Latest posts of: CryptopreneurBrainboss

Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 [355] 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 ... 421 »

7081

Other / Meta / Re: ]Feature] Ability to Pin a message within a thread.

on: May 31, 2019, 02:45:09 PM

If the feature was to be implemented, It should also be limited to some specific boards as I see a situation were some users might misuse the feature as advert opportunities (i.e selling the pinned message spot to advertisers) I do observe same issue with platforms like Facebook and telegram with this feature.

7082

Other / Beginners & Help / Re: HOW TO ADD SIGNATURE I'M NEWBIE

on: May 31, 2019, 01:05:02 PM

I would advise you build your account instead of taking the short cut, 1merit isn't that hard to get that's if you're in search of the privilege of a jnr member rank. I'll only recommended buying a copper membership if you're interested in getting some privilege linked to member rank for business purposes.

7083

Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Still have coins on BITBLENDER? you only have a FEW HOURS TO WITHDRAW! LAST CALL

on: May 31, 2019, 05:19:09 AM

Quote from: mjglqw on May 31, 2019, 02:51:18 AM But they could just open it back up for a few days and only allow withdrawals, right? Opening up just for a few hours would definitely mess some people up. I don't know though, the owner is probably rightfully paranoid. Definitely they can. Maybe they might have be tipped of been under investigation lets not forget bestmixer was under a year long investigation but no one knew. If they feel threating their decision is justifiable. This is like the bear market for mixers now we'll know those mixer inwhich our privacy is truely anonymous.

7084

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Service Discussion (Altcoins) / Re: Should Bounty Participants Be Capped ?

on: May 31, 2019, 04:59:02 AM

The problem is the bounty participants aren't encouraging the projects to capped down on the numbers of participants they should employed. For a retweet/share campaign which involves writing of original post or tweets when there isn't a post to share or retweet instead of participants to create original post about the project, they engage in copy & paste of past post by projects or plagiarism of other participants works. Same problem can be found in signature, translation, article campaigns etc. Also most bounty participants don't have real friends, all the numbers we see are bought followers or subscribers that's why must campaign prefer quantity over quality so at least they get more exposure even though it means paying pennies.

7085

Other / Meta / Re: Merit & new rank requirements

on: May 31, 2019, 04:28:34 AM

Quote from: pushups44 on May 30, 2019, 11:42:43 PM I am also just becoming acquainted with the messy politics of this forum wherein legendary members are engaging in continuous flamewars with one another. It seems there is some sort of ego battle going on based on forum rank. We have more than 30+ boards on the forum and the politics is mostly been felt on reputation, meta and sometimes scam accusation boards. The boards were actual information is been exchange in regards to questions been answered, learning & teaching isn't affected. Why they argue shouldn't disturb you. Focus on your reason for joining forum which I believe is to learn. You have to understand they're all humans and as humans, there is always a possibility of disagreement, debating and unnecessary argument when two or more individuals comes together. The politics is kinda interesting if you pay close attention to it. At the end of the day they'll disagree to agree

7086

Economy / Reputation / Re: [need DT] using multiple account, trading merit, self-talking, trading trust

on: May 30, 2019, 10:27:48 PM

Quote from: DireWolfM14 on May 30, 2019, 02:59:26 PM Quote from: wwzsocki on May 30, 2019, 11:04:43 AM Quote from: CryptopreneurBrainboss on May 30, 2019, 10:45:00 AM ...rules are rules and we have to judge everyone equally. Please tell me which rules are you talking about? That's thing, there are no official rules for trading merit with your alts (or friends,) yet there are a few activities that don't violate the rules but are sure to earn you a red-tag. That's the issue with a decentralized trust system, it's bound to have flaws. As a community we should work together to mitigate those flaws. system. We don't have to be baby seated at every given opportunity. Not all rules are written to give room for diversity. The beauty of @wwzsocki case is the way both him and the DT members have handled it and it should be applauded. He has proven himself to be a reasonable human unlike other past cases were the accused uses the opportunity to attack the trust (DT) system. Kudos to all parties involved.

