My offer 0.4
sorry, that is very low amount but thanks for your interest. 0.4 Is not low according to Current market.Lots of accounts are now in the Market Which is making price really down.. Average price for Full is 0.05 For Senior is 0.14 and Hero is 0.25 Where are you getting this info from? Prices do seem to be down slightly from what I gather, but not this cheap. Wouldn't even really be worth selling them for that as you can make more in signature campaigns. I also suspect accounts will become more valuable again soon with the return of the PD campaign and others as well.
|
|
|
Please heed what theymos said about this and don't hassle his family or whatnot. This is probably better left to theymos or someone with better connections to be honest. I doubt it will easily be recoverable so you're likely just wasting your time. I am aware of the situation. I am trying to recover it and if I somehow recover it(probably won't ), I will give you 1 BTC. If I forgot, PM me! Judging from this thread, detective work doesn't seem to be one of your talents. Haha.
|
|
|
Nice to see another fixed-rate campaign. Haven't seen one in a while. Movie (if participating in competition): The Guns of Navarone
Movie if taking part in the contest: The Shawshank Redemption
Movie: True Lies
Lol fail. You're meant to put Bitstarz in the title. The Bitstarz Redemption etc.
|
|
|
because i think with new forum software admin will work on controlling of spam and scam and disabling multiple accounts can be an option just guessing but always wanted to be on safe side
is there any indication from the administration suggesting that this is possible? otherwise this is all just speculation. i don't think they'll regulate multiple accounts in the future. No. It's not going to happen. Impossible to do and many users have alt accounts for valid reasons. It would be unfair to punish everyone and too time consuming to even start policing.
|
|
|
That's irrelevant to anything I said. Accounts can be recovered regardless of how safe you think you're making them.
|
|
|
Be careful, ACCTseller and Quickseller are the same person. They sell disputed/ hacked accounts and then take no responsibility afterwards. You cannot participate in signature campaigns with negative rep. THERE IS NO ROI. I have now lost 1.1 BTC to this fraud.A SCAM thread has been opened: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=884261.0If you want genuine accounts with chance of 0 fraud than pm me.I sell accounts with the email account associated with it.So you have everything to yourself.Nothing to worry. That doesn't secure them very much. In fact, it could make them less secure if they don't change the email (you could gain access to the original email via secret questions or whatnot). Accounts here can still be recovered by the admins etc as well. Oh no you have it all wrong.I use escrow on my deals.And I let the buyer change every single detail including questions,answers and passwords.So actually there is no chance of fraud in my accounts. No I don't have it wrong, you do. You claimed there's no chance of fraud because you give them the email and that is wrong and also gives them a false sense of security. Regardless of them changing all the details an account can still be recovered by signing an address associated to that account even after all those things have been changed, so there is still a chance of fraud on your part or even potentially the escrow used.
|
|
|
Log-on time has nothing to do with activity. And you have to be actively browsing for the time to go up. For activity, simply put you get 14 points every two week period. You need to make at least one post in every period to collect those points. Next period starts on Tuesday and you can get another 14 points then.
|
|
|
That would be really shady...we aren't a bank where the top ten traders get +10% reward or so but bitcoin alk do not have some fund to promote forum activity??? I thought that bitcointalk have funds available for this. Also, I did not think at high awards. I thought something like 0.5btc for the first, 0.25btc for the second and 0.1btc the third .. or something like this... and this would only be once a year !!! They have the funds, just really not for to 'promote forum activity' in such a way. I guess maybe some yearly competitions could be fun though this forum doesn't really seem the type to dish out money via such giveaways. I think if it was to happen it would have to be for something that couldn't be exploited and mere votes/voting could unfortunately.
|
|
|
Bitstars is active again. Fixed rate deal: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=911992.0Edit: already full: . By my count all 25 x 0.1 and 10 x 0.05 slots have now been taken (assuming everyone is accepted). yes all free slots are taken now will create a final post including list of user who enrolled in this campaign
|
|
|
Yeah, that's not going to happen for the reasons already stated above. However, someone is free to create their own unofficial popularity contest with a reward if they so wish.
|
|
|
Why this service is changed to just for staffs? Why PD left others behind?
