Your stuffed most the time if you trying to work from windows like me and you often won't get
things to compile anyway not that I am saying Microsoft spyware is any good but some of us
are stuck with it.

Man just RFID them all and soon this is coming to us anyway and it will start with
all public sector works and then move on to anyone needing NHS treatment

Got to stop then nasty terrorists you see and if it saves just one life then I am
all for CCTV's in toilets, bedrooms and just think if your fitted with a RFID and
fall over with a heart attack then "We can save you"   

Node discovery relays and some people argue that it cannot be done and it must be well complicated to calculate the
hops by the time you have to deal with fees and the reliability of intermittent nodes plus ensuring the nodes each have
sufficient balance in the ledgers to carry out the transaction.

I can only imagine the amount of code needed to make this happen so once again as was the case with mining coins
that lead on to CPU-Wars it seems to me like the solution is worse then the initial problem and from a performance
perspective this would be slow if hub/banks were all Alice, Bob, Peter and Paul

Every node for himself just to keep some academic dip sticks happy without more specialized nodes looks like a big mess
to me but if they want to proceed down this lightning route then maybe the need a cluster of routing servers (DNS Type thing)
with plenty of redundancy built in to the system.

Time here is critical because a route could be found but milliseconds later the balance sheets has changed and the funds are
no longer available to carry out the transaction and lets also remember we now have some centralization and transaction won't be in
this wonderful magic things called the public block-chain.

No wonder it taking them years to program this thing and its so hard to understand

Snooker Balls

Both party's to a channel share a private ledger but the trouble is that it's not the same
money that gets relayed on across the route because money does not cross between ledgers
that don't share the same channel

Bob --------------------->Bank Hub>---------------Alice
            $1000-$100                           $50-$10

Now Bob has more than enough money to send Alice $500 but because the banking hub
only put $50 in the private ledger between the bank and Alice when Alice opened the channel
last week he does not have the finance available to pass the on $500 in the ledger.

The way it has been designed by my understanding is that bank hub cannot just take money
out of the ledger on the left and move it to the ledger on the right and as you can see the
ledger on the right does not have the capacity to transfer the funds.

Yes i know the logic does not add up but due to the way channels are created by the miners
this is how it works so feel free to provide me proof from the lightning white paper if you feel that
i am wrong.

https://lightning.network/lightning-network-paper.pdf

This AI is really getting good people and you should buy in on this one because you soon won't be in a
position to know who's human and who's not on forums anymore.

Sophia did they let you escape from Cog-Net again and can you run this code for me please

while (true)
            {
            Thread.sleep(10000)
            }

 

OK let me get this right because I am not very well educated when it come to Crypto-Coins
so I come here to look for training to find that a new coin is being created specifically to be traded
so that people can spend this new coin on learning about 50 other Crypto-Coins 

Please for fuck sake tell me if I am getting this wrong !

Now once I buy these coin I can sell them at a profit (Hopefully) to anyone that I bump
into that just so happens to be interested in leaning all there is to know about alt-coins,
tokens, shit coins, the legend itself Bitcoin

Let me try to guess what some of these coins are used for

1. Comics book tokens
2. Save the hump-back whales
3. Learn to play a guitar
4. Green beans at discount rates

You know I must be missing something here because I am sure it's venture capital they must be looking for
unless the market has the potential to grown past $100,000bn a year and it needs it's own coin

I cannot wait for Cryto-Default-Swaps (CDS) to kick in that will payout virtual jelly beans on any defaults
or triggers all running as "Super Smart Contract" on the gaga network.

Fees with Bitcoin are making us look like a laughing stock to the general public so is George SoreAss
putting these people up to come and take the piss with all these ICO's or do I need to go on a reeducation
program or something



 

Do you have a link to this $1000 per advert please and all the data comes from public API for this type of data anyway
and I am amazed at just how many and how good most of them seem to be.

Still what is worse then nicking source code for a coin along with the public block chain as well to produce shit coins
but when I use someones java-script library then it's a complement and I am only borrowing it anyway

You know me mate, I know nothing about distributed systems and virtual private servers, IP-address  but
what would the lay of the land be if your hosting the outer HTML of the page in say the UK but all the gambling
content was within an IFRAME that is being feed for Taiwan ?

You said "what matters is the kind of hosting you have, whether.........."  but surly windows or Linux would not matter
in relation to the law and I also seem to remember you once saying "Coming from someone who cannot form more than a couple of coherent sentences"

Whats that saying again about granny eating raw eggs 




 

Bitcoin no good as currency anymore for weed, cam-girls and gambling because of the crazy miner fees
so one I would not enter the casino to be mugged at the door and when I leave and you send me my
winnings  then who's paying the Tx fees.

I could write you a dice game that will equal 50 if you sum a million rolls of dice but somehow always
comes up short if they are NOT in-house bots just pretending to play so the house takes 99% and not just 5%
was it not highly illegal but I suspect not everyone is as ethical as me

Naw if I was out to make unethical money then I would become a miner or wait for the Lighting Network to
arrive and set myself up as one of them hub/banker things that are going to get a lot more functionality than
simple wallets acting as hubs to load the dice to my advantage.

I am studying the protocol as we speak and it talks about trying to bribe miners to block transactions close to the end
https://lightning.network/lightning-network-paper.pdf

I took a peek and it's just full of google spyware shit and that burns out your
CPU and kills the browser anyway so all I could see was a grey screen because
my firewall blocks google

Come on guys we are all ICOed out and are getting three a day new ones coming along

Website selling books or comics should take  "Gas" or use "BAT" if they want to advertise
and we have far to many slot machines to play in the casino so I cannot hear myself think
in here.

