The page you posted on is 204 kB. I guess it'll be around half a gigabyte compressed.
 He's talking about the entire WO thread. I would absolutely donate money to a fund that was created for the sole purpose of stuffing BSV with junk to these ends.
Someone needs to set this up.
Just start creating txs, duh. What the heck are you waiting for? We're waiting for 2 GB blocks... or megagigs, or gigamegs... whatever... The plan will go too slow with the current block size restrictions, lol. |
|
|
|
Project needs a flag as it is still being actively marketed, now using a bumping service that includes an account used to shill for the new Bitconnect scam, among other scams. Flag for Blue Hill Mining.Also, I doubt their "CEO" is actually involved in this project. You'd think he would list it on his LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kurt-becker-6a60731a/Also also, they are using an image from this article about highway tunnel excavation to put their logo on top of: Blue Hill Mining project plans to bring the mining industry to a new level with the help of blockchain technology. Blockchain will allow users of Blue Hill Platform to track information about the sources of raw materials and concentrates, which can not be obtained in the traditional way today. Learn more about Blue Hill Mine and our promising project on our website https://www.bluehillmining.com!  Wonder why they uploaded the image to an image hosting service located in Russia when they're supposed to be from Germany, regulated by Switzerland, and mining a mountain in Mongolia... Hmmm... |
|
|
|
LOL. That's one helluva parking job. And they also parked in a disabled spot... As somebody already tweeted, "he probably qualifies." |
|
|
|
It may be a drink of the future if everything will be realized well.
Warning to potential investors: This project has hired a bumping service that has also been promoting a new version of the Bitconnect scam. There is a strong possibility that this project is also a scam and should be avoided in favor of projects that don't hire bumping services. |
|
|
|
I wonder if you are going to cooperate with other exchanges soon
Warning to potential investors: This project has hired a bumping service that has also been promoting a new version of the Bitconnect scam. There is a strong possibility that this project is also a scam and should be avoided in favor of projects that don't hire bumping services. |
|
|
|
I think things can change in the future. Asians can be interested in a safe messenger with the function of over-the-counter trading.
Warning to potential investors: This project has hired a bumping service that has also been promoting a new version of the Bitconnect scam. There is a strong possibility that this project is also a scam and should be avoided in favor of projects that don't hire bumping services. |
|
|
|
I will tell the CEO and our team whether they still have time to renew the current Whitepaper. Thank you for your positive post
Right well, they probably should if they want to be seen as a legitimate enterprise. You're welcome. You have pretty solid classification of criteria, which i mostly agree with. I want to ask the project team a simple question. Why should I use their services if it is safer for me to go to the original source of their white paper and use their services instead?
I like your avatar by the way. You're like a slavic ninja. |
|
|
|
Also I would recommend everybody personally affected by BiteBTC to file a complaint against them with CoinMarketCap here: https://coinmarketcap.com/request/Provide CMC with a link to this thread and describe your own personal experience with them. Perhaps a mass influx of requests will encourage them to take action. |
|
|
|
Guys, file a complaint against BiteBTC with CoinMarketCap here: https://coinmarketcap.com/request/Provide them a link to this thread and your own personal experience with them. Perhaps a mass influx of requests will help them take action. |
|
|
|
I wonder why i got distrusted by a nutildah.. i guess because he tried to sell his account and i am not a fan of that.. Didn't even do anything about this, oh well. People have reasons for their actions i guess  Actually I did that yesterday, like more than 24 hours ago, and the reason is because I don't agree with tagging people for old offenses unless their account is currently engaged in sketchy activity. I tend to agree with the Pharmacist's point of view on this issue: At this point I personally would not go back to 2017 in order to tag an account dealer unless the member in question is extremely problematic or there are some other circumstances happening that would lead me to believe that the person needs to be negged. I've not yet run across that.
After going a year and five months without leaving a single feedback you've left 22 negative feedbacks in the last 16 days, some are for account sales in 2016/17. You left a total of 5 feedbacks in your 3 years here before that. That kind of behavior is a bit odd to me, but you know, you're free to do as you will. You've also been added by LFC_Bitcoin and fillippone so its safe to say you are firmly on DT2. No hard feelings. |
|
|
|
|
Oooh this is getting good.
Too bad its not being live streamed.
Keep us up to date with what you find out!
|
|
|
|
Does anyone want to have a local copy of this thread? I could compress all pages into a downloadable file, so you can search the raw HTML for old posts.
How big would that be? Put it in the BSV blockchain, they have gigabyte blocks. The only other thing there are weather stuff. Don't mean to get technical on you all the sudden by I was looking into it the other day and as of right now its only possible to cram 100 KB of data into a single BSV transaction (or 4 JJG posts -- sorry JJG, you know I'm still a fan). After they switch to 2 GB blocks, it would only take about a week of spamming their transactions with as much data as possible until the BSV blockchain grew to over 2 terabytes in size. Needless to say, it would only be a few months of constant spam attacks before the blockchain became too unwieldy for almost anybody to manage it. Their node count would drop to near zero. If the transaction fee was around 1 cent per tx, the attack would cost about $1,200/hr to run. Frankly I don't see why this won't eventually happen. |
|
|
|
We also need to know :
-how many lines of text JJG has posted
-which word has been posted the most : moon, hodl , fuck, weeee... ?
-who has posted the most haikus
Lets just spitball some guesstimates here... Word / Most times posted by / Number of times posted "Hodlsleep" / micgoossens / 1,455 "corn" / BobLawblaw / 734 "fuck" / Last of the V8s / 2,715 "arse" / gentlemand / 114 "blockalypse" / jbreher / 1,107 "TLDR" / JayJuanGee / 909 "jews" / realr0ach / 12,755 |
|
|
|
Sorry to derail OP but why does TAA/Cryptohunter have such a hardon for you?
I am handsome in ways to them I guess, but its time I finally let them down: sorry cryptohunter, you're just not my type. I think I poked fun at them when they started to unravel mentally (what was that, like 6-7 months ago?) and now I'm forever part of "them." |
|
|
|
Does anyone want to have a local copy of this thread? I could compress all pages into a downloadable file, so you can search the raw HTML for old posts.
That's quite an offer. Somebody could theoretically use it to find out which members had a history of using the words "bullish" or "buy" right before BTC made a definitive move upward, or "bearish" for the opposite. Would be pretty noisy but possibly still insightful as to finding out who tended to be correct in their calls over time. I don't have enough time to put that kind of analysis together but maybe somebody else does. |
|
|
|
Would anyone be interested in seeing a full list of all the users who ever posted in this topic, sorted by post count (highest first)? I can scrape 24000 pages if there is a demand for it  Whatever you do is pleasant  But don't try to out-game our very fine filippone WO asset You can't out-game Loyce, because he bought the game, paid for it with some of his merits. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
