Don't want your sharez tanking? Halt trading. Why didn't anyone think of that b4? Danny & TAT demonstrate revolutionary, out-of-the-box thinking  |
|
|
|
@btcapples:  <==beat me to it |
|
|
|
|
It's pretty sickening having to watch people begging ken for a snapshot of devices that are supposedly shipping *right now*, and being ignored.
What possible reason other than sadism could there be behind that?
|
|
|
|
Heads up!  *whoops, update:  @thekekk: Kindly put a bid @.0019999, because promised. thekekk shown to be all talk:  |
|
|
|
Ken's Universal Answer: ...
This will all be sorted out in the near future. I am very committed to all of my trusting and patient investors. What we are doing right now will raise shareholder value very quick.
|
|
|
|
|
No tweets from Danny since that fateful meeting on the 18th.
No posts from cryptocyprus since the 15th.
No promised financial reports.
Self-moderated thread started a la Labcoin & Active Mining.
Popcorn shortages reported throughout the civilized world.
Good times.
|
|
|
|
troll some more haven't bought to many shares under 20, please help me buy some more
How many more sub-.002 shares will you be buying? |
|
|
|
He's not. I haven't touched my trust and this is what I see:  You're also pretty well known here, so... |
|
|
|
|
If those shares were sold, (the extra private investors) + (LMB) would have gotten the same percentage of the profit that LMB is now getting, but *there would have been more money in the kitty. (more caek to divvy up)
It's really not that complicated.
|
|
|
|
...
"Just given to LMB" as opposed to what?
The shares were already owned by LMB so just because they didn't sell the shares does not mean they need to buy them back.
You need to understand how this works. LMB now has a bigger slice of the caek without adding anything to the caek (which is arguably delicious). If those shares were sold, (the extra private investors) + (LMB) would have gotten the same percentage of the profit that LMB is now getting, but *there would have been more money in the kitty. |
|
|
|
@WhaleInc: I believe PL's point was that LMB Subsidiaries, who were entitled to 40% of the profits in the original prospectus, are now entitled 68.4835125%. Fer free @btcapples: Like a boss  |
|
|
|
|
You're right. I should have said "lowest in 4 months."
*I am a bit surprised that NeoBee didn't put up a buy wall.
With millions of shares left to sell, it seems to be in NB's best interest to keep the price up.
Or why Danny didn't drop a line to bolster his investors' confidence.
Nothing to do but munch popcorn and watch this unfold.
|
|
|
|
|
Last price: ฿0.00250000
Recordsetting!
|
|
|
|
...
C) But the trust in bitcoin is irrelevant in your case -- your shares are denominated in bitcoin. If bitcoin price fell to a penny, wouldn't you spend a few bucks to buy up *all the shares on Havelock?*
...
... I don't agree that the trust in bitcoin is irrelevant. If bitcoin dies, NeoBee wil go down as well. If bitcoin goes to the moon, NeoBee will have an high change of success. ... Investing with bitcoin could be rephrased as "divesting from bitcoin." In other words, you're betting against bitcoin, even in this case. It's not very intuitive, so try to stick with me: Imagine that bitcoin confidence fell to the point of ... nothing. Each bitcoin is worth zero dollars and zero zero cents. Imagine also that NeoBee has tangible and/or fiat assets -- a nice laptop and a dollar. <==("something") Question: At what price point (in bitcoin) would it be wise to buy NeoBee shares? Answer: At any price point. The value of NeoBee is (a nice laptop + 1 dollar), while your bitcoins are worth (nothing, zero). (Something) > (nothing). Is this any clearer? |
|
|
|
|
^You are upset that your dream of selling bitcoin to bankers backfired.
It is not I but you yourself who is responsible for your current predicament, your rage is misdirected.
|
|
|
|
A) This offering, along with ~95% of bitcoin securities, was aimed at the inexperienced investors. Headshot.
B) The huge amount of media attention was bought and paid for by NeoBee. It was not a fluke.
C) Insulating bitcoin users from market fluctuations was one of NeoBee's selling points. You're suggesting that it's a failure?
Finally, confidence is flagging because there are no tangible results. The Ukyo fiasco, which was supposed to showcase Danny's abilities to the bitcoin world, proved that he was capable of grand promises but not much else.
Or something like that.
A) Many posting in this thread, including myself, are inexperienced investors. Also havelock is not exactly the epicenter of experienced investors.. The shares only started to catch on after the IPO was posted on reddit. C) No, i am not suggesting NeoBee is a failure. I am suggesting that the price of the NeoBee share is somehow related to the trust in bitcoin itself. With the recent events, trust in bitcoin is probably at lower levels than during the NeoBee launch. A) I'm pointing out that this offering was aimed at hobby investors, you were the target demographic. The colloquialism is "easy mark." C) But the trust in bitcoin is irrelevant in your case -- your shares are denominated in bitcoin. If bitcoin price fell to a penny, wouldn't you spend a few bucks to buy up *all the shares on Havelock?* ^If that's not clear, tell me & I'll give it another shot. |
|
|
|
...
Easy. Danny doesn't speak Greek - and this was a Greek-Speaking program.
Huh. Didn't know that. Figured he might'a picked up a phrasebook before starting a bank. Basic etiquette. |
|
|
|
|
No, JimmyJazz. I'd like to salvage whatever value this situation has to offer. Your plight, for instance, makes an excellent cautionary tale for the would-be backyard investors.
And I'd be lying if i didn't admit to enjoying teh lulz.
Keep'em coming.
|
|
|
|
...
Took money for undelivered preorders
... He's still trying to take money for undeliverable pre-orders. The same product lineup that was "available" before is still "available" on his website. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
