For security reasons, if your account is unattended for more than 21 days, automatic re-investing will be enabled automatically to prevent you of losing your earnings because of possibly lost or forgotten private key. To opt out, you should contact us. Automatic opting out of this feature will be implemented soon.
-Mulletwang
Funny how this is a security protocol there, this explains why I dont receive my small earning of the free 10 ghs. This is sure a red flag for the investor already as there is something shady going on. First of all, someone who loss their private key of the address will quickly change their withdrawal address there. This is actually not a security proctocol , rather a red flag as they could be preparing to end their service soon Note : the sign of the collapsing of a "cloudmining" is that there is something wrong or delay about the payment, the owner will then make up A-Z excuses about it . Food for thoughts ! Maybe the protocol is there is stop people like you who have invested nothing yet expect something for nothing. Right, I get 0.4 cent monthly from cloudminr, which is alot?  . Yes I have invested nothing, but it was their giveaway anyway There is nothing wrong with their service because it continues to work as it has always been intended to work.
It is something wrong because that they are implementing this suddenly which caused some of their "investor" to automatically purchase more hashes instead getting their payout You can't blame the operator for you not reading the FAQ in its entirety. Yes, but people can blame them if there is a sudden change with it, My last login was 3 months ago and I can clarify that this is a sudden change of their rules. Show me where excuses that you claim were made Read above, My last login was 3 months ago. yet I receive their payment before unlike this week Anyone reading this should recognize that there is a systematic effort to discredit this service. Yes it is, im stating my opinion as I see some red flag which is similar scenario like most of the collapsed-ponzi mining. Maybe they are a ponzi, but there no evidence to support that claim as many have stated or implied Yes there isnt any evidence, but there is a red flag to it. Which is why im stating my opinion here because I had got burn alot in ltcgear before |
|
|
|
For security reasons, if your account is unattended for more than 21 days, automatic re-investing will be enabled automatically to prevent you of losing your earnings because of possibly lost or forgotten private key. To opt out, you should contact us. Automatic opting out of this feature will be implemented soon.
-Mulletwang
Funny how this is a security protocol there, this explains why I dont receive my small earning of the free 10 ghs. This is sure a red flag for the investor already as there is something shady going on. First of all, someone who loss their private key of the address will quickly change their withdrawal address there. This is actually not a security proctocol , rather a red flag as they could be preparing to end their service soon Note : the sign of the collapsing of a "cloudmining" is that there is something wrong or delay about the payment, the owner will then make up A-Z excuses about it . Food for thoughts ! |
|
|
|
Why do you need a loan to pay for another loan? Just pay it and apologize to your BTCJam investors.
You see, I have some financial problems, that's why I need to refinance the loans. , all you need is a single click there but the fact that you are seeking the loan here rather than there actually trigger a red flag which means your reputation is bad there and your "refinance loan" wont be filled up or that you wish to scam here and not to tarnish your reputation there |
|
|
|
Only accepting dogecoin? do you have an accepting bitcoin site?
We've got long-range plans to accept bitcoin deposits as well, but we're primarily a dogecoin-facing site - withdrawals would be in doge. Transaction times are faster, deposits are faster, and it's easier to understand betting amounts as we don't have to scale deposits based on an arbitrary "1 BTC = 1000 chips" factor. so you are not accepting bitcoin for now? If this is the case then this wont fit in this section, since you can only put your sites in this section if your sites accept bitcoin Kindly move it here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=197.0The move topic button is in your bottom left |
|
|
|
What are the requirments to receive a deposit bonus? What rollover do i need to do ? please explain thank you  there are no requirement for this, the only thing you need to do is to deposit into your account. First time deposit will get 100% match up to 1 BTC and you need to wager it 30x to be able to withdraw them. For information about wagering percentage check this page out https://fortunejack.com/promotions/ |
|
|
|
It is a debatable topic. lol. From the campaign viewpoint, it is fair. Those who make the campaign effective should be rewarded more, however insignificant that may be, that those who may not. I am only talking about a small incentive, may be a bonus for those who actually post in the boards associated with the campaign. It might result in campaigns excluding certain members otherwise. So, speaking long term, this is actually good for those who are interested in other boards. Fair points, but it could be resulted in more spam dont you think? since people might be trying to post in there although he has no interest in it and just trying to get some extra tips for posting there, lol, it won't be that big enough to persuade unwilling people to post there. lol. It is better than campaigns that state 10 etc. posts minimum in this particular board to get payout. Yet, the latter seems to be okay with the participants  For some people, perhaps it is enough to persuade them. Reemembered the first avatar campaign on the boards? some people quickly sell their avatar off for such small rates so yes even with a small amount, some people can be persuaded to do something and yes the latter seems to be a common rules for most of the gambling signature campaign like minimum of X posts in gambling boards |
|
|
|
It is pretty normal for stunna to be late since he did promised us he "will" posted a detail explanation about it but he didnt set up a due date for it.
