Ask the Libertarians how a "free market" would create a functional meshnet.
That's what we're discussing right now. Welcome to the discussion.
|
|
|
Greed will destroy you.
Still using dial up to connect to the Internet? Or are you enjoying the benefits of the greedy companies that want to offer more and more speed to make money?
|
|
|
my past couple posts were going off to a tangent of a country wide ISP avoidance.. so lets simplify it. yes im continuing on about payment side of internet access. but because its local im not worrying about payment protocols as its easier to manage bitcoins with not many non-direct internet hops locally
imagine in a town 5 people had the internet(blue circles) and were willing to open their wifi internet connection to random people and relays(red circles) to make a whole town WIFI accessible
I like the part about having your bitcoin address tied to your computer. You could have your connecting client sign a transaction for verification. I do like how the closer you get to the "real" Internet the higher the cost because of the assumed better bandwidth. But there should be a way to pay (and charge) for the best speeds and higher traffic. This would encourage people to be like miners and upgrade their hardware often with the final result being blazing fast network speeds and high data ceilings.
|
|
|
Are you even aware of the type of auction this was? It was a Dutch auction - all winners paid the price of the lowest winning bid. So, even if 1 bidder offered a crazy $10,000 per coin, they would not pay that much unless all other bidders were equally crazy.
Where do you get the info about Dutch auction? I think he means a Dutch oven. Similar but very different.
|
|
|
That was me, I just pulling some change out of my couch. Converted them to bitcoins.
|
|
|
Bolivia has only banned using bitcoins on its banks national payment system.
Like Visa banning using bitcoins over its credit card network or banks banning the use of bitcoins for wire transfers.
Essentially.
Bolivia has not banned bitcoins!
|
|
|
I get out of Afghanistan in 3 weeks.
It's time for me to plant my seed too...
|
|
|
I could see something like a "subscription" base for nodes connecting to nodes.
Each node pays for X amount of bandwidth up front to another node. That node does not know if it is a relay or a user connecting. Something like .01 BTC for 10Gb of data transfer. Once that amount is used up, the node or user has to pay again. This has been shown to be a viable way of paying for Internet service with bitcoins.
You could set the amount you want and your nodes could seek out the best rate among nodes. Users could also seek out the best nodes to connect to for their Internet access.
If a node is getting paid a lot for traffic it then has to pay other nodes for the traffic needs from them.
There could be different levels of access for short term access like in an airport where you only need 10Mb or so, or higher subscriptions for major hubs.
The market would push the rates down as anyone can drop in a node and set their price.
|
|
|
translation: BOARD RESOLUTION No. 044/2014 SUBJECT: MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS - BAN USE OF COINS AND CURRENCY NO NAMES REGULATED IN THE FIELD OF PAYMENT SYSTEM NACIONAL.VISTOS: The Political Constitution of Estado.La Law No. 1670 of October 1995, the Central Bank of Bolivia BCB 31.) Law No. 393 of August 21, 2013, Financial Services. The Statute of BCB approved by Resolution of Board No. 128/2005 of 21 October 2005 and subsequent amendments. The Payment System Regulation High Value, approved by Resolution of Directory N ° 131/2009 of 27 October 2009. The Payment Services Regulations approved by Board Resolution No. 121/2011 of 27 September 2011 as amended by Resolution of Directors N ° 59/2012 of 22 May 2012 and No. 100/2013 of 30 July 2013. Regulation of Electronic Payment Instruments approved by Resolution of Directory N ° 126/2011 of 4 October 2011 and amended by Resolutions Directory N ° 25/2012, 60/2012 and 22/2013 of 23 February 2012, May 22, 2012 y5 March 2013, respectively. Regulation for International Remittance Transfer approved medianteResolucion Directory N ° 071/2012 of 19 June 2012 and amended by Directory Resolution N ° 154/2012 of 28 August 2012. The Report of the Management of Financial Institutions-GEF-BCB-DVSP SSPSF-INF-2014- 35 of April 30, 2014. The report of the Legal Affairs Management BCB-GAL-HEALTHY-INF-2014-149 of 6 May 2014. WHEREAS: That the State Constitution provides in Article 328 that is vested with the BCB, in coordination with economic policy determined by the Executive, the serialadas ademásde by law, regulate the payments system.
