Wow, thanks for the heads up. First time I've ever participated in a raffle. He's been in a good mood over 300 times now, probably more than I have in my entire life. |
|
|
|
remember 71% of the planet is covered in water  And Rest will be covered by PBET soon  Why did you hire thread spammers to spam in your thread for you? Its pretty obvious what's going on. Any project that hires bump bots to create the illusion of interest gets negative credibility points. |
|
|
|
+1 WO merit. This was really cool to read and watch. Too bad he can't crank one out in under 10 minutes to have a chance at mining the next block. Maybe if you have a team of 200 people all working on it at the same time. Totally efficient use of manual labor, and graph paper... |
|
|
|
Because broad generalizations are a logical fallacy
Not always. Besides, you are confusing V8's opinion with roach's opinion. We're talking about two separate things. "Last of the V8s alleges: Due largely to the factors mentioned in this topic, I believe that anyone dealing with realr0ach is at a high risk of losing money, and guests would be well-advised to avoid doing so. This determination is based on concrete red flags which any knowledgeable & reasonable forum user should agree with, and it is not based on the user's opinions."
Again, for literally the 4th time the rating was left for his abusive and doxing behavior, something Theymos himself said was reasonable.
Your trust for Vod wasn't just for doxing Og, you included a bunch of other language that is thoroughly your opinion and not based on Vod's trade history. Seems like you just want everyone else to adhere to a standard while you yourself remain free to do whatever you want. You know this, but what is important is you dig up any tiny morsel of a fault possible to project on my part to justify your abuse. Judging ones opinions also falls firmly under the description of "judging the content of those words". All you are doing is semantic gymnastics to try to make this ok when everyone knows damn well what your motivation is, and it is not protecting the user base or the integrity of the trust system. We have a chance here to form new standards different than the previous clusterfuck of abuse under the old system, and people such as yourselves rush immediately to turn the new system into the old system so you can get your little control freak red tinged dopamine click hit.
This is projection-based stupid talk and not worthy of a response lengthier than this. |
|
|
|
the lawsuit to assign them a million bitcoins proves that he is Satoshi
Only because I am familiar with your broken trollery do I begin to understand what you are talking about. However, your leaps in logic remain incomprehensible. The existence of a lawsuit proves nothing. I suspect that Wright will actually win the lawsuit because there was never any million bitcoin trust to begin with. However, we will have to wait and see how the lawsuit plays out before jumping to any conclusions. |
|
|
|
HAPPY DAYS  I laughed at your guess when I first saw it but now I must concede that your forecasting skills are far better than mine. You have a good shot at winning, congrats! $3,665 .
~snip
Do I still have a chance to win?  Lets hope not! I think we would all be pretty pissed if you did. |
|
|
|
Of course, anything could still happen, but its encouraging for the Dems that all of their top candidates are shown as beating Trump in a Fox News poll.  IIRC Fox News also showed Hillary beating Trump through much of the election, so make of it what you will. The only poll that was consistently correct in forecasting the election results was one done by USC and the L.A. Times, interestingly. |
|
|
|
Maybe somebody afraid other success? Pi know people who every day sitting and typing in forums about nothing...
Talking about yourself again? That's literally all you do -- type about nothing. You just talk to yourself all day long, churning out hundreds of spam comments for a few dollars. Pretty lame. There is no doubt in my mind this project is a scam -- investors be warned. |
|
|
|
It is an innovative concept that is will play a crucial role in our community.
Yes, it is very innovative project. I have a question, how much cents is Revain paying to push such shit posts? What's funny is bitcoin is up 20% in the last 10 days and the price of Revain has taken a dive in terms of bitcoin over the last 10 days, which corresponds to about when I called them out for hiring shitposters in their ANN thread. Hopefully they've learned by now that it was a mistake and won't do it again in the future. |
|
|
|
Dude. So what? Is there evidence it can even be moved off the exchange? Why did you come back to post this? Youre still getting paid to spread propaganda? This coin was a bigger fraud than BSV, and that's saying a lot. |
|
|
|
|
Dont send this guy any money if you were thinking about it. Yes, BiteBTC is indeed a scam exchange but this OP is likely a scammer looking for a free handout. He has multiple accounts and is engaged in different scam attempts across the forum.
|
|
|
|
That is why it is necessary to check everything. First of all it is necessary to read carefully the WhitePapers and see the development of project.