Each time he said "soon" it will actually means that it gonna takes a while. Anyway it isnt like he is owing to us. In the end It is his decision to either publish on how hufflepuff did the exploit or not publish it
it is not serous for any administrator to promise something that he cannot keep afterwards, this is bad bad bad... so disappointing man Well, atleast even if he consider not to post it, there will be no effect on us. So I dont think that it is as hassle to force to stunna to post it. But as far as I know, Stunna will keep his promise in the end although it might take him some to deliver them |
|
|
|
Well, it doesn't bring a quick solution, it at least means he's not in panama under a new identity  And if he's a scammer, he's a very crappy one  Plus, apparently, balances have been developed, it's not just a crappy widget with zero functions behind it.I dont see any changes there and it is still a crappy widget with the word "pending" on the balance which I highly doubt someday it gonna change. Doesnt matter actually, since I thought everyone has been forgetting about this already , even the beeliever in litecointalk is having zero interest with it already as well |
|
|
|
It is a debatable topic. lol. From the campaign viewpoint, it is fair. Those who make the campaign effective should be rewarded more, however insignificant that may be, that those who may not. I am only talking about a small incentive, may be a bonus for those who actually post in the boards associated with the campaign. It might result in campaigns excluding certain members otherwise. So, speaking long term, this is actually good for those who are interested in other boards. Fair points, but it could be resulted in more spam dont you think? since people might be trying to post in there although he has no interest in it and just trying to get some extra tips for posting there The max limit is kept to keep a check on forced posting. That is the only reason that is keeping us from raising it as suggested. No, reducing it further, will not have a good effect. Thanks Raising it wont be necessary, it is less than 24 hours for the counting to start and no one reached 100 posts yet as of now. The average posts for those who reach 100 posts in a week is usually 100-110 posts ( not to count quickseller's ). Clearly I dont mind making another 10 posts extra for the campaign since there is an extra bonus in play |
|
|
|
Hi there, I'm able to send send Bitcoin from my xapo wallet , play & withdraw also to my xapo wallet?
Cheers!
Yes you can , there is a box for the return address before you proceed for the bet, simply put in your xapo deposit address there and click on it to place bet, there will be then an address for you to send your bet into. Your winning will be received at the address you put as the winning recipient address |
|
|
|
I want to share my strategy to everyone because I don't have many bitcoin and this strategy not tested in the long run that's why I give it to everyone. If you don't want my strategy then I will keep it myself and stop bashing me here.
If I have more time and bitcoin, I can do this easily.
step 1. Find the pattern - find many more pattern.
step 2. Learn the algorithm of the site or create your own algorithm.
step 3. Use some martingale
step 4. Create suitable Strategy for that site - I preferred unorthodox strategy.
step 5. Create bots then run in VPS.
as said you can't win in the long run, so no method/strategy can beat house. if you have luck/lots of bitcoins then you can make desired profits.
Having lots of bitcoin is not a guarantee that you will profit yourself by using a martingale strategy, either way you will have a red streak and hit the maximum bet even if you have the unlimited bitcoin. But having luck is another factor in gambling which not everyone has |
|
|
|
Hi,
I have 2 questions . Please help me for more details !
- 1BTC from your faucet . What is testnet? Can I spend testnet in the shops that accept Bitcoin ?
- How to recover 10 - 50% lose bets ? How it works?
Thanks in advance !
- 1BTC from your faucet . What is testnet? Can I spend testnet in the shops that accept Bitcoin ?
Testnet is basically bitcoin used for the purposes of testing, it is not the same as the actual bitcoin and you cant spend it to purchase something, although you can withdraw it if you have a testnet wallet which will not be any use to use. For more info, here https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Testnet- How to recover 10 - 50% lose bets ? How it works?
Each time you do a single manual roll and you lose, there will be an option for you before rolling the next one to recover your loss 10 % recover loss if you roll under 50 20 % recover loss if you roll under 40 30 % recover loss if you roll under 30 40 % recover loss if you roll under 20 50 % recover loss if you roll under 10 |
|
|
|
Support is mostly Edward and Stunna.
Makes sense, this could be one of the problem that support is mainly late in replying back to the problem since Stunna is a busy guy and have alot of stuff to do I suppose. Micro do you have any data about how many support are available to deal with the support service ? it seems like there is sudden rise of complaints due to unanswered support |
|
|
|
Lower the post cap as I proposed. I think every campaign should do that it should be forum regulated rule.
