- I do not know how many of you have ever tried to exploit Bitcoin with Bot on Telegam, sounds crazy but I got Bitcoin on my Blockchain wallet. That was amazing. I introduced more of my friends to join and daily mine was about 0.04 Bitcoin. A good income.
- Has anyone ever exploited Bitcoin on a telegam bot that cheated? You can contact me on Telegam @quangbinh9701.
hmm... After many years of being active on this forum, i know that when a relatively "new" member (eventough you registered in 2013, the activity of your account is very low) is talking about "exploiting" Bitcoin, he/she is actually talking about bitcoin mining. This being said: you can't mine bitcoin with a telegram bot. If you think you're mining using a telegram bot, you're probably falling for a ponzi scam. It's possible you're one of the early investors of the ponzi scam, so it's possible you'll ROI, but i can pretty much guarantee that late investors will get scammed sooner or later. - I have withdrawn the BTC from the telegam bot on numerous numbers with the initial investment I put in there. I also do not know if it is really scam or not. I need opinions of people |
|
|
|
|
- I do not know how many of you have ever tried to exploit Bitcoin with Bot on Telegam, sounds crazy but I got Bitcoin on my Blockchain wallet. That was amazing. I introduced more of my friends to join and daily mine was about 0.04 Bitcoin. A good income.
|
|
|
|
|
Wondering why verium and vericoin clients are missing the addnode command. Those 2 doesnt even try to connect to any hosts listed in .conf. vericoin.info is the only node in peers.dat file and its down - so no new miners allowed inside.
|
|
|
|
Thank You  |
|
|
|
|
So how do you start a node in that forked jtoomin network? -w 9334 or what? Where is readme or something? It is very bad to split small p2pool in two small networks - ill hope it doesent go any smaller from this :O I think that share diff should be increased 10x at least.
|
|
|
|
|
Where is documentation for downloading and configuring jtoomin p2pool node?
|
|
|
|
Yes its based on difficulty Everything was calculated right at some point, if I remember right one share was calculated to live 3 blocks time. Nowdays the math is done wrong, share is calculated to live 0,2 blocks time or something  Renting hashpower is very risky bacause shares dont pay out etc.. However, I disagree with nreal. It should not be related to anything higher than 1 block time. I am all for renting hash on p2pool mainnet, but renting hash is always a risk and that risk should be reflected in share life on mainnet. I do realize that jtoomim is the one working on the updated fork so ultimately what he codes is up to him, but it is my opinion that p2pool for mainnet should always favor long-term p2pool miners not renters. If that is a problem, then the solution may be to have two separate p2pool pools, one for mainnet and one for renters. I concur with in2tactics on this one. Share should always pay out - thats the idea i guess. Dont mix things with rented or not rented. If one uses 2ph for 24 hours and dont get any payment for that the p2pool sucks because these easy to find shres makes sharechain go too fast round.. Too small share diff doesnt help anyone.
Shares do pay out. If they didn't, we wouldn't be here. The difference between (short-term) rented hashpower and non-rented hashpower on P2Pool is that the renter is essentially gambling that P2Pool finds a block while his shares remain in the sharechain (about 3 days). Their payouts therefore rely heavily on chance. Just because someone uses 2PH/s for 24 hours on P2Pool and doesn't get a payout, doesn't mean that P2Pool "sucks." All it means is that his or her gamble didn't pay off. Also, if you're unsatisfied with P2Pool's default share difficulty, you can always set your own by appending "+", followed by your preferred difficulty level, to the end of your P2Pool mining address. And if you prefer to only have "difficult-to-find" shares on P2Pool's sharechain, simply append "/", followed by your preferred difficulty level, to the end of your P2Pool mining address. Those were the days when a share used to be valid for 3 days. Everyone was whining at the time that its too difficult to find a share and then it was adjusted so a share is nowdays valid for a day. It doesnt help if a big miner raises his shares to max which is 30x the minimium. Its like flooding the system with tiny shares. And no you dont get paid for every share you get like you should because shares are too fucking small and small shares flood the system.. But share should be valid not 3 days but somewhere near the shares needed to get 2 blocks, 1 block at least which was earlier today 8 days for 1 block now its 7.9 days - so difficulty should be so that shares would be valid for lets say 12 days. Then it would be like fun to get few shares and then few blocks.. |
|
|
|
Share difficulty is adjusted too low. Theres no advantage if shares get old before block is found.. Like if now expected time to block is 10 days and shares ttl is 2 days :/ It should be much more difficult to find a share and maybe the share could be calculated to live at least 2 blocks time. So share would be valid for 20 days... Keeping easy to find shares is stupid and prevents big miners as well as small miners to get decent payout.. Min share difficulty is now 1234113 an it should be at least 30x that.. Every share counts but not pays..
