DefaultTrust changes

[marlboroza]

However gospodin did remove all (or many) of his inclusions, which is what caused Vispilio to drop out.

He left Vitalik and me 

He didn't. There is a bug in BPIP that sometimes shows people who drop out of DT1 as removing all their inclusions/exclusions.

I didn't know that. I included Vispilio to my trust network for a second, this is what I saw on my trust page:



peloso - DT manipulator and abuser
mhanbostanci - abuser and account seller
wolwoo - scam supporter
Aqualun89 - ban evader
Tecshare - troll and shill

I wonder why account Vispilio trust these users judgement? This account has to be completely removed from DT!

~Vispilio

[1714756428]

1714756428

[Vispilio]

~marlboroza

Hacker1001101001 has brilliantly summed up amateur hitman ~marlboroza with the following singular sentence,

it's such a concise summary of who this character is that it can be appropriately pasted under every single one of his Bitcointalk posts:

Please leave the forum alone you dirty piece of double standards and agendic defamator.

[JollyGood]

The reason why foul mouthed user Vispilio has added people to his trust and distrust list is purely on the basis of political manoeuvring and nothing else.

For user Vispilio to state that equal low-life user hacker1001101001 deserves credit for posting nonsense about you or any other member, it clearly shows he should not be DT any time in the future.

There are several members that really should be nowhere near DT but they have played the system to have their way. It is something that should looked at higher up the chain to be honest.

~snip~

peloso - DT manipulator and abuser
mhanbostanci - abuser and account seller
wolwoo - scam supporter
Aqualun89 - ban evader
Tecshare - troll and shill

I wonder why account Vispilio trust these users judgement? This account has to be completely removed from DT!

~Vispilio

[Vispilio]

~JollyGood

see page 112 of this beautiful thread for who ~jollygood really is,

if Interpol doesn't pick him up soon, be sure to notify your local law enforcement about him on sight


The nepotism cult will now no doubt come up with 20+ posts of bullshit to obfuscate the reality about them, and since one cannot be expected to cater to their trolling all week long, I suggest earnest Bitcointalk members to bookmark pages 112 and 113 of this thread for future reference.


All the Best

[Timelord2067]

I have adjusted the translation. With that super-important issue out of the way, can we discuss why wolwoo and now peloso are not at -99 in DT1 exclusions even though they both have declared that they will include anyone into their trust lists.

You might want to have a look at this person's gaming the system over the last six months adding then subtracting the same/similar users again and again.  Same as Peloso has been doing.

[JollyGood]

Are you still using your "DragonDance" login?  

see page 112 of this beautiful thread for who ~jollygood really is,

if Interpol doesn't pick him up soon, be sure to notify your local law enforcement about him on sight


The nepotism cult will now no doubt come up with 20+ posts of bullshit to obfuscate the reality about them, and since one cannot be expected to cater to their trolling all week long, I suggest earnest Bitcointalk members to bookmark pages 112 and 113 of this thread for future reference.


All the Best

[suchmoon]

You might want to have a look at this person's gaming the system over the last six months adding then subtracting the same/similar users again and again.  Same as Peloso has been doing.

I looked at it and I don't think it's similar to what peloso is doing at all. He's not in DT1 and even if he gets in next month his trust list changes don't seem to boost his rating or damage anyone's rating, nor is he fishing for support at the bottom of the DT1 list, like peloso was attempting to do. He also hasn't declared that he will include anyone who includes him, which is what peloso said and what prompted my post that you quoted.

[TECSHARE]

You might want to have a look at this person's gaming the system over the last six months adding then subtracting the same/similar users again and again.  Same as Peloso has been doing.

I looked at it and I don't think it's similar to what peloso is doing at all. He's not in DT1 and even if he gets in next month his trust list changes don't seem to boost his rating or damage anyone's rating, nor is he fishing for support at the bottom of the DT1 list, like peloso was attempting to do. He also hasn't declared that he will include anyone who includes him, which is what peloso said and what prompted my post that you quoted.

Last of the V8s is an official owner of an extra large tin of ball polish, he gets a pass.

[LoyceV]

Last of the V8s is an official owner of an extra large tin of ball polish, he gets a pass.

I'm still unsure what exactly he's being accused of. Wiping his Trust list, using only DefaultTrust, and then making a new Trust list doesn't seem like such a bad thing to me.

[nutildah]

I'm still unsure what exactly he's being accused of. Wiping his Trust list, using only DefaultTrust, and then making a new Trust list doesn't seem like such a bad thing to me.

I think is the main problem is Timelord and TECSHARE see anyone who excludes them as an assault to democracy. Looking at V8s trust list history, its pretty evident what was going on: he wanted out of DT1, now he wants back in. He's not even in yet and already the scrutiny has begun.

[TECSHARE]

Last of the V8s is an official owner of an extra large tin of ball polish, he gets a pass.

I'm still unsure what exactly he's being accused of. Wiping his Trust list, using only DefaultTrust, and then making a new Trust list doesn't seem like such a bad thing to me.

Weird... I seem to see people get accused of all kinds of manipulation for doing nothing more than using the trust system pretty regularly. I guess all that matters is how shiny the user leaves the nuts after they are done.

[Last of the V8s]

Last of the V8s is an official owner of an extra large tin of ball polish, he gets a pass.

I'm still unsure what exactly he's being accused of. Wiping his Trust list, using only DefaultTrust, and then making a new Trust list doesn't seem like such a bad thing to me.

Weird... I seem to see people get accused of all kinds of manipulation for doing nothing more than using the trust system pretty regularly. I guess all that matters is how shiny the user leaves the nuts after they are done.

