32 votes in the poll so far27 vote for Joshua
5 votes for Pulev
A huge jump in voting took place in the previous 12 hours or so with just 2 extra votes for Pulev but 6 extra votes for Joshua. We need more votes here please 
|
|
|
|
Thank you for highlighting your situation here. I have read your posts in the coinsbit ANN thread and can clearly see you have been selective scammed by them. I feel very sad for you because you lost your funds at the hands of the coinsbit scammers. Unfortunately it seems like your funds will not be returned because the coinsbit/p2pb2b/exrates/whitebit exchanges are run by the same group of scammers that have a track record of selective scamming. I hope after members read your story they decide to stay from the scam exchange websites mentioned above. Please post any updates you have of correspondence with them so we can be kept in the loop. With this post I would like to make everyone aware of my experience with COINSBIT.IO
~snip~ |
|
|
|
Anything you have to say or want to say should be in the public domain, kindly post your comments here in the open forum. Thank you. Contact me and I'd be glad to discuss it but I cannot provide legal advice in a public forum.
However if you Google me and "ccTLD .IO" or "BIOT" you will get some idea.
|
|
|
|
Welcome. Yes better to keep on topic in this thread and keep it all about Bitsler.
~snip~
Very much appreciate your input.
But can we please respect the Thread. Bitsler is a great website with a great owner.
|
|
|
|
Thank you for your post but I think you are being a bit harsh here because you are going with the notion that jamyr promoted a scam website knowing it was a scam. I would like to give him and other betking affiliates the benefits of any doubt by saying they would probably never promote a scam website if they knew it was a scam. If betking users lost their funds after registering via affiliate links then betking owner/operator serial scammer Dean Nolan is ultimately responsible. I think existing betking affiliates should have resigned and new affiliates should have refused to sign up as soon as serial scammer Dean Nolan scammed the winners of the 2018 Christmas wager out of 20 BTC +EV but each to their own: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4751127.msg52921341#msg52921341Anyway, I hope serial scammer Dean Nolan does not manage to pocket thousands of USD$ for himself by creating fake accounts and passing them off to Bitsler as genuine ex-users. The serial scammer Dean Nolan is also a compulsive liar too. I am looking at it in a different way. 1. I am not looking to get $200 as that is way too much and I didn't have that much on my betkings account. 2. I was just trying to see if my affiliate back then would have earned anything and if there was, would like to have it transferred on my bitsler account. 3. Dean said no, so that's it. I said okay and moved on. 4. Theres lots of promotions on Bitsler currently, BTSLR challenge, chat games, bounty roll, lottery and the occasional Coupon, etc. So, those from betking who availed the $200 and even those who did not, would have found more than $200 in my opinion. They would have found a better place to gamble their cryptos with lots of games, variety of coins supported. 5. In case you have not created your account on bitsler yet, I'll pm you my ref link if you don't mind.  There is a huge difference between joining bitsler from Dean Nolans affiliate link to claim the 200 dollars that was promised from bitsler versus having affiliate income at the betking website that you are trying to get back. They are literally nothing alike, one talks about how bitsler will now who is actually a betking user that got scammed by way of having dean affiliate link them so it could be decided and confirmed by dean, while the other is you having affiliate income at betking itself which has nothing to do with bitsler. Moreover, it is only logical that someone who has managed to get others into a scam website with affiliate links should not be getting any money at all, whoever you have brought to betking lost all their money, you should lose all of yours as well for bringing them to a scammer website. |
|
|
|
Do you know the specific reasons why the channel was removed? The generic reason given by Youtube explains nothing: "This account has been terminated for a violation of YouTube's Terms of Service." It would be interesting know what exactly Youtube what found to be in breach of their ToS |
|
|
|
Does anybody know why Youtube removed his channel? And was it the "BCH official" channel or the "Roger Ver official channel" that was removed? ~snip~ Now Ver is blaming 'Bitcoin core anti-competition maximalists false reported videos...' for reporting his videos and bringing down his Youtube channel.  |
|
|
|
It is a boxing match, anything can happen. If for some reason Pulev catches Joshua with a good shot which concusses him (almost like when Fury caught Wilder and when almost like when Ruiz caught Joshua in the first fight to knock him down) then anything is possible. After what happened with Ruiz it is clear Joshua will never take another opponent for granted, he will go in to the remaining fights of his career with his eyes open knowing if he loses it will not be because he took his focus away from the opponent as he did with Ruiz, he will accept his defeat on the basis he tried his best but the better man on the day won. Joshua should beat Pulev but it just might go all the way to a points decision as this could be the last professional fight Pulev will participate in and he will want to try to win it. Well majority of us voted for the same person ,and yeah we will be surely upset if Pulev suddenly win here lol. |
