this is a bought account
If your account is a bought account, that is good for you, why are you telling me that? |
|
|
|
Check back your trusted list mate. They're tagged red. - 8 from my pov
They're 0: -0 / +0 with unmodified trust settings. @OP You're seeing that because your (bought) account have someone who gave a positive feedback to Cryptominer in your trust list. My account is not bought. I have not modified anything in my trust list, it is as it always has been since I have signed up. Also, you can go back to my posts from the very beginning, they have always been satirical and sarcastic, as well as free of grammar/spelling errors. It doesn't make sense when you accuse me of using a bought account. I won't waste any time defending myself against something that I do not consider to be a vice though. I've edited my post to clarify some thing while you were typing. That should make things clear. You gave them a positive trust back in 2014 and you're included in your own trust list/network by default. Oh, I just realized that the rating I had left on their profile when they absconded was a positive one, not a negative one. Oops! |
|
|
|
Check back your trusted list mate. They're tagged red. - 8 from my pov
They're 0: -0 / +0 with unmodified trust settings. @OP You're seeing that because your (bought) account have someone who gave a positive feedback to Cryptominer in your trust list. My account is not bought. I have not modified anything in my trust list, it is as it always has been since I have signed up. Also, you can go back to my posts from the very beginning, they have always been satirical and sarcastic, as well as free of grammar/spelling errors. It doesn't make sense when you accuse me of using a bought account. I won't waste any time defending myself against something that I do not consider to be a vice though. |
|
|
|
Check back your trusted list mate. They're tagged red. - 8 from my pov
Wait, why is it different for me then? And how do I change it so that mine shows -8 too? This is the outcome when newbies buy accounts here on bitcointalk. That really does not answer my question, but alright, I guess. |
|
|
|
Check back your trusted list mate. They're tagged red. - 8 from my pov
Wait, why is it different for me then? And how do I change it so that mine shows -8 too? |
|
|
|
For people too young to remember, CryptcoMiner was 2014's biggest Ponzi scheme, targeting Bitcointalk users in a very old-fashioned scam contrastingly presented in a unique way, they shut down when they hit the 70 BTC mark. You can see many posts of it, just use Google, there are many threads about it on Bitcointalk even to this day https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=785376.0So, why does the user's trust rating show: Trust: 10: -0 / +1 |
|
|
|
I believe the sun shines every day and thats my god.
So your God is the solar messiah? Christians do worship on Sunday after all. It's not a coincidence. |
|
|
|
Does anyone else think that Lauda should not be a moderator?
Lauda proceeds with her opinion when moderating the board. Lauda does not follow the rules of the board the same way other moderators do. Lauda is not open to ever being wrong or mistaken. Lauda does not understand what it means to moderate the board. Lauda does not bother to explain reasons behind actions in a friendly way. Lauda likes to be abrasive with people she is moderating. Lauda is power hungry.
I move to have Lauda removed from being a moderator effective immediately.
There are lots of moderators on Bitcointalk, but of course you chose to pick on Lauda, the female moderator. I'm not surprised, this place is the garden of sexism. Oh that's funny, even if Lauda is female do you really think this subject has anything to do with that, seriously get a life. This is about the attitude Lauda has as a moderate and while i think it can be a little harsh at times and even in bad taste we are all different and voice our options differently. It's not a coincidence. I'll retract my statement if you can show me a similar post about a male moderator, with members of the opposite sex consistently bashing him. I feel sorry for any females in your life, because you are too privileged to see sexism and empathize with them. |
|
|
|
Damn, I cry because my big bet in last yea, I lost 1 year salary, damn I was almost kill myself.  I am so sorry to hear that has happened to you. Do you know what the bet was in particular? You don't have to share details if you're not comfortable. |
|
|
|
I really do not give a shit about what you think about the content of my posts. I do not make them to amuse you, or anybody for that matter.
