I’m in the need for someone that’s knowledgeable in machine language especially for the Motorola 6800 microprocessor. I’ve started reading the instruction set related to such microprocessor, but I don’t understand it well.

As such, I am looking for someone that could help me create a program in machine language suitable for the 6800 microprocessor. The program will sort three given numbers in ascending order. For example, if I have the following set of numbers: 10, 4, and 5, you would need sort them in the following manner using machine language: 4, 5 and 10.

The memory addresses 0000, 0001 , and 0002 will contain the three numbers. The program will start or begin from address 0003.


In summary, what I am asking for is the following:

1.   Create a program in machine language that sorts three different numbers in ascending order (program must be written in a table where it contains the memory address, the specific mnemonic, and a comment related to such instruction).

2.   Number “A” will be stored in memory address 0000.

3.   Number “B” will be stored in memory address 0001.

4.   Number “C” will be stored in memory address 0002.

5.   Program will start/begin/execute from memory address 0003.

6.   Create a flowchart related to the sorting program.


For your convenience, I have included the instruction set for the 6800 microprocessor in the following link (PDF): https://drive.google.com/file/d/1XX9B7l2EFmgDAzEdODtv_82LVJy_pLIN/

Once the job is done, you can contact me via PM to do business with you. I look forward to paying 0.015 BTC (could be more if necessary) if everything works correctly as it should. Will use escrow if needed (although I always pay quickly. Please check my trust for reference).

The deadline for this task would be on or before April 15th, 2019. If you have any doubts, please reply here or contact me via PM. Thank you.

I'm confirming that I've received this week and past week's payment. Thank you DogecoinMachine and Crypto-Games.net team, as always!

Holding Ethereum right now, is the best thing you can do especially when it will switch to PoS soon. I believe that prices below $200 are a good entry point for anyone looking to obtain massive profits in the long term. With PoS, one could be able to earn some extra coins by simply hodling ETH in your wallet. Of course, it takes time to see positive results with Ethereum or any other cryptocurrency.

But, investing a little now and then into Ethereum, could make you extremely wealthy in the long term. Therefore, there's no doubt that Ethereum will rise again sometime in the not-so-distant future. Just my thoughts

That's certainly true, mate. Banks have dominated the financial sector for quite a long time. Even with crypto's breakthrough decentralized technologies, it can never overcome Banks. I believe that the main reason for this, is because Banks are the gateway towards Fiat which is largely backed by the government. Knowing that it's hard to regulate crypto, it's the reason why Fiat is still the dominant form of money nowadays.

Given that some Banks have started to embrace Blockchain technology, it seems that they're more supportive towards crypto than against it. But time will tell us whenever Banks will alongside crypto in this ever-changing world. Just my opinion

Agree. Ethereum has first mover advantage, which explains why it's been able to retain its place as the second largest crypto by market cap (despite its setbacks). On the other hand, competitors like Cardano and EOS have stayed behind Ethereum because their lack of adoption and popularity within the mainstream world. The slowness in development from Cardano's team, would render the project one step behind relative to other popular smart contract platforms.

Despite this, there's still potential for Cardano to grow into a full-fledged cryptocurrency that can be comparable to Ethereum in the future. However, saying that Cardano will destroy Ethereum is truly a misconception, IMO. 

Well, both platforms have good and bad things. One could obtain the benefits from one-another, as no crypto is perfect. However, it seems that EOS has greater activity than TRON in many ways. Still though, TRON's strongest point here is marketing/promotion (something that EOS lacks massively). Despite this, EOS is still a strong smart contract platform that it's often compared with Ethereum.

In terms of dApps, tokens, and DEXs, EOS is the winner leaving TRON in the dust. Which means that if we compare all the popular smart contract platforms of the world, then Ethereum will be first, followed by EOS and finally TRON.

Nonetheless, both coins are good for holding in the long term, especially when a bull market is bound to happen soon. Just my thoughts

While this is the perfect time to invest into altcoins, not every altcoin is suitable for investment. Hyper-inflated cryptocurrencies on the market like Dogecoin and TRON have a little chance of increasing in price within the future. This makes them unsuitable for long term investment, because of their large instability on the market. However, they're still good for doing day trades with the hopes of doubling your money within a short time frame.

