the devs i respect are the one's who understand the implications of the position they assume such as core dev for a revolutionary new form of money that has a chance to become a reserve currency and a public good. i respect those devs who then choose to be paid or funded by a foundation or a research center where they can't be accused of having a financial conflict except by the most extremists who will never be satisfied with anything and see evil everywhere they look.
Good that you unequivocally admit you want the NWO coin. (it may fly over your head as to why the bolded portion implies my conclusion) So now we know where you stand. |
|
|
|
every attribute you seem to have, he seems to have. every attribute he seems to have, you seem to have.
His left eye was losing vision. My right eye is 90% blinded. Whoops. This is really comical. Are you under stress because of the court case? You are acting strange. I suggested you get on Skype so you can see me on web cam. But you refused. pm'd Next day. I will sleep. i'm not interested in talking. one quick glance to verify you're not Armstrong. I don't have Skype installed at this location. I have to travel to other location. I believe you are interested in constructing evidence to build some civil suit against me. lol, see i knew it. all blow and no go. I want to talk with you. I want to see you on cam also. I want to try to explain to you why you need to stop your Dunning Kruger presumptions. But you don't want to talk. You just want to capture my image from the web cam. i won't capture anything. i just want to see if you're Armstrong. you're the one who offered. An offering to communicate is a two-way street. It is not your right King Cypherdoc to determine that you only want to see me for a few seconds on cam and not talk to me. I want to probe your brain. I want to find out more about your personality. Etc.. You know why we programmers don't make 3000 BTC on defrauding our fellow community? Because we are enjoying too much the challenge of doing. And we see through such simpleton thought processes that you use to lure in naive investors to your trap. Thus we don't have the conscience to do what you do. I suppose your ignorance helps you manage your conscience.
you have no details of the case so don't jump to any conclusions. but of course, that's not your objective is it? to be fair. I read the filing by the plaintiff. I observe your personality here in this forum. I am a very good judge of people. I am a late June Cancer. We see right through everything. And those Cancers on the leading edge of the start of the Cancer dates are also movers and shakers.only a nutjob would expect to be able to get away with saying things like that. I've been close to a lot of people in my lifetime because I love deep interpersonal relationships. Thus I have a large enough dataset to pull from to have concluded there is a strong correlation. I also thought astrology was bullshit. But as hard as I tried, I was proven wrong in my experience (now that isn't a double-blind survey but relativity can't be i.e. your experience may be different). Unlike most people who never get out, I am not an armchair commentator. I have been all over the world in so many nooks and crannies. That is why I have lost my wealth and my eye. Nothing ventured, nothing gained. I'd do it all over again. |
|
|
|
Hi guise, how's the slow-mo trainwreck going in here? everyone happy? good  Notice how it went off the rails when you started crappin all over the devs? Try to keep it in your trousers, remember who's piloting this plane, who's the passengers and stop trying to grab the stick, KK? Ta, tally ho. TPTB dev goes down with a whimper and right on time, MOA dev shows up throwing hand grenades. anyone see the pattern i've already pointed out? but it's ok, there are plenty of excellent devs with the right vision. What, the "if they're not with me, then they're against me" reality pattern? it's not "with me". it's with Gavin. yes, i trust Gavin way more than the other financially conflicted Blockstream devs. i'm not the one who came up with the block size increase idea. it's a recommendation from the only guy who could have got us here since Satoshi turned over the reins to him. guys like gmax and luke were causing trouble long before this issue became a debate. To a simpleton n00b chatterbox who loudly flaunts his disrespect of knowledge, everything is Black & White (caps intended). Whereas, the reality is more complex. Turns out that both sides of this particular block size argument are going to lose (i.e. centralization is unavoidable by any choice). |
|
|
|
TPTB dev goes down with a whimper and right on time, MOA dev shows up throwing hand grenades.
anyone see the pattern i've already pointed out? but it's ok, there are plenty of excellent devs with the right vision.
Yes we see clearly the pattern of your delusion and disrespect for the programmers who make this entire technology happen. I am ROTFLMAO that you think you have won any debate with me. Btw, I think perhaps MOA was the guy who spanked me on some Bitcoin 101 issue when I first arrived in this forum in 2013.  I've learned much since then. |
|
|
|
No, to this day, reading his blog makes me cringe.
