|
As practice shows, most often, after updating, the prices of coins of the updated projects, mainly increase. However, it is difficult to say anything for sure.
After all, there is so much speculation on the market that the option of a pump immediately before updating with a subsequent dump or vice versa with an even longer coin pump is not excluded.
As with halving, nothing definite can be said here.
|
|
|
|
When you day a successful project, what do you mean? What standard do you use in measuring a blockchain-based project? If you say 'hype' then you're most likely judging the price or the ICO our IEO the project organised. I can assure you that price or funds raised is by no means a measure of a successful project. The project might have had a successful price pump or Crowdsale but if it doesn't achieve it's target which it set out in its roadmap, it is unsuccessful.
I agree with you. To understand whether a project is successful, time must pass. Take a look at any of the coins from the top 100. of these projects can be called successful. What will unite all these projects which, after years, still hold their positions in the leaders of the crypto market? I think the main thing is the idea and the working team. |
|
|
|
If, for example, IEO was announced by the Binance exchange, which is a very authoritative resource in the cryptocurrency market, then I completely trust the new project in this case. If it is announced by less famous exchanges, then I am concerned about these projects. And any changes that the team makes should be in relation to its project, should be duplicated and explained also by the exchange that conducts IEO. I suppose if things are exactly like that in this situation, then many problems can be solved.
Alas, you are right. The crypto market can be divided into segments, some have more money and they are of better quality, others have less and they are weaker. The Binance Exchange and its like are included in the top segment, which causes the most confidence from investors, which means that no matter which project will be placed on Binance, it will immediately receive a large credit of trust, at least for the time of the sale. |
|
|
|
|
The TON project is really a very large project, you can tell an example for the industry, at least in terms of marketing.
Notice how little information there is in the information field until the moment the project has laid down the conditions for using their wallet, and immediately received a ban from regulators.
I think it’s not for nothing that TON did not give out any information about the project for so long. I am sure that the project will be launched, although not immediately.
|
|
|
|
It depends on the project itself and what are you buying into as after this terms you can guide the price if its overpriced or underpriced. I think most of the ICO's are overpriced at the beginning but if you can catch the private investor ICO then you will have a chance to have some profits as soon as its lands on exchanges, if not , you will have to even wait until the project goes alive even more and tech is used in some way or simply wait for it to pump and you don't want to wait for a pump...maybe it never comes.
I do not think that this directly depends on the project, rather it depends on the market. Look at what prices all ICOs started selling in 2018 and with what prices they began to bargain immediately after entering the market. All investors are in a strong minus because of this. Therefore, I believe that ICOы is almost always overpriced. |
|
|
|
|
One of the best tips that I heard sounded as follows:
"In order to invest you need and have free capital, in order to have free capital you need an occupation that will bring income that suits you, in order to have such an occupation you must be able to do something, learn and you pay back. "
I think this approach is very true.
|
|
|
|
|
If you don’t have money, then how are you going to invest in anything? First of all, find the money for a comfortable life. Find a job, one or two.
It is important that you have a source of income. When you have free money you can well invest it according to a previously developed investment plan.
Bitcoin is still a very promising investment, the main thing is not to rush, you have already learned from your mistakes.
|
|
|
|
Often investors or bounty participants influence the development team, they are constantly asking to add an exchange or find out when there will be an exchange.
In your opinion, this is the reason why good projects choose bad exchanges? Because they are in a hurry? I don’t think so, and it's strange. Any project is aimed at successful implementation, it is obvious that working with a bad exchange the chances of success of the project coin are somewhat reduced. Only one thing can justify such actions - an unsuccessful fundraising. |
|
|
|
If ICO not dead do you know any success ICO in 2019?
ICO are dead, it is a fact. However, even in this dead state, the ICO market manages to produce successful projects, from the last of these projects the Ferrum Network project. It raised $ 1,120,000 on the sale and successfully placed on the exchange. Now it is trading below the price of ICO due to the general downtrend in the market. |
|
|
|
|
See what is happening on the market. The market is bleeding. The capitalization of altcoins decreases every month. And regulators clamp down on the largest projects, which will undoubtedly affect the attitude of the majority of the crypto market. No wonder, after all, new money does not enter the market, which means the onset of a recession is inevitable. I think if Bitcoin drops to the levels of $ 6000 or $ 5000, this could become a catalyst, subject to a positive information background, to growth.
|
|
|
|
|
The cryptocurrency market is full of a wide variety of ideas, some of which are very multi-communicating.