You couldn't be more wrong. Actually I like them really hairy and dripping in butt-nuggets from careless forward wiping. Then I can nibble them off slowly and teasingly until the great crescendo. You know nothing.

Meanwhile, yes, I've got some more time to devote to the forum, trying to keep the scumbags and drunken imbeciles away.

[LoyceV]

Last of the V8s is an official owner of an extra large tin of ball polish, he gets a pass.

I'm still unsure what exactly he's being accused of. Wiping his Trust list, using only DefaultTrust, and then making a new Trust list doesn't seem like such a bad thing to me.

Weird... I seem to see people get accused of all kinds of manipulation for doing nothing more than using the trust system pretty regularly.

That certainly happens, but it doesn't answer my question what Last of the V8s is being accused of.

I guess all that matters is how shiny the user leaves the nuts after they are done.

I'm not confortable discussing another guy's nuts. Let's just say I'm more into girls Bitcoin

[JollyGood]

A fantastic reply that made me laugh out loud but it seems wasted when directing it towards someone with such a questionable character and nature as TECSHARE.

I have TECSHARE and some of his trust reciprocating buddies on IGNORE as I cannot stomach endless amounts of their attention seeking tactics, I find them somewhat nauseating.

Last of the V8s is an official owner of an extra large tin of ball polish, he gets a pass.

I'm still unsure what exactly he's being accused of. Wiping his Trust list, using only DefaultTrust, and then making a new Trust list doesn't seem like such a bad thing to me.

Weird... I seem to see people get accused of all kinds of manipulation for doing nothing more than using the trust system pretty regularly. I guess all that matters is how shiny the user leaves the nuts after they are done.

You couldn't be more wrong. Actually I like them really hairy and dripping in butt-nuggets from careless forward wiping. Then I can nibble them off slowly and teasingly until the great crescendo. You know nothing.

Meanwhile, yes, I've got some more time to devote to the forum, trying to keep the scumbags and drunken imbeciles away.

[TECSHARE]

Last of the V8s is an official owner of an extra large tin of ball polish, he gets a pass.

I'm still unsure what exactly he's being accused of. Wiping his Trust list, using only DefaultTrust, and then making a new Trust list doesn't seem like such a bad thing to me.

Weird... I seem to see people get accused of all kinds of manipulation for doing nothing more than using the trust system pretty regularly.

That certainly happens, but it doesn't answer my question what Last of the V8s is being accused of.

Maybe read the thread? It seems like Switzerland is slowly turning into Austria.

You might want to have a look at this person's gaming the system over the last six months adding then subtracting the same/similar users again and again.  Same as Peloso has been doing.

[LoyceV]

Maybe read the thread?

I read most of this thread. It's a bit long to try to find anything I might have missed. You're the one who claimed he "gets a pass". A link would be nice.

[TECSHARE]

Maybe read the thread?

I read most of this thread. It's a bit long to try to find anything I might have missed. You're the one who claimed he "gets a pass". A link would be nice.

A quote literally answering the question you were presenting is not good enough?

[JollyGood]

I tend to find a tranquil sense of pleasure when I cannot read posts from TECSHARE and his buddies because I have them on IGNORE. A decision I am glad I made some time ago as I am not missing much from them.

I commend you and several other members that continue to engage with them in a civil manner even though you get next to nothing in return from them in simple coherent messages. I wish I had your temperament and patience to deal with these attention seeking good-for-nothing members that have created their own gang within a gang to cause disruption to the forum but it was easier for me to simply give up and IGNORE them all.

Maybe read the thread?

I read most of this thread. It's a bit long to try to find anything I might have missed. You're the one who claimed he "gets a pass". A link would be nice.

[LoyceV]

A quote literally answering the question you were presenting is not good enough?

I addressed that quote here and also in my follow up question here:

Last of the V8s is an official owner of an extra large tin of ball polish, he gets a pass.

I'm still unsure what exactly he's being accused of. Wiping his Trust list, using only DefaultTrust, and then making a new Trust list doesn't seem like such a bad thing to me.

I'm still not sure what you (@TECSHARE) are trying to say: do you want V8 to not get a pass? Or do you want others to get a pass too?

I commend you and several other members that continue to engage with them in a civil manner even though you get next to nothing in return from them in simple coherent messages. I wish I had your temperament and patience to deal with these attention seeking good-for-nothing members that have created their own gang within a gang to cause disruption to the forum but it was easier for me to simply give up and IGNORE them all.

I've put some users on ignore, but TECSHARE isn't one of them, I don't consider him to be "bad". He seems to be on a mission to improve the Trust system, I think his intentions are good, and he sticks to his believes even though many people seem to disagree.

[TECSHARE]

A quote literally answering the question you were presenting is not good enough?

I addressed that quote here and also in my follow up question here:

Last of the V8s is an official owner of an extra large tin of ball polish, he gets a pass.

I'm still unsure what exactly he's being accused of. Wiping his Trust list, using only DefaultTrust, and then making a new Trust list doesn't seem like such a bad thing to me.

I'm still not sure what you (@TECSHARE) are trying to say: do you want V8 to not get a pass? Or do you want others to get a pass too?

I commend you and several other members that continue to engage with them in a civil manner even though you get next to nothing in return from them in simple coherent messages. I wish I had your temperament and patience to deal with these attention seeking good-for-nothing members that have created their own gang within a gang to cause disruption to the forum but it was easier for me to simply give up and IGNORE them all.

I've put some users on ignore, but TECSHARE isn't one of them, I don't consider him to be "bad". He seems to be on a mission to improve the Trust system, I think his intentions are good, and he sticks to his believes even though many people seem to disagree.

I want there to be consistent, objective, and equitable rules, not purely a popularity contest which currently determines the current trust system.