|
|
|
If that is the case he might be looking for a long time to find an investment that can safely give him anything close to what he is seeking. ~snip~
He wants to get 1000% as ICO were but at the same time wants everything be safe as IPO |
|
|
|
Going by what general consensus shows, Joshua will beat Pulev and Fury will beat Wilder. Pulev is probably going to never fight professionally again as his age will probably not allow it and Wilder will probably not fight again if he gets beaten by Fury again because his ego will not allow him to risk a third defeat. Fury vs Joshua with a re-match clause included will make a blockbuster fight. Providing Fury beats Wilder and if Joshua beats Pulev it will pave the way for Fury with his WBC belt and Joshua with his IBF, IBO, WBA and WBO belts is the fight all heavyweight boxing fans want to watch. If the Fury-Joshua fight goes ahead, I think Fury will win both the initial fight and the re-match both by a clean knock out 10 second count by being flat-out on his back or TKO by virtue of the referee stopping the fight. After that, Fury should simply retire and enjoy the multi-millions that he would have made from his career. It is clear Fury will fight Wilder and Joshua will fight Pulev and after that the two-fight deal between Fury and Joshua will go ahead next year.
There was an agreement already but to say it's clear that they both fighters will win, I think AJ has a better chance on winning, but Fury to win against Wilder, probably 60/40 for me, Fury will be favored though. If both will win, so let's just see. It will be a massive pay day for both of the fighters.
|
|
|
|
Ok, thank you for the clarification. Regarding the statement in question about the user that +213 BTC in winnings, I hope the he healthy, happy and safe. Because I wasnt paying any attention... I have previously mixed up Daniel and Ryan, both have Bustabit References, one v1 and one v2. Of course I meant to say RHavar |
|
|
|
I think demanding re-matches after the event would probably carry no value, the best form of protection would be a re-match clause before any fight takes place which would ensure and guarantee it rather than wrangle about it later. Joshua would probably only ever get in to a fight if a re-match clause was inserted, that was what allowed him to fight Ruiz again otherwise Joshua would have to wait for another shot at getting any of the titles back. Surely, because AJ would demand a rematch and beat Pulev like he did with Ruiz, and also we have to remember that the Wilder vs Fury fight is still to be decided, if Pulev can pull out an upset then for sure Wilder also has a chance to beat Fury. So both Fury and AJ has to beat their opponent now for them to get a good payday when they fight in UK. |
|
|
|
@nutildah The long arms photographs are really funny. The two photos with Trump and Macron are just priceless |
|
|
|
Ver made millions of USD$ off the back of being an early adopter but as time went by it seems he decided to follow a different route from the mainstream users. Does being a whale give a right to own or control the future path of the whole crypto? I could be wrong but it seems obvious his failure to effectively become a de-facto leader or controller of Bitcoin led to his passion to create BCH and his attempt to directly/inadvertently destroy or damage Bitcoin. Quite sad to see his fall from grace actually, he could have been an ambassador for Bitcoin but ended up being regarded by many people as an ungrateful traitor to the very hand that made him a multi-millionaire. It is an old post but deserves a reply. Yes prison time really does sound excessive but for some reason or another Ver was sentenced to serve time in jail. Am not too sure exactly how that would have affected his mindset which led him to leaving the US behind and giving up his US citizenship but he did return to attend some sort of events to talk about Bitcoin (and BCH). As far as I remember all he did was sell flash powder based firecrackers on eBay, i.e. potassium (per)chlorate + aluminium, something even kids play around with, and some are making him out as if he sold octogen to terrorists. Maybe he shouldn't have stored it in his apartment building but prison time seems excessive. He is one of those spoiled brats who never really had to account for his selfish behaviors, and even though he got a light sentence, he feels that he was treated unfair and punished excessively, so he never really has figured out ways to take responsibility for his own fuckups, whether current or historical. Poor lil roger.  Always the victim, but never his fault. |
|
|
|
Why did you attribute those comments to Daniel when you quoted RHavar? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2897545.msg54614544#msg54614544~snip~ But if you read on what Daniel said about the subject then you can also read that the winner was thinking about suicide.... It was a life changing amount for him. I Quote Daniel: I saw he ended up +213 BTC, and then posted something along the lines that having so much money is too much pressure and he doesn't deserve to be rich -- so he plans on killing himself and leaving the money to his family. He then deleted his account after that.
