1st rule, there are no rules just traditions 2nd rule, see the first rule
|
|
|
Train to the moon! ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.shockmansion.com%2Fwp-content%2Fmyimages%2F2014%2F02%2FMoon-1.jpg&t=663&c=At_-2n-cEuiB6w)
|
|
|
It is morning in China...so probably something from there.
|
|
|
Over $460...the upper line has been breached.
I also notice the sells going out a long way has gone down by about a million dollars.
|
|
|
Mao was able to kill millions using his super voice powers.
|
|
|
we need to
Did he have a mouse in his pocket?
|
|
|
How can you have a software program that is an organization that executes change in the real world?
Bitcoin foundation has lobbyists that physically walk places and speak things with actual mouths.
Write letters, etc.
Seems to me AI would be needed for this. And robots.
The software they want is a way to organize people to pay for those lobbyists in a decentralized way that people can vote on how their money is spent.
|
|
|
As much as I love to point out that Hitler rose to power thanks to socialists the truth is that he took advantage of the party much like our public officials do all the time.
It is actually a pretty powerful combination, you get the "country first" patriotic nationalists that are all about their country in a "we're number one" type of mentality, and you combine it with the socialists who cater to the huge masses of poor people promising them free money and you have a pretty powerful combination.
Imagine a party in the US of down home US patriots, "that's my flag, not a rag" "USA USA USA!" nationalists combined with the universal health care, tax the rich, safety net, union masses that want free handouts. They are easily swayed with sweet talk and promises and no amount of reason would dent their blinders. Anyone could get elected, even someone like Hitler with an ulterior motive.
|
|
|
thinking of the customer opinion. having the foundation as the money store and/or the multisig provider are technically the same thing. as the site can easily store all 3 keys as it was the service that produced them. im seeking a non foundation controlled monitisation of idea's solution where the only control the people behind the foundation have to do is site maintenance. no fund management, no vote controlling. as that should be decentralized and community controlled.
I believe there is a way that each party can produce their keys without central knowledge of all 3. That type of stuff is beyond my knowledge, that is why I have not yet tackled the multisig stuff.
|
|
|
but still stuck on how to ensure the nominee's/end recipients are not just scammers with a cunning proposal.
would requesting that all nominee's/proposal makers to fully dox themselves as part of their proposal be the answer/enough?
My end goal is to have it very decentralized, but as a baby steps type of thing I am centralizing some parts until I can decentralize it. The proposal process will require verification by my company, from just verifying simple things for simple proposals to full identification and background. Each proposal will include the proposer and any information they provide, after time they will be rated much like on ebay. My long term decentralization strategy will include multi-signature where I will have third party escrow services (currently BitPools will escrow) hold one of a 2:3, have the proposer hold another of the 2:3 and have the pool voters designate a user or users to hold the other part of the 2:3. Going further it will not just be a single escrow, but both proposer and voters choose an escrow service...if there is a dispute then both escrow services review the problem. If they cannot come to a solution then a random (higher) escrow escrow service will break the tie. This is sort of how private businesses hire arbitration services to handle disputes all the time.
|
|
|
"It is our goal to use BitCoin's unique infrastructure to implement a fair, transparent and secure voting method in combination of a unique way of pooling the BitCoins of many (or few) individuals toward common goals." Are you going to apply to win the $100,000 bounty? I sent the guy a message on reddit. I will not open the source though, but that does not make the voting any less transparent. I will be leaving Beta soon anyway, I had considered replacing many of the Bitcoin Foundation roles with this anyway. And much more. I don't go on Reddit much but an upvote would be good to get some discussion on this: http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/25sf4f/100000_bounty_for_software_platform_that_can/chku16gSuch funding would help push me toward leaving my job and working full time on the website. Then again, Bitcoin over $800 will do the same.
|
|
|
The only people who care about what Snowden is saying pretty much knew everything he revealed anyway.
Everyone else either justified it in their minds or ignored it.
I believe he destroyed his own life for nothing.
|
|
|
More jobs lost?!?
thanks Obama
|
|
|
There are a lot of National Socialists in the US. They just do not advertise it in this way.
They just vote that way.
|
|
|
This is pretty insane, looks like nobody wants to rock the boat and go up or down on the price. Who will flinch in the next 4 days? ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi61.tinypic.com%2F2pr7lg1.png&t=663&c=p6-XJ6v4-YCtsw)
|
|
|
The Op's chart is a deliberate joke, to mock bulls. Anyone took it seriously?
Nah, I was just trying to find an extension of this chart: https://www.tradingview.com/v/7YEmxS3K/so I made one myself, I suck at charts, that was the first one I have done in the 4 years I've been following Bitcoin
|
|
|
|