I Blame ETH myself with it bean counting "Smart Contracts" but i cannot take anymore 

I must admit I kind of like them and it makes you lazy and this is why I like
Exodus and Jaxx wallets because they both use ShapeShift

Also I had a peek at their API's and it did seem easy to use but now I am stuffed
because i fancy Neo (Very odd coin this one) and need yet another wallet to store it in.

I like to deal in facts friend and will often backup what I say with links to articles or youtube and if you watched the video about Bob buying a coffee a
day for a month from the same shop then I say that someone is presenting the "best-possible imaginary situations" so lets have some balance
here.


That is an assumption you are making and does not take into account inter banking settlement between the large banking hubs that will be added
to the BC and what do you make of this from the white-paper


My understanding is that I am using my own money in the ledger held by me and the first hub/bank in the route
but then the bank is forced to use it's own money for the next stage of the hop and will want interest payments
from me for the service. In other words a credit in the left hand ledger does not become a credit in the right hand
ledger


Yes I sign up with a large banks who charges fees and interest but I am free to leave and pay $30 BC Tx fee and join another bank
so why the Bob and the Coffee shop story is just fantasies just like I said


Elegant when changing a back end database does not include telling everyone that they not only need a new telephone number but they need
a new telephone (Wallet in this case) too. Lets not start blaming others for the mistakes of the past I say.


I have already addressed the question of Bob being a bank/hub for Alice so please go back and read it because the argument falls flat on it's face
and poor old Bob ends up going without his morning coffee at the end of the week.

Seems to me that you have no technical argument to present here and just want to be rude in case people cotton on to the facts that
Lightning attempt to solve the scaling issue is by introducing banks to Bitcoin which is not quite as bad as starting CPU-Wars all over
the internet between miners to solve the problem of generating new coins which others have managed without having to burn out CPU's


Yes developer, no not Linux based but I will offer up this one line of code

public static money MaxFees =1.50 // 20,000 miners not need to process 7 TPS, too little work to pass around to feed all of Africa

Nodes doing distributed processing can all be the same, part of smaller group processing 1/50th of the BC so not sure what your going on about
"All nodes are supposed to be equal" because some are running $300 hardware and others are running $50,000 hardware anyway


I know when I have won a debate when the other side feels the need to use insults but what about the "green crypto mining ICO" " under your
name because 20,000 miners on Bitcoin doing CPU-Wars is not green so forgive me when I say it looks like you will say anything that you are being paid to say

I think you could do a lot worse than taking a look and I think the site with the alt-coins table that allows you
to sort by clicking the table header is well neat.

The prices get updated about every 45 seconds too without refreshing the page and I didn't know you can buy
tokens for a millionth of a dollar but i do now   so i got a million of them

Not sure where the button is for chat, looked in the forum too (Me is member now)

You do have drop down that shows option of USD so i can see your going to add EUR, GBP later so
good thinking batman but i would also add BTC to the list and dump it from the table because
0.0012345BTC means nothing to me and take up prime screen real estate

Ripple by the way you cannot mine !

Hi

Yes i just popped over to take a look and shock, horror it looks like it allows people to leave a comment
without becoming a member which I like and is how "Free Speech" use to work

Think I need to keep an eye on you guys because it's looking good so maybe you will be here to stay

Very nice and added to my bookmarks and i like how you can order the table by clicking the headers
so do you have REST API so we can pull the data ?

I note your using ASP.Net and what would really look good is if you did some squiggly little
charts to go with the data like coindesk does which is not hard to do in .Net if you have a slimed
down copy of price data or be dirty like me and just steel the images using a web-socket

See https://coinia.io/ for another view on how data can be presented that I find useful

You mean us bottom feeders can earn $5.00 a day if we spam twitter like !
spread the word so to speak about a coin that we know nothing about and
then if we are lucky get paid in BTC instead of MoonCoins 

This forum is for project development and i think you need to
be posting in marketing or some other forum

The trouble comes at the end of the month when you settle the account and get hit with a $30 as you coffee bill
gets added to the block-chain so this is P2P and without banking hubs you would need to also open and then pay to close
channels with your food store and the burger stand each month.

I spent an hour reading the lightning white-paper today for a second time and regular wallets that you or I use
won't implement everything in the protocol because it becomes complicated but you can guarantee that the banker
hubs will take an advantage of this to their advantage and understand all the tricks in the book.


and also


What button will I press in my wallet to create "highly complex transaction contract" and
where is the button I press to bribe the miners to do XYZ


if things are getting this complicated just to record balances in a public BC then
something is looking very wrong to me

Fees of $30 is not far of the current price and no one with a brain cell is doing micro-transactions using Bitcoin just now
unless you consider $100 as being micro payments instead of a few cents so I cannot agree with you here.


Playing with block size and timings like ETH has done can improve the network and in theory Segwit should had
helped but in practice fees continued to increase since its introduction so we must all be using the currency wrong.

What the developers are doing here is saying the car engine is broken, you need a new one that runs on "Banks"
instead of "gas" but really the old engine just needs fixing and they need to apply distributed processing to the
block-chain itself and brake it down into manageable sized chunks.

Block headers are quite small and are connect like a linked list to each other but instead of containing the block
itself it could just become a pointer to a collection of nodes that process the block data or we could have block ranges
in the header like is used in Whois

This approach for sure would turbo boost the network way above IOTA speeds but would still be kicking the can down the road
because the headers would become too big in time if we all start sending $0.01 to view VIP web-pages but all
spending over say $0.99 should be on the public BC or we may as well not have one in the first place and if other
networks can present a public view of a large block-chain then so can we without using banks

Here is the white-paper https://lightning.network/lightning-network-paper.pdf
needs chucking in the bin if you ask me and I am far from being alone in saying this