It is important to read the fine print as you said or the betting terms to know exactly what it is that you are betting on. In my experience, most of the bookmakers I have played on offer markets only for the regular 90 minutes of play. If the odds are for potential overtime as well, it's usually written above or below that particular market. Sometimes it's in brackets in small letters.

If you are a big-time player, that difference between 1.90 and 1.95 can mean a lot.

Here is another examples of a sportsbook that offers different odds for the same outcome of the match. This time its Betja.com for the Europa League match PSV Eindhoven - AS Monaco.

The odds on a home win on the 1/X/2 markets is 1.90.
If you place a bet on the Asian Handicap -0.5 market, you are betting on the same outcome but for higher odds of 1.95.

Satoshi didn't create Bitcointalk.org. He created a forum which was hosted on bitcoin.org. Here is a great thread on the history of the forum that was bumped a few days ago > [BCT FACT] Bitcointalk was originally on Bitcoin.org but ... drama.

It's only three pages long, and you should learn a few things after you read it.

Does it feel like Bitcointalk, Cyrus, theymos, and many of the mods care much about altcoins to the point to make YouTube videos about them? 95% (maybe even more) of all bounty campaigns are scams. Users will either not get paid, they will receive worthless tokens that will never amount to anything or be listed anywhere, or they will get less than what was agreed. Even the developers of such campaigns don't believe in their projects and view them as schemes to get rich by taking BTC, ETH, and other valuable coins from gullible investors, and dumping their tokens on the market.       

Which ones? It might seem unfair to mention one or two when we have so many good contributors. Maybe just a shoutout to all forum members.

Seems sleazy to me. Who is going to record the song, mix the music, and make it sound right? Not to mention the cost for such a project. Not everyone likes rap and if the song sucks, it might be a reason for the viewers to stop watching the video. 

You don't have to worry about that. Signature campaigns generally don't count posts made in Games and Rounds.
You will be required to post in Gambling and Gambling Discussion though. But yeah, I understand what you are saying.

I don't see that ever happening. Imagine that you need some urgent help today and that has to be in the next 5-6 hours. But the two people who can help you can no longer post because they reached their daily quota. They could PM you, but let's say you/they don't want that. The forum (actually theymos) isn't going to limit people in that way.

AIs don't copy-paste. Especially not those produced in Switzerland.

Back in 2006, when the Calciopoli scandal hit Italian Serie A. One match of Fiorentina and another team (I forgot which one it was) was fixed. But it wasn't fixed to profit from illegal betting. Fiorentina's president was a good friend of the guy who was the president of the opposing team. One of the clubs needed a draw to avoid being related to Serie B and the two friends had a meeting and agreed that their head-to-head meeting would be a tie. In such a scenario, you need both teams to know about it.

Fixed games exist, but whoever is "selling" them online for $10 doesn't have any info about them. There are various reasons why matches get fixed. It's not always to profit from illegal gambling, although that is surely one of the biggest reasons they exist.

Sometimes clubs help each other when one of them needs a point or two to reach certain goals. If you let us win today, we will return the favor when you need it. I am sure matches get fixed as part of the negotiations when signing new players. The club might be willing to drop the asking price if they win the next time they meet.

All you need is one player to fix a match. Football bets on markets such as "will there be a penalty" or "will there be a red card" bring good returns. For such a fix all you need is the keeper or one if the defenders to concede a penalty or make a tackle where he will be shown a red card. The entire team doesn't need to know about it. They might not even lose the match.

Because no matter whether we like it or not, NFTs are trending and being hyped right now. Coinbase wants a piece of the pie like all the other platforms and NFT marketplaces.

---

The last few days I kept seeing Facebook ads for a Shaquille O’Neal NFT collection. Has anyone else seen them? I first thought it was a scam, but after seeing this thread, I took a second look. He actually did release his own NFT collection, but it has got nothing to do with Coinbase. He partnered with Ethernity. 

In that case, the more appropriate term is importing. Transferring suggests that a transaction took place and when we are talking about importing seeds, there are no transactions being made. He uses Electrum as a cold-storage client, so I don't think he is trying to avoid paying a few cents or a dollar to save on transaction fees. It's just a misunderstanding due to the difference between Electrum and BIP-39 seeds.

It takes longer, it's less user-friendly, but it's safer. The security of your coins should be the top priority. It's inconvenient if the offline computer isn't booting up properly. Why is that? Is it a hardware or software issue? Did you reformat the OS before you installed Electrum on it and created your offline wallet? 

It's because of a hardware vulnerability with OLED displays that could make side-chain attacks possible. Someone who knows how to check the Trezor's power consumption could recover parts of the seed or PIN code.   
The vulnerability could be exploited if the owner of the device uses a fake USB cable that is pre-prepared for this scenario.

This Trezor blog post explains it much better than I can.

I never heard of either two to be honest, but that's not a surprise since they are relatively new. I will take a look at them the next time I make changes and add new names to the table.

Thanks!

Bitcoin only exists on the Bitcoin blockchain. Any other alternatives are altcoins and can't be considered Bitcoin. Like I said in a previous post, I won't be adding info about alternative BTC-pegged tokens.