That pursuant to Article 331 of the Political Constitution of the State, the activities of financial intermediation, the provision of financial services and any other actividadrelacionada with the management, use of savings and investment are of public interest ° can only be exercised prior authorization of the State in accordance with the law The Law No. 1670 provides in Articles 2, 3 and 30 BCB aims to ensure the stability of the domestic purchasing power of the national currency, for which cumplimientoformula policies generally applicable monetary and payments system, to be subject to its regulatory jurisdiction, all entities of intermediation financial and financial services authorized by the Superintendency of Banks and Financial currently Authority Financial System Supervision ASFI.) That the Act No. 393 in its Article 124, provides that transactions under the services provided by financial institutions can be made through media electronics, which must necessarily enforce security measures to ensure the integrity, confidentiality, authentication and non-repudiation. Also in section IV of this seriala article the Supervision Authority and the Financial System according to BCB its powers, ISSUED regulation establishing the procedure and rules deseguridad for operations, as well as the minimum requirements for the entities to engage in electronic banking, phone banking and through mobile devices. Regulation System of Large Value Payment defined in its Article 32 that payment orders will be recorded in the following currency denominations: a) Currency national (MN), b) Foreign Currency (ME) only Mares of the United States of North America, c) Domestic currency with value maintenance in relation to the Unit Housing Development (MNUFV), and d) national currency with value maintenance relationship to the Sea of the United States of North America MVDOL). Regulation of Electronic Instruments seliala Payment in Article 5, paragraph a) funds established in the accounts based mobile wallet payments (accounts payment) will be called only nacional.Que currency has been detected in some countries the use of virtual currencies like Bitcoin, Namecoin, Tonal Bitcoin, IxCoin, Devcoin, Freicoin, 10coin, Liquidcoin, Peercoin, Quark, Primecoin, Feathercoin and others that do not belong to ningian state, country or economic area, emission and therefore use is not regulated and may cause a loss to their holders. The Management of Financial Institutions by BCB-GEF-SSPSF-DVSP-INF-2014-35 Report evaluates the current regulations governing the national payment system and the use of monetary denominations otrasmonedas or not authorized by the BCB, and recommends ban use coins not issued or regulated by states, countries or economic areas and monetary denominations not authorized by the BCB in the amice the national payment system
That the Legal Department by BCB-GAL-HEALTHY-INF-2014-149 states that relevant BCB Report, in its capacity as monetary and exchange only authority in the country, with enough power to issue general regulations specialized application, prohibit the use of coins and currency denominations gue are not found in the field of regulated national payment system concluding that the ban is legally applicable, remain the responsibility of the Board of BCB consider approval.
That the Board of BCB in his capacity as the highest authority of the institution is responsible for defining policies, specialized regulations and internal rules generally applicable, being empowered to promulgate rules and adopt the broad decisions that were necessary to fulfill the functions , powers and responsibilities assigned by law to the Issuing Entity.
Article 1. Starting date using coins not issued or regulated by states, countries or economic orders and electronic payment in coins and currency denominations not authorized by the BCB in the field of national payment system areas is prohibited.
Article 2. The President and the General Manager, are responsible for the execution and enforcement do this Resolution.
|
|
|
Full text: RESOLUCION DE DIRECTORIO N 044/2014 ASUNTO: GERENCIA DE ENTIDADES FINANCIERAS — PROHIBICION DEL USO DE MONEDAS Y DENOMINACIONES MONETARIAS NO REGULADAS EN EL AMBITO DEL SISTEMA DE PAGOS NACIONAL.VISTOS: La Constitucion Politica del Estado.La Ley N° 1670 de 31 de octubre de 1995 del Banco Central de Bolivia BCB).La Ley N° 393 de 21 de agosto de 2013, de Servicios Financieros. El Estatuto del BCB aprobado mediante Resolucion de Directorio N° 128/2005 de 21 de octubre de 2005 y posteriores modificaciones. El Reglamento del Sistema de Pagos de Alto Valor, aprobado mediante Resolucion de Directorio N° 131/2009 de 27 de octubre de 2009. El Reglamento de Servicios de Pago aprobado mediante ResoluciOn de Directorio N° 121/2011 de 27 de septiembre de 2011 modificado mediante Resoluciones de Directorio N° 59/2012 de 22 de mayo de 2012 y N° 100/2013 de 30 de julio de 2013. El Reglamento de Instrumentos Electronicos de Pago aprobado mediante Resolucion de Directorio N° 126/2011 de 4 de octubre de 2011 y modificado mediante Resoluciones de Directorio N° 25/2012, 60/2012 y 22/2013 de 23 de febrero de 2012, 22 de mayo de 2012 y5 de marzo de 2013, respectivamente. El Reglamento para la Transferencia de Remesas Internacionales aprobado medianteResolucion de Directorio N° 071/2012 de 19 de junio de 2012 y modificado mediante Resolucion de Directorio N°154/2012 de 28 de agosto de 2012. El Informe de la Gerencia de Entidades Financieras BCB-GEF-SSPSF-DVSP-INF-2014- 35 de 30 de abril de 2014. El Informe de la Gerencia de Asuntos Legales BCB-GAL-SANO-INF-2014-149 de 6 de mayo de 2014. CONSIDERANDO: Que la Constitucion Politica del Estado establece en su Articulo 328 que es atribuciOn del BCB, en coordinaciOn con la politica economica determinada por el Organo Ejecutivo, ademasde las serialadas por Ley, regular el sistema de pagos.