Or maybe you have better idea?
why is limiting the post is an excelent way of reducing the spam posts?please elaborate more of this. if you check on the weekly/ bi weekly sig campaign with small posts requirement, you can actually see that most of them are still spamming their post count at almost the end of their pay week In short, spammers will always spam no matter what the post requirement is, best thing to do is to warn them or to cut off their payment immediately. The current idea of ndnhc to check on personally each posts is actually a good idea, lets see how this goes for tomorrow |
|
|
|
I don't see your point. Why are you asking signature campaign managers to exclude posts made in the politics section? There is meaningful conversation there, probably more so then in many other sections.
I would repeat my solution to shit posts in the forum would be for campaign managers to do a better job of weeding out shit-posters.
I am asking that because I consider them as off-topic. Let me ask you this, where would a person who wants to discuss about Movies or Music post? in off-topic right? And that's not paid for because it is considered useless. But people arguing whether a religion is right or not is meaningful and paid for? How can that be fair? Argue about religions is more useful than talk about what kind of music do you like, or am I wrong? Arguing about religions pretty much will create an endless debate , this happens many time even on this forum . Each party will keep on pushing their religions towards the other using some facts about how good their religion are but some threads in politics and society is still okay imo |
|
|
|
I don't see your point. Why are you asking signature campaign managers to exclude posts made in the politics section? There is meaningful conversation there, probably more so then in many other sections.
I would repeat my solution to shit posts in the forum would be for campaign managers to do a better job of weeding out shit-posters.
this goes as well as my solution for this problem. By excluding some boards it will be like mitigating the spammers to another boards. In the end this will not stop the problem of the spam posts itself but rather move it. Best thing to do is the campaign manager need to be stricter and denied payment for everyone who did a shit posts whatsoever |
|
|
|
I agree with the Quickseller's idea, the signature campaign maintainers should accept only the valid users (check them with the last posts). We should remember also another thing, what is the problem : the post or the sig ad?
Agree, someones' helpfull post in the excluded should not be exclude just because the board is being excluded for payment. Best thing to do for the campaign manager is to check on this personally. It is not a spam if someone give an answer to a question about what is a sign message in beginners boards, it is a spam when there are more than 2 same useless answer about that Cheers |
|
|
|
Pesobang , I think there is a mistake here. the funds that you sent is 1.4 BTC to carra. Assuming that all 20 members will make a maximum earning of 0.07 BTC x 20 = 1.4 BTCbut the google doc has a total of 24 peoples https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Bcxxz9w57He1CtadLG9TkKEnukC7557Yj14CuQv7ovA/edit?pli=1#gid=137032497Your funds is not enough to pay the current payment for 24 people assuming all of them make maximum earning of 0.07 BTC x 24 = 1.68 BTC ( - 0.28 BTC ) Although there is a tiny chance that all member will get a maximum earning but to provide the supposed maximum payment in escrow is a standard practice for the safety of the participants themselves. Since it pays bi-weekly, the maximum needed for 24 participants is 0.84 BTC. Noted, then probably it is best to put in that information in OP since I thought that it will be still monthly or user can choose wether to be paid monthly or biweekly because some information could be missleading X BTC/month for Y constructive posts or more. = X BTC/2 weeks for Y constructive posts or more
40 constructive posts minimum every month
|
|
|
|
Pesobang , I think there is a mistake here. the funds that you sent is 1.4 BTC to carra. Assuming that all 20 members will make a maximum earning of 0.07 BTC x 20 = 1.4 BTCbut the google doc has a total of 24 peoples https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Bcxxz9w57He1CtadLG9TkKEnukC7557Yj14CuQv7ovA/edit?pli=1#gid=137032497Your funds is not enough to pay the current payment for 24 people assuming all of them make maximum earning of 0.07 BTC x 24 = 1.68 BTC ( - 0.28 BTC ) Although there is a tiny chance that all member will get a maximum earning but to provide the supposed maximum payment in escrow is a standard practice for the safety of the participants themselves. |
|
|
|
Can't you send PM to multiple people in one go? To protect their privacy, you could use BCC field.
Unless there is a restriction on how many people you can send PM simultaneously.
He can't, a newbie account is limited to 5 PMs/hours, and that is why he is asking few people to do it for him instead but I doubt that someone will risk their own account for this job. $80 x 25 = $2000. This is big amount for easy job.
Too good to be true, put your fund to escrow. Maybe someone will do this for you.
Lets see if he puts on his funds in escrow, this could be outrageous as I think most of the negative trust account will grab on this thing if he did put up funds in escrow |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