I have to proof read and when I don't then my writing is missing words. Because I think I am writing what I am saying in my head but then on proof read I realize I didn't. I often write for example "everything" instead of "everytime". Armstrong seems to have the same slight mental issue. I think this is caused by having a much faster processing engine than the I/O engine of the brain. |
|
|
|
i did file a response and declaration. you should read that too.
Link please? |
|
|
|
If Bitcoin does not compete with Paypal and Visa then it will NEVER compete with gold and central banks.
The reason is that physical presence matters. Gold is physical and has only two serious rival metals: platinum and silver. CB fiat is made physical by government power: legal tender for printed cash and debt-money backed by taxation and guns (although through incompetence, fiat is proving a failed experiment).
Bitcoin also has a physical presence: its ecosystem of users, companies, on-line services and large mining network. Take those away and it becomes just another Worldcoin, Yacoin, Litecoin or Auroracoin.
Bitcoin, the software can be copied many times, and its principles can be adapted in new ways e.g. NXT and Monero.
There is no useful scarcity for a digital currency unless that scarcity is backed by a physical presence, an ecosystem.
Capping the Bitcoin network at 1MB blocks is an assumption that enough of an ecosystem has been established that this particular instance of digital currency cannot be overtaken by a larger ecosystem, a larger physical presence, by one of the alternatives. This is a huge assumption which is not viable because the Bitcoin ecosystem footprint in the world economy is miniscule. Only when volumes approach Visa-scale can people sit back and consider that Bitcoin is seriously competing with gold and central banks. Even then, it can't remain standing still.
Possibly correct but irrelevant because they said it won't start (won't run) on their home computers if you move to VISA scale. But if it requires centralization to reach mass, then it won't compete with CBs any more as it will be controlled by the State. Dilemma. Check mate. Failure. Bitcoin is fundamental flawed. (you guys have very slow logic. I figured this out 100 pages back and you still haven't gotten the point) you're still wrong. both as a programmer stuck on "start" and with your economic assessment. That is not a rebuttal. Make one if you wish. |
|
|
|
every attribute you seem to have, he seems to have. every attribute he seems to have, you seem to have.
His left eye was losing vision. My right eye is 90% blinded. Whoops. This is really comical. Are you under stress because of the court case? You are acting strange. I suggested you get on Skype so you can see me on web cam. But you refused. pm'd Next day. I will sleep. i'm not interested in talking. one quick glance to verify you're not Armstrong. I don't have Skype installed at this location. I have to travel to other location. I believe you are interested in constructing evidence to build some civil suit against me. lol, see i knew it. all blow and no go. I want to talk with you. I want to see you on cam also. I want to try to explain to you why you need to stop your Dunning Kruger presumptions. But you don't want to talk. You just want to capture my image from the web cam. i won't capture anything. i just want to see if you're Armstrong. you're the one who offered. An offering to communicate is a two-way street. It is not your right King Cypherdoc to determine (i.e. it is not an attractive inducement for me) that you only want to see me for a few seconds on cam and not talk to me. I want to probe your brain. I want to find out more about your personality. Etc.. I did not install Skype here on my development machine and location because Skype is arguably spyware. I only have one computer currently at this new location. I am building two more computers and my new 24" Acer monitors just arrived. Just haven't completed that task yet. My livein 25 year old boobastic gf is pissed off that I was over at the other location the past two nights and I promised her not to go over there again until maybe tomorrow. Last night she was pissed off that I was still on the computer until 5am. So this has to stop! Have you ever tried to keep up with a 25 year old woman at our age who wants sex 10 times per day? You know why we programmers don't make 3000 BTC on defrauding our fellow community? Because we are enjoying too much the challenge of doing. And we see through such simpleton thought processes that you use to lure in naive investors to your trap. Thus we don't have the conscience to do what you do. I suppose your ignorance helps you manage your conscience.
