Good evening  What will the tokens of your project allow me to do? |
|
|
|
|
By the way, is it supposed that in the system it will be possible to buy and purchase only one goods? Or does the project deal with any goods regardless of the direction?
|
|
|
|
Only I have the name of this project associated with Evangelion? |
|
|
|
All the time I forget to ask - how is the quality of the articles determined?
What do you mean? For example, I'll write an article. How to determine what it will be quality? This fact determines the number of tokens I received Well, for sure articles will be evaluated by professional editors who know the subtleties of writing texts |
|
|
|
By what criteria the Ambassador will be selected? And what will be the reward?
What does the Ambassador mean? Does he have any advantages? |
|
|
|
I do not confuse anything, ICO should only pass at the end of the month?
November 11 |
|
|
|
By the way, this system of protection seems rather silly to me. What is the difference that the decision taken contradicts the adopted strategy? It can make a profit!
To tell the truth, to me such system on the contrary seems necessary. The decisions taken by the manager can be fatal, and none of the depositors need this. So do not be afraid of this option This is the only thing that pleases - this option can be turned off. I doubt that someone will actively use it |
|
|
|
|
By the way, this system of protection seems rather silly to me. What is the difference that the decision taken contradicts the adopted strategy? It can make a profit!
|
|
|
|
By the way, can anybody explain to me why this system is needed at all, thanks to which the fund manager can not make decisions at his own discretion?
You're definitely confusing something. The fund manager can not make decisions that are contrary to the accepted strategy of the fund, while this option is not necessary. |
|
|
|
By the way, as far as I understand, the developers have already conducted pre-ICO?
Nope The team held a closed round of sales. I understand that it was possible to participate in it only by invitation Most importantly, this round was successful. That is, the development team has the means to implement the project, it will be possible to conduct an effective advertising campaign... Usually every project has funds for an advertising campaign. However, a successful closed round of sales means a certain interest in the project If only in the closed round did not participate relatives and friends of the team) |
|
|
|
By the way, as far as I understand, the developers have already conducted pre-ICO?
Nope The team held a closed round of sales. I understand that it was possible to participate in it only by invitation |
|
|
|
So, do I understand correctly? This is a system of funds that everyone can open. This in fact seems to be a lucrative and interesting project, as far as I understand with my weak English ...
Well, in general terms, everything is correct. But in fact, not everyone will be able to open such a fund, he will have to undergo something like a test of market knowledge Is it something like a protection system? So that people without experience are not allowed to manage the fund? Yes, the system provides different levels of protection for its users. Perhaps you'd better read the white paper to better understand this project Of course, I'm studying the project documentation. In any case, thanks for your help. You are welcome) If there are any other questions - write, users will definitely help you) |
|
|
|
It seems to me that similar projects have already been carried out, I'm not sure that this system is absolutely unique ... Although I may be wrong, there are now a lot of different ICOs
You know, I have this feeling too. However, secondaryity does not make this project less attractive, at least for me |
|
|
|
So, do I understand correctly? This is a system of funds that everyone can open. This in fact seems to be a lucrative and interesting project, as far as I understand with my weak English ...
Well, in general terms, everything is correct. But in fact, not everyone will be able to open such a fund, he will have to undergo something like a test of market knowledge Is it something like a protection system? So that people without experience are not allowed to manage the fund? Yes, the system provides different levels of protection for its users. Perhaps you'd better read the white paper to better understand this project |
|
|
|
I was just advised that here I can find projects that will be profitable. I'm in the right forum, right?
Well, I'm not sure yet about this particular topic, but the forum is correct I understand correctly that this project is a crypto-currency fund? That is, if I invest in it, then the developers will manage my funds? Well, not quite. The project offered by the developers is a system of funds. That is, you can invest in this project money and make a profit from the system itself, rather than its individual fund |
|
|
|
Hi, please answer to which state or territory your company is registred. Cannot find it here. And, I would like to know your jurisdiction option.
Judging by the fact that there are many Russian names among the developers, the company is registered in Russia, is not it? Well, that does not mean anything. A company can be registered in another country, with more favorable taxation and a better attitude to crypto-currencies |
|
|
|
Have you transferred the topic to another subforum? This is the right solution, here you can attract more users))
I also thought about this - why such an interesting project has so few views  |
|
|
|
Will the tokenbox provide legal assistance to future funds and traders who are going to work within the framework of this platform?
Needless to say, they offer a platform with a variety of disparate functions available for both funds and investors. Which, for example? For funds: legal support, ratings, tokenization, smart contracts, etc. For investors: a multi-currency wallet, trusted traders, security, openness of data, etc. Rating? What is that? All funds on this platform will have their own specific rating. The peculiarity is that even smaller funds can compete with larger ones. Because the role will be played not by the capitalization of the fund, but by the rating (does not depend on capitalization) Hmm... And from what will this rating depend? We discussed this in another topic. The rating depends on the fund's strategy, the magnitude of the risks and benefits. In short, everything by analogy with real-world funds |
|
|
|
|
It turns out that the system brings a revolutionary approach to management as a blocking of the decisions of the fund manager?
|
|
|
|
It's some kind of stupidity. That is, the fund manager will not be able to conclude a profitable transaction only on the basis of his own considerations, even if it will bring the fund a fabulous profit
Well, as far as I understand, the possibility of blocking the decisions of the fund manager can be added at the stage of fund creation. Simply put, all this is solved I correctly understand that blocking the manager's decisions is an optional option? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