Despite this, there are numerous altcoins today which are highly recommended to buy right now. There's Stellar, Ripple, Ethereum, Cardano, Monero, and EOS. However, the list keeps on growing according to active development, innovation, and mainstream adoption.

Therefore, buying altcoins at the right time, could make you earn a lot of money within the future. Just my opinion

I hope so. While it's true that nothing lasts forever, Bitcoin has been able to retain itself after several years since launch. After all Bitcoins have been mined, miners could easily live off TX fees. But that will largely depend on the price per Bitcoin by then, since low prices can cause many miners to run off. As you've said earlier, it's a cycle where some miners leave while others join the network as difficulty decreases.

The only concern would be the Lightning Network, as it would redirect most of the attention from the main chain into a second layer that's off-chain. If many people prefer to transact only with the Lightning Network without interacting with the main chain, then miner's profitability would decrease for sure. Everything will depend on how sustainable the Bitcoin economy is, in order to support the needs of many miners worldwide.

Nonetheless, there's a possibility that Bitcoin will last for many generations as its self-sustainable. Just my opinion

Agree. Most Bitcoin forks have no future, since they're merely copies of the original Bitcoin blockchain. Carrying the Bitcoin brand/name shows that there's no originality on them, compared to other altcoins. It seems that people are largely interested into Bitcoin itself than other variants of Bitcoin because of obvious reasons. It's no secret that both BCH and BSV will become extremely centralized in the future because of their huge block size. Unless technology grows at a fast rate, while prices remain low, it'll be hard to see people stay on track with ever-growing storage and bandwidth to support these blockchains.

On the other hand, with Bitcoin's Lightning Network, people can still support the Blockchain without the added costs of storage and bandwidth largely because of the limited block size of the main chain. In effect, this results in decentralization where it's easy for anyone to support the network on a budget.

Therefore, time will prove us right when Bitcoin (BTC) will become the one true cryptocurrency, while the rest of its copies will die in the long run. Just my thoughts

Stablecoins have been considered among many investors to be a safe-haven for crypto's volatility. Ever since Tether (USDT) emerged, several other stablecoins have launched in order to provide people with a wide variety of options to choose from. However, the stability of stablecoins is yet to be questioned since we've seen how Tether has gone below $1 in the past.

NuBits used to be a stablecoin too, but now it has lost its peg to the USD. Which means, that the same thing could happen with most stablecoins out there, since they're traded on a free market.

Nonetheless, do you believe that stablecoins will have a future? If not, why?

With Ripple's growing partnerships among banks and businesses worldwide, it seems that traditional payment systems will become replaced with DLT technology (aka as Blockchain). Because of the many benefits such technology provides, it looks likely that it will replace the old SWIFT system in the future. Unless such system does the switch to Distributed Ledger Technology, it may become outperformed by Ripple or Stellar in the future.

On the other hand, IBM has been working on a new payment network called "World Wire" powered by the Stellar protocol. Which means that existing players could be left in the dust if they don't grasp the benefits of the Blockchain.

Nonetheless, what are your thoughts about this?

Since the last financial crisis back in 2008, Bitcoin has emerged as a new alternative payment system for the world. The creator of this revolutionary cryptocurrency had a good mindset since he/she designed a system free from corrupt governments’ manipulation and centralized control. The benefits that Bitcoin's Blockchain provides are numerous that can transform our economy for the better. However, there's a possibility that a next financial crisis or global economic collapse will happen in the future as Banks and governments worldwide inflate Fiat currency.

Of course, Fiat will transition towards becoming a digital currency backed by worldwide central banks. But when the next crisis comes, I believe that people will resort towards cryptocurrencies as a safe-haven for their investments.

Which is why, it makes me wonder whenever such crisis will trigger a massive adoption of crypto in the future? Any thoughts about this?

As Bitcoin's mining industry grows, the dominant ASIC company known as Bitmain controls most of the network's hashrate. Major mining pools are under such company's control, putting at risk the entire Bitcoin blockchain against 51% attacks.

Of course, several solutions have been proposed by devs such as PoWx (Optical PoW) and BetterHash. However, such solutions haven't taken off yet, leaving the mining process partially centralized.

Nonetheless, do you think that it's possible to prevent further centralization of mining pools in the future? Or is it too late already?

