have the discipline required to quit while they're ahead!
|
|
|
A few facts that haven't been mentioned here: * That losing sequence went 1/16, 1/8, 1/4, 1/2, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64 - so 11 losing bets in a row. * That guy had been coming to the site day after day, and winning 10 BTC each day on 3 different accounts. So 30 BTC per day. * This is the first time he busted - previously he only got up to 64 twice and won it both times. * He's still around 460 BTC *up* overall. * Here's a chart of the combined profit against number of rolls from the 3 accounts: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FjVFFKmG.png&t=665&c=PfbLkuX3ZtLIbA) So while it's true that in general martingale isn't a winning strategy, in this case it all worked out pretty well for him! Edit: here's a list of the bet details: +------------+---------+------+-------+----------+ | betid | bet | high | nonce | time | +------------+---------+------+-------+----------+ | 1063871599 | 64.0000 | 0 | 23 | 09:59:27 | | 1063871035 | 32.0000 | 1 | 22 | 09:59:17 | | 1063870799 | 16.0000 | 0 | 21 | 09:59:13 | | 1063870573 | 8.0000 | 1 | 20 | 09:59:09 | | 1063870357 | 4.0000 | 0 | 19 | 09:59:05 | | 1063870086 | 2.0000 | 1 | 18 | 09:59:00 | | 1063869842 | 1.0000 | 0 | 17 | 09:58:56 | | 1063869565 | 0.5000 | 1 | 16 | 09:58:51 | | 1063869383 | 0.2500 | 0 | 15 | 09:58:48 | | 1063869197 | 0.1250 | 1 | 14 | 09:58:45 | | 1063869067 | 0.0625 | 0 | 13 | 09:58:43 | +------------+---------+------+-------+----------+ Edit 2: here's a list of all his bets over 20 BTC. Notice he won 2 out of 3 at 64 BTC and 9 out of 12 at 32 BTC! +------------+--------+------+---------------------+--------+ | betid | uid | bet | date | profit | +------------+--------+------+---------------------+--------+ | 954417255 | 444612 | 32 | 2014-04-01 04:47:48 | 31.36 | | 972923827 | 390060 | 32 | 2014-04-04 10:07:09 | 31.36 | | 979554255 | 443793 | 32 | 2014-04-05 10:04:31 | 31.36 | | 997244196 | 444612 | 32 | 2014-04-08 07:21:56 | 31.36 | | 1001940814 | 390060 | 32 | 2014-04-09 05:42:09 | -32 | | 1001941194 | 390060 | 64 | 2014-04-09 05:42:15 | 62.72 | | 1019802937 | 443793 | 32 | 2014-04-11 23:58:17 | 31.36 | | 1025835234 | 443793 | 32 | 2014-04-12 23:45:06 | 31.36 | | 1025845181 | 443793 | 32 | 2014-04-12 23:47:22 | -32 | | 1025845427 | 443793 | 64 | 2014-04-12 23:47:25 | 62.72 | | 1041768962 | 390060 | 32 | 2014-04-15 11:33:18 | 31.36 | | 1041786397 | 390060 | 32 | 2014-04-15 11:37:03 | 31.36 | | 1057748701 | 444612 | 32 | 2014-04-18 04:03:02 | 31.36 | | 1063871035 | 444612 | 32 | 2014-04-19 09:59:17 | -32 | | 1063871599 | 444612 | 64 | 2014-04-19 09:59:27 | -64 | +------------+--------+------+---------------------+--------+
|
|
|
Primedice fixed their deposit issues quickly so what is going on with this site? I was gonna test it out but not if they don't fix this guys issue first.
Do you have anything to report on the deposit issue? Is it a Bitcoin-wide issue? Odd that the same thing would affect PrimeDice and CoinRoll at the same time, but I've not heard of any problems on Just-Dice. Could it be a DDoS issue perhaps?
|
|
|
why does this: cypher@cypher:~/Desktop$ sha1sum bitaddress.org.html 2d139339eaf0d1884436c316525e2f89d7249d45 bitaddress.org.html not match this: bitaddress.org-v2.9.0-SHA1-6e9ae5c64d510b53fa39e36a3017d5342b838984.html Probably because your web browser mangled the file. Try using curl or wget to download it.
|
|
|
|