I don't ...Forum does...moderators do....Yes I don't expect you to make posts to amuse me,forum expects you to make posts which are constructive and on-topic since you're not contributing to yourself but the community as a whole... The people I communicate with believe my ideas are relevant, so do the moderators. If you have an issue with any posts, instead of derailing threads by bickering, I suggest you use the report feature. Bonus points if you stop stalking me. |
|
|
|
Poor you Americans. I'd never get caught if I was a miner, because I doub't my government even know what is Bitcoin  ... Which government is this? I doubt they don't know, most of them are all aware. |
|
|
|
Incest was allowed during those time because god said so and the population ain't that huge compare today.
There were even a time that abraham was permitted by god to have sex with sarah the slave of her wife just so they can have son.
Wow, so glad we are having this discussion here. All the Christians are finally coming out and admitting that their God is not so moral after all. From allowing sexual slavery of your underage daughters to allowing incest. Real Godly. |
|
|
|
So your source mentions Leviticus 18:6-18, but I was talking about the NT. Where in the New Testament is incest forbidden? Since you don't believe in the OT laws.
You can Google something like "incest in the New Testament" just as easily as I, right? You don't even seem to understand that I believe in the O.T. laws way more than the average Christian. So, why would you want me to do your research for you? Of course, what one means when he says, "believe in the OT laws," might be uncertain without more explanation. After all, James in the N.T. says regarding belief in God, "even demons believe, and shudder."  That's the point. Christianity is so contradictory, you would think that for someone who claims to be omnipotent and benevolent, he would clarify and be more specific just so he doesn't have to send 99% of the population to a place full of fire, and smoke, and torture where you will live forever till the end of time (Christianity is elitism, I believe that). Oh wait, he has already committed genocide against the unborn, so it's not really a benevolent God after all. But he loves you? |
|
|
|
Nobody gives a damn about a trust rating which isn't from a person in the default trust list. You shouldn't too. Those kind of fake trusts affect nothing. People don't even read them.
I read them!  I could link you to a 100 posts where you are signature spamming btw. I really do not give a shit about what you think about the content of my posts. I do not make them to amuse you, or anybody for that matter. |
|
|
|
This is the third time that Op opens a thread and saying that he has more than 9 BTC. The previous 2, was locked and he never show that BTC. Now again the same phishing attempt and for no reason...  You clearly have an issue Op...  Lol not sure how he may scam later but posting the same thing over and over again and then lockig the thread isn't a good practise. Scammers are real funny. I don't see how he can scamm really by posting such threads but.. Maybe he wants to lend and then accept a collateral and sell this collateral before he can even provide the money to be sent to the loanee. The reason Bitcointalk scammers are funny is because they're mostly kids trying to score free Runescape membership. It's really amusing seeing people dispute in 20+ paged threads over a couple of satoshis. |
|
|
|
|
So your source mentions Leviticus 18:6-18, but I was talking about the NT. Where in the New Testament is incest forbidden? Since you don't believe in the OT laws.
|
|
|
|
|
Keep sharing your stories guys. I am reading them all, and so is the rest of the community I am sure.
|
|
|
|
This topic smells like a butthurt liberal sjw crap  The awkward moment when you believe in a book that is okay with you selling your daughter into sexual slavery as the word of God, and deem it less offensive than those "butthurt liberal sjws". BADecker, you still haven't shown me the verse. Based on love, if it is more beneficial for your daughter to sell her into slavery than not, why wouldn't you want to do it, even today? What verse? The verse that prohibits incest in the Bible |
|
|
|
This topic smells like a butthurt liberal sjw crap The awkward moment when you believe in a book that is okay with you selling your daughter into sexual slavery as the word of God, and deem it less offensive than those "butthurt liberal sjws". BADecker, you still haven't shown me the verse. |
|
|
|
|
So, you get to pick and choose what parts of the OT are still relevant, like the ten commandments?
Alright, then. The ten commandments still do not prohibit incest in any way. You wanna show me where in the NT incest is forbidden?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