Thanks for reminding me that this project has a plagiarized white paper. Just a reminder to all newcomers, this project employs spam bump bots to bump its thread (as can be seen by the fake conversation in this thread by bottom feeder accounts) and their white paper is heavily plagiarized from the Binance whitepaper:    WARNING: THIS PROJECT IS A SCAM. DO NOT INVEST. |
|
|
|
To a wanker whose ego overrides common sense and rational thinking, everything to be said by anyone is only an opinion if they disagree with it. Likewise, anything to be said by someone is a fact if they agree with it.
Type 1 flags are meant to be subjective, aka opinion based. Get over it. I like how you lecture me about rational thinking as you make broad generalizations int he same breath. How does A exclude B? Its possible to do both simultaneously. Type 1 flags are meant to be "more subjective". More subjective does not mean totally subjective. Additionally the language Theymos used EXPLICITLY EXCLUDED the flag being used to object to people's opinions, making your subjectivity argument moot.
No, he did not. Please share with us where you read that. Again, the situation is no different than you thinking Vod's "mental instability" is a red flag when it comes to trust related issues. Vod has never failed one trade yet you decided to negative trust him on the basis of your opinions. Nobody would make a flag about somebody if they said they hated chocolate ice cream, even though that is also an opinion. Its more than just roach's words being an "opinion" we're talking about here. Its about a user's words suggesting that they should not be trusted based on the content of those words. There is a logical case for this given the content across the breadth of roach's posts. You may not agree with it, but that doesn't mean that everybody else shouldn't. |
|
|
|
Sunday Haiku Day
We must try not to forget
Short BTC poems.
'Short Bitcoin poems' would have been syllabically correct Right, I guess po-ems Is 2 syllables, not one As Homer said, "Doh!" |
|
|
|
Truly, there are slot of projects with fake team but they are still working.
Name one. And just because a scam makes you money doesn't mean its "working." Not that it ever will, you're only here to spam on behalf of scams. You get paid upfront by some desperate idiot to bump their boring projects for them. This project hired you because they know they would never make it on their own merits. They've probably spent more money on you than they've raised. There have been repeated accusations of falsifying the development team, but nevertheless the project has long been on the market. Personally, I don't think WAB is a good project and sold the coins I had a long time ago, but nevertheless similar precentors exist. What are you talking about? The project was never "working." It was a scam from day 1! https://steemit.com/wabnetwork/@vladislav/the-russian-developer-accused-of-fraudulent-block-startup-estimated-at-usd-38-millionSure, you can buy its tokens if you're an idiot, and there's a slim chance you will sell them for a high price (very slim), but this isn't a "working project." Its obviously a scam. It's bullshit. Much like Expi. Every thread you comment on is for a bullshit project because real projects don't hire low-grade spammers. |
|
|
|
|
Sunday Haiku Day
We must try not to forget
Short BTC poems.
|
|
|
|
Truly, there are slot of projects with fake team but they are still working.
Name one. And just because a scam makes you money doesn't mean its "working." Not that it ever will, you're only here to spam on behalf of scams. You get paid upfront by some desperate idiot to bump their boring projects for them. This project hired you because they know they would never make it on their own merits. They've probably spent more money on you than they've raised. |
|
|
|
How can you protect the created projects from the fall in the value of tokens when entering the exchanges?
This ICO is over, so why did they hire your bumping service to keep spamming their thread for them? I don't get it. I wouldn't touch any project that hires your type of service with a 10 foot pole. |
|
|
|
I think that if you made some money from that project - that is not a scam for you.
Spoken like a true piece of shit. You're basically saying scams are OK so long as you make money. Who made money from this project besides you? You didn't invest anything in this project -- you were hired by them to spam for them. You'd have to be a complete idiot to invest in this scam. Plagiarized white paper No team Hired bumping service This project is a scam. Potential investards be warned. Technically he is right, but morally it just doesn't sound right. Some people say that bitcoin is scam. They probably have btt bounty on discord so that's a reason, for that activity on this thread, or maybe it is real. It is so easy to call a project scam and you don't have strong arguments. I've been around here a lot longer than you. I know a scam when I see one. Stick around and see for yourself. Morally its perfect. Spamming for a living is what is un-moral. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