Que conforme al Articulo 331 de la Constitucion Politica del Estado, las actividades de intermediacion financiera, la prestacion de servicios financieros y cualquier otra actividadrelacionada con el manejo, aprovechamiento e inversion del ahorro, son de interes public° y solo pueden ser ejercidas previa autorizacion del Estado, conforme con la Ley. Que la Ley N° 1670 dispone en sus Articulos 2, 3 y 30 que el BCB tiene por objeto procurar la estabilidad del poder adquisitivo interno de la moneda nacional, para cuyo cumplimientoformula las politicas de aplicaciOn general en materia monetaria y del sistema de pagos, estando sometidas a su competencia normativa, todas las entidades de intermediacion financiera y servicios financieros autorizadas por la Superintendencia de Bancos y Entidades Financieras, actualmente Autoridad de Supervision del Sistema Financiero ASFI).Que la Ley N° 393 en su Articulo 124, establece que las operaciones efectuadas en el marco de los servicios que prestan las entidades financieras, podran realizarse a traves de medios electronicos, los que necesariamente deben cumplir las medidas de seguridad que garanticen la integridad, confidencialidad, autentificacion y no repudio. Asimismo en numeral IV de este articulo seriala que la Autoridad de Supervision del Sistema Financiero y el BCB de acuerdo a sus competencias, emitiran regulacion que establezca el procedimiento y normativa deseguridad para las operaciones, asi como los requisitos minimos que deben cumplir las entidades para realizar actividades de banca electronica, banca por telefono y mediante dispositivos mOviles. Que el Reglamento del Sistema de Pagos de Alto Valor define en su Articulo 32 que las ordenes de pago seran registradas en las siguientes denominaciones monetarias: a) Moneda nacional (MN), b) Moneda extranjera (ME) sOlo Mares de los Estados Unidos de Norteamerica, c) Moneda nacional con mantenimiento de valor con relacion a la Unidad de Fomento de Vivienda (MNUFV), y d) Moneda nacional con mantenimiento de valor con relacion al Mar de los Estados Unidos de Norteamerica MVDOL). Que el Reglamento de Instrumentos Electronicos de Pago seliala en su Articulo 5, inciso a) que los fondos constituidos en las cuentas que sustenta los pagos con billetera movil (cuentas de pago) estaran denominadas exclusivamente en moneda nacional.Que se ha detectado en algunos paises el uso de monedas virtuales como el Bitcoin, Namecoin, Tonal Bitcoin, IxCoin, Devcoin, Freicoin, 10coin, Liquidcoin, Peercoin, Quark, Primecoin, Feathercoin y otras que no pertenecen a ningian estado, pals o zona economica, en consecuencia su uso y emision no esta regulado, pudiendo ocasionar perdidas a sus tenedores. Que la Gerencia de Entidades Financieras mediante Informe BCB-GEF-SSPSF-DVSP-INF-2014-35 evalua la normativa vigente que regula el sistema de pagos nacional y el uso de otrasmonedas o denominaciones monetarias no autorizadas por el BCB, y recomienda prohibir el uso de monedas no emitidas o reguladas por estados, paises o zonas economicas, y denominaciones monetarias no autorizadas por el BCB en el amito del sistema de pagos nacional
Que la Gerencia de Asuntos Legales mediante Informe BCB-GAL-SANO-INF-2014-149 manifiesta que es pertinente que el BCB, en su calidad de unica autoridad monetaria y cambiaria del pais, con facultades suficientes para emitir normativas especializadas de aplicacion general, prohiba el uso de monedas y denominaciones monetarias gue no se encuentren reguladas en el ambito del sistema de pagos nacional concluyendo que la prohibicion es legalmente procedente, siendo competencia del Directorio del BCB considerar su aprobacion.
Que, el Directorio del BCB en su calidad de maxima autoridad de la institucion es responsable de definir politicas, normativas especializadas de aplicacion general y normas internas, estando facultado para dictar las normas y adoptar las decisiones generales que fueran necesarias para el cumplimiento de las funciones, competencias y facultades asignadas por Ley al Ente Emisor.
