Q: Should Lauda *really* be a moderator of bitcointalk A: no

[BitcoinEXpress]

Most of us use a definition which includes things like cheating people out of escrow money, etc.

Any chance you can cite any evidence proven cases of escrow scamming here on BCT?


~BCX~

Is this an attempt at irony?  I don't get it.  Playing dumb: you know there's a 20 page thread detailing how QS cheated people out of escrow money by fooling them into thinking he was a third party just so that he could collect the fees and not have to use an actual escrow for the deal, right?

Oh that 20 pages.

Yes it's pretty much rock solid proof

But QS says it isn't relevant to his reputation.

Thanks for pointing that out.


~BCX~

[1715133865]

1715133865

[1715133865]

1715133865

[1715133865]

1715133865

[suchmoon]

Didn't master-p and escrow.ms get busted for escrow scamming some time ago as well?

Master-P - yes.

escrow.ms AFAIK didn't scam anyone on the forum but got arrested IRL.

[boki15]

What difference does it make if bitcointalk staff is involved in many questionable actions. If accusations are truth, then he fits pretty well to the team.

[ajareselde]

What difference does it make if bitcointalk staff is involved in many questionable actions. If accusations are truth, then he fits pretty well to the team.

The only question that should be asked is  "Are they doing their job correctly? "   Being a staff member isn't only limited to Virgin Mary,saints and alike.

[boki15]

no they arent, it is fact, black on white, especially visible in altcoin section. With that said, what is "coorect job" at all? The best is the one who fits best to this working place, which means you have to fit to the team. Just look at "unofficial rules" that officials reffer to. This is just one of X examples "how it should not be done".

If he is honest person, he probably would rethink to join such team. If not, then he really fits perfectly.

[Quickseller]

I will just leave this up here:

All times GMT
In Freenode #cryptocurrency-collectors

Code:

August 19 20:57:18 <defcon23>	;;slap Lauda 
August 19 20:57:40 <defcon23>	lol dont saw gribble was put on quiet :)
August 19 21:05:06 *	digicoinuser (~chatzilla@unaffiliated/digicoinuser) has joined
August 19 21:07:26 <Lauda>	french bastard
August 19 21:07:39 <Lauda>	Don't make me send another terrorist to Europe
August 19 21:07:45 <Lauda>	;;stab defcon23
August 19 21:08:23 <defcon23>	0_o ?
August 19 21:08:26 <defcon23>	what ??
August 19 21:08:39 <Lauda>	don't slap me
August 19 21:09:20 <defcon23>	try to stay polite please
August 19 21:09:38 <Lauda>	You slapped me pfft
August 19 21:09:51 <defcon23>	i havent insult you
August 19 21:10:04 <Slck>	<ognasty> @lauda Please keep in mind this channel broadcasts to IRC, which is a public forum.  Your terrorist threats and extortion comments are not appreciated.  Thanks.
August 19 21:10:16 <Lauda>	<defcon23> ;;slap Lauda
August 19 21:10:19 <Lauda>	Don't care.

Here Lauda says that he will send a terrorist to Europe. This is probably a joke, but still in very bad taste, and demonstrates the maturity level of Lauda.

Code:

August 19 22:23:17 <Slck>	<ognasty> The fact that I come here to share knowledge and help people, yet run into bad eggs like Lauda shows you the intent of some people around here.
August 19 22:23:39 <Lauda>	Begging and harrasing people, false knowledge
August 19 22:23:44 <Lauda>	Very helpful indeed.
August 19 22:24:07 <Slck>	<ognasty> Keep spreading lies.  You're certainly helping yourself.
August 19 22:24:43 <Lauda>	Everything is factually correct and recorded by IRC and PM logs.
August 19 22:24:47 <Lauda>	No worries.
August 19 22:24:56 <Slck>	<ognasty> Indeed, your threats and extortion comments are logged.
August 19 22:25:06 <defcon23>	indeed it is
August 19 22:25:12 <Slck>	<ognasty> As are your lies about my PMs and begging.
August 19 22:25:12 <Lauda>	Very strong threats indeed
August 19 22:25:19 <Slck>	<ognasty> Definitely not behavior I would expect from a moderator.
August 19 22:25:24 <Slck>	<ognasty> I'm guessing I'm not the only one.....

