Bitcoin Forum
June 17, 2024, 03:22:55 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 [36] 37 38 »
701  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Blue Fury Miners V2 2.6Gh/s on: November 01, 2013, 10:43:46 AM
Beastlymac,
Thanks for the quick response.  I solved the H error rate by going to the original modified bfgminer 3.2.0.  The hash rate is still 2.26 GH/sec.  I posted this in the support thread.
702  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: Blue Fury Support Thread. on: November 01, 2013, 10:42:19 AM
After trying to run the Blue Fury miner with bfgminer3.4.0 with -S bigpic:all, it was detected and hashed, but had a very high H error rate (about 61%) after about 40 minutes.  The hash rate was about 2.26 GH/Sec.
Trying the original modified bfgminer 3.2.0 resolves the H error rate, but the hash rate is still about 2.26 GH/sec.
Is there any way to change the configuration or firmware to get closer to the specifiec 2.6 GH/sec?
 
703  Bitcoin / Group buys / Re: [BPMC] Blue Fury USB ~2.6GH/s 0.88BTC [Australia/NZ] on: November 01, 2013, 09:38:04 AM
Julz, thanks for the direct delivery.
I managed to get it going, but the results are strange.  Not sure if it is a faulty device or something else.  Running the latest BFGMiner  (3.4.0).  The rest of the installation is per Beastlymac in https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=299295.0.  To avoid interactions with other things it is running entirely alone, on a separate Win7 64 PC as a single device on a powered hub.  I am getting a very high H error rate (about 61% after about 40 minutes) and the hash rate is about 2.26GH/sec (on Slush's pool).  I tried resetting the device, the miner software etc, but there is no improvement.  I wonder if it is a faulty device or a configuration problem.

More exploration:  Using the older bfgminer 3.2.0 with the original batch file seems to solve the high H rate.  The hash rate remains however close to 2.26 GH/sec.

Cheers
704  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Blue Fury Miners V2 2.6Gh/s on: November 01, 2013, 09:25:34 AM
Just got my BF and it's running on Win7 with BFGminer 3.4.0, but the results are strange.  The hash rate is about 2.26GH/S and the HW error rate is HUGE ~ 61% after more than 40 minutes.  Tried resetting BFG, reinserting the device but there is no change.  Is it faulty?

More exploration:  using the older bfgminer 3.2.0 with the original batch file seems to solve the high H rate.  The hash rate remains however close to 2.26 GH/sec.
705  Bitcoin / Group buys / Re: [BPMC] Blue Fury USB ~2.6GH/s 0.88BTC [Australia/NZ] on: October 31, 2013, 06:54:35 AM
I have a tracking number... hoping it's for the entire batch.

Hi Julz
Any news on these?
706  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [100 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: October 26, 2013, 08:44:46 AM
I still got no reward for the block 20598 with 38472 shares! I'm qqqq85 on the pool.
You can raise it with Live Support (see link on left side of the Slush web site), 'they' probably will not look here.
I had this one confirmed at 'normal' reward rate.  Did you mine steadily through the whole block?
707  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: Doctor for Block Erupter USBs? on: October 26, 2013, 06:14:34 AM
I apparently tried to run too many block erupters off of one hub; the hub got very hot and seems to have burned something out inside (apparently the part of the hub that supplies the power to the individual ports), and now 3 of the 4 block erupters no longer seem to be working, even when I try to use them with another hub (when I plug in the block erupter the computer doesn't even seem to recognize that anything has been plugged into it). I don't think there is any damage to the computer or its USB ports itself though, because it still recognizes and uses USB flash drives and external hard drives without a problem.

I was hoping that maybe it was just some sort of a software/registry etc. issue, but I restored my entire OS partition from an Acronis True Image image I made a week ago when the block erupters were still working fine, and the computer still does not recognize these 3 block erupters. So the problem seems to be the block erupters.

Two of the block erupters I don't see any signs of life at all in; the third sometimes when I try plugging it in, the little tiny square LED light will come on and stay on continuously, but the computer still doesn't recognize the block erupter.

Is there any kind of repair service that may be able to fix these 3 block erupters? If so, what is the cost and how do I get in touch with them?

If not, does anyone have any suggestions for environmentally friendly uses for dead block erupters? So far I have thought of 'paperweight', but I'm sure there are more uses I haven't considered.

Thanks!
Check that the USB ports on your PC are working - for example by plugging a USB Flash drive and checking that it is recognized.  Had a case of USB port damage (seems only the 5V rail) due to a powered hub 'injecting' too much into the PC.
Check the suspected BE's with another hub or by plugging them 1 at a time into the PC USB port.

There was a guide somewhere on the forum on clearing the USB port settings (but you probably took care of that by restoring the partition)
708  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [100 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: October 26, 2013, 06:07:42 AM
It seems I got shortchanged again in the last block:

20608    2013-10-26 02:16:27    1:27:23    291941058    97919    0.00061354

Anybody else?  I hope it gets corrected but I doubt it; I've had a couple that never did so.