7087

Other / Meta / Re: Merit & new rank requirements

on: May 30, 2019, 09:21:57 PM

Quote from: pushups44 on May 30, 2019, 08:30:30 PM and to the credit of the forum the coders get a lot of merits Can you back this up? All I know was merit/statistics analysers were the ones getting most merit at the very beginning but now that is no longer the case. Sure they're still getting some fair share of merits but when you observe the merit stats (ALL-TIME & RECENT) merit recievers you'll notice we have a combination of users from all aspects of quality contributions to the forum on the list, we have the spam/scam hunters, merit/statistics analysers, anti-spam campaign managers, high and average quality forum contributors on the list. Merits are now been circulated round the forum than before. Therefore it's safe to conclude, the merit system is improving and it'll keep on improving (give it time)

7088

Other / Meta / Re: Obliterate all Aridropped Merit Please @theymos

on: May 30, 2019, 11:11:01 AM

There's a reason why it's called a privilege, you don't denial people of their privilege especially when they have done nothing wrong. I was against the demotion of jnr members who haven't earned any merit but that decision turned out great and considering earning just 1 merit isn't that hard even though you're just an average poster and not a spammer that was a great decision by theymos but demoting higher ranked users just because they're not impressing meriters isn't right. A better solution will be demoting members with only airdropped merits who are caught spamming the forum with shitposts don't generalize the punishment just because of few members especially as earning the merit for those ranks (hero, legendary) isn't that easy. To OP, just because you came in late doesn't mean the early users should get punished. Is just like the miners of today requesting for the same block rewards that miners during 2009-2012 got

7089

Economy / Reputation / Re: [need DT] using multiple account, trading merit, self-talking, trading trust

on: May 30, 2019, 10:45:00 AM

Quote from: DireWolfM14 on May 29, 2019, 07:45:07 PM I've been watching this thread from the beginning, and to be honest I want to believe wwzsocki. I do too but they (DT member who have tagged him) can't based their judgement just on emotions, they have to work with facts and evidence and that's what they're doing until proven otherwise. My advice to @wwzsocki will be to continuing handling the situation calmly as he's doing and maybe over time he might get pardon and the tags will be removed but for the main time he should continue in his regular activities. Also don't over dramaticalize the situation to attract more tags if not you'll render the account you have worked hard ranking up useless. I hate to see people that have put in some efforts into contributing to the forum get punished but rules are rules and we have to judge everyone equally.

7090

Economy / Reputation / Re: "Realish" time DT1 Change Log

on: May 30, 2019, 07:19:28 AM

Kudos, you time off the forum truely paid off. Since the report updates every 10minutes, will there be an option to view the report of a particular day. e.g if I wanted to view the change log of today in 2weeks time will that option to fitter event by date be available?

7091

Other / Meta / Re: Please Do Something.(Ban Request)

on: May 29, 2019, 05:32:16 PM

Quote from: logfiles on May 29, 2019, 04:06:30 PM What's your objective OP? OP's objective is simply, he brought the case forward so the user @mich will lose his slot on the Bitcasino signature campaign as he could not secure a slot himself. The whole requesting for ban subject title is just a distraction as he knows none of those offense will results to ban and considering he has committed similar offense don't think he was expecting a ban respond because it would had affected him too. He's just jealous and looking for a way to stop his partner in crime from enjoying the privilege he's currently enjoying.

7092

Other / Meta / Re: List of Bitcointalk.org Userscripts

on: May 29, 2019, 03:34:42 PM

Signature Adblock Script [0.5.0] thread was posted = March 26, 2015

7093

Other / Beginners & Help / Re: What are the benefits of using Cryptocurrency as a payment method?

on: May 29, 2019, 01:16:50 PM

OP firstly you have to understand none of the other cryptocoins you gave as example are currency and anyone accepting them as payment option are misusing them. Ethereum and Binance coin are utility tokens created for specific purpose inwhich been used as an currency wasn't one of those purpose. Back to your questions, for personal benefits; it eliminate the need for a third party system, which means I don't have to rely on a 3rd party system when carrying out a transaction using bitcoin although this benefit isn't constant since most merchant now employed the service of a 3rd party providers like bitpay etc. Gives me comfort/satisfaction Low cost of transactions Borderless and faster transactions Privacy/anonymousity The list goes on and on but the most important which can also be classified under my satisfaction benefits is that it give me a sign of accomplishment that I'm contributing to the adoptation of bitcoin as a currency.

7094

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Telcoin ; a sleeping giant.

on: May 29, 2019, 08:07:05 AM

Quote from: BQ on May 23, 2019, 01:49:39 PM we're moving towards crypto as utility and not only hype/speculation. Exactly, the market is becoming more mature year in year out. Gone are the days investors rely mere on speculation and hype to decide on which cryptocurrency to buy or not to buy but now it's more of prediction (backed with analysis) and token utility like the likes of Binance coin etc. The shitcoins will all die out in the spam of 2-5years so before buying any token ask yourself this question, will this coin/token I'm about buying still be easily tradable in 5-10years period and will the utility of the token still be valued as to having an effect on the industry?.