Here it seems that others feel similarly about Lauda's extortion attempts

Code:

August 19 22:28:39 <Slck>	<ognasty> @lauda Odd you know everything about everything else.
August 19 22:28:49 <Slck>	<ognasty> Why does this one question escape your vast knowledge base?
August 19 22:29:05 <Lauda>	Because I couldn't give a flying fuck about other people? :D
August 19 22:29:11 <Lauda>	I'm just messing with you, I don't give a damn haha
August 19 22:29:13 <Slck>	<ognasty> You seem to care a lot about me.
August 19 22:29:19 <Lauda>	Hello? xD
August 19 22:29:23 <Lauda>	It's what I do :D
August 19 22:29:23 <Slck>	<ognasty> backtracking... awesome... lol
August 19 22:29:37 <Slck>	<ognasty> Don't pretend to be smart while you're drunk.  You are making too many mistakes.
August 19 22:29:49 <Lauda>	Nah, I troll people that look vulnerable
August 19 22:29:52 <Lauda>	Don't take things personal :D
August 19 22:30:02 <Lauda>	You did well, better than before.
August 19 22:30:07 <Slck>	<ognasty> Thank you for admitting it.  That's what I needed.
August 19 22:30:23 <Slck>	<ognasty> Mission accomplished.

Here Lauda admits that he trolls people that he thinks is vulnerable.

Of course QS has a beef with the concept of DT

This is not true.

His (QS's) definition is basically "someone who publically disagrees with me".

Also not true, however both of these comments are off-topic here.

[Vod]

I think it's creepy when conversations are being recorded and analyzed like that. 

I agree that QS wishes DT removed.  I find that deeply disturbing.   

[Lauda]

Here Lauda admits that he trolls people that he thinks is vulnerable.

Who is this "he" Lauda? I thought I was a she. You need to put your act together.

I think it's creepy when conversations are being recorded and analyzed like that.  

I must apologize that you had to see that. I did not know that the 'work' that I do was evaluated based on how I interact with people outside of the 'workplace'. I need to start being nice to my mother, and very serious in everything that I say to my acquaintances. One of the comic relief attempts during a 'heavy' argument:

Code:

[23:31:41] <Lauda> Give me COIN or BAN hammerz

They don't have anything on me (even defcon23 changed their mind as can be seen in their trust rating). Acquiring my DOX is near-impossible, finding moderation error is also unlikely (as this is rare), so they have to spy on our chat-room and cherry pick parts of it. That said, I'm going to stay away from this thread (again) as my time is better spent actually moderating.

The only question that should be asked is  "Are they doing their job correctly? "   Being a staff member isn't only limited to Virgin Mary,saints and alike.

Missed this one:

[Heutenamos]

OP was last active 3+ weeks ago






                                                                                                             

[tspacepilot]

OP was last active 3+ weeks ago

OP is an alt of Quickseller.  He often uses and alt account to start his accusation threads.  Eventually he ends up using the Quickseller account for the attack.  I'm not sure if it's because of some "strategy" if it's just because he forgets to log in and out a lot as he's trying to sockpuppet the thread.

[boki15]

OFFTOPIC (at least I think discussion about he/she is offtopic)
I dont want to say anything with this post, just commenting on the argument that Lauda is "she". But before I write it, it is total offtopic to discuss about he/she as it does not change anything, accusations are not done differntly to female/male persons.

Holding on such arguments you could filter most women here by using him/her; he/she ... in their posts, by statistics most users who use it are women and the explanation seems to be that its more important for them then for males and on other side it produces more data beside drifting (like supermarkt example) out in discussion if somebody is male or female. Following this logic and what I see on bitcointalk this percentage of males who use it would be marked as collateral damage.

Back to this accusation by name, I am not sure what it should mean, Lauda is female name? Most popular person with this name (only popular that I know) is Niki Lauda


He was also known as the owner of airline discounter Lauda Air which lasted until 2013.

@Lauda
Everybody makes mistakes, even you and if you believe in opposite, there is no need in finding it out by stating such, especially not if you are part of staff, people should not have reason to attack staff and your answer sounds somehow as invitation for those who have too much time and nothing better to do.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

@QS: Soooo lauda is demonstrably guilty of having a cynical, black sense of humor. 

Oh the horror!

Oh the horror!!

[gorgon666]

OP was last active 3+ weeks ago

Do not worry. I am still finding dirt on Lauda. I know some reasons why Lauda is still on staff, but I think those reasons will go away soon.