I suggest making share life a function of current network difficulty rather than time. I agree with -ck. It should be a function of current network difficulty. Yes its based on difficulty Everything was calculated right at some point, if I remember right one share was calculated to live 3 blocks time. Nowdays the math is done wrong, share is calculated to live 0,2 blocks time or something Renting hashpower is very risky bacause shares dont pay out etc.. However, I disagree with nreal. It should not be related to anything higher than 1 block time. I am all for renting hash on p2pool mainnet, but renting hash is always a risk and that risk should be reflected in share life on mainnet. I do realize that jtoomim is the one working on the updated fork so ultimately what he codes is up to him, but it is my opinion that p2pool for mainnet should always favor long-term p2pool miners not renters. If that is a problem, then the solution may be to have two separate p2pool pools, one for mainnet and one for renters. Share should always pay out - thats the idea i guess. Dont mix things with rented or not rented. If one uses 2ph for 24 hours and dont get any payment for that the p2pool sucks because these easy to find shres makes sharechain go too fast round.. Too small share diff doesnt help anyone. |
|
|
|
Share difficulty is adjusted too low. Theres no advantage if shares get old before block is found.. Like if now expected time to block is 10 days and shares ttl is 2 days :/ It should be much more difficult to find a share and maybe the share could be calculated to live at least 2 blocks time. So share would be valid for 20 days... Keeping easy to find shares is stupid and prevents big miners as well as small miners to get decent payout.. Min share difficulty is now 1234113 an it should be at least 30x that.. Every share counts but not pays..
I suggest making share life a function of current network difficulty rather than time. Yes its based on difficulty Everything was calculated right at some point, if I remember right one share was calculated to live 3 blocks time. Nowdays the math is done wrong, share is calculated to live 0,2 blocks time or something Renting hashpower is very risky bacause shares dont pay out etc.. |
|
|
|
|
Share difficulty is adjusted too low. Theres no advantage if shares get old before block is found.. Like if now expected time to block is 10 days and shares ttl is 2 days :/ It should be much more difficult to find a share and maybe the share could be calculated to live at least 2 blocks time. So share would be valid for 20 days... Keeping easy to find shares is stupid and prevents big miners as well as small miners to get decent payout.. Min share difficulty is now 1234113 an it should be at least 30x that.. Every share counts but not pays..
|
|
|
|
|
Its as easyer to find a block with btc conf 1000000 than nothing less, dead and orphan shares rise their heads with that setting. But im feeling that bitcoind works somehow better with stock settings or even + something. Ive found 5 or 6 blocks after may - and bfore that with 0.05 fees and so none. 182x is lucky number maybe
Stock settings might be the best?
|
|
|
|
I wish there could be some more blocks in p2pool. I have invested everything back to pool and so far so good - ive been gaining more and more with rented power. One time i did it with only the btc address and didnt get a single share with a one btc, so after that im doing it with /something. So im gambling i guess, without blocks sofar. I just wish everything is allright with my configs, because ive spend just over 10 btc now. Maybe next time then with a shiny new btc  Some say its better to have more at once, like its better to have 1 ph for one hour than 100 th for 10 hours. Is it? |
|
|
|
What they did is called crime here where i live. Ive paid chinese taxes to get my miners there for few moments - im not interested at all mining on any bitmain pools thats why i did choose hosting.
Bitmains reputation is gone.
Why is bitmains reputation gone. UMISOO is not bitmain Bitmain got me invest to miners hosted at Umisoo, and pay chinese vat for those. There was a prob with --queue in cgminer conf that i asked to fix they didnt, but told me to use antpool instead of p2pool. And now they are tryin to force me to do that after stealing my miners. I did realize this cgminer --queue prob before they shiped my miners, and asked them to fix the prob before shipping. They told me not to worry they can fix it at umisoo. Well they couldnt do that 5 s. modification at umisoo. When i contacted bac to bitmain they told me that their engineers think that i have it wrong. They lie all the time at bitmain, all they are interested is stealing btc. I wish them a DDos full year. Bitmain dont care, its bullshit company. Bitmain has become greedy. I have seen multiple things they have done that support this so I dont argue there. THey used to provide great customer support and be for the people and the ROI now they are not (which is sad since its what got them popular so fast). However UMISOO going down has nothing to do with BITMAIN. There are tons of ads on bitcointalk but doesnt mean if they fail its bitcointalk's fault. I dont share Your toughts, selling miners to soon to be dead hosting and forcing user to pay chinese taxes + taxes and shipment after a few weeks again. They take every mbtc they can, no matter how but they take it. BITMAIN sucks I think that this blackout should have been told to customers a month or so before it happens, and tell how things are not to lie at first. |
|
|
|
What they did is called crime here where i live. Ive paid chinese taxes to get my miners there for few moments - im not interested at all mining on any bitmain pools thats why i did choose hosting.