7095

Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Which Mixer is getting axed next?

on: May 29, 2019, 07:31:10 AM

Make your choice from the list before, anymore could be the next bestmixer and possiblities are some are already under investigation just as bestmixer was but nobody knew although if I was to pick the least favorite to get axed my vote will go to chipmixer (they appear more professional than the rest) I could be wrong though lol . Quote from: LeGaulois on January 26, 2018, 12:22:20 PM 2019 List Bitcoin Mixers Bitcoin Tumblers Websites ⭐Name: ChipMixer 🔹Clearnet link: https://chipmixer.com 🔹Tor link: chipmixerwzxtzbw.onion 🔹Bitcointalk thread link: Here 🔹Fees: PWYW (Pay what you want) ⭐Name: BitMix.Biz 🔹Clearnet link: https://bitmix.biz 🔹Tor link: bitmixbizymuphkc.onion 🔹Bitcointalk thread link: Here 🔹Fees: from 0.4% to 4% (+ Network fees 0.001) ⭐Name: BitCloak 🔹Clearnet link: https://bitcloak43blmhmn.com 🔹Tor link: bitcloak43blmhmn.onion 🔹Bitcointalk thread link: Here 🔹Fees: Randomized ~2% (+ Network fees 0.001) ⭐Name: Mixer 🔹Clearnet link: https://[banned mixer] 🔹Tor link: mixermikevpntu2o.onion 🔹Bitcointalk thread link: Here 🔹Fees: From 1% to 5% (depending on the method) (+ Network fees) ⭐Name: PrivCoin 🔹Clearnet link: https://privcoin.io 🔹Tor link: tr5ods7ncr6eznny.onion 🔹Bitcointalk thread link: Here 🔹Fees: minimum fee 0.8% (+ Network fees 0.0008) ⭐Name: Pay Shield 🔹Clearnet link: N/A 🔹Tor link: payshld6oxbu5eft.onion 🔹Bitcointalk thread link: N/A 🔹Fees: (+ Network fees) ⭐Name: CryptoMixer 🔹Clearnet link: https://[banned mixer] 🔹Tor link: cryptomixns23scr.onion 🔹Bitcointalk thread link: here 🔹Fees: 0.5% + 0.0005BTC ⭐Name: MixTum 🔹Clearnet link: https://[banned mixer] 🔹Tor link: mixtum5lbuslyow2.onion 🔹Bitcointalk thread link: here 🔹Fees: 5% (+ Network fee) ⭐Name: Ecomix 🔹Clearnet link: https://ecomix.io 🔹Tor link: ecomix7ez6ygyou4.onion 🔹Bitcointalk thread link: Here 🔹Fees: From 0.3% to 4% (+ Network fees 0.00001 to 0.0003 ) ⭐ Name: Blender.io 🔹 Clearnet link: https://blender.io 🔹 Tor link: blenderiocpxfema.onion 🔹 Bitcointalk thread link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5052876 🔹 Fees: From 0.5% to 2.5% for each operation, plus extra 0.0001 BTC for each tar ⭐Name: Wasabi Wallet 🔹Clearnet link: https://wasabiwallet.io 🔹Tor link: wasabiukrxmkdgve5kynjztuovbg43uxcbcxn6y2okcrsg7gb6jdmbad.onion/ 🔹Bitcointalk thread link: Here 🔹Fees: 0.003% ⭐Name: BitMaximum 🔹Clearnet link: https://bitmaximum.io 🔹Tor link: bitmaximumgnmsaf.onion 🔹Bitcointalk thread link: Here 🔹Fees: From 0.5% to 15% (+ Network fee) ⭐Name: FoxMixer 🔹Clearnet link: https://www.foxmixer.com 🔹Tor link: foxmixer6mrsuxrl.onion 🔹Bitcointalk thread link: Here 🔹Fees: Vary, depends on confirmation time. ⭐Name: MyBitMix 🔹Clearnet link: http://mybitmix.com Mirror: http://mybitmix.biz 🔹Tor link: mybitmix7rkdtzmi.onion 🔹Bitcointalk thread link: Here 🔹Fees: from 0.5% to 3.99% + miners fee 0.0007 per one extra output address ⭐Name: MixerTumbler 🔹Clearnet link: https://mixertumbler.com 🔹Tor link: n/a 🔹Bitcointalk thread link: Here 🔹Fees: From 2% to 5% (+ Network fee)

7096

Economy / Service Discussion / Re: BitCloak Mixer - Important Feature Proposal: Blacklist Addresses

on: May 29, 2019, 03:05:28 AM

Very interesting feature although the possibility of this working effectively is minimum as it can be easily abuse and considering some decent amount of coins that get mixed has fraudulent origin, I can't just help but wonder how beneficial this idea is to your business operation. Morally: The idea is perfect, Business wise: Not that much.