[Heutenamos]

OP was last active 3+ weeks ago

Do not worry. I am still finding dirt on Lauda. I know some reasons why Lauda is still on staff, but I think those reasons will go away soon.

3 weeks is a long break & was worried if u girls have given up fighting by mistake. Just don't forget the password lmao....

[Joel_Jantsen]

OP was last active 3+ weeks ago

Do not worry. I am still finding dirt on Lauda. I know some reasons why Lauda is still on staff, but I think those reasons will go away soon.

3 weeks is a long break & was worried if u girls have given up fighting by mistake. Just don't forget the password lmao....

You're mistaken.Such audacious fighters need an army of accounts for maximal damage.While one account takes attention on one thread the other account goes offline until the current account is beaten to death by facts and proved wrong contradicting all their posts.Once they realize they have nothing more to rant about,they go back to the other account and try harder on another thread they were earlier whining about.

[mammabitcoin2u]

I've read 1 page, pg 17 the last one in this thread.  I want to bash my face if it can help not seeing nonsense.

QS yep reputation even when I was brand spanking new is cautionary at best.  Seeing the cattiness is beyond words Sending terrorists was an obvious joke gonna get all politically correct hypocritical Snappin bits of a chat is bullshit the entire chat leading up to the bits matters. Don't hate on the truth or those who tell it.  Newbies should see it repeated again n again. Move on with what you got left.

As for the topic, posts I've seen I got no qualms.  This thread topic is childish at best.

gonna go bash my face

[awesome31312]

Does anyone else think that Lauda should not be a moderator?

Lauda proceeds with her opinion when moderating the board. Lauda does not follow the rules of the board the same way other moderators do. Lauda is not open to ever being wrong or mistaken. Lauda does not understand what it means to moderate the board. Lauda does not bother to explain reasons behind actions in a friendly way. Lauda likes to be abrasive with people she is moderating. Lauda is power hungry.

I move to have Lauda removed from being a moderator effective immediately.

There are lots of moderators on Bitcointalk, but of course you chose to pick on Lauda, the female moderator. I'm not surprised, this place is the garden of sexism.

[bitkilo]

Does anyone else think that Lauda should not be a moderator?

Lauda proceeds with her opinion when moderating the board. Lauda does not follow the rules of the board the same way other moderators do. Lauda is not open to ever being wrong or mistaken. Lauda does not understand what it means to moderate the board. Lauda does not bother to explain reasons behind actions in a friendly way. Lauda likes to be abrasive with people she is moderating. Lauda is power hungry.

I move to have Lauda removed from being a moderator effective immediately.

There are lots of moderators on Bitcointalk, but of course you chose to pick on Lauda, the female moderator. I'm not surprised, this place is the garden of sexism.

Oh that's funny, even if Lauda is female do you really think this subject has anything to do with that, seriously get a life.

This is about the attitude Lauda has as a moderate and while i think it can be a little harsh at times and even in bad taste we are all different and voice our options differently.

[awesome31312]

Does anyone else think that Lauda should not be a moderator?

Lauda proceeds with her opinion when moderating the board. Lauda does not follow the rules of the board the same way other moderators do. Lauda is not open to ever being wrong or mistaken. Lauda does not understand what it means to moderate the board. Lauda does not bother to explain reasons behind actions in a friendly way. Lauda likes to be abrasive with people she is moderating. Lauda is power hungry.

I move to have Lauda removed from being a moderator effective immediately.

There are lots of moderators on Bitcointalk, but of course you chose to pick on Lauda, the female moderator. I'm not surprised, this place is the garden of sexism.

Oh that's funny, even if Lauda is female do you really think this subject has anything to do with that, seriously get a life.

This is about the attitude Lauda has as a moderate and while i think it can be a little harsh at times and even in bad taste we are all different and voice our options differently.

It's not a coincidence. I'll retract my statement if you can show me a similar post about a male moderator, with members of the opposite sex consistently bashing him.

I feel sorry for any females in your life, because you are too privileged to see sexism and empathize with them.

[tspacepilot]

OP was last active 3+ weeks ago

Do not worry. I am still finding dirt on Lauda. I know some reasons why Lauda is still on staff, but I think those reasons will go away soon.

We know that you're still here, you've been trolling Lauda with your main account, Quickseller.  Why do you continue with this sockpuppet account attacks even when it just makes you look more dishonest?