I hope he's alright, seems like he's a bit overwhelmed with his win :/ |
|
|
|
Are you still using your "DragonDance" login? see page 112 of this beautiful thread for who ~jollygood really is, if Interpol doesn't pick him up soon, be sure to notify your local law enforcement about him on sight The nepotism cult will now no doubt come up with 20+ posts of bullshit to obfuscate the reality about them, and since one cannot be expected to cater to their trolling all week long, I suggest earnest Bitcointalk members to bookmark pages 112 and 113 of this thread for future reference. All the Best |
|
|
|
I am braced for it, I think Binance will probably completely drop all NPXS pairings before the end of the year and it will bring about the end of Pundi X sooner rather than later. Investors deserved better from the team but they were badly let down. What do you think would happen if one or two of those large exchanges decided to drop NPXS? I just checked CMC and noted the previous 24 hour volume was showing as $1.5 million, that is just a phenomenally tiny amount for a project of that stature that this once was.
If a large exchange or two drops it from their pairing, what would happen to it? Would it survive or would it simply sink?
I don't want people to think I am a FUDster because this is one of the projects i highly supported and thought had a very great future, unfortunately what i thought was wrong. NPXS getting dropped from top exchanges is inevitable. In fact Binance already removed the NPXS/BTC trading pair, it's a shame. They now only have NPXS/ETH and NPXS/USDT which could also be scrapped off binance anytime especially if ETH prices go up |
|
|
|
Can you kindly define what you mean by the word 'oversight'? It will help if you clarify it so a definitive answer can be given. I hope there will be a resolution soon, I think this situation has hurt a lot of people. Do they have any proper oversight?
|
|
|
|
What exactly is the point you are making? I read this post several times and cannot understand what you trying to get at here. Hi All,
We have been holding some BTC/ETH since the few years ago, however, majority of our assets are remaining in traditional stock and equity as we are from the stock brokerage background.
Eventhough we believe Ethereum should be a great alternative to replace the traditional capital market. However, we have been seeing a lot of Alt coin is offered in the past few years and yet quite a large number of them are scam in nature or highly in doubt. A lot of my peers have lost part of their investment in those alt coins. This is the reason that prevent us from investing larger portion of our assets into ETH. This may be also the reason why ETH market value is remain lower than BTC.
As compare to the traditional global equity market, digital assets market are remain extremely small in value. Are there a highly viable solution to convert those traditional capital market investors to hold more digital assets in their portfolio?
|
|
|
|
Both the UK and the EU want the best possible deal they can get but one thing the EU has to concede is that the UK is their biggest trading partner so if the UK is buying billions of EUR worth of products from the EU then it will hit them harder than it will hit the UK. The current UK Prime Minister is not a push-over like his predecessor (ex-Prime Minister May) and they EU have to got to accept what was announced a few days ago by the British government, they will not extend negotiations beyond 31st December 2020 and any deal needs to be signed then because the UK will not be part of the European Union from 1st January 2021 in any way shape or form or be bound by its treaties - unless it forms part of a new deal between the two parties. The goal of the UK is to be in the European Economic Area, just like Norway right now. The question is if both the British government and EU officials are looking for this solution.
From past statements of high-rank officials, it seems as if they wanted vengeance upon the Great Britain.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