7097

Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Some suggestions to future merit giveway thread starters

on: May 29, 2019, 01:30:13 AM

Quote from: jademaxsuy on May 28, 2019, 04:16:17 AM I haven't seem merit giveaways lately in the forum after quickseller and OGnastys merit giveaway thread. It seems that most users are hoarding merits? That's not the case, the lack of merit giveway thread doesn't mean people are hoarding smerits, infact we have more users awarding deserving post without creating a merit giveway thread (it isn't mandatory to create a thread to merit posts) also if you're in search of merit giveways you should look more in the off topic board because most giveway recently have been moved to the board.

7098

Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Can anybody explain these term to me in crypto?

on: May 28, 2019, 07:39:55 PM

Scalability is the problem bitcoin faces, on-chain and off-chain are type of bitcoin transaction while other terms you asked for description are the possible solutions to the scalability problem. For more detail information read the below links. Read for scalability: Quote from: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitcoin_scalability_problem The bitcoin scalability problem refers to the discussion concerning the limits on the amount of transactions the bitcoin network can process. It is related to the fact that records (known as blocks) in the bitcoin blockchain are limited in size and frequency Read for block size: Quote from: https://www.mycryptopedia.com/block-size-explained/ The block size is simply the maximum limit a block can be filled up with transactions. For example, the Bitcoin block size currently stands at 1 MB Read for On-chain and off-chain transaction: Quote from: https://blockbasis.com/help/blockchain/difference-chain-off-chain-transactions/ On-chain transactions reflected on the public ledger, visible to all participants on the blockchain network while Off-chain transactions, transfer agreements between two or more parties Read for Lighting network: Quote from: https://www.bitcoinforbeginners.io/cryptocurrency-guide/bitcoin-lightning-network-explained/ The Lightning Network is a second layer off-chain solution for Bitcoin’s scaling problem. The goal is to technologically support Bitcoin mass adoption while keeping the coin useful, affordable, decentralized, and censorship-resistant. It does this by opening payment channels between 2 users/peers that (normally would) have established relationships and don’t require trust Read to understand first and second layer protocol and how they can be used to solve the scalability problem: Quote from: https://medium.com/@timevalueofbtc/the-bitcoin-second-layer-d503949d0a06 Bitcoin’s first layer, or base layer, is a protocol proposed in 2008 that has reached a global state of consensus as it approaches its tenth birthday. Follow link to for more detail information, (Skip the gold introduction paragraph, scroll down)

7099

Other / Meta / Re: Giving out merit to people you know, acceptable or not?

on: May 28, 2019, 05:00:51 PM

Well just to point out, that post you linked in your OP was actually worth meriting irrespective of whether you know the OP or not. I did merit the post myself because it was a honest question that other users could relate to) so you didn't do anything wrong. About meriting friends, I don't see anything wrong with that, especially when you did find their post won't meriting although you shouldn't abuse that privileges in regards to meriting spam or posts you won't have merited if you didn't know that individual personally because if you do it'll come back to hurt you. Merit are met for quality contributions therefore irrespective of who the posters are, (be it friends, trolls, members of ranks we presume don't need merit etc) you're free to send them smerits with exception to yourself (alts).

7100

Economy / Reputation / Re: LFC_Bitcoin - Reputation Thread

on: May 28, 2019, 02:43:32 PM

Quote from: The-One-Above-All on May 28, 2019, 01:46:06 PM <*> If I have been spamming just for some BTC dust as you claim but have ranked up from member rank to almost Hero member rank in just 5months (jan-may) of actively participating/contributing to forum discussion in the little way I could then the merit system have failed. But guess what the system haven't failed since my contribution have been highlighted worth reading and truely they're (you can skimmed through my merited post to keep yourself busy instead of wasting your energy attacking a third world country dog as you describe). If those i have labeled trustworthy (users in my custom trust list) have also labeled LFC_Bitcoin trustworthy and after going through his activities on the forum and have seen what he has been doing in regards to tagging scammers to keep the forum safe then off course he has to be a trust worthy/net positive user of the forum and have also earned himself a spot-on my custom trust list. (added)**.

Pages: « 1 ... 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 [355] 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 ... 421 »