Block 20608 fixed itself,
Slush must have a script running a couple of hours after a block was found that recounts the shares.
 
if you want to calculate your correct payout use the following:

25 divided by the total round shares
then multiply with your number of submitted shares

(25/total shares) * your shares
Unfortunately the reward calculation is not that simple, as Slush uses a system described in https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1976.msg50002#msg50002
score = score + exp(round_time/C),
to avoid 'pool hopping', essentially this means that if you left the pool some short time before a block was solved, your reward will be much lower than the simple proportion of your submitted shares...

correct,
but it comes pretty darn close, specially for shorter rounds ( if mined steady for at least 1 million shares )
You are correct for steady hash rates...Smiley
709  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [100 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: October 26, 2013, 05:56:30 AM
It seems I got shortchanged again in the last block:

20608    2013-10-26 02:16:27    1:27:23    291941058    97919    0.00061354

Anybody else?  I hope it gets corrected but I doubt it; I've had a couple that never did so.

Block 20608 fixed itself,
Slush must have a script running a couple of hours after a block was found that recounts the shares.
 
if you want to calculate your correct payout use the following:

25 divided by the total round shares
then multiply with your number of submitted shares

(25/total shares) * your shares
Unfortunately the reward calculation is not that simple, as Slush uses a system described in https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1976.msg50002#msg50002
score = score + exp(round_time/C),
to avoid 'pool hopping', essentially this means that if you left the pool some short time before a block was solved, your reward will be much lower than the simple proportion of your submitted shares...
710  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [100 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: October 26, 2013, 02:12:43 AM
mining.bitcoin.cz responds with

503 Service Unavailable
No server is available to handle this request.

now back 'on the air'....
711  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [100 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: October 20, 2013, 04:28:01 AM
Not sure what happen? Miners were not down.

 
#               Block found at Duration                    Total shares                 Your shares            Your BTC reward          Block #             Block value              Validity
20474         2013-10-19 19:49:11 0:58:18         183619562                   14319                   0.00278337                 264716           25.05891520      98 confirmations left 
20473         2013-10-19 18:50:53 4:18:43         806905065                  47775                    0.00000000                 264706           25.02120000      88 confirmations left 
20472         2013-10-19 14:32:10 0:33:05         101910920                   9975                     0.00273336                 264672           25.12480605      54 confirmations left 
20471         2013-10-19 13:59:05 1:34:50        290381577                   31050                    0.00262393                 264664           25.03999643      46 confirmations left 
20470         2013-10-19 12:24:15 0:36:09        109556297                   12050                    0.00281957                 264650           25.06568921      32 confirmations left 

Comparing your fraction of shares to Total shares to mine, there is clearly a lower value for this block, perhaps your rig or internet connection had some issue towards the end of the block
Block #   Share ratio Aurel57/Kabopar
20474   1.649844452
20473   1.225817211
20472   1.936893204
20471   2.221506761
20470   2.186536019
712  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [100 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: October 19, 2013, 10:06:27 AM
All my Block Eruptor stopped working 15 miutes ago for no obvious reasons ... using BFGMiner. Network on my RPi seems ok. Anyone else has issues with the pool ?
my rig is working ok, but I noticed a large drop in the pool's hash rate (from about 220TH to 198TH/s)

now at 176TH, looks like another DDOS attack or some server fault at our pool?!
713  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [100 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: October 19, 2013, 09:55:47 AM
All my Block Eruptor stopped working 15 miutes ago for no obvious reasons ... using BFGMiner. Network on my RPi seems ok. Anyone else has issues with the pool ?
my rig is working ok, but I noticed a large drop in the pool's hash rate (from about 220TH to 198TH/s)
714  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [100 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: October 18, 2013, 11:12:17 AM
Is anyone else experiencing that reward payout is not happening?  Had my confirmed reward above the threshold for at least 2 hours and no payout... Wake up slush server, put some more coals into that engine....

Yeah me too

Now 3 hours over due.... Huh

And now 4 hours... Slush, PLEASE!!!!
715  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [100 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: October 18, 2013, 10:04:10 AM
Is anyone else experiencing that reward payout is not happening?  Had my confirmed reward above the threshold for at least 2 hours and no payout... Wake up slush server, put some more coals into that engine....

Yeah me too

Now 3 hours over due.... Huh
716  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [100 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: October 18, 2013, 08:10:18 AM
Is anyone else experiencing that reward payout is not happening?  Had my confirmed reward above the threshold for at least 2 hours and no payout... Wake up slush server, put some more coals into that engine....
717  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [100 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: October 12, 2013, 12:42:27 PM
visdude@
I don't think it would get fixed once it is confirmed, would it?

the confirmation is an external issue, while the reward is internal to the pool.  I think that in the past there were similar cases that got fixed eventually
718  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [100 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: October 12, 2013, 11:37:33 AM
visdude@
I had this one ok
20352    2013-10-11 17:14:40    0:46:18    85167670    5746    0.00157400    262973    25.39866404    confirmed

It may 'fix itself' later.

On another matter - my reward payout finally happened, just about 3 hours late...
719  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [100 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: October 12, 2013, 09:49:58 AM
my bitcoin address is fine.... it's Slush holding on to those rewards.... used to pay like clockwork 1 minute past the whole hour when the confirmed reward was above the threshold, but recently it's quite random... i'm sure that it will eventually get sorted, just frustrating....Sad
720  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [100 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: October 12, 2013, 09:08:41 AM
And just crossed another round hour, still above the threshold and no payout.... wake up Slush.... send some coins.... please....
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 [36] 37 38 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!