Bitmains reputation is gone.
Why is bitmains reputation gone. UMISOO is not bitmain Bitmain got me invest to miners hosted at Umisoo, and pay chinese vat for those. There was a prob with --queue in cgminer conf that i asked to fix they didnt, but told me to use antpool instead of p2pool. And now they are tryin to force me to do that after stealing my miners. I did realize this cgminer --queue prob before they shiped my miners, and asked them to fix the prob before shipping. They told me not to worry they can fix it at umisoo. Well they couldnt do that 5 s. modification at umisoo. When i contacted bac to bitmain they told me that their engineers think that i have it wrong. They lie all the time at bitmain, all they are interested is stealing btc. I wish them a DDos full year. Bitmain dont care, its bullshit company. |
|
|
|
|
What they did is called crime here where i live. Ive paid chinese taxes to get my miners there for few moments - im not interested at all mining on any bitmain pools thats why i did choose hosting.
Bitmains reputation is gone.
|
|
|
|
Stay away from Bitmain!
... snip long rant...
Im not a bitmain customer anymore !!
Here in Finland this would be called crime.
So what does this have to do with p2pool? You sure you've got the right thread for this? Yes I´m sure. Bitmain folks tell lies to users who wish to use p2pool, they told that it would be possible to change miners settings at umisoo when miners are there. When it arrived they told me that their engineers think that im wrong and i should be happy with alot dead... 30-50% at the time. And now this - lying and.... How much do you think p2pool looses because ants wont submit doa shares? Or do You think that everyone replaces that not working cgminer with working one? Bitmain works against p2pool. |
|
|
|
Stay away from Bitmain! The official announcement from thei www... "UMISOO Minerals mine equipment maintenance outage will be a temporary power outage, I'm sorry, this will give you an early loss, we will give you compensation at the end or the next." 2 Emails from webmaster Hello, I'm really sorry! Summer to come, need to re-deploy mines to facilitate mining machine of heat, which can increase the life of the mining machine operators and improve strength. We also carry out mining machine maintenance cleaning. In the end, we will give you appropriate compensation, I hope you can understand. Best wishes! Umisoo 21.3.2015 Dear User, We are so sorry to inform that your miners have been turned off due to the relocation of Umisoo's mining farm. The new relocated mining farm is owned by Bitmain, while it is no longer suitable for the continuation of the previous Umisoo type's hosting service, because new mining farm is located in a remote rural area installing with small limited bandwidth, and exporting IP for strict secrecy. In order fix the trouble that caused: 1> Umisoo will buy the S4 market from Hashnest.com to compensate the hosted hardware, e.g.: User who owns one hosted S4 will get 2Th/s of S4 market on Hashnest platform. 2> Hosting service fee on Umisoo is 0.11 US$/kWh, while the maintenance fee on Hashnest is 0.0967 US$/kWh. 3> Umisoo will compensate the downtime loss based on 100% PPS payout. Compensation will be issued to your account on Hashnest. 4> Your balance of hosting service fee on Umisoo will be transacted to your account on Hashnest. 5> Please submit your account on Hashnest to Umisoo ( webmaster@umisoo.com) to speed the transfer. Our truly apologies again, Looking forward to receive your reply and move on. Umisoo March 30, 2015 Im not a bitmain customer anymore !! Here in Finland this would be called crime. |
|
|
|
If p2pool is the best paying pool, I suggest that we create a honey pot that node owners put their default payout address, where the node fees goes to. With that income someone trusted like windpath rents miningpower and the result is donated back to users. P2pool gets little more speed and it would be fun to see how it goes.  |
|
|
|
|
2015-02-23 11:38:27.207584 New work for worker! Difficulty: 16500.000000 Share difficulty: 5601123.034554 Total block value: 25.004579 BTC including 1 transactions
|
|
|
|
Stratehm/stratum-proxy works just perfect on p2pool, not sure why but even one s4 hosted at umisoo works just fine without any changes to queue. Best results ever  worth to try, and it supports nicehash too so when the price is right... https://github.com/Stratehm/stratum-proxy |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