---

Betnomi is off the list!
I asked twice in their ANN topic about the way they handled the communication with users who were part of the Betnomi affiliate network but their admin refused to answer. Maybe they scammed their affiliates and maybe not. But since they don't feel like being transparent about it, I have decided to remove them. 

I also played on PSG tonight. I need them and Inter to win. I have already correctly predicted these two earlier matches. Away wins for Manchester City and Sporting. Great odds on Sporting btw, a gift by the bookies.

As I am writing this, Inter just conceded an equalizer.
I am negatively surprised by Borussia Dortmund so far. I expected a draw here, maybe even an away win.     

You wouldn't unless you know how to inspect the code and look for backdoors and things in the codebase that shouldn't be there. That's why it's recommended to use open-source wallets. But even if they are open-source, I reckon that 90% of users don't know how to check and verify the legitimacy of the code. But at least it's possible to do so, and you are trusting that others have done it properly. If a wallet has been around as long as Electrum has, you can be sure that it has been thoroughly checked by numerous security experts. 

Sirius created Bitcointalk.org, but that's not the original forum. It's not the forum that satoshi created. Satoshi's forum was hosted on bitcoin.org. After that it was moved to forum.bitcoin.org I think. Bitcointalk.org is the third board and the one we use today. Unless there were more in between that I forgot about. To complicate the issue even more, sirius isn't the person who came up with the name "Bitcointalk". Jeff Garzik did. Theymos mentions that in one of the quotes I shared in my previous reply.

It's much easier for the mods to delete posts that break the rules if they are made aware of them and they know exactly what is wrong with them and what to pay attention to. Instead of having only 10-20 staff members (not really sure how many there are) browsing the various forum sections in search for offenders, their job is made easier with the help of hundreds of volunteers who go "hey, look here, this is where your attention is needed".

It's not that I don't think he doesn't want to learn about Bitcoin or that he isn't capable of understanding it. He is the kind of guy that likes shortcuts. He will take the faster and easier route instead of the more complicated one. Many times, that's not a bad approach, but with Bitcoin it is. The easier and more user-friendly and convenient way to store and interact with crypto can cause people to lose their savings and have them stolen or lost.

I have tried to introduce a few friends to the technology for years, but I can't say I've had a lot of success. A few seemed interested, but when we got to the point of either investing or performing a service in exchange for Bitcoin, suddenly that interest waned. Then when they hear about the price increases and possibilities crypto offers, they tell me I was right. I want to change that record and try it one more time with him.       

I am not really worried that Binance will disappear overnight, but I understand what LoyceV was talking about. It's the regulatory frameworks that centralized exchanges like Binance have to comply with that worry me more than an exit scam or disastrous hacking incident. But no matter what happens, it wouldn't be the first time.

Most replies hint at that it's best to learn the proper ways to go about the seed and private keys. I wanted to spare my friend from that since he hasn't expressed a desire to ever learn it. I will probably just do it for him, and then it's up to him whether or not he wants to learn the ways of Bitcoin. 

I meni je teško povjerovati da su imali toliki broj ASICa i da im je u fokusu bio Bitcoin. Sigurno je neki GPU-minable altcoin.

Ne samo da more ključa već se i otapa antarktički led, a Bitcoin je največi krivac za to.

Moraju na neki senzionalistički način da dovrše članak da to izgleda moćnije a ida ima i više teksta. Ja sam sretan što Bitcoin nije balon koji je blizu €50.000 i svaki dan se čeka da pukne. A to da Bitcoin troši električne energije kao neke države će naši novinari ponavljati desetljećima. To će bit kao sportski komentarori koji su izmislili da je igrač "prošao kao brzi voz" i virus se još od ex yuge širi i fraza se i dan danas koristi.

Jedna zanimljiva i pomalo zbunjujuća vijest dolazi iz Bosne i Mrkonjić Grada.
Tamo su radnici lokalne elektrodistribucije otkrili da je jedna firma krala struju s kojom su rudarene kriptovalute. U tekstu se ne navodi šta je rudareno i kakvu su tačno opremu pronašli. Vidim da stranica nije specijalizirana na kripto pa im ne mogu ni zamjeriti.

U teksu piše da je otkriveno "360 računara za rudarenje kriptovaluta, a procjena je kako je za godinu dana na pravljenje virtuelnog novca potrošeno 900.000 maraka".
Da li su u pitanju rigovi sa 360 kartica, ASIC mineri, ili nešto treće ostaje nepoznanica. I ovaj drugi dio rečenice nije najjasniji u kojem kažu da je potrošeno 900.000 maraka na "pravljenje kriptovaluta". Da li misle da je ukradeno toliko struje ili je to investicija u opremu za rudarenje, ili pak vrijednost izrudarenih coina?

Ako su im toliko struje pokrali, onda je ta grupa dobro zeznula elektroprivredu. U nastavku teksta pišu:
..."izvršen je obračun neovlašćene potrošnje u iznosu od 4.564,25 KM."

Izvor:
https://www.6yka.com/novosti/u-damjanovicevoj-kruni-kradu-struju-za-rudarenje-kriptovaluta