You correctly unscrambled two of the terms: public key and taproot.
Even though "CryptoOne" does fit, it's not the term I was looking for. What is it anyways, a crypto blog?
"Admit cruel" is wrong.

You can't guess again until someone else posts their predictions!

I am not familiar with how YouTube works for content creators, but doesn't a channel need a certain number of subscribers, views, and comments before it can earn commissions from YouTube or from the ads? I seriously doubt anyone creating and uploading their videos earns serious revenue unless certain conditions are met. "Influencer-like" conditions.   

Who knows if anything that is written in the OP is even true!? It could just be someone wasting everyone's time by coming up with that name. Since I was curious, I checked the email on the have i been pwned website and it did find that the address has been leaked in 7 different data breaches. The first one dates back to 2015. Who knows what the goal of OP is... 

I couldn't help but laughing when I saw the name and logo of the coin.
Good luck with your project!

For your next venture, you could create the tit token.
A big shoutout to Only Fools and Horses and Del Boy for the name TIT.

I opened a similar thread a few months ago to ask a question regarding the bumping rules. I thought the rules had changed because I noticed that my bumps were getting deleted although they weren't breaking any forum rules. I didn't bump my threads more than once in a 24-hour period and I always deleted old bumps. It turns out that admins sometimes delete bumps if additional posts by you or other users were made after the bump. That's because the bump has served its purpose and is no longer needed because the new posts bump the thread anyways.

Ko želi da se igra, ima malo vremena i voli da pogađa riječi i pojmove, nek pogleda ovu moju novu temu > Pmalek’s Complete the Word Game and Get Merits.
Dao sam prednost članovima najnižih rangova da prvi pogađaju (newbie - Member) ne bi li dobili malo merita, a od sutra mogu svi ostali.

You are right, that was my mistake. The correct clue is one word made up of nine letters. I edited the second post now to remove the space. Good eyes!
Care to venture a guess on some of the terms or all of them?

You have to understand that the Bitcoin/Bitcointalk community was different in those days. Bitcoin still didn't find it's real use case and people were in it for the technology and the advantages a decentralized currency gave them. Theymos gradually progressed up the forum ranks to where he is now. He knew how to run the forum, had an interest in bitcoin, and did the things other users lost the interest for (as he stated in one of his quoted posts).     

I agree with mk4 here.
You already have crypto (both bitcoin and dogecoin), and if the seller accepts payments in cryptocurrencies, all you need is an address to pay the invoice. An address or a QR code you need to scan. Your task is to send the coins to the provided address. What happens with them after that is none of your concern. Instead of contacting BitPay support, can you get in touch with the merchant and ask him to help you make the transaction or pay with fiat if he no longer accepts cryptocurrencies? 

1.   mining code
2.   block header
3.   eosio
4.   ring signature
5.   opcodes
6.   hyperledger


* Members of all ranks can guess the terms.

Good Luck!



* Members of all ranks can guess the terms.
* I might repeat terms from previous rounds.

Good Luck!





1.   light wallet
2.   public key
3.   open source
4.   sidechain   
5.   arbitrage
6.   taproot
7.   limit order   


1.   block reward
2.   cryptography
3.   ponzi scheme
4.   genesis block
5.   rugpull
6.   finality
7.   merkle tree
8.   immutability   


1.   fungibility
2.   encrypt
3.   cypherpunk
4.   orphan block
5.   bitcoin-qt
6.   flood attack


1.   distributed ledger
2.   shard
3.   consensus algorithm
4.   block height
5.   coinjoin
6.   virgin bitcoin


1.   cosigner
2.   confirmation
3.   blockchain validator
4.   layer 2
5.   intermediary
6.   allocation


1.   cold storage
2.   hashrate
3.   chain reorg
4.   flippening
5.   merkle root
6.   halving  


1.   protocol
2.   mnemonic
3.   soft fork
4.   bear market
5.   censorship resistant
6.   overbought  


1.   asic miner
2.   deflation
3.   silk road
4.   distributed system
5.   solidity
6.   elliptic curve  


1.   tamper-proof
2.   whitepaper
3.   virtual currency
4.   cipher
5.   coin burn
6.   pseudonymity

A few months ago, I created the Riddles and Brain-Teasers for Bitcointalk Members (Newbies – Members) thread. Then I saw soliton's Bitcoin Crosswords. So that made me think of a similar game that involves Bitcoin and crypto-related terms.

•   For each round, I will post a few incomplete words, and you have to guess which ones they are.  
•   The terms will always be something you would expect to hear if you are familiar with Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies.