Articulo 1. A partir de la fecha queda prohibido el uso de monedas no emitidas o reguladas por estados, paises o zonas economicas y de ordenes de pago electronicas en monedas y denominaciones monetarias no autorizadas por el BCB en el ambito del sistema de pagos nacional.
Articulo 2. La presidencia y la Gerencia General, quedan encargadas de la ejecucion y cumplimiento do la presente Resolucion.
|
|
|
<"Bolivia Bans Bitcoins!"> @OP are you going to change the title to be more accurate?
If it was unambiguously wrong I'd do so. However: 1. The notion that Bolivia did so is clearly expressed in the Coindesk article. 2. It's unclear what relationship the Central Bank of Bolivia has with the government - as others have noted, their pronouncements may extend no further than their own operations. Or they may be backed up by the full force of the civil government with all that implies. I just don't know either way at this point. My reason for posting the OP was not to have people blindly swallow it (I wouldn't expect the crowd around here to do so anyways), but to chew it up, toss it around and gain a better collective understanding or at least clarify the uncertainties. A partir de la fecha queda prohibido el uso de monedas no emitidas o reguladas por estados, paises o zonas economicas y de ordenes de pago electronicas en monedas y denominaciones monetarias no autorizadas por el BCB en el ambito del sistema de pagos nacional. translation: Starting date using coins not issued or regulated by states, countries or economic orders and electronic payment in coins and currency denominations not authorized by the BCB in the field of national payment system areas is prohibited. Bolivia Central Bank bans bitcoins on their payment system ie. No sending bitcoins from bank to bank, over wire transfers, etc.
|
|
|
A really independent mesh network is necessary. Independent from the Internet. It's resilience will give us enough safety.
Early on it could certainly tunnel through the current Internet.
|
|
|
US government should be loved by their citizen.
Free education, cheap housing and social safety net compare to the rest of the world.
Free indoctrination, cheap rounding up of the poor to be kept away from the rich people and training people to be dependent upon the government so they will grant that government more power. Many US comradescitizens love the US government.
|
|
|
Anonymous does not have web pages that collect e-mail addresses.
They put instructions on Tor or 4chan or places like that.
|
|
|
1. Death penalty is not a deterrent. Of the top reasons for murder, people are not usually in the state of mind to even consider the death penalty. I doubt someone who is willing to murder would see much difference between living the rest of their lives in jail or dying. They do not value life much in the first place, why would you assume they value their own life? Then again, if we had the ten commandments in schools maybe people would read that one about "thou shalt not kill". But most people who are fighting to get those commandments into schools are fine with finding excuses to ignore that commandment. 2. The rights of the mother to "choose" outweighs the right of life for the child. This should be left to the states to decide. As murder is a state crime (not defined in the Constitution), if you believe it is murder then you should believe it should be left to the states. I must view gay people no other way than being born that way and gays have no choice in the matter regarding their sexuality. It should not matter. Government should not be involved in our private lives at such a level. 4. Banning guns is somehow a good idea. Banning guns is always a good idea for the people with the guns. Easier to control those without it. 5. The 1% are evil. Some, not all, of the 1% got there thanks to government using those guns that they don't want you to have. Most of the most wealthy companies are banks, Bitcoin is the answer to that.
|
|
|
Nobody should have the moral authority to kidnap someone at gunpoint and throw them in a cage.
Oh I don't know about that. I indirectly know several people who I feel comfortable having the gov do this to. Are referring to people who have this done without due process? If a man is raping a 6 month old baby, yeah I got no problems with the gov throwing him in jail. If a man rapes a 6 month old baby (or initiates force against someone) anyone is morally justified in self defense or making things right with the victim. An entity should not have moral authority just because they are "the government".
|
|
|
I use http://www.bitronictech.net I pay in bitcoins, the rates are good and the service is the best I have ever had with a hosting company.
|
|
|
Greed would destroy it. People would jam their competitors bandwidth to get more money.
When you have to pay for the bandwidth you use, and your competitors get paid for providing that bandwidth...how would people be able to jam their competitors bandwidth?
|
|
|
I've often seen mesh network type projects, why exactly haven't any of them taken off?
I also usually see that there is no financial incentive in most of these projects. Once the few people working for free move on to other things, nobody replaces them, waiting for those people to come back.
|
|
|
You can use your bitcoins while hodling them at http://www.bitpools.comYou keep your coins in your wallet and get to use them to participate in pools without them ever leaving your control.
|
|
|
|