[...]
sorry bud,at this point i feel it's only fair that I tag you so newbies won't fall for this, you are apparently shilling these scammers, (intentionally or unintentionally ) while we don't have a solid proof YET , it's safe to assume that someone who is selling something that is too good to be true is most likely a scammer. i will revise my decision once and IF the opposite is proven.
|
|
|
they can be real, he might have them , but sure as hell, he is not going to send you shit. !
|
|
|
isn't this what most campaigns do? they all have the word "quality" there and most of them don't seem to follow through. a single test would be counting merit for those people wearing signatures, i am pretty sure the majority of them don't even have a rate of 1 to 10 merit to post ratio, they all seem to post the same shit everyday and since they still get paid, why should they bother?
|
|
|
oh mr Truong, you shilling your 277$ indicator? maybe post in the market place instead.
|
|
|
Cloudbet will resolve the case. And I will be back when got update. But they are doing their best to solve the case. Props to them.
Swofty
i see a bit of change in tune here, are they forcing you to do this in order for them to resolve your problem? seems like the community pressure on them is working, let's hope they resolve this case, thought we still need a full explanation at some point.
|
|
|
I think it's rather a waste of time trying to explain to someone who doesn't know what TA is that it actually works. the problem that i seem to find with most of those people is that- they think TA is purely numeric based, something like physics or math that can't go wrong, if 1+1 = 2 today, then it has to be same the next day,thinking of it this way indeed leads to not believe in it, specially after making or seeing a few bad calls that end up in a loss, when you expect something to work 100% of the time, the moment it does not work is the moment you stop believing in it. however if you think of TA of more like a physiological based analysis, where you try to predict based on previous actions of market decision makers, of where the majority of the money is likely headed to at x point. after all , trading as a concept is nothing but gambling with slightly above 50% probability of success. actually with proper capital and risk management, even at 50% success ratio you end up making money, but these people don't want to learn, they rather buy bitcoin at 15k and blame the whales!. it's easier that way indeed.
|
|
|
That is known alts of any one.
+ i wouldn't take everything in that thread seriously.
|
|
|
The fact that the person that owns the telegram now sent messages to people I had conversations with it's not my problem.
whose problem then? Yes, I have accepted to give him the money he lost, but after series of pm's and his arrogance, I decided not to care anymore.
it does not make sense, you knew you it was your mistake that's why you decided to pay him. so him being nice to you or not should make no difference, admiring to your mistake once, doesn't give you the right to change your mind the next day and say it was not my mistake and i am not paying you shit. No, using a single address it's a stupid way to manage cryptocurrencies received from severals users.
The opposite is correct, if you know how to handle your business then you should know that every account you have including bitcointalk are hackable, the only thing that is supposedly secured is your wallet, even if your account is hacked, any btc sent would still be safe, you can have more than 1 address, it does not matter, as long as the user can verify the signature and know it's your own address that should be good enough.
|
|
|
"I dare do all that may become a man. Who dares more is none" - Shakespeare
"Roses are red, you got the answer , now lock the thread" by: "mikeywith" adiós
|
|
|
Line 1 to 15 is complete waste of time. if anyone wants to investigate the case, i advice you to start reading from line no 16.
ok, so correct me if i am wrong. your telegram account was hacked, the member sent 100$ worth of BTC to the scammer that uses the telegram account that was in your initial post, and then you simply "claim" that it was not you who got the money, you offered the guy a refund because somehow you are responsible for that, the next day you changed your mind and say you don't owe him anything. and when you have been asked, why haven't you not warn about it, you said I did not notified because I thought it won't be necessary, I deleted it from the topics.
so it didn't cross your mind that somebody might be already talking to the scammer on your telegram and sending them money? if i was to believe that your telegram was actually hacked, i would still think you are responsible for being reckless. the first thing you should have done was to notify others about this. also as a responsible manager or whatever your position was, you should have used a single BTC address , signed and verified by you and stated that people should only send to this address, which is not there in your self-moderated topic > https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106534.msg49692509#msg49692509TL;DR , you deserve the tag for at least being careless about people's money. and unless you pay back the money to that user, i don't think it's right for you to nag about the feedback, once you settle the scam accusation opened against you, you may get a better luck removing that tag or getting a counter, which i highly doubt anyway.
|
|
|
There is far more to mining Bitcoin than pure profit.