1.   Accounts created after the date this thread was posted ARE NOT ALLOWED TO PARTICIPATE.
2.   This thread is intended for users of all ranks, but NEWBIES, JR. MEMBERS, AND MEMBERS will have one day advantage to guess the terms. What does that mean? When a new round starts, only newbies, jr. members, and members can guess the words. The next day, after I give the green light, all other ranks can participate.
3.   No cheating, editing, or deleting posts. Edited replies won’t be counted.
4.   You can guess how many times you want, but you aren’t allowed to post again unless someone else writes a post.  
5.   You can only guess EACH WORD ONCE PER POST. You can’t provide 2 or more answers for the same word, but you are allowed to guess all of the terms.
6.   If no one can guess the correct word/words, I will add a few more letters.
7.   EACH correctly guessed term will be awarded 1 MERIT for the user who was the fastest.
8.   Every round will have 5-10 random words.

I use VPNs for other purposes and I have mistakenly logged in to Binance once while I was connected to my VPN. There wasn't a problem since I am not located in a country where Binance is not allowed to operate and the VPN also didn't provide me with an IP from a restricted jurisdiction. Still, I wouldn't suggest you do that.

If you have already used your account from your real IP in the past, it makes little sense to switch to a VPN now.
If you want to resume trading on that exchange or you are registering a new account, you have to undergo KYC. They will know who you are and where you are from, so it again make no sense to hide your real location.

The more coins you have staked, the greater your chances to mine the next block. Your mining power or potential to validate blocks is determined on how much of the native token you already own and have put up for staking.

You can find plenty of articles on the subject if you google "how are transactions confirmed in POS coins" or some combination like that. 

There were some rumors that Newcastle was interested in both Ramsey and Rabiot, but I am not sure how reliable those are. The biggest problems with both players are their salaries. Both earn plenty of money, which makes them unattractive for many teams. However, teams from the English Premier League can easily afford them. Ramsey doesn't play a big role in Juve's plans and it wouldn't be bad if he got off-loaded abroad. Rabiot is part of the team plans and will cost more. I doubt either of the two will leave unless Juventus finds suitable replacements.  

I don't think he will be sold because his contract expires at the end of the season. Nedved has recently hinted that the club and player have come to an agreement on almost all details regarding the contract extension and there are only a few things that are missing. They would be stupid to let a player like Dybala go for free and I am not sure he wants to.

Yes, I know that.

Judging by one comment on Reddit, it's the Recovery Check app that is causing the issues. They need to update the app as well to incorporate the changes made in the firmware. The same user said that issues with the Recovery Check app happened in the past as well. It looks like Ledger is pushing their updates without properly checking everything. And other users posted that their firmware upgrade worked just fine. 

Source

You believe you did There either was a transaction or there wasn't. Judging by the next sentences in your post, there was.

Do both wallets contain a total of 1.1912 mBTC or is the entire balance in the other wallet?

It's around $75 due to the drop in value that happened yesterday.

Please don't transfer any more bitcoin to your Electrum wallet until it's clear that you didn't create a watch-only wallet, and that you can move the coins that are already there.

You might have just saved your transaction instead of broadcasting it. If you don't feel comfortable sharing your BTC addresses with us, then check them yourself on a block explorer such as https://blockchair.com/.

What is the address you sent the coins from? Enter it on a block explorer and check its history.
What is the address you sent the coins to? Enter that as well on a block explorer and see what it says.

The address you shared that begins with 3Nymsmo has not sent or received anything, as stated previously. 

I would personally not purchase a Nano X because of everything that has been happening recently. I have the Nano S and think it's a nifty little gadget and I would pick that over the Nano X if I had to use a Ledger product again. I am personally looking to buy a Trezor Model T on discount to further divide my portfolio.

How does it look in terms of discounts for the Trezor T and do they have a history or giving users discount codes if they ask for them? 

I am not sure that a software upgrade can fix the problems they have with the Nano X battery. Several posts and videos suggested that the battery connectors were causing the charging issues. They need to be lifted up manually. But let's wait and see. Time will tell.

There is one thing I don't like about this video that explains the faulty connectors though.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yfZJIXBp1Ic

He didn't turn on the device before applying his fix, so that we can actually see that his method fixed the issues and that there was an issue in the first place. I have no reason to doubt the video creator. I am just saying it could have been done better.   

This is not exclusively related to the error message you are getting, but you might want to try it out.

This reddit post explains that there are two ways to access the Avalanche wallet:

• Through https://wallet-beta.avax.network/access
• Through https://wallet.avax.network/access

Please check if those sites are genuine yourself. I am only posting what I found and can't guarantee those are the correct sites.
Several users have reported that they fixed access errors by using the beta site. However, the post is from 7-8 months ago and might be outdated by now.