This is exactly how it is; they merely use Nigeria as a bait to get what they want, careless of the consequences of how they utilize the money. I only hope that the decision-makers managing this will consider and weigh dealings that will benefit the nation as a whole if not, then this is a no-go area for them.

Ultimately, what matters is that Bitcoin works as a decentralized cryptocurrency no one can stop (even though Satoshi abandoned the project some time ago). I don't really care if Bitcoin's creator is dead or alive as long as it works as intended. The pioneer cryptocurrency's been doing fine without Satoshi anyways. Who knows if someday people give up on their quest trying to find who the real Satoshi is? Just my opinion

I guess you are right. If you want to seek fun from gambling, using a bot will not give that but you only spend your money through the bot and let it run based on your setting. Perhaps, those who use a bot can really get the fun while those who do not use a bot will say that the bot will not give the fun thing. If some people still use the bot, let them enjoy their time, and perhaps, by using the bot, they can do other things while they can play gambling without pressing any button.

This is real cricket, because whenever the top order falls most of the time we'll shut down the TV. In recent days the match used to go till the end as the lower order players have begun to show their ability of batting and change the match. As said there is no hope over the players, but Axar made it happen.

Valid point. Most gambling addict people tend to be very impulsive in playing. There are times that they would withdraw from their bad habits but after a while, they will come back because they can't restrain themselves. This is already given since addiction can't be cured overnight and can't be just done and healed if band aid solutions will just be given. Just like with this proposed solution of gambling but not using real money. This could possibly help but it is not ideal for the long term.

Because eventually, gamblers will crave for more and will find ways to gain from playing. Because after all, most gamblers are here to play and win. If winning is not an issue, then the thrill would be what they will going to be after later on. The risk of betting is exciting when you know you can gain some or lose some.

It's typical to see people tell that they know something and stuff from here and there. And that happens when they're an avid fan of that sport and thinks that they've got the utmost knowledge amongst them all.

But to say a criticism, it's an okay thing to say. Although, if those things you're saying about stuff in those sports are mere opinion and no facts to support it, better remain it as an opinion and avoid argument to people that has facts.

I think Shikhar Dhawan is a very good player.  He sometimes plays the game with a very cool head but Shikhar Dhawan does not play with a hot head.  I hope Shikhar Dhawan will give better performance.  If he plays well, I am interested to watch India play.  And if Shikhar Dhawan plays badly, I don't want to watch the game.

Truth, a person who has plans of entering gambling can be restricted through the environment. Same time a person who have got addicted can't be changed through a change in environment. Nowadays everything is in the palm, so unlike the environment the user will participate into gambling activities.

If this is so, what is the point of using bots for casinos? if they are not able to beat the system? I feel that this type of gambling bot is not profitable at all, and even so if it worked only 1 time and if they show that it works 100% well, guaranteeing good amounts of profit, no matter how expensive it was, I know that the players would buy it, but It doesn't make any sense, besides, as I said before, it doesn't make sense to play with bots risking our lives, which may already be well worked by a bot that doesn't even have a good effectiveness rate, at least in my personal opinion. I don't see anything good about it.

I think I'll agree with that 1st phrase you've said, it's not actually being greedy because of one us here has a responsibility on ourselves and on our family. In my case, I need to secure my family and self first before reaching out to other people and help them. Being hospitable is not always about other people because we can also do that to our own family.

As I said, not all people has the same mindset that you have and we don't have to argue about that. It's just like we don't have the same choice of food and the only difference is we are now talking about people.

Other than gambling, they too have pyramids, mummies and many more famous stuffs or events which is found or have happened in Egypt. This place is surely an important part of the history of mankind. Thanks to Egypt that they have discovered a game which are profitable and fun at the same time.

I cannot imagine life will be if there will be no gambling. Maybe my life now is a bit more boring but on the positive side, maybe I will learn how to save up because I notice that I can immediately spend my extra funds in gambling but it's okay if I can lose them because they are just an extra anyway and I already use most of my money on important things.

That is right, might be impossible to think that the winnings will be spent in helping the people in need but there are actually some people who is kind enough to give their all even if they are also the one's who need the most.

In most cases like as you've stated, people tend to pay the necessary first to lessen the burden they are carrying and that's actually the right thing to do rather than taking a step in buying expensive things that later on will become a liability and be drown again in the bills after splurging the winnings in unnecessary things.

Actually there is no difference between manual gambling and bots, the difference thing is maybe just to save time, nothing more. We can use bots only to replace us so we don't spend too much time in front of the PC / cellphone for betting. For profitable, there is no evidence that can guarantee that using bots will definitely win and profit. This is not a definite investment that will always profit, gambling is gambling, there is no need to expect to win every day with bots. Loss and Win will come together. and where you are lucky enough, so you can get more win than lose.

I do not agree with you because the main share of gambling advertising is on the Internet, and nowadays more and more people play gambling online. I learned about gambling as a child. At that time even if there was internet (dial-up) not everyone could afford the service, not to mention the lack of gambling sites. Today many bloggers with a huge number of subscribers advertise gambling, so a large percentage of today's generation learns about gambling through the Internet.

South Africa Women VS England Women

An ODI match between England Women's team and South Africa Women's team is being held. England Women's team managed to set a huge target of 372. Tammy Beaumont scored 119 runs for the team. The First 4 batsmen all scored more than 50 runs.
South Africa is batting now. They managed to collect 80 runs after losing 1 wicket in 13 overs. Their run rate is good enough. Probably they will score close to 300 runs.

GiftedMAN wasn't wrong either but wasn't supposed to be generalized as he put it, in some situation some gamblers are always known to disguised under that umbrella so that people don't view them as gambler especially when they see them as a responsible and public model, you know that some society view gambling as a wayward thing to indulge in, they always find a way to hide under this circumstances.
People are different and our financial status have different tastes, there are some gamblers that truly play to have fun and have a nice time, doing it in the first place is not because of money but when it goes as predicted, that doesn't mean they wouldn't take the money, after all, we all do like money.

Is wrestling part of the sport? Cos what I see in wrestling matches is a pure fixed and scripted match to entertain viewers(Not International wrestling between countries cos that one is not fixed). I remember when I was a bit young and naive, I do believe that wrestling is pure real but as time goes on, I came to realize is pure acting and fixed matches.

The way I do find out that matches are fixed is when I see a big team using their second-best team to play in a crucial match

With the development of the world of technology it should be able to have a good impact on gambling places because it can make it easier to make transactions at gambling places so more people should be gambling because they can be accessed all over the world with ease from starting deposits and withdrawals which are quite easy , this is an important task for the marketing department and developers to hold events that can attract more people to the gambling place.

From my experience, in most cases, gamblers think that event is fixed, while it's actually not. All the signs point to the conclusion that it was fixed when you lost your bet. That's how our brain works.

But, of course, there are fixed events still. I say "still' because there were much more of them in the past, and, surely, there will be much less of them in the future.

Unless you know from some inside info that event was fixed, you can't tell, imo.

Qatar is in Group A. And here their opponents are Ecuador, Netherlands and Senegal. Teams are considered strong but their performances are not consistent. If Qatar can perform a bit better, they have a chance to win both matches. And I think they will be able to draw in that match if they play defensively. Moreover, as the home team, they will get some extra advantage.