As a rule, people are inspired precisely by the idea, and its potential implementation. When the project comes out, then it becomes clear how much the project team will be able to implement, and at this point everything may go wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
The US government is smart, it understands that attempts to completely isolate Bitcoin will lead to its even greater spread.
They went the trickier way, creating an atmosphere in the info field in which people themselves would reject bitcoin because of its danger and futility, it is these settings that the US government forms with its messengers.
|
|
|
|
|
Now there really is a period of accumulation of volumes for the largest positions in altcoins. This can be seen on orders on exchanges.
Whales do not merge altcoins in anticipation of the fall of bitcoin, however, they are gaining positions on them.
I believe that we are either waiting for a short viola season by the end of October, or a strong decline.
|
|
|
|
I find it strange that projects on this level don't want to consult SEC before the sale, one would think that it would be better then getting halted/sued later.
Perhaps at the time of fundraising this was not necessary. Even in the USA there is no full-fledged legal framework regarding relations with cryptocurrency. GRAM tokens could well not fall under the concept of securities at the time of the sale.It is a pity that the launch of the project will have to be postponed, but I think it will take place nevertheless. |
|
|
|
|
You understand that blockchain is an implementation of a certain idea. That is, the idea first appears, only then they launch the mainnet.
Only after the launch it becomes clear how well the idea works, but as a rule, projects first publish the idea and raise funds for its implementation.
|
|
|
|
We downloaded the CTO AKA CLOUD TOKEN wallet and are very impressed with it. Not only you can exchange coins in there but also they have businesses and trading robots generating profits 24/7. which means we also earn around 65 a month in their JARVIS AI robot scheme, which is good. I put in a little crypto there and it started already to earn some CTO token. This is also a nice hedge against the volatility of Bitcoin etc, but you can also put in stable coins in the robot as well, which gives you a lot more than what the bank gives you.
You should be aware that this wallet is an appendage of the project, which in itself is a pyramid. Pyramids, as practice shows, tend to crumble, which means that your funds stored in the accounts of this project are already in danger. You must communicate this information when you are attracting people to the project. |
|
|
|
Lol, risks need to be taken in other to make big changes in life, i bet this guy sold his house because he have another, who would have a single home and sell? where will he live? he is a rich man to be able to take this risk like its nothing.
I do not think that a rich person would distribute funds in this way among these coins. The price of bitcoin goes down - and its entire portfolio goes down the spot with bitcoin. And the funny thing is that in his portfolio there is no bitcoin at all. A very strange and extremely risky portfolio. I advise you to reconsider your investment strategy. |
|
|
|
How ever bitcoin become popular around the world but investor or trader of bitcoin have use bank for cashing out bitcoin for the money, without have bank how to buy some thing in our live using money when bitcoin still not legal transaction payment, I always cash out my bitcoin balance to the bank and keep hold it for using with many transaction.
The fact is that banks serve the money that we use in everyday life. There are no structures that would do the same with cryptocurrency. There are no intermediaries, and this is the main difference. We exchange cryptocurrency for ordinary money, which we then spend. As long as there is this cycle, as long as there is fiat, banks will exist.Something can change only if the whole world switches to cryptocurrency. |
|
|
|
|
Institutional investors have huge capital at their disposal. They will not rush things and invest in a speculative market with huge risks.
Most likely they will wait or provoke a drop in bitcoin as low as possible, and only after that they will invest in bitcoin. Now the market is not calm, such investments can be very risky.
|
|
|
|
|
So it happened. Regulators seriously took on Telegram and Tone Blockchain.
The most interesting thing will happen on October 31, because under the contract, if the project is not launched, he will have to return all the funds to investors in full.
My opinion is that the project will still be launched, which will lead to sanctions against Pavel Durov.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