Because we don't make shitposts and Stunna wanted to close it whilst he came up with a way to control the spam it was unfortunately causing. He seems to have come up with some solutions and the campaign will be resuming for everyone shortly but with stricter restrictions and controls on participants.
|
|
|
The negative feedback is harsh as he has stopped providing escrow from his main account. Keep a look out for one of his alts to start providing escrow.
Which ALT are you talking about? Link to the account please. ~~MZ~~ He's probably just speaking in general terms and being presumptuous and doesn't know of any of his alts but just saying to keep an eye out for them. I don't think he'll be rushing to start a new escrow any time soon anyway and he'd be better just waiting a while and trying again on his current account if he was going to do so.
|
|
|
Be careful, ACCTseller and Quickseller are the same person. They sell disputed/ hacked accounts and then take no responsibility afterwards. You cannot participate in signature campaigns with negative rep. THERE IS NO ROI. I have now lost 1.1 BTC to this fraud.A SCAM thread has been opened: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=884261.0If you want genuine accounts with chance of 0 fraud than pm me.I sell accounts with the email account associated with it.So you have everything to yourself.Nothing to worry. That doesn't secure them very much. In fact, it could make them less secure if they don't change the email (you could gain access to the original email via secret questions or whatnot). Accounts here can still be recovered by the admins etc as well.
|
|
|
he said numerous times that the mistake was unintentional when he was asked if he was going to repay out of his own pocket. This leads me to believe that he was not planning on paying out of my own pocket. The situation was resolved quickly enough so that it didn't need to come to that
Well he may or may not have done the right thing in that situation but I guess we'll never know now. Luckily for everyone involved really. Regardless, redsnow's rep is somewhat tarnished and your feedback can stay if you so wish it to be. That's your call.
|
|
|
yes he was probably lying about giving an incorrect address but it doesn't matter. The only reason this situation was resolved was because badbear bailed him out. It is because of BadBear that both parties wil not face a total loss. I don't think it is appropriate for his reputation to be unscathed in this case
But we don't know how redsnow would've acted because of that. He may or may not have returned the funds out of his own pocket. Had he done the same as segvec then yes negative feedback would be justified. It's arguable as to whether his reputation is unscathed. He has a trusted neutral warning and a red from Eal and you and many people will now not trust him, but most of all he's stopped offering the service which was the right thing to do.
|
|
|
Who's a global mod?
grue And I assumed the email here was random, but because of that randomness someone exploited it and created it themselves to reset the password (unless I'm mistaken. This is the problem with using fake/made-up but easily created email addresses).
I highly doubt that, how would a third party know the made up address? Because redsnow apparently posted proof that included the email from the looks of it. If this wasn't the case and it was just down to forgetting to remove the email suspicion should be cast on the original creator of it.
|
|
|
A global mod in the default trust list is nobody? I have a feeling moreia himself is somewhat involved in this. He told redsn0w it was random, while he made that email address. I think he was planning this to make redn0w look bad. the question is, why? Who's a global mod? And I assumed the email here was random, but because of that randomness someone exploited it and created it themselves to reset the password (unless I'm mistaken. This is the problem with using fake/made-up but easily created email addresses).
|
|
|
this demonstrates that if he gives an address to send payment to that he doesn't control he will treat it as if payment was not received. If I am sending first to him and he makes this kind of mistake then I am out however much I just sent. This is essentially what happened with segvec in the currency exchange section when he gave someone an incorrect address and the person who sent funds to be out 14 btc Edit: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=896143.0It's comparable and you can draw comparisons but it's a different case. Also, segvec is probably lying though he should've paid back for his error either way and so should redsnow had it come to that. Luckily this situation got sorted so no one was out of pocket but it could've been worse and redsnow was lucky in that respect and has gotton off lightly and relatively unscathed.
|
|
|
|