I call B.S on that, sorry not sorry But as a late adopter, I'm guessing that would be too difficult to explain it all to you.
"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" By: Albert Einstein
|
|
|
Lots of people are buying (like me) now that the price is so low again. Panic sellers are selling to happy people like me that are loading up. I
Lots of people were buying at 12k , as well as 6k. i am only willing to think they are not "happy now" missing the chance of doubling their coins, same thing will happen if we drop to 1k, when people who sell now will load up 3 times btc than buying now. I am not saying we are dropping for sure, but the chances are there, even though there are more reasons for price not to drop from here. but you need to be prepared for that case scenario. agreed 100% the lower 3k has officially become a bull zone for now, it only makes sense to long that area, however a break below the lowest low will trigger a good drop, regardless of the the million reasons why btc should go up from here, the ABC for any market suggest that it's easier to move in the same direction than reversing.
|
|
|
update : i still think we have bottomed, tho i also think it's too early to buy now, a flat market is about to take over for a few months "assuming we bottomed". i made a whole topic explaining my theory on why do I think that regadless of wether we have bottomed or not, to me, it's not the best time to buy BTC yet. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5105680.msg49710747#msg49710747 read it, let me know what you guys think.
|
|
|
I don't see any reason that he is not going to spam the forum with bot if he have. you just don't get it, yes we all know he is going to spam the forum , my grandmother knows this. however, he should not be tagged for spamming, i am willing to blindly bet that well over 90% of posts on this forum are pure-spam b.s made only to gain post count towards a certain payment. this has nothing to do with the person being a trustworthy or not. OP, look at this ^ . this is what people should be tagged for " potential scam" aka "trust-related".
|
|
|
I see this as only to make money from bounties by posting spam.
isn't this what 90% of members here do ? so should they all be tagged equally?
|
|
|
luckily you are not a DT member. this is a very poor judgment to say the least.
|
|
|
well most of those people who come to the forum for whatever campaigns post only shitposts, so be it automated or manual makes no difference. also this thing should be handled by mods not DT members, i see no scamming attempt here therefore i see no reason for the tag, nor do i see a reason for you to start a whole thread about this for a newbie account, specially given the fact that you seem to already understand the story. Bots will be nuked or banned,because there are lot of dedicated people were working on this forum to make it spam free so spam posts and the posts from bots will get reported and will get deleted soon.And one thing new met system made impossible for them to rank up so you will be at this rank forever.
feel free to report the post, even though i would like to bet the horse that mods won't delete that post.
|
|
|
this all sounds cool assuming we have already bottomed, you see getting in too early can get you more bitcoin than getting in "safe" but it can also screw you over, if you have already spend most of fiat on btc at 3.5k range, what is your plan if the price drops to 1k?
|
|
|
Most people here don't care about crypto vs the banks. They just want their bags to be pumped so they can dump for fiat money. There aren't many hardcore libertarian left in bitcoin.
let's be realistic, liberation and financial freedom comes from owning way above average of whatever that majority of people accept as a method of payment one-way or the other. if you are a poor kid and you are not working on it, bitcoin won't help you. if tomorrow we wake up and every bank out there closes their doors, and the whole world elect bitcoin to be the one and only measurement of wealth, are we all going to be liberated? indeed not, those with more bitcoin stacking will be liberated and happy while the rest will be just as miserable they are now. financial freedom is always about the "quantity" , how you scale/measure it does not matter, bitcoin,gold,cash,sheep,cows, lands or anything for that matter. bitcoin's major and probably only strength over traditional system is "anonymity", and you will never be liberated with 0.1 btc hiding in your wallet.
|
|
|
|