you have no details of the case so don't jump to any conclusions. but of course, that's not your objective is it? to be fair. I read the filing by the plaintiff. I observe your personality here in this forum. I am a very good judge of people. I am a late June Cancer. We see right through everything. And those Cancers on the leading edge of the start of the Cancer dates are also movers and shakers. Just return the BTC as long as the manufacturer can commit to dispersing it to the victims you harmed with your endorsement. Do the right thing. Live to profit another day. Perhaps you can't return it if you've squandered it. File a counter affidavit for the public record to make your side of the case known. By entering that endorsement game without anonymity, you implicitly subscribed to this trial. Why did you risk a profitable medical practice and a timely investment in BTC by doing such risky endorsements? Why put yourself in such a predicament if you are as wealthy as you boastfully claim? |
|
|
|
Fuck man I told you 100 pages upthread that big blocks favor large centralized mining because of the equation that determines orphan rate says the orphan rate increases with the propagation delay. Then you retorted that IBLT resolves that, and I said yes but IBLT requires all miners to see all transactions and agree thus is centralization of the network bandwidth requirements.
can you even construct a proper sentence? and i said most miners have most tx's in their mempool which is why Gavin thinks it is likely to work. i'm sure there is some work to be done along with testing but the concepts are the same. Again you are repeating the IBLT argument. Can't you see that! Then you go over to Reddit and reargue the same nonsense that I had already explained to you is illogical. Then you write here that programmers use too much logic and not enough double-blind surveys.
Fuck man get off our lawn already!
do you even have a clue? the Chinese miners are claiming their bandwidth connections are crap and have given pretty poor connectivity rates. the miner making the claim was BTCGuild the #3 largest miner in the world. he was making the claim that all Chinese miners have the same problem. that includes the #1 and #2 miners Discus Fish and Antpool, both Chinese. therefore, all 3 of the largest miners in the world cannot conduct the large miner, large block against small miner attack the Blockstream devs have been FUD'ing. get it or are you retarded? Your logic is so weak you can't see you didn't make a point. Do I have to spell out for you dunce? |
|
|
|
from today. TPTB and Armstrong think in lockstep about Summers: We are simply drowning with people in charge who have no real world experience. According to the former US Treasury Secretary and Harvard economist Larry Summers “the world suffers from a savings surplus and therefore threatens to fall into a secular stagnation.” He looks at the world through fogged glasses – not even a rose colored pair. He claims that now for decades to come we will have to adjust accordingly to slower economic growth and increasing economic and social problems. The reason for this is that in some countries such as China and Germany, people saved too much, rather than consume or to invest. Therefore, they exported their savings abroad and thus led to an oversupply of savings, for there is no sufficient demand. Summers’ solution – the cash-free economy.http://armstrongeconomics.com/armstrong_economics_blogHe won't publish my "21 Inc" revelation. I emailed him 3 times. He has published every allegation he knows about Summers except the above. He won't publish the 21 Inc story because it blows up his assertion that there are no powers-that-be coordinating a NWO outcome. Armstrong and I disagree on this. He thinks the NY Club banksters are isolated by China, Russia etc and that they are too dumb to coordinate the world and they only are controlling the USG so they can do risk-free trading. I have presented evidence to him that the global elite are complicit and playing us for fools with false flags (e.g. the Ukraine conflict, the Spratly Islands conflict, etc are manufactured conflicts) but he refuses to accept this. I explained to him that his database and model can't "see" this coordination because the global elite use compartmentalization and deception. He reads my emails because in the past he posted a rebuttal blog post everytime I emailed him some criticism I wrote in the forum about him. Also a couple of years ago he emailed me back and forth a few times. But I've never spoken to him. |
|
|
|
but i don't think you are a programmer. i think you're Armstrong.
You are losing your sanity dude. It is really pitiful to watch you go on this delusional tirade. Me not a programmer, hahaha. Btw, Armstrong is a very skilled programmer.
