Huh, didn't know messages had report buttons.  Reported now, thanks

I have asked user zumzero (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=140810) to stop spamming my inbox.  This resulted in a flood:



Since this is a bannable offense, and the user has been previously banned, ban him pl0x.

^theMiracle is my alt account.

Gox is just an example of "...repeated history of being evaporated due to economic anomalies, black swan events, economic turmoil due to politic-economic situations etc..."
The sort that the nervous money is (presumably) seeking to avoid according to the post I replied to.

TL;DR:  Bitcoin is not the proverbial government bonds -- let's be real.

All that nervous money is going to just pour into Gox ... owait.

What you need is these babies...



EMP & armageddon-proof

I simply pointed out that "he could have run with more" argument is unsound, since you don't know how much of the pot is sucker money.

^Thanks.  Every bit counts.

They do.  The info they get is seldom accurate -- in your case, never.  Is there a scam or a failure you're not invested up to your eyeballs in?

If I didn't make myself clear:

There is no plausible scenario in which *anyone trying to get money from Jon* would to tell you to sue.

Those planning to file a civil (tort) case against Jon would not tell you to sue him because you would be competing for the same (limited) funds.  The more people sue Jon, the less money each one will be able to get back, the messier the case, etc., etc.

Those looking for a solution outside of the legal system obviously don't want you to sue, but assuming that you'll somehow benefit from their efforts is unreasonable.  Backroom deals are seldom done to benefit the public.

Lol look:
For a successful Ponzi, there must be an illusion of many investors.  This is easily done by "investing" the schemer's own money -- he'll get it back.
You never know just how much of the pot is real sucker coin, because you're not meant to know.

From the start of Neo's media campaign, Cypriot "curiosity" in Bitcoin has been steadily declining.  If you interpret that as success, what would failure look like?

To sum up:
After Neo's "education," the number of Cypriots including the term "Bitcoin"¹ in their searches *plummets*.  
Excelsior!

1. Searches such as "bitcoin wallet," "bitcoin bank," etc., etc.



@derpy below:
*done.  done ur best. Lrn 2 English.

So what was "Cyprus is #2 for bitcoin searches" supposed to tell us, Derpy  
P.S:  "Neo&Bee" doesn't even generate enough volume for Google to notice

Lol, after Neo's media barrage, Cypriots are *less* interested in Bitcoin, as both the 30 and 7-day charts show.
Nice going



https://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=bitcoin&geo=CY&date=today%201-m&cmpt=q

^Not sure if you're talking about mine, but I gave links directly under the pics -- check it yourself

Well, not sure how they got the #2 rating they used for their PR, but it can't possibly be related to NeoBee.  In the past 12 days (see my edit above), Cyprus doesn't even rank.

I guess Cypriots no longer need to know anything about Bitcoin -- Neo educated them

Lol...

Lol, no


(https://www.google.com/trends/explore?hl=en-AU#q=bitcoin)

But heck, fifth ain't bad, amiright?

[edit]  Moar lulz -- results for "past 12 days" -- Cyprus doesn't even rank


(https://www.google.com/trends/explore?hl=en-AU#q=bitcoin&date=today%207-d&cmpt=q)

@equipoise:  You might be on to something...  How much is NeoBee payin' you?

This is not a begging thread.  Yet.

^Lol, with all of the coin spent on PR, I'd expect #1.
Don't know much about Cyprus, but isn't the total population something like 1 million folks?  As in 1/8th of NYC? NeoBee itself is probably responsible for 3/4 of the search volume

Yep.  But otherwise, things are going swimmingly.
*Full disclosure: NotLambchop is heavily invested in popcorn, the gold standard of Bitcoin securities*