As a matter of fact, some countries provide free internet already in public areas such as park, malls, etc. On the other hand, I would not agree that the internet will be fully free for all. Just think about the quality they will provide if that happens, I would think that the internet will be so slow because ISPs gives good quality of service if they are paid high enough.

I have some questions regarding the signature campaign.

1. Are we allowed to post on any board? Just meet the 15 post per week and that's it? It happens that I did not see any rules about the signature campaign. Also, is the quality of post necessary in order to be paid?
2. When will be the payday? Is it by week or after the ICO? If by week, is there a fixed duration or it will depend on what date we registered?

Please provide rules regarding the signature campaign. I do not know if the rules were given on other thread or somewhere, if there is kindly reply the link.

Thanks in advance.

Hello. Thank you for accepting me in the signature campaign. I am informing the manager of the bounty that I have updated my signature. More power Wi Coin!

dev, how will we know that we ranked up or not? Are we going to inform you or it will be automatic?

Hello yahoo and yo-ex team, I would like to give my thanks to you for the payment I've received. I will wait for further announcement and I will hang on with your signature. I hope that I will work with you again

And how do you think you can implement that? How do you even know that all bitcoin users would answer your anonymous poll? Is there a certainty that they will answer honestly? How about multiple voting, can that anonymous poll identify if that particular user voted already? Your idea seems to be very difficult. There are many possibilities and factors to consider before implementing such anonymous poll. That approach will not also give the exact number of users, even not near to the exact number.

But how come they will get any profit from accepting bitcoin if the bitcoin users does not know that they are accepting bitcoin. They must advertise that  they are already accepting bitcoin from the start. That way, they can evaluate whether accepting bitcoin as payment is profitable or not.

I do not know where did you get this information but this is not entirely true. I cannot even give a single country that do not use fiat anymore.

Fiat money is still the mostly used type of money across the globe. It is being used every minute for payment. You claim that digital money is the only money being used and you even neglect the fact that digital money, at any point, did not surpass fiat at all.

Yes, who would control a decentralized currency? Even Satoshi cannot control bitcoin now. Bitcoin was intentionally made as an untouchable currency specifically for any government, organization, or international body. They can ban bitcoin anytime they want but they cannot control individuals from using it.

And what if that "other" coin gained many users and had many transactions per minute, don't you think that their fee will likely to increase as well? The quality of service is directly proportional to the required fee. That is why even bitcoin's fee increased, many are still using bitcoin.

Seriously? 1% of the total population in the world is using bitcoin? The total number of bitcoin users is so much far from the 1% you are saying. What do you think is the 1% of the world's population? There are more than 7 Billion people in this world and the 1% of 7Billion is 70 million. The number of bitcoin user is not even near 10 million so from where did you get that statistics of yours?

True. Every system has faults and bug. No one can really do a perfect system. There will always be someone or a group of individuals that will penetrate a system. Therefore, bitcoin will always be prone from any hackers around the world.

Come to think of it, that is quite intriguing. That fact could make us think that Satoshi Nakamoto is actually a group of skilled individual and not just a single person. Well I am not saying that bitcoin cannot be made with just a single person.

Even if blockchain was patented, some developers would still use blockchain's concept. That is how innovation works today. More and more developers and programmers will be utilizing blockchain in different type of applications. And come to think of it, is there some sort of problem if blockchain was used mostly in different application rather than currency at all?

That 1% is not shocking at all. There is not much people using bitcoin today to contribute more in any company's revenue. The number of bitcoin users worldwide does not even have 1% of the total population in the world so this rate is more than normal to me. Just wait a little more, when bitcoin becomes more popular, when bitcoin's value become at least 10,000 USD per BTC. Then you will see that 1% revenue will soar high exponentially.

This type of problem would likely become a threat for bitcoin's existence. Who would pay 10-20% of fee? Even rich people would be mad due to the very high fees. Also, this is why bitcoin is still impractical when it comes to a daily basis of usage.

I would rather cash out my BTC instead of using BTC for many transactions, especially on microtransactions. Cash will not require fees when on a face to face payment, so why use bitcoin. I still prefer fiat in using for payments, and bitcoin for me is for earning.

I also ranked up. I enrolled here as a newbie and now I am a Jr. Member. If by any chance that there would be a slot for me as a Jr Member, I would like to fill in 
Will be updating my signature now that corresponds to my rank. More power yo-ex 

Whether we like it or not, wrongdoers will remain on doing bad things. It is really sad to think that bitcoin is used in such activity but what can we do about it? Nothing. Criminals will always find new ways on how they will do their bad deeds and since bitcoin is just there, waiting to be used, they will use it not only for bribery but for other type of criminal act also. They will stop at nothing just to do what they want.

A possible reason for this is that they do not prioritize the use of bitcoin as payment as of now. I think that they already thought about announcing their shop is already accepting bitcoin as payment. That is a basic marketing strategy. But if they do not prioritize that type of payment (via bitcoin) then they will not waste funds by having signature campaigns. They will just include in their website that they are accepting bitcoin or they will just include that detail in their banner or whatever.

Yes, people from around the globe are using bitcoin already, but the question was if all country. It is a fact that not all country are using bitcoin as of now but what if that scenario happens. It seems that you did not quite comprehend what was asked.

OP, blockchain can handle every user, that is the main purpose and the design of blockchain itself but the question is how much time it would take in order for blockchain to accommodate each user, I think it will take forever. A further optimization must be done so that it can accommodate such number of users. Today that the number of user is so small, compared to the total number of people in this world, blockchain have some issues upon accommodating every transaction what more if all country uses bitcoin. Blockchain have many work to do to address every user.

That is right. This world had become more and more dependent to the internet and if the internet itself dies, it would be chaos. Businesses are also affected because some company uses the internet in order to provide services to their costumers. Not to mention other people who uses the internet in a daily basis such as in social media, online games and others.