It's been quite some time since Hedera Hashgraph has been announced, which aimed to be a competitor of popular cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum. The team behind this new cryptocurrency, claims that Hashgraph can replace the Blockchain as it's faster, and more scalable than any other cryptocurrency today. However, to me it seems that this cryptocurrency is nothing more than another DAG coin like Nano and IOTA.

Despite this, Hashgraph hasn't been released yet (as far as I'm aware) and it's not available for trading across the crypto market. Whenever it will be able to overcome top-tier cryptos like Bitcoin and Ethereum is yet to be seen.

Nonetheless, what are your thoughts about this?

Given how close we are towards reaching the limit of 21 million Bitcoin in circulation, I've been often curious to know the outcome of Bitcoin once all its supply is mined. Depending on Bitcoin's price in the future, miners could either continue to support the Blockchain or abandon it altogether. After all, there will be no more newly minted coins which means that miners will live off TX fees.

Nonetheless, what are your thoughts about this? Will Bitcoin survive even after all coins have been mined? What are the possible outcomes?

Agree. It's often good to present people the true benefits of Bitcoin, as this will spur mainstream adoption. Without adoption, only a small number of people will use Bitcoin as a currency for daily payments. What seems to gather the most attention from people though, is businesses and companies accepting Bitcoin for payments. As such, the more popular Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies become, the better as they would be used more as an alternative currency to Fiat.

Nonetheless, I believe that a great way to make people use Bitcoin as a currency would be to give away some free coins (Satoshis) to anyone within your region. Just my opinion

Exactly. Ethereum is known to be as the veteran of smart contracts, whereas Cardano is just a cadet. It takes time to develop a robust software capable to withstand anything within its path. Considering that Ethereum has been tried and tested over the years, it's still the number one platform of choice among people within the mainstream world. Despite this, there's a chance for Cardano to become as good as Ethereum if developers continue to improve it every step of the way.

The wide array of cryptocurrencies available on the market today, makes it even tougher for other alternatives to replace already established leaders in the crypto space. With due time, Cardano will be able to become as strong as Ethereum someday. However, I believe that it will never destroy Ethereum because the latter will always be one step ahead.

Nonetheless, the future holds many exciting things for both Cardano and Ethereum. Just my thoughts

Completely agree with you, mate. In this bear market season, it's great to build our stash of altcoins for the future. The recent developments on Stellar and other top-tier cryptocurrencies, shows us that the Blockchain Industry is here to stay. Given how active these altcoins have been after all these years, there's a high potential for growth within the future.

As such, if you're considering buying the top-tier altcoins, then I'd recommend that you always look for active development and mainstream adoption. There had been few cryptocurrencies which are active in development, but not as widely adopted as others. Which is why, buying altcoins which meet such requirements at today's cheap prices, could greatly benefit you in the future.

Nonetheless, I believe that Stellar, Ethereum, Cardano, EOS, and Litecoin are among the best altcoins money can buy right now. Just my opinion

Agree. I believe that regulation is "anti-ethical" for the whole cryptocurrency space. After all, Satoshi invented Bitcoin to be free from middleman in the first place. Considering that today people still rely on centralized exchanges and custodians to acquire or sell cryptocurrencies, the vision of decentralization is far from becoming a reality.

Now, the term "decentralization" is used more for hype than something serious for the Blockchain Industry. We've seen how crypto platforms like Ripple and Stellar claim to be "decentralized" when theoretically they're centralized. On the other hand, supposed decentralized exchanges like CryptoBridge are now requiring US citizens to verify their IDs via a KYC process. Which is why, I believe that at some point decentralization has been abused resulting in its demise within the future. Just my thoughts

Well, I've asked about both TRON and EOS largely because they are very similar in many technical aspects. While it's true that Ethereum is slow, it still has a larger variety of dApps than both Tron and EOS combined. However, these two alternative smart contract platforms could prove to be useful for business use. TRON can be used as the next decentralized web, while EOS can be used as the business platform for smart contracts and token issuance/distribution.

It all comes down whenever both platforms become extremely adopted in the future, relative to other popular cryptocurrencies like Ethereum and Cardano. As we've seen many times, it's not about the technology or features of a specific cryptocurrency but rather how active it is in development. So far, EOS has the lead here while TRON is just focusing on marketing/promotion.

Nonetheless, time will tell us whenever both cryptos will survive or die altogether in an extremely competitive market. Just my opinion