there you go again. every attribute you seem to have, he seems to have. every attribute he seems to have, you seem to have. Martin Armstrong ' s writing typically includes numerous spelling and grammatical errors that we don't see with Anonymint et AL. MA'S speech and writing are patterned very much the same, while very unlike Anonymint's consistent writing style. I try not to stick my oar into this swirling pool of egos and childish arguments but sometimes I guess I like to waste time too! that's possible altho from what i recall those grammatical problems were confined to the time when he was in prison. remember, he was beat up, probably malnourished, mentally ill, and who knows, maybe faking mistakes to make his condition appear worse for when he appealed. I also commit grammatical and spelling errors when I am in a rush. I have often said I am inside Armstrong's head because there are so many parallels in our abilities and experience. But he is in his mid to late 50s, and I am still 49 for a few more days. And he was a hedge fund manager for the Japanese postal fund and I have been a programmer except from 2006 to 2012 I was a silver investor as I dug down into the rabbit hole that September 11, 2001 forced me to wake up to. I was in my birth place New Orleans, LA on that infamous day because my eye surgeon was there. Btw I called the top of the silver price within a few pennies. Ask former Hommel forum members such as rpietila (or he might have been gone by then). I didn't start emailing Armstrong until 2012 or 2013. It was his call for gold to peak and decline from 2011 (which I didn't discover until 2012) and his call around August 2012 for the DJIA to continue its bull market heading eventually to potentially 39,000 that really struck me. He has since explained that the DJIA inverted to align with private assets (formerly aligned with public assets, i.e. sovereign bonds) and thus will have a correction before Oct 2015 and then head for those nosebleed levels in 2017 as private capital and the international dollar short heads back safe haven home. |
|
|
|
"but he may construct a civil lawsuit against me", whimper, whimper. "oh wait, i'm in the Phillipines! or am i?", whimper, whimper.
I am also on a US citizen, not a permanent resident, and thus subject to passport cancellation and deportation. |
|
|
|
every attribute you seem to have, he seems to have. every attribute he seems to have, you seem to have.
His left eye was losing vision. My right eye is 90% blinded. Whoops. This is really comical. Are you under stress because of the court case? You are acting strange. I suggested you get on Skype so you can see me on web cam. But you refused. pm'd Next day. I will sleep. i'm not interested in talking. one quick glance to verify you're not Armstrong. I don't have Skype installed at this location. I have to travel to other location. I believe you are interested in constructing evidence to build some civil suit against me. "i need to sleep", whimper, whimper. "i need to travel to another location", whimper, whimper. ROFLMAO!  what a jackass. Both are true. You are the jackass. |
|
|
|
every attribute you seem to have, he seems to have. every attribute he seems to have, you seem to have.
His left eye was losing vision. My right eye is 90% blinded. Whoops. This is really comical. Are you under stress because of the court case? You are acting strange. I suggested you get on Skype so you can see me on web cam. But you refused. pm'd Next day. I will sleep. i'm not interested in talking. one quick glance to verify you're not Armstrong. I don't have Skype installed at this location. I have to travel to other location. I believe you are interested in constructing evidence to build some civil suit against me. lol, see i knew it. all blow and no go. I want to talk with you. I want to see you on cam also. I want to try to explain to you why you need to stop your Dunning Kruger presumptions. But you don't want to talk. You just want to capture my image from the web cam. You know why we programmers don't make 3000 BTC on defrauding our fellow community? Because we are enjoying too much the challenge of doing. And we see through such simpleton thought processes that you use to lure in naive investors to your trap. Thus we don't have the conscience to do what you do. I suppose your ignorance helps you manage your conscience. Fuck man I told you 100 pages upthread that big blocks favor large centralized mining because of the equation that determines orphan rate says the orphan rate increases with the propagation delay. Then you retorted that IBLT resolves that, and I said yes but IBLT requires all miners to see all transactions and agree thus is centralization of the network bandwidth requirements. Then you go over to Reddit and reargue the same nonsense that I had already explained to you is illogical. Then you write here that programmers use too much logic and not enough double-blind surveys. Fuck man get off our lawn already! |
|
|
|
every attribute you seem to have, he seems to have. every attribute he seems to have, you seem to have.
His left eye was losing vision. My right eye is 90% blinded. Whoops. This is really comical. Are you under stress because of the court case? You are acting strange. I suggested you get on Skype so you can see me on web cam. But you refused. pm'd Next day. I will sleep. i'm not interested in talking. one quick glance to verify you're not Armstrong. I don't have Skype installed at this location. I have to travel to other location. I believe you are interested in constructing evidence to build some civil suit against me. |
|
|
|
every attribute you seem to have, he seems to have. every attribute he seems to have, you seem to have.
His left eye was losing vision. My right eye is 90% blinded. Whoops. This is really comical. Are you under stress because of the court case? You are acting strange. I suggested you get on Skype so you can see me on web cam. But you refused. pm'd Next day. I will sleep. i'm not interested in talking. one quick glance to verify you're not Armstrong. I don't have Skype installed at this location. I have to travel to other location. |
|
|
|
If Bitcoin does not compete with Paypal and Visa then it will NEVER compete with gold and central banks.
The reason is that physical presence matters. Gold is physical and has only two serious rival metals: platinum and silver. CB fiat is made physical by government power: legal tender for printed cash and debt-money backed by taxation and guns (although through incompetence, fiat is proving a failed experiment).
Bitcoin also has a physical presence: its ecosystem of users, companies, on-line services and large mining network. Take those away and it becomes just another Worldcoin, Yacoin, Litecoin or Auroracoin.
Bitcoin, the software can be copied many times, and its principles can be adapted in new ways e.g. NXT and Monero.
There is no useful scarcity for a digital currency unless that scarcity is backed by a physical presence, an ecosystem.
Capping the Bitcoin network at 1MB blocks is an assumption that enough of an ecosystem has been established that this particular instance of digital currency cannot be overtaken by a larger ecosystem, a larger physical presence, by one of the alternatives. This is a huge assumption which is not viable because the Bitcoin ecosystem footprint in the world economy is miniscule. Only when volumes approach Visa-scale can people sit back and consider that Bitcoin is seriously competing with gold and central banks. Even then, it can't remain standing still.
Possibly correct but irrelevant because they said it won't start (won't run) on their home computers if you move to VISA scale. But if it requires centralization to reach mass, then it won't compete with CBs any more as it will be controlled by the State. Dilemma. Check mate. Failure. Bitcoin is fundamental flawed. (you guys have very slow logic. I figured this out 100 pages back and you still haven't gotten the point) |
|
|
|
Game over, Frap.doc. Thus Saith The LORD. Amen! of course not. as long as you continue to constrain it to 1MB. Cypherdoc is correct. Nick Szabo and Oleg Andreev are both wrong. I don't care what their credentials are, in this matter they are not thinking clearly. They are not incorrect about it won't run decentralized. of course not. as long as you continue to constrain it to 1MB.
You missed the technical point. Start was referring to "won't run". i'm pretty sure he meant "start competing". Because you aren't a programmer. Szabo is. first off, Szabo didn't tweet that. Oleganza did. the word "start" is juxtaposed btwn 2 forms of the word "compete". it means "start competing". second, even a non-programmer such as myself realizes that Oleganza would never claim Bitcoin won't even "start running". it IS running currently. he would have said something like it can't "scale". Oleg is a programmer too. Szabo retweeted it thus presumably agreeing with it. At Visa scale it would not run decentralized any more. Meaning it would not run on their home computers any more. I know what he meant because I think as a programmer does. Programmers are precise and mean what they say. A period mean end this statement. |
|
|
|
...I don't buy his "computer model" explanation though. You probably lack appropriate domain knowledge to form an accurate assessment? Have you not reviewed his record of correct predictions? It is essentially flawless since the 1980s if you understand his predictions are conditional and price and time are separate predictions. You are most possibly right. I probably lack of the appropriate knowledge; nevertheless I have (as stated) said that he "passed one test", which (clarifying further for those who misunderstood) that his "model" is proven to be working. What I'm not sure about is that it's based on a computer model ie: a relational database mining s/w that includes every single economic data out there, that is able through calculations to extract an accurate prediction within a chaotic model. To put it into perspective, as a theoretical physicist, I rest assure you that such a model is defined as " unpredictable". If you know more on the matter, I'd be honoured if you satiated my curiosity and obliterate my ignorance. I can certify that I'm more than capable to understand (even though it will take some more time than most geniuses in here) subjects from IT to QM (nevertheless, I stopped a while ago, being productive on the 1st one). Thanks in advance for your help. I will come back to this after some sleep. Before i sleep, some links: https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Aarmstrongeconomics.com+hidden+orderhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=355212.msg10890931#msg10890931https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=365141.msg9566419#msg9566419 See also his entropy model for a stochastic momentum model. |
|
|
|
every attribute you seem to have, he seems to have. every attribute he seems to have, you seem to have.
His left eye was losing vision. My right eye is 90% blinded. Whoops. This is really comical. Are you under stress because of the court case? You are acting strange. I suggested you get on Skype so you can see me on web cam. But you refused. pm'd Next day. I will sleep. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
