I could accept some independent women are successful, but when I look at the top crypto hodler list, I could barely get any women in the list, something that make me cannot convinced they are fine with being in the list.

Risk averse is the description of an investor who, when faced with two investments with a similar expected return, prefers the one with the lower risk.

Isn't this initiative rather dangerous. I mean, walking around woth your cold wallet on you. That's like telling a whole bunch of people you meet wherever you go that hey look, I have cash on me and I've got it all on my hand. Anyways even if someone can't use it after stealing, it is still dangerous walking around telling people you have money.

I have read a somewhat similar article with the PPV but without the tickets sold part and the people coming in. I think when Mayweather gets this statistics, he would really think about coming out of retirement. It’s another easy money for him. I guess the name of Manny Pacquiao are still on rage and still going with a lot of people trying to tie it with Mayweather.

Why would such a big company like Samsung focus on such a small market like the crypto enthusiasts market?
The costs ot implementation/risk/profit ratio isn't good.What crypto are they going to implement?BTC,ETH,ripple?Are they going to create samsungcoin?

Many new exchanges are present and provide better services but the market response is weak, trading volume is still small.
I hope that the more exchanges, the greater the number of transactions and the greater the velocity of money.

At the same time, new exchanges keep popping out from nowhere, and it doesn’t make any sense. The competition is getting too much and only the big old exchanges are taking the lead, new exchanges can’t even compete and majority of them ends up along the way. I think these new exchanges will just continue to die off, cause no one is showing interest in them, not when there are exchanges like Binance and everyone is scrambling for an opportunity to sign up for it. The bigger exchanges will continue to take the lead. All these new ones are going no where.

Manny Pacquiao still boasts the ability to outperform most of the best welterweights in the ring and outdraw most other boxers at the box office.

It still remains to be seen if he can recapture past glory in or out of the ring.

Pacquiao’s January 19th 12-round landslide win over former four-division titlist Adrien Broner at the MGM Grand Garden Arena in Las Vegas produced a live gate of just over $6 million from 11,410 tickets sold according to data provided to BoxingScene.com from the Nevada State Athletic Commission on Monday.

“Unfortunately we are unable to provide any information as the below is rumour and speculation.”

No one could disagree that bitcoin is gaining popularity day by day and the adoption rate is good compared to what we had some 2 years back. By considering these, we cannot expect this bearish trend to persist for long. Prices may get double within the wink of our eyes. New cycle may start at any time. Unfortunately, the downfall in last year happened just followed what we had in 2014 but I believe that must be a coincident and we may not have all the things to be repeated. I always believe into exponential growth of bitcoin prices and it happened like $1200 in 2013 and $19,400 in 2017.

Yes, history may repeat but it does not need to be an exact one. Bitcoin rises and falls because people do trade it. But, in long run it keep rising alone and we must look for making use of this alone. This must be a good time to accumulate as much as bitcoins we are able to buy and hold with a plan of long term holding.

Maybe I am missing something here, but if there is no luck then why would people compete? If someone has a better army than you, why would you even fight them?

Do you think bitcoin will continue to fall to prices below $ 3000? I saw the market conidisi kept red, without green. At the beginning of 2019, there seems to be no sign of a change in a better direction. What do you think about this? Please give opinions that are simple but easy to understand. Thank you!

U go to buy a car with bitcoins but to find out ur car depreciate in 3 years. While holding onto bitcoins the value of ur bitcoins appreciate. Just a speculation. Taking risk at an extreme. Trading ur bitcoins for a car. Hah . But Bitcoin doesn't always sky rocket in value every 3 years. Or does it.

Cointelegraph: You probably get asked this question a lot, but I have to ask. Since 10,000 Bitcoin is worth around 80 million dollars today, do you ever regret paying 10,000 BTC for two pizzas?

LH: You know, I don't regret it. I think that it's great that I got to be part of the early history of Bitcoin in that way, and people know about the pizza and it's an interesting story because everybody can kind of relate to that and be [like] - "Oh my God, you spent all of that money!" I was also kind of giving people tech support on the forums and I ported Bitcoin to MacOS, and you know, some other things - fix bugs and whatnot, and I've always kind of just wanted people to use Bitcoin and buying the pizza was one way to do that. I didn't think it would get as popular as it has, but it's gotten to be a really catchy story for people.

I first mentioned this last year that Djokovic could be the player to surpass Nadal and Federer in Grand Slam titles won and right now my prediction is looking very good. If Nadal doesn't win the French Open this year then yes I believe Djokovic can match Nadal's 17 GS titles this year as if Djokovic can stay fit and healthy then he will be hard to beat at Wimbledon and the US Open. He may even win the French Open with the form he is in right now.

@Kemarit and I have been saying this for a while now about Djokovic as his form in the back end of last season looked like the Djokovic of old. He now becomes the outright Australia Open winner on 7 titles and also surpasses Pete Sampras on the all time GS winners. We are all very lucky to see the top 3 players all of time play at the same time and I'm not sure if we'll see this again.

My careful prediction is that the reversal of the trend will happen at the same time as ETF listing. Even though it goes against Crypto principles, this will definitely have positive influence on the price.

Already now in the new year only a week remained until February 2. Why February 2nd? If any growth does not resume until February 2, it will be the longest period of decline in the history of Bitcoin.

There are a lot of small shops which accept crypto payments around the world. However, in my opinion, what will really push the cryptocurrencies forward is the adoption of Bitcoin by some big player in the trading industry, such as Amazon.

What do you think, will Amazon start to accept Bitcoin as a payment method if its price rises to new-record values again (like in 2017)? Could it be that they are not adopting it because they treat crypto as a hostile technology for their business? Or they just don't take Bitcoin seriously, like thinking it will despair in the near future?

While personal documents and your identity are not protected by any guarantees and laws KYC can't be demanded on the exchange in small quantities .Another case when it comes to significant amounts. On many exchanges market  chang up to $1000 is simplified without KYC and its rightly!

I remember watching one of the longest last year with Isner (thought it was Baustia Augt for a minute) which was in a tiebreak and was 16 match points to win it in the fifth set or something like this.
But #5 was none other then Novak Djokovic and Rafal Nadal in 2012 Australian open which took 5 hours and 53 minutes.
https://www.sportskeeda.com/tennis/longest-tennis-grand-slam-matches-off-all-time-history
"Both the players were so tired after the final during the post-match presentation that they were given chairs to sit on. The Spaniard Nadal was up a break in the final set but Djokovic clawed his way back to level the score at 4-4. He broke Nadal in the 5-5 and then served out the match to win the final set 7-5.

Result: Novak Djokovic def. Rafael Nadal 5–7, 6–4, 6–2, 6–7(5–7), 7–5 "

I think everyone should differentiate withdrawal from rejection. When we say withdrawal, it means the CBoE will just re-apply if everything settles down in the side of US government. A eventual rejection will dose all hopes and that might have a negative effect on the price.

Right now the withdrawal doesn't mean anything for investors though, that's why their no significant dent on the price, imho.

I don't think you need to understand the technical features of btc to invest in it or buy it. Most of the time people just need to have a basic understanding about how the whole thing works. Although, nowadays, most people only see bitcoin as a store of value, or a digital asset that can give you a ROI in the long run. People no longer care about the tech behind a crypto, it's all about making money.

In my case, I didn't understand the tech behind bitcoin back in the day, all I knew was that it was a decentralized cryptocurrency where you can send money while remaining anonymous, that alone caught my attention to put money in it, as time went by, I started reading a bit more about the tech, then I stopped doing that since I don't need to know every technical aspect of bitcoin in order